박사

체육수업 전문성 증진을 위한 교사학습공동체의 실천 과정과 효과 탐색 = An Investigation of the Implementation Processes and Effects of a Teacher Learning Community on Professional Development

논문상세정보
' 체육수업 전문성 증진을 위한 교사학습공동체의 실천 과정과 효과 탐색 = An Investigation of the Implementation Processes and Effects of a Teacher Learning Community on Professional Development' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 교사교육 프로그램
  • 교사학습공동체
  • 체육수업전문성
  • 현직교사교육
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
335 0

0.0%

' 체육수업 전문성 증진을 위한 교사학습공동체의 실천 과정과 효과 탐색 = An Investigation of the Implementation Processes and Effects of a Teacher Learning Community on Professional Development' 의 참고문헌

  • 효율적인 수업운영과 학습자 관리: 학교체육의 이론과 실제
    손천택 인천대학스포츠과학연구소 세미나 자료집 [1996]
  • 효율적 체육수업과 좋은 체육수업에 대한 초등교사의 인식
    정우식 한국체육교육학회지, 8(4), 61-76 [2004]
  • 현행 교원연수의 문제점과 개선 방안
    김택천 한국스포츠교육학회 춘계세미나 자료집, 3-17 [2002]
  • 한국교육개발원 학교컨설팅에 다가가는 컨설팅장학
    연구자료 RRM2012-03, 1-237 [2012]
  • 한국 초등학교의 교사문화에 관한 해석적 분석. 미간행 박사학위논문, 고려대학교 대학원
    황기우 서울 [1992]
  • 한국 초등교육의 이념
    정재걸 초등교육연구, 16(2), 59-86 [2003]
  • 학습조직이 교사전문성에 미치는 효과 연구. 미간행 박사학위논문,서울대학교 대학원
    허은정 서울 [2011]
  • 학습공동체 참여를 통한 체육교사의변화 경험과 요인 탐색
    오승현 한국스포츠교육학회지, 21(3), 67-88 [2014]
  • 학교급과 교사 경력에 따른 좋은 수업에 대한 중요도 및 실행수준 인식 차이
    권성연 열린교육연구, 18(4), 78-103 [2010]
  • 학교교육 내실화 방안 연구(Ⅰ)-학교교육과정과 수업의 운영을 중심으로. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRC2001-10
    양종모 유정애 장연자 정미경 조난심 서우리 한국교육과정평가원 [2001]
  • 학교 컨설팅
    진동섭 서울: 학지사 [2003]
  • 학교 지역 단위 체육교과교육연구회 활동을 통한 초임교사의 경험과 반성에 관한 연구
    이호철 정우식 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(3), 135-158 [2011]
  • 학교 밖 교사학습공동체에 대한 사례연구
    서경혜 한국교원교육연구, 25(2),53-80 [2008]
  • 하나로 수업에서의 전인교육 실현: 간접체험활동과 간접교수활동의역할. 미간행 석사학위 논문. 건국대학교 교육대학원
    한민국 서울 [2007]
  • 핀란드 교사연수의 특성과 시사점
    김갑성 김도기 나윤선 초등교육연구,23(1), 329-349 [2010]
  • 프로그램 개발
    변창진 서울: 홍익 출판사 [1994]
  • 평생학습자 관점에서 본 교사교육 제고
    김정미 연세교육연구, 14(1),197-223 [2001]
  • 탐구중심 교사교육과 체육교사교육. 한국체육학회
    최의창 제 33회 학술발표대회논문집, 285-294 [1995]
  • 코치의 인성적 자질 함양을 위한 인문적 접근 탐색
    최의창 한국스포츠교육학회지, 16(1), 119-143 [2009]
  • 컨설팅장학에 대한 초등교사들의 인식과 요구 분석
    김병주 민병조 이임숙 초등교육연구, 21(1), 347-369 [2008]
  • 컨설팅장학 효과 관련 변인 간 구조적 관계
    홍혜인 한국교원교육연구,31(3), 343-370 [2014]
  • 컨설팅 장학에 관한 질적 실행 연구. 미간행 박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원
    김도기 서울 [2005]
  • 초등학교교사를 위한 체육연수의 현황과 과제. 강신복(편). 현대 스포츠교육학의 이해, 477-508
    조순묵 서울: 레인보우북스 [2009]
  • 초등학교 체육전담교사의 수업지식 분석
    고문수 손천택 한국스포츠교육학회지, 10(3), 159-209 [2003]
  • 초등학교 체육장학 실태 분석 및 개선 방안 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교 교육대학원
    강경문 충북 [1998]
  • 초등학교 체육수업컨설팅의 메커니즘과 교육적 의미
    양정모 한국스포츠교육학회지, 18(2), 95-118 [2011]
  • 초등학교 무용분야 예술강사들의 전문성 개발을 위한 학습공동체 사례 연구
    김지영 한국스포츠교육학회지, 20(4), 67-91 [2013]
  • 초등학교 1급정교사 자격연수 프로그램 평가. 미간행 석사학위논문, 서강대학교 교육대학원
    한상순 서울 [2008]
  • 초등체육 발전을 위한 체육학 연구의 동향과 과제
    이옥선 한국초등체육학회지, 18(4), 113-128 [2013]
  • 초등체육 교과교육론
    안양옥 서울: 레인보우북스 [2006]
  • 초등신임교사의 체육수업 전문성 신장을 위한 멘토링 체험연구. 미간행 박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원
    이영국 서울 [2008]
  • 초등교육학의 학문적 성격과 탐구 영역
    유승희 초등교육연구, 13(2),181-203 [2000]
  • 초등교육의 재개념화
    엄태동 서울: 학지사 [2003]
  • 초등교육의 과정 철학적 접근 : 화이트헤드의 과정철학을 중심으로
    박종국 교육학연구, 46(2), 1-25 [2008]
  • 초등교육의 개념화의 맥락적 접근
    박종국 초등교육연구, 17(2), 53-76 [2004]
  • 초등교육 연구에 있어서의 질적 사례연구
    김세영 초등교육학연구, 19(2),31-57 [2012]
  • 초등교사의 체육수업 전문성과 지도가치신념 및 수업반성의 인과관계
    이제행 학습자중심교과교육연구, 13(4), 33-47 [2013]
  • 초등교사의 체육교육 실천공동체 형성과 교수 전문성 개발에 관한 해석적연구. 미간행 박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원
    이승배 서울 [2008]
  • 초등교사의 체육교과 학습공동체 형성
    김택천 박윤혁 이승배 한국스포츠교육학회지, 17(2), 101-125 [2010]
  • 초등교사의 전문성 결정요인 탐색. 미간행 석사학위논문, 서울교육대학교 교육대학원
    강지아 서울 [2010]
  • 초등 체육수업 컨설팅의 활성화 방안 모색
    박대원 박종률 정상진 교육연구, 56, 157-190 [2013]
  • 초등 체육교육에 대한 담임교사들의 신념
    박재정 한국체육학회지, 46(3),149-161 [2007]
  • 초등 체육 수업에서 협동학습 적용을 위한 교수 학습 과정 개발.미간행 석사학위논문, 서울교육대학교 교육대학원
    조기희 서울 [2006]
  • 초등 체육 수업론
    고문수 경기: 교육과학사 [2012]
  • 체육전문인교육
    최의창 서울: 레인보우북스 [2009]
  • 체육전문인 전문성의 재검토 - 심성적 차원의 역할과 그 교육 -
    최의창 한국스포츠교육학회지, 18(2), 1-25 [2011]
  • 체육교육 T-멘토링 프로젝트 참여자의 경험과 변화
    이재용 한국초등체육학회지, 17(1), 15-30 [2011]
  • 체육교사의 전문성 연구. 미간행 박사학위논문, 한국체육대학교 대학원
    이제행 서울 [2005]
  • 체육교사 양성 및 연수 교육과정의 효과적 운영방안. 미간행 박사학위논문, 한국교원대학교 교육대학원
    김영식 충북 [2003]
  • 체육교사 간접교수행동의 교육적 효과. 미간행 석사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원
    정현우 서울 [2010]
  • 체육교과 수업 컨설팅 연구. 교육논총
    김재운 이재용 27(특집호), 169-201 [2007]
  • 체육 전공 대학생들의 청소년기 스포츠 참여를 통한 생활기술(life skills) 습득 경험과 요인 탐색
    이옥선 한국스포츠교육학회지, 19(1), 1-22 [2012]
  • 체육 교수장학의 실태 분석
    이종형 한국스포츠교육학회지, 9(2), 168-181 [2002]
  • 체육 교과내용지식의 수준과 수업지식의 관련성. 미간행 박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원
    안양옥 서울 [1995]
  • 책임감 모형의 실행 적합성 제고를 위한 수정 모형의 적용 효과 탐색
    이옥선 한국체육학회지, 53(3), 269-283 [2014]
  • 책임감 모형의 실행 양상 파악 및 실행 제고를 위한 모형의 개선 방향 탐색
    이옥선 한국스포츠교육학회지, 20(1), 17-37 [2013]
  • 질적 연구자의 자세
    고상숙 고호경 수학교육논문집, 12, 423-450 [2001]
  • 질적 연구 : 방법과 사례
    조용환 서울: 교육과학사 [1999]
  • 중학교에서의 컨설팅 장학 적용에 관한 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교 교육대학원
    변귀자 충북 [2006]
  • 중등체육교사 연수의 현황과 개선방안 탐색. 강신복(편). 현대 스포츠교육학의 이해, 443-476
    김대진 서울: 레인보우북스 [2009]
  • 중등교사의 교수역량에 대한 경험적 연구. 미간행 박사학위논문,서울대학교 대학원
    황은희 서울 [2008]
  • 중등 체육 1정 자격 연수의 현황 분석 및 개선방안 탐색
    박종률 한국스포츠교육학회지, 13(4), 81-104 [2006]
  • 좋은 체육수업을 위한 교사의 역량 및 역할 탐색
    이대형 학습자중심교과교육연구, 12(4), 281-307 [2012]
  • 좋은 체육교사에 관한 질적 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문, 건국대학교 대학원
    이지은 서울 [2006]
  • 좋은 체육 수업에 관한 질적 사례 연구
    유정애 한국스포츠교육학회지,9(2), 124-154 [2002]
  • 제7차 교육과정 적용에 따른 수준별 수업 자료 개발 연구
    이화진 한국교육과정평가원구원 연구보고 RRC 14-1 [2001]
  • 전문성 향상을 위한 초등교사 양성교육 프로그램 개선방안
    정혜영 초등교육연구, 15(2), 425-456 [2002]
  • 전문성 향상을 위한 무용교사 양성의 방향정립에 관한 고찰
    최경희 한국무용교육학회지, 18(2), 1-17 [2007]
  • 전문성 연구 문헌의 비판적 고찰: 성과, 한계,그리고 HRD 함의
    동미정 배을규 이호진 HRD 연구, 13(1), 1-26 [2011]
  • 전문성 개발과정 및 핵심요인에 관한 연구
    오헌석 고용직업능력개발연구,9(2), 193-216 [2006]
  • 전문가학습공동체 운영사례와 정책적 시사점 - 미국‘Cottonwood Creek School'의 실천을 중심으로 -
    이경호 한국교원교육연구, 27(4), 395-419 [2010]
  • 장학론
    이윤식 서울: 교육과학사 [1999]
  • 인성교육과 교사의 전문성: 초등교사의 역할에 주는 시사
    박종덕 초등교육연구, 20(3), 107-127 [2007]
  • 인문적 체육교육과 하나로 수업
    최의창 서울: 레인보우북스 [2010]
  • 유치원 교사의 개인적 지능과 교사 전문성과의 관계. 미간행 석사학위논문, 연세대학교 교육대학원
    성화영 서울 [2006]
  • 왜 구성주의인가
    강인애 서울: 문음사 [1997]
  • 온라인 학교 컨설팅의 특성 탐색: 에듀넷과 ‘즐거운 학교’를 중심으로. 미간행 박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원
    명재연 서울 [2005]
  • 오래된 미래교육
    정재걸 서울: 살림터 [2010]
  • 예비교사를 위한 체육교과 수업 컨설팅 사례연구
    이재용 한국체육교육학회지, 16(1), 15-28 [2011]
  • 예비교사들의 협력적 수업연구에 대한 실행연구
    서경혜 한국교원교육연구, 28(1), 133-161 [2012]
  • 스포츠 교육학
    최의창 서울: 레인보우북스 [2003]
  • 수학교사의 전문성 신장을 위한 수학교과모임의 활성화 방안 연구.미간행 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교 교육대학원
    이홍기 충북 [2005]
  • 수업컨설팅의 방향
    이용숙 열린교육실행연구, 10, 3-31 [2006]
  • 수업컨설팅 지원 프로그램 및 교과별 내용 교수법(PCK) 개발 연구
    이화진 한국교육과정평가원구원 연구보고 RRI2006-1 [2006]
  • 수업 전문성 신장을 위한 사회수업 학습공동체 활동 사례 연구. 열린교육연구, 18(4)
    김경은 한국열린교육학회 [2010]
  • 수업 비형의 개념과 위상
    이혁규 교육인류학연구, 13(1), 69-94 [2010]
  • 반성적 마이크로티칭에 나타난 예비 체육교사의 실천적 지식 내용과 수준 분석
    박정준 최의창 체육과학연구, 21(4), 1595-1614 [2010]
  • 반성적 교사교육에서 "반성"의 의미
    정윤경 교육의 이론과 실천, 12(2),165-188 [2007]
  • 문화체육관광부 2008년도 초등학교 스포츠강사 모집 공고
    문화체육관광부생활체육과 [2008]
  • 뛰어난 발레교육자는 어떻게 성장하는가?: 발레교수전문성의재개념화를 위한 발달과정 분석. 미간행 박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원
    홍애령 서울 [2013]
  • 국립국어원 표준국어대사전. http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr
    /에서 검색 [2014]
  • 구리나 마르틴 부버의 철학에 비추어 본 교과교육의 성격 고찰: 초등교육을 중심으로
    초등교육연구, 25(4), 147-167 [2012]
  • 교직 성격 고찰: 교직의 전문직성에 관한 반성적 논의.
    허병기 교육학연구,32(1), 49-77 [1994]
  • 교육적 관계에서 본 교사의 위치: 플라톤「향연」의 관점
    김인 초등교육연구, 21(2), 357-377 [2008]
  • 교육인류학의 수업 이해 과정과 그 의의에 관한 질적 사례 기술 연구
    서근원 교육인류학연구, 14(1), 77-128 [2011]
  • 교육의 개념
    이홍우 경기: 교육과학사 [2009]
  • 교육에서의 질적 연구 : 방법과 적용
    김영천 이용숙 서울: 교육과학사 [1998]
  • 교육과학기술부 2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 체육과 교육과정
    교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-361호 [별책 11] [2011]
  • 교육과학기술부
    문화체육관광부 2010 스포츠강사 지원 계획 [2010]
  • 교육과정 실행에 관한 교사의 이론:혼합적 연구 방법을 통한교사의 실천적지식의 탐구
    김두정 교육과정연구, 27(3), 127-157 [2009]
  • 교육 프로그램 개발 모형의 분석 : 프로그램 평가를 위한 시사점 논의
    정재삼 교과교육학연구, 2(2), 80-97 [1998]
  • 교원연수기관 평가인증 방안 연구. 한국교육개발원 수탁연구
  • 교사학습공동체에서 프로토콜을 적용한 사례와 그 유용성에 대한 연구
    김남균 초등교육연구, 26(3), 1-20 [2013]
  • 교사학습공동체 참여를 통한 지리교사 전문성 개발-근거이론적 접근. 미간행 박사학위논문, 한국교원대학교 교육대학원
    김대훈 충북 [2014]
  • 교사학습(teacher learning) 이해를 위한 이론적 기초 탐색
    소경희 교육과정연구, 27(3), 107-126 [2009]
  • 교사평가 시스템 연구
    김이경 박상완 백선희 유균상 이태상 정금현 한국교육개발원 연구보고 RR 2004-8 [2004]
  • 교사전문성의 재개념화에 대한 연구
    김옥예 교육행정학연구, 24(4),139-160 [2006]
  • 교사자율연구모임을 통한 교사 전문성 성장 과정 : 협동학습연구회에 관한 문화기술적 연구. 미간행 박사학위논문, 성균관대학교 교육대학원
    김성천 서울 [2007]
  • 교사의 영적 성숙을 위한 교사교육과정의변화 방향 탐색
    허영주 교육과정연구, 28(1), 261-290 [2010]
  • 박사
  • 교사의 수업전문성 관점에서 본 교사교육의 발전방향
    손승남 한국교원교육연구, 22(1), 89-108 [2005]
  • 교사의 교과내용지식 연구와 체육교육학 연구에의 시사점
    안양옥 한국체육학회 국제세미나 논문집. 371-378 [1993]
  • 교사용 실천지능검사의 구성 요인에 대한 이론적 고찰
    백순근 교육평가연구, 18(2), 59-77 [2005]
  • 교사교육에 대한 새로운 요구와 방향
    유현숙 한국교원교육연구, 19(3),137 [2002]
  • 교사 학습에 대한 공동체적 접근
    서경혜 교육과학연구, 44(3), 161-191 [2013]
  • 교사 전문성 연구
    유정애 한국스포츠교육학회지, 7(2), 41-59 [2000]
  • 교사 전문성 개발을 위한 대안적 접근으로서 교사학습공동체의 가능성과 한계
    서경혜 한국교원교육연구, 26(2), 243-276 [2009]
  • 교사 연수와 수업 전문성 발달
    김찬종 교육연구와 실천, 75, 67-90 [2009]
  • 교사 공동체가 교사의 수업지도성에 미치는 영향
    이동배 학습자중심교과교육연구, 12(3), 389-410 [2012]
  • 교과전문성과 초등체육 전담교사 경험이 가지는 의미
    이재용 한국스포츠교육학회지, 8(2), 65-83 [2001]
  • 과학교사 모임 활동을 통한 교사의 정체성 형성과정에 대한 탐색.미간행 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 교육대학원
    김효정 서울 [2011]
  • 과학 교과교육학 지식의 본질과 발달
    임청환 한국지구과학회지, 24(4),235-249 [2003]
  • 계층분석과정(AHP)을 이용한 중등교사 교수역량척도의 하위 요인 간 상대적 중요도 분석
    길혜지 박경인 백순근 교육평가연구, 25(3), 389-409 [2007]
  • 계절별 체육수업의 이해
    이종철 정병근 조홍식 한국스포츠교육학회지,17(2), 41-60 [2010]
  • 강원도 내 초등학교 스포츠강사 운영실태 및 개선방안. 미간행 석사학위논문, 강원대학교 교육대학원
    정지수 춘천 [2009]
  • 가지 않은 길
    최의창 서울: 레인보우북스 [2006]
  • 가르치는 일의 성격과 '교과교육학적 지식'의 한계
    김선구 교육철학,37, 1-23 [2009]
  • 『질적연구방법론』
    김영천 서울: 문음사 [2006]
  • “역량” 과 “심성”
    신춘호 : 초등교육의 성격에 관한 성찰. 초등교육연구, 23(4), 1-20 [2010]
  • ‘좋은 체육수업’에 대한 중등학교 체육교사의 인식:중요도-실행도 차이 분석을 중심으로
    이성흠 이준 한국교원교육연구, 27(4), 317-341 [2010]
  • ‘전국체육교사모임’의 조직정체성 형성에 대한 문화기술적 사례연구. 미간행 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교 교육대학원
    박정준 충북 [2006]
  • van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for anaction sensitive pedagogy. London, Canada: The University of WesternOntario.
  • Zwozdiak-Myers, P. (2012). Teacher as a researcher/reflective practitioner. In S. Capel & M. Whitehead (Eds.), Learning to teach physical education in thesecondary school (3rd ed., pp. 265-285). London: Routledge.
  • Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (1998). Best practice: New standards forteaching and learning in America’s schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Zeichner, K. M., & Tabachnick, B. R. (1981). Are the Effects of UniversityTeacher Education" Washed Out" by School Experience?. Journal ofteacher education, 32(3), 7-11.
  • Young, M. F. D. (1998). The curriculum of the future. London: Sage.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
  • Wright, L. J. (2004). Preserving the value of happiness in primary schoolphysical education. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 9(2), 149-163.
  • Wolcott, H.(1994). Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis, and Interpretation. London: Sage.
  • Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, andinterpretation. London: Sage.
  • Wilson, E. (2009). School-based research: A guide for Education student. London:Sage.
  • Willemese, M., Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen, F. (2005). Values in education: Achallenge for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2),205-217.
  • Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of theresearch on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecologicalperspective on inquiry. Review of educational research, 68(2), 130-178.
  • Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical literacy: Throughout the lifecourse. London:Routledge.
  • Whitehead, M. (2001). The concept of physical literacy. European Journal ofPhysical Education, 6(2), 127-138.
  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. London:Routledge.
  • What's Worth Fighting for in Your School?.New York
    Fullan, M. Hargreaves, A. NY: Teachers College Press. 최의창 역(2006). 학교를 개선하는교사. 서울: 레인보우북스 [1996]
  • Wachob, P. (2011). Critical friendship circles: The cultural challenge of coolfeedback. Professional Development in Education, 37(3), 353-372.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mentalprocesses. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impactof professional learning communities on teaching practice and studentlearning. Teaching and Teacher education, 24(1), 80-91.
  • Vella, J. (1994). Learning to listen, learning to teach. The power of dialogue ineducating adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review ofEducational Research, 54(2), 143-178.
  • UNESCO (1967). Recommendation concerning the Status of Teacher. Records ofthe general Conference Fourteenth Session, Paris. 29-39.
  • Tsangaridou, N., & O’Sullivan, M. (1997). The role of reflection in shapingphysical education teachers’ educational values and practices. Journal ofTeaching in Physical Education, 17(1), 2-25.
  • Tsangaridou, N. (2012). Educating primary teachers to teach physical education.European Physical Education Review, 18(3), 275-286.
  • Tsangaridou, N. (2006). Teachers’ knowledge. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonal, & M.O’'Sullivan (Eds.) Handbook of physical education (pp. 502?515). London:Sage Publications.
  • Tsangaridou, N. (2002). Enacted pedagogical content knowledge in physicaleducation: A case study of a prospective classroom teacher. EuropeanPhysical Education Review, 8(1), 21-36.
  • Tindall, D., & Enright, E. (2012). Rethinking teacher knowledge in physicaleducation. In S. Capel & M. Whitehead (Eds.), Debates in physicaleducation (pp. 107-119). London: Routledge.
  • Thomas, K. T., & Thomas, J. R. (2008). Principles of motor development forelementary school physical education. The Elementary School Journal,108(3), 181-195.
  • The knowledge-creating company: HowJapanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford universitypress. 장은영 역(1998). 지식창조기업
    Nonaka, I. Takeuchi, H. 서울: 세종서적 [1995]
  • The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learningorganization. Random House LLC. 강혜정 역(2014). 학습하는 조직
    Senge, P. M. 서울: 에이지이십일 [2006]
  • Tannehill, D. (2013). Professional learning in communities of practice. In K.Armour (Ed.), Sport pedagogy: An introduction for teaching and coaching(312-324). London: Routledge.
  • Swanson, R. A. (2001). Human resource development and its underlyingtheory. Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 299-312.
  • Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G.Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models (pp.117-141). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
  • Stroot, S., & Ko, B. (2006). Induction of beginning physical educators into theschool setting. In D. Kirk, D. Mcdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Thehandbook of physical education (pp. 425-448). London: Sage Publication.
  • Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NK:Cambridge University Press.
  • Stoll, L., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Elaboratingnew approach. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learningcommunities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 1-13). UK: OpenUniversity Press.
  • Stevenson, H. W. (1991). Japanese elementary school education. The ElementarySchool Journal, 92(1), 109-120.
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Spradley, J. P. (1979). Ethnographic interview. New York, NK: Holt, Rinehart andWinston.
  • Solomon, M. A., & Lee, A. M. (1996). Entry characteristics, practice variables,and cognition: Student mediation of instruction. Journal of Teaching inPhysical Education, 15(2), 136-150.
  • Sockett, H. (2006). Character, rules and relations. In H. Sockett (Ed.), Teacherdispositions: Building a teacher education framework of moral standard (pp.49-68). Washington, DC: AACTE Publications.
  • Sloan, S. (2010). The continuing development of primary sector physicaleducation: Working together to raise quality of provision. EuropeanPhysical Education Review, 16(3), 267-281.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis.Oxford, England: Appleton-Century.
  • Siedentop, D., & Tannehill, D. (2000). Developing teaching skills in physicaleducation (4th ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
  • Siedentop, D. (2002). Content knowledge for physical education. Journal ofTeaching in Physical Education, 21(4), 368-377.
  • Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: Ashifting perspective. Journal of curriculum studies, 36(2), 257-271.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge of teaching: Foundation of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-21.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2) : 4-14.
  • Sergiovanni, T. J., & Strarratt, R. J. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition (8th ed.).New York, NK: McGraw Hill.
  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). Small Schools, Great Expectations. EducationalLeadership, 53(3), 48-52.
  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  • Seels, B., & Richey, R. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  • Secada, W. G., & Adajian, L. B. (1997). Mathematics teacher’s change in thecontext of their professional community. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson(Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 193-219). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
  • Schoolteacher: A sociological study
    Lortie, Dan C Chicago:University of Chicago Press. 진동섭 역(1993). 교직사회: 교직과 교사의 삶.서울: 양서원 [1975]
  • Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new designfor teaching and learning in the professionals. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  • Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professional think inaction. New York, NK: Bacic books.
  • Schempp, P. G. (1993). Constructing professional knowledge: A case study of anexperienced high school teacher. Journal of Teaching in PhysicalEducation, 13, 2-23.
  • Sarason, S. B. (1993). The case for change: Rethinking the preparation ofeducators. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • SVAP 교수?학습 과정을 적용한 체육 수업 프로그램 개발
    성기훈 조기희 한국초등체육학회지, 16(1), 39-51 [2010]
  • Royse, D., Thyer, B., & Padgett, D. (2009). Program evaluation: An introduction.Cengage Learning.
  • Rovegno, I. (2003). Teachers’ knowledge construction. In S. Silverman & C.Ennis (Eds.), Student learning in physical education: Applying research toenhance instruction (2nd ed., pp. 295-310). Champaign, IL: Human kinetics.
  • Rovegno, I. (1995). Theoretical perspectives on knowledge and learning and astudent teacher's pedagogical content knowledge of dividing andsequencing subject matter. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,14(3), 284-304.
  • Rovegno, I. (1992). Learning to teach in field-based methods course: Thedevelopment of pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and TeacherEducation, 89(1), 69-82.
  • Romar, J. E. (1995). Case studies of finnish physical education teachers:Espoused and enacted theories of action. Abo: Abo Academi UniversityPress.
  • Rink, J. E., & Hall, T. (2008). Research on effective teaching in elementaryschool physical education. The Elementary School Journal, 108(3), 207-218.
  • Rink, J. E. (2005). Teaching physical education for learning (5th ed.). New York,NK: McGrow-Hill.
  • Rink, J. E. (2003). Effective instruction in physical education. In S. Silverman &C. Ennis (Eds.), Student learning in physical education: Applying researchto enhance instruction (2nd ed., pp. 165-186). Champaign, IL: HumanKinetics.
  • Rhodes, C., & Beneicke, S. (2002). Coaching, mentoring and peer-networking:Challenges for the management of teacher professional development inschools. Journal of In-Service Education, 28(2), 297-310.
  • Raelin, J. (2001). Public reflection as the basis of learning. Managementlearning, 31(10), 11-30.
  • Prytula, M., & Weiman, K. (2012). Collaborative professional development: Anexamination of changes in teacher identity through the professionallearning community model. Journal of Case Studies in Education, 3, 1-19..
  • Professional capital: Transforming teachingin every school
    Hargreaves, A. Teachers College Press. 진동섭 역(2014). 교직과 교사의전문적 자본-학교를 바꾸는 힘. 파주: 교육과학사 [2012]
  • Price, L. (2012). Gymnastics in the primary years ? The foundation of learningto move with enhanced confidence, competence and imagination. In G.Griggs (Ed.), An introduction to primary physical education (pp. 108-134).London: Routledge.
  • Pratt, D. D. (2002). Good teaching: One size fits all?. New directions for adultsand continuing education, 93, 5-15.
  • Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A theoreticalreview. Educational research, 54(4), 405-429.
  • Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (1997). Program evaluation: Methods and casestudies (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NY: Prentice-Hall.
  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle &S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology(pp. 41-60). New York, NK: Plenum.
  • Pickup, I., & Price, L. (2007). Teaching physical eduction in primary schools: Adevelopmental approach. London: Continuum.
  • Pickup, I. (2012). The importance of primary physical education. In S. Capel &M. Whitehead (Eds.), Debates in physical education (pp. 13-24). London:Routledge.
  • Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. London: Routledge.
  • Penny, D., & Evans, J. (2012). Who is physical education for?. In S. Capel & M.Whitehead (Eds.), Debates in physical education (pp. 157-170). London:Routledge.
  • Peel, D., & Shortland, S. (2004). Student teacher collaboration: Preservice onlearning together. Innovation in Education & Teaching International, 41(1),49-58.
  • Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: The Oxford University Press.
  • Pascual, C. (2006). The initial training of physical education teachers: In searchof the lost meaning of professionalism. Physical Education and SportPedagogy, 11(1), 69-82.
  • Participant observation. Belmont, California: WadsworthPublishing. 신재영 역(2006). 참여관찰법
    Spradley, J. P. 서울: 시그마프레스 [1980]
  • Parker, M., Patton, K., Madden, M., & Sinclair, C. (2010). From committee tocommunity: The development and maintenance of a community ofpractice. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29(4), 337-357.
  • Palmer, P. J. (2010). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of ateacher's life. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research. ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.
  • O’Sullivan, M., & Deglau, D. (2006). Principles of professional development.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(4), 441-449.
  • Oja, S. N., & Smulyan, L. (1989). Collaborative action research: A developmentalapproach (Vol. 7). London: Falmer Press.
  • Oakeshott, M. (1967). Learning and Teaching. In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The conceptof Education (pp. 156-176). London: Routledge & Kagan.
  • Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. CambridgeJournal of Education, 26(3), 293-306.
  • Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal ofCurriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.
  • National Association for Sport. (2004). National standards for physical education.Duboque, Iowa: McGraw-Hill.
  • Nash, J. B., Richter, C., & Allert, H. (2004). Drawing on design to improveevaluation of computer supported collaborative learning: Twocomplementary views. Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice,281.
  • Murray, F. B. (1989). Explanation in education. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.),Knowledge base for beginning teacher (pp. ix-xii). New York, NK:Pergamon Press.
  • Murdoch, E., & Whitehead, M. (2012). What should pupils learn in physicaleducation. In S. Capel & M. Whitehead (Eds.), Debates in physicaleducation (pp. 55-73). London: Routledge.
  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
  • Morgan, P., & Hansen, V. (2008a). The relationship between PE biographies andPE teaching practices of classroom teachers. Sport, Education and Society,13(4), 373-391.
  • Morgan, P., & Bourke, S. (2008). Non-specialist teachers’ confidence to teach:The nature and influence of personal school experiences in PE. PhysicalEducation and Sport Pedagogy, 13(1), 1-29.
  • Morgan, P., & Bourke, S. (2005). An investigation of pre-service and primaryschool teachers’ perspectives of PE teaching confidence and PE teachereducation. ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal, 52(1), 7-13.
  • Morgan, P. J., & Hansen, V. (2008b). Physical education in primary schools:Classroom teachers' perceptions of benefits and outcomes. HealthEducation Journal, 67(3), 196-207.
  • Morgan, J., & Lambert, D. (2005). Geography: Teaching school subjects 11-19.London, Routledge.
  • Molenda, M., Pershing, J. A., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). Designing instructionalsystems. The ASTD training and development handbook, 4, 266-293.
  • Miliband, D. (2004). Personalized learning: Building a new relationship withschools. Speech to the North of England Education conference. Belfast.
  • Metzler, M. W. (1990). Instructional supervision for physical education.Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
  • Megginson, D., & Garvey, B. (2004). Odysseus, Telemachus and Mentor:Stumbling into, searching for and signposting the road to desire.International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching, 2(1), 2-10.
  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacherlearning communities: Professional strategies to improve studentachievement. New York, NK: Teachers College Press.
  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Oberman, I. (1996). Teacher learning: New policies, newpractices. New York, NK: Teacher College Press.
  • McLaughlin, M. W. (2005). Listening and learning from the field: Tales of policyimplementation and situated practice. In Lieberman, A. (Ed.), The roots ofeducational change (pp. 58-72). The Netherlands: Springer.
  • McLaughlin, M. W. (1991). Enabling professional development: What have welearned?. In A. Liberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staff development foreducation in the 90’s (pp. 61-82). New York, NK: Teacher College Press.
  • McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. CambridgeJournal of Education, 35(3), 357-382.
  • McGinnis, J. R., Watanabe, T., & McDuffie, A. R. (2005). University mathematics andscience faculty modeling their understanding of reform based instruction in ateacher preparation program: Voices of faculty and teacher candidates.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 407-428.
  • McCombs, B. L. (1986). The Instructional Systems Development (ISD) Model: AReview of Those Factors Critical to Its Successful Implementation.Educational Communication and Technology, 67-81.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York, NK:Harper & Row.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370.
  • Marsden, E., & Weston, C. (2007). Locating quality physical education in earlyyears pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society, 12(4), 383-398.
  • Mallett, C. (2004). Reflective practices in teaching and coaching: Using reflectivejournal to enhance performance. In J. Wright, D. Macdonald, & L. Burrows(Eds.), Critical inquiry and problem-solving in physical education (pp.147-158). London: sage.
  • Malina, R. M. (1996). Tracking of physical activity and physical fitness acrossthe lifespan. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 67(3), 48-57.
  • Makopoulou, K., & Armour, K. (2011). Teachers' professional learning in aEuropean learning society: The case of physical education. PhysicalEducation and Sport Pedagogy, 16(4), 417-433.
  • Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 조덕주, 곽덕주, 이지현, 장경윤, 진석언, 최은식, 최의창, 홍진곤 역 반성적 교사교육 실제와 이론
    서울: 학지사 [2007]
  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and developmentof pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J.Gess-Newsome & N. G. Ledermen (Eds.), Examining pedagogical contentknowledge (pp. 95-132). Netherlands: Springer.
  • Macdonald, D., Mitchell, J., & Mayer, D. (2006). Professional standards forphysical education teachers' professional development: Technologies forperformance?. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 11(3), 231-246.
  • MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). Notre Dame:University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Lyons, N. (2010). Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a wayof knowing for professional reflective inquiry. London: Springer Science.
  • Lund, J., Wayda, V., Woodard, R., & Buck, M. (2007). Professional dispositions:What are we teaching prospective physical education teachers?. ThePhysical Educator, 64(1), 38-47.
  • Louis, K. S., & Miles, M. B. (1990). Improving the Urban High School: WhatWorks and Why. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Lortie, D. C., & Clement, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  • Little, J. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers'professional relations. The Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536.
  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minorityLincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. 1985. Beverly Hills, CA: SagePublication.
  • Lee, O., & Choi, E. (2013). Utilizing peer coaching to facilitate pre-servicephysical education teachers' reflection. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,22(2), 147-154.
  • Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: JohnWiley & Sons. 김정혜 역(2006). 체인지 리더십
    Fullan, M. 서울: 아이앤컴퍼니 [2001]
  • Lawson, H. A. (1990). Beyond positivism: Research, Practice, and undergraduateprofessional education. Quest, 42(2), 161-183.
  • Lawson, H. A. (1988). Occupational socialization, cultural studies, and the physicaleducation curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 7(4), 265-88.
  • Lawson, H. A. (1984). Invitation to physical education. Champaign, IL: HumanKinetics.
  • Lawson, H. A. (1983). Towards a model of teacher socialization in physicaleducation: The subjective warrant, recruitment, and teacher education. Journalof Teaching in Physical Education, 3(1), 3-15.
  • Lawrence, J., & Whitehead, M. (2010). Lesson organisation and management. InS. Capel & M. Whitehead (Eds.), Learning to teach physical education inthe secondary school (3rd ed., pp. 80-100). London: Routledge.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning and legitimate peripheralparticipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. Perspectives onsocially shared cognition, 2, 63-82.
  • Larson, A. (2006). Student perception of caring teaching in physical education.Sport, Education and Society, 11(4), 337-352.
  • Kulinna, P. H. (2008). Models for curriculum and pedagogy in elementary schoolphysical education. The Elementary School Journal, 108(3), 219-227.
  • Kruse, S. D., & Louis, K. S. (1993). An emerging framework for analyzingschool-based professional community. Paper presented at the annualmeeting of the American Educational Research Association, 12-16.
  • Krech, P. R., Kulinna, P. H., & Cothran, D. (2010). Development of a short-formversion of the Physical Education Classroom Instrument: Measuringsecondary pupils' disruptive behaviours. Physical Education and SportPedagogy, 15(3), 209-225.
  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1999). Encouraging the heart: A leader's guideto rewarding and recognizing others. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley &Sons.
  • Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: Core reflection asa means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching,11(1), 47-71.
  • Korthagen, F. A., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001).Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education.
  • Korthagen, F. (2010). How teacher education can make a difference. Journal ofeducation for Teaching, 36(4), 407-423.
  • Korthagen, F. (2004). In search of a good teacher: Toward a more holisticapproach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1),77-97.
  • Klemola, U., Heikinaro-Johansson, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (2013). Physical educationstudent teachers' perceptions of applying knowledge and skills aboutemotional understanding studied in PETE in a one-year teachingpracticum. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18(1), 28-41.
  • Kirk, D., Macdonald, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2006). The handbook of physicaleducation. London: Sage.
  • Kirk, D. (2012). What is the future for physical education in the twenty-firstcentury?. In S. Capel & M. Whitehead (Eds.), Debates in physical education(pp. 220-231). London: Routledge.
  • Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A frameworkfor analysis. Journal of In-service Education, 31(2), 235-250.
  • Keay, J., & Spence, J. (2012). Addressing training and development needs inprimary physical education. In G. Griggs (Ed.), An introduction to primaryphysical education (pp. 179-194). London: Routledge.
  • Joyce, B., & Calhoun, E. (2010). Models of professional development. ThousandOaks, CA: Corwin & NSDC.
  • Johnson, S. D. (1987). Knowledge and skill differences between expert andnovice service technicians on technical troubleshooting tasks. Training andDevelopment Research Center Project Number Twenty.
  • Jess, M. (2013). Becoming an effective primary school physical educationteacher. In K. Armour (Ed.), Sport pedagogy: An introduction for teachingand coaching (271-286). London: Routledge.
  • Jess, M. (2012). The future of primary physical education: A 3-14 developmentaland connected curriculum. In G. Griggs (Ed.), An introduction to primaryphysical education (pp. 37-53). London: Routledge.
  • Ince, M. L., Goodway, J. D., Ward, P., & Lee, M. (2006). The effects ofprofessional development on technological competency and the attitudesurban physical education teachers have toward using technology. Journalof Teaching in Physical Education, 25(4), 428-440.
  • Hunter, L. T. (2006). Research into elementary physical education programs. InD. Kirk, D. Mcdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Handbook of Research inPhysical Education (pp. 571-586). London: Sage.
  • Huling-Austin, L. (1986). What can and cannot reasonably be expected fromteacher induction program, Journal of Teacher Educator, 37(1), 2-5.
  • Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. InN. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.428-444). London: Sage Publications.
  • Hoyle, E., & John, P. (1995). Professional knowledge and professional practice.Londoen: Cassell.
  • Howells, K. (2012). Placing an importance on health and physical activity. In G.Griggs (Ed.), An introduction to primary physical education (pp. 207-220).London: Routledge.
  • Hord, S., & Sommers, W. A. (2007). Leading professional learning communities:Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: The Corwin Press.
  • Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning community: Communities of continuousinquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational DevelopmentLaboratory.
  • Hockly, N. (2000). Modelling and ‘cognitive apprenticeship’ in teacher education.ELT Journal, 54(2), 118-125.
  • Herling, R. W. (1998). Expertise: The development of an operational definitionfor human resource development. In R. J. Torraco (Ed.), Academy ofhuman resource development (pp. 715-722). Baton Rouge, LA: AHRD.
  • Hellison, D. R., & Templin, T. J. (1991). A reflective approach to teachingphysical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Heifez, R., Linsky, M. & Grashow, A. (2009). The practice of adaptiveleadership. Boston, MA: Havard Business School Publishing Corporation.
  • Haywood, K., & Getchell, N. (2009). Lifespan motor development (5th ed.).Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Haywood, K. M. (1991). The role of physical education in the development ofactive lifestyles. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62(2), 151-156.
  • Haydn-Davies, D. (2012). The challenges and potential within primary physicaleducation. In G. Griggs (Ed.), An introduction to primary physical education(pp. 25-36). London: Routledge.
  • Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.
  • Hartley, J. (2012). Learning and studying: A research perspective. London:Routledge.
  • Harrington, H. L., Quinn-Leering, K., & Hodson, L. (1996). Written case analysesand critical reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-37.
  • Harper, D. (2005). What’s new visually?. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.)Qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 747-762). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Harmon, P., & King, D. (1985). Expert systems: Artificial intelligence in business.New York, NK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
  • Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the ageof insecurity. New York, NK: Teachers College Press.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning.Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 6(2), 151-182.
  • Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and teachereducation, 14(8), 835-854.
  • Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work andculture in the postmodern age. New York, NK: Teachers College Press.
  • Hargreaves, A. (1991). Contrived collegiality: The micro-politics of teachercollaboration. In J. Blaise (Ed.), The politics of life in schools (pp. 46-72).New York, NK: Sage.
  • Harasim, L. (1996). Online education. Computer networking and scholarlycommunication in the twenty-first-century university, 203-214.
  • Hansen, D. (2001). Teaching as moral activity. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbookof research on Teaching (4th ed., pp. 826-857), New York, NK: Macmillan.
  • Hale, R. (1999). The dynamics of mentoring relationships: Towards anunderstanding of how mentoring supports learning. Continuing ProfessionalDevelopment, 2(3), 75-80.
  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teacherand Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381-391.
  • Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitativeresearch. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitativeresearch (2nd ed., pp. 163-194), London: Sage.
  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge andteacher education. New York, NK: Teachers College Press.
  • Grimmett, P. P., & Erickson, G. L. (1988). Reflection in teacher education. NewYork, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Griggs, G. (2012). Getting athletics off the track, out the sack and ‘back ontrack’. In G. Griggs (Ed.), An introduction to primary physical education(pp. 151-160). London: Routledge.
  • Griggs, G. (2008). Outsiders inside: The use of sports coaches in primaryschools. Physical Education Matters, 3(1), 33-36.
  • Griffiths, M. (2013). Mentoring as a professional learning strategy. In K. Armour(Ed.), Sport pedagogy: An introduction for teaching and coaching (299-311).London: Routledge.
  • Graham, K. (1991). The influence of teacher education on perspectivedevelopment: Beyond a custodial orientation. Quest, 43(1), 1-19.
  • Graber, K. C., Locke, L. F., Lambdin, D., & Solmon, M. A. (2008). Thelandscape of elementary school physical education. The Elementary SchoolJournal, 108(3), 151-159.
  • Graber, K. C. (2001). Research on teaching in physical education. In V.Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 491-519).Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Goodlad, J. I. (1994). Educational renewal: Better teachers, better schools. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Garrett, R., & Wrench, A. (2007). Physical experiences: Primary studentteachers' conceptions of sport and physical education. Physical Educationand Sport Pedagogy, 12(1), 23-42.
  • Garman, A., Evans, R., Krause, M. K., & Anfossi, J. (2006). Professionalism.Journal of Healthcare Management, 51(4), 219-222.
  • Gardner, W. E. (1989). Preface. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base forbeginning teacher (pp. ix-xii). New York, NK: Pergamon Press.
  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. London: Macmillan and Company.
  • Gallahue, D. L., Ozmun, J. C., & Goodway, J. (2006). Understanding motordevelopment: Infants, children, adolescents, adults. Boston: Mcgraw-hill.
  • Furman, G., & Mertz, C. (1997). Community and schools: Promise and paradox.New York, NK: Teachers College Press.
  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NK:Teachers College Press.
  • Fullan, M. (2004). Leadership sustainability. Ca: Corwin Press.
  • Fraser, C., Kennedy, A., Reid, L., & Mckinney, S. (2007). Teachers’ continuingprofessional development: Contested concepts, understandings and models.Journal of in-service education, 33(2), 153-169.
  • Fishbaugh, M. S. E., & Hecimovic, T. (1994). Teacher study groups as a meansof rural professional development. In M. Diane (Ed.), Rural partnerships:Working together. Proceeding of the Annual National Conference of theAmerican Council on Special Edition (14th, Austin, Texas, March 23-26).
  • Fink, A. (1995). Evaluation for education & psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  • Fincher, M., & Schempp, P. (1994). Teaching physical education: What do weneed to know and how do we find it. GAHPERD journal, 28(3), 7-10.
  • Fernandez-Balboa, J. M., Barrett, K., Solomon, M., & Silverman, S. (1996).Perspectives on content knowledge in physical education. Journal ofPhysical Education, Recreation, & Dance, 67(9), 54-57.
  • Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature ofknowledge in research on teaching. Review of research in education,3-56.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. B. (1990). Making subject matter part of theconversation in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 41,32-43.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Teacher learning: How do teachers learn to teach?.In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers(Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions inchanging contexts (3rd ed., pp. 697-705). New York, NK: Routledge andAssociation of Teacher Education.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (1990). Conceptual orientations in teacher education. NationalCenter for Research on Teacher Education.
  • Faucette, N., & McKenzie, T., & Patterson, P. (1990). Descriptive analysis ofnon specialist elementary physical education teachers’ curricular choicesand class organization. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 9(4),284-293.
  • Faucette, N., & Hillidge, S. (1989). Research findings: PE specialists andclassroom teachers. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,60(7), 51-54.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual review of psychology, 47(1), 273-305.
  • Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice onthe development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge handbookof expertise and expert performance, 683-703.
  • Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham: OpenUniversity Press.
  • Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher Thinking. A Study of Practical Knowledge. CroomHelm Curriculum Policy and Research Series. New York, NK: NicholsPublishing Company.
  • Duncombe, R., & Armour, K. M. (2004). Collaborative professional learning: Fromtheory to practice. Journal of in-service education, 30(1), 141-166.
  • Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning community at work: Bestpractices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: NationalEducation Service.
  • Dufour, R. (2004). What is “professional learning community”? Educational Leadership, 61(6), 6-11.
  • Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. Handbook ofresearch on teaching, 3, 392-431.
  • Diez, M. (2006). Assessing dispositions: Five principles to guide practice. In H.Sockett (Ed.), Teacher dispositions: Building a teacher education frameworkof moral standard (pp. 49-68). Washington, DC: AACTE Publications.
  • Diaz-Maggioli, G. (2004). Teacher-centered professional development. Alexandria,Virginia: ASCD.
  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflectivethinking to the educational process. Lexington, MA: Heath.
  • Denzin, N. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. Denzin & Y.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500-515). London:Sage.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Securing the right to learn: Policy and practice forpowerful teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 13-24.
  • Darkenwald, G. G. (1989). Enhancing the adult classroom environment. In E. R.Hayes (Ed.), New direction for continuing education (pp. 67-75). SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Base.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikzentmihaly, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology ofoptimal experience. New York: HarperPerennial.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing amongfive approaches. London: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixedmethods approaches (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design (2nd ed.). London:Sage.
  • Corcoran, E. (1981). Transition shock: The beginning teacher's paradox. Journalof Teacher Education, 32(3), 19-23.
  • Cooper, H. (2004). Exploring time and place through play. London: David Fulton.
  • Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.New York
    Wenger, E. NK: Cambridge University Press. 손민호, 배을규 역(2007). 실천공동체: 지식창출의 사회생태학. 서울: 학지사 [1998]
  • Cole, A. L. (1997). Impediments to reflective practice: Toward a new agenda forresearch on teaching. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 3(1),7-27.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge andpractice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of research ineducation, 249-305.
  • Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research andknowledge. New York, NK: Teachers College Press.
  • Clutterbuck, D. (1991). Everyone needs a mentor. London: Institute of Personneland Development.
  • Clifford, C., & Feezell, R. (2009). Coaching for character (2nd ed.). Champaign,IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching andteacher education, 18(8), 947-967.
  • Chedzoy, S. (2012). The development of the physical education curriculum inprimary schools in the United Kingdom. In G. Griggs (Ed.), An introductionto primary physical education (pp. 57-67). London: Routledge.
  • Charles, J. (2002). Contemporary Kinesiology (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: StipesPublishing.
  • Chapman, C. Ramondt, L., & Smiley, G. (2005). Strong community, deeplearning: Exploring the link. Innovations in education and teachinginternational, 42(3), 217-230.
  • Chang, R. Y. (1994). Creating high-impact training. Irvine, CA: Richard ChangAssociates.
  • Capel, S., Blair, R. (2012). Why do physical education teachers adopt aparticular way of teaching. In S. Capel & M. Whitehead (Eds.), Debates inphysical education (pp. 120-139). London: Routledge.
  • Capel, S. (2010). Continuing professional development in PE. In S. Capel & M.Whitehead (Eds.), Learning to teach physical education in the secondaryschool (3rd ed., pp. 286-304). London: Routledge.
  • Campbell, E. (2003). The ethical teacher. Philadelphia, PA: Open UniversityPress.
  • Campbell, E. (1997). Connecting the ethics of teaching and moral education.Journal of Teacher Education, 48(4), 255-263.
  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible words. Cambridge, MA: University Press.
  • Britzman, D. P. (1986). Cultural myths in the making of a teacher: Biography andsocial structure in teacher education. Harvard educational review, 56(4),442-457.
  • Bosco, J. (1986). An analysis of evaluations of interactive video. EducationalTechnology, 25, 7-16.
  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping theterrain. Educational researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
  • Borich, G. D. (1990). Observation skills for effective teaching. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
  • Blume, R. (1971). Humanizing teacher education. Phi Delta Kappan, 53, 411-415.
  • Berliner, D. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher,15(7), 5-13.
  • Beerens, D. R. (2000). Evaluating teachers for professional growth: Creating aculture of motivation and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
  • BAALPE, CCPR, PEAUK, & Physical Education ITT Network (2005). Declarationfrom the National Summit on Physical Education, London.
  • Ashy, M., & Humphries, C. (2000). “Don’t use balloons on windy days”:Elementary education majors’ perceptions of teaching elementary physicaleducation. Action in Teacher Education, 21(1), 59-71.
  • Arnold, P. J. (1997). Sport, ethics and education. London: Cassell.
  • Arnold, P. J. (1979). Meaning in movement, sport and physical education.London: Heinemann.
  • Armour, K. M., Chambers, F., & Makopoulou, K. (2012). Conceptualising teachingas learning: The challenge for teacher education. In S. Capel & M.Whitehead (Eds.), Debates in physical education (pp. 205-219). London:Routledge.
  • Armour, K. M., & Yelling, M. R. (2004). Continuing professional development forexperienced physical education teachers: Toward effective provision. Sport,Education and Society, 9(1), 95-114.
  • Armour, K. M., & Yelling, M. (2007). Effective professional development forphysical education teachers: The role of informal, collaborative learning.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26(2), 177-200.
  • Armour, K. M. (2006). Physical education teachers as career-long learners: Acompelling agenda. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 11(3), 203-207.
  • Anderson, C. W. (2003). Teaching science for motivation and understanding.Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University.
  • Almond, L. (1989). The place of physical education in schools. London: KoganPage.
  • Aleccia, V. (2011). Walking our talk: The imperative of teacher educatormodeling. The Clearing House, 84, 87-90.
  • Akiba, M. (2012). Professional learning activities in context: A state wide surveyof middle school mathematics teachers. Education Policy AnalysisAchieves, 20(14), 1-36.
  • Airasian, P. W., & Gullickson, A. (1997). Teacher self-evaluation. Evaluatingteaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice, 215-247.
  • 21세기의 교원 연수 체제
    강원근 한국교사교육, 17(1), 55-79 [2000]
  • 21세기의 교사상과 교직
    이돈희 한국교원교육연구, 17(1), 1-18 [2000]
  • 2014년도 교원연수 중점 추진 방향
    교육부 교육부 교원복지연수과 [2013]