박사

이러닝 환경에서의 감성적 어포던스 설계원리 개발

박태정 2015년
논문상세정보
' 이러닝 환경에서의 감성적 어포던스 설계원리 개발' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 감성 설계
  • 감성적 어포던스
  • 감성조절
  • 어포던스 기반 설계
  • 이러닝
  • 학업감성
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
99 1

0.0%

' 이러닝 환경에서의 감성적 어포던스 설계원리 개발' 의 참고문헌

  • 휴먼 미디어 인터페이스
    권만우 서울: 한국학술정보 [2004]
  • 휴대전화 인터페이스에 관한 미디어 생태학적 고찰
    이동후 인간 환경 미래, 2, 113-137 [2009]
  • 협력학습을 위한 Cybergogy 모델 연구
    강명희 서울: 이화여자대학교 산학협력단 [2005]
  • 한국교육심리학회. 『교육심리학용어사전』
    서울: 학지사 [2000]
  • 한국U러닝연합회 지식디자인 실무 (이러닝 업그레이드 전략)
    서울: 콘텐츠미디어 [2007]
  • 학업상황의 정서조절이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향: 정서와 학습전략을 매개로. 미 간행 박사학위논문
    김은진 경희대학교 대학원 [2013]
  • 학습자 만족도 확인을 위한 교육․훈련프로그램 반응평가
    이성흠 서울: 교육과학사 [2005]
  • 학습상황에서 정서의 존재: 학습정서의 원천과 역할
    김민성 아시아교육연구, 10(1), 73-98 [2009]
  • 학습 참여 증진을 위한 어포던스 관점의 모바일러닝 설계원리 개발. 미간행 석사 학위논문
    최원정 중앙대학교 대학원 [2013]
  • 품질경영과 감성공학
    이순요 서울: 인간경영사 [1994]
  • 컴퓨터 학습자료의 상호작용력 제고 방안: 중학교 생물학습에적용된 버튼 활용 기법
    강이철 교육공학연구, 15(1), 43-64 [1999]
  • 청각장애아동을 위한 e교과서 설계원리 개발. 미간행 박사학위논문
    이국정 대구대학교 대학원 [2013]
  • 창의력 계발을 위한 학습게임의 설계
    송수미 안성혜 한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문 집, 5(1), 6-12 [2007]
  • 참여적 실시간 이러닝 환경에서 학습자의 정서, 정서 조절전략이 학습참여 및 학습성취도에 미치는 영향: Facebook환경을 중심으로
    이인숙 교육공학연구, 30(3), 413-442 [2014]
  • 중학생이 지각한 부모와 교사의 성취목표지향성과 자기조절학습전략과의 관계에서 성취정서의 매개효과 검증
    도승이 손수경 교육심리연구, 26(2), 479-504 [2012]
  • 제품디자인에 있어서 잠유성의 재해석과 그 적용. 미간행 박사학위논문
    김영호 중앙대학 교 대학원 [2004]
  • 정서와 교수-학습 연구의 쟁점과 전망
    도승이 교육심리연구, 22(4), 919-937 [2008]
  • 정서발달과 정서지능
    정옥분 서울: 학지사 [2007]
  • 전시공간에 나타난 관람자를 위한 어포던스 특성연구. 미간행 석사학위논문
    김보영 국민 대학교 대학원 [2009]
  • 전문성 수준에 적응적인 학습활동 중심 이러닝 설계전략 개발. 미간행 박사학위 논문
    김선영 서울대학교 대학원 [2013]
  • 자연사 박물관에서 일어나는 관람객들의 상호작용적 학습: 근접발달 영역 체계를 중심으로. 미간행 박사학위논문
    김기상 서울대학교 대학원 [2008]
  • 인지적 어포던스 기반의 모바일 콘텐츠 활용방안에 관한 연구. 미간행 박사학위 논문
    이호선 한양대학교 대학원 [2014]
  • 이러닝 환경에서 감성지능이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향
    이인숙 교육정보미디어연구, 18(3), 227-248 [2012]
  • 이러닝 콘텐츠 사용자 인터페이스의 교육적 사용성 증진을 위한 어포던스 설계 전략 개발. 미간행 박사학위논문
    박형주 중앙대학교 대학원 [2012]
  • 유비쿼터스러닝을 위한 감성이벤트 온톨로지를 이용한 개인화 지식 에이전트. 미 간행 석사학위논문
    홍승우 한양대학교 대학원 [2012]
  • 유비쿼터스 시대의 교육방법 및 교육공학
  • 웹기반 학습에서 학습자의 정서표현 방식과 교수자의 반응기대가 학습에 미치는 효과. 미간행 석사학위논문
    유은영 서울대학교 대학원 [2009]
  • 웹기반 학습에서 사용자 인터페이스 그래픽 메타포 유형이 학습 및 사용편의성에 미치는 영향. 미간행 박사학위논문
    이다예 서울대학교 대학원 [2007]
  • 온라인 토론에서의 정서적 경험의 변화과정: 타인과의상호작용을 통한 정서의 변화
    김민성 교육심리연구, 22(4), 697-722 [2008]
  • 역 디자인 공감력: 베스트셀러의 비밀
    최지숙 서울: 비즈앤비즈 [2010]
  • 에듀테인먼트의 이해와 활용
    백영균 서울: 도서출판 정일 [2005]
  • 어포던스 이론 기반의 모바일 증강현실 교육시스템 설계 가이드라인 및 프로토타 입 개발 연구. 미간행 박사학위논문
    황윤자 한양대학교 대학원 [2013]
  • 어포던스 디자인을 위한 스마트 공간 구축 요인에 관한 연구
    민병택 지용규 기초조형학 연구, 9(3), 125-133 [2008]
  • 어머니의 정서사회화 행동과 학령기 아동의 정서조절 전략 및 정서조절 능력간의 관계. 미간행 박사학위논문
    박서정 성균관대학교 대학원 [2004]
  • 스마트폰을 활용한 새로운 에듀테인먼트 콘텐에 관한 연구
    김현석 은혜영 2011 한국HCI 학회 학술대회, 695-698 [2011]
  • 소셜네트워트와 교육: 그 가능성과 과제
    나일주 2011년 한국교육정보미디어학회 춘계학 술대회 발표집 [2011]
  • 성취목표지향성이 학습결과에 미치는 영향: 정서의 조절효과
    양명희 교육심리연구, 23(1), 51-71 [2009]
  • 성영아 아날로그적 감성디자인을 활용한 e-Book 콘텐츠 개발 연구
    유명환 브랜드디자 인학연구, 5(1), 75-90 [2007]
  • 사이버대학 학습자의 성격유형,자기주도성,정보기술에 대한 태도 및 자기효능감과 학업성취도 간의 관계 규명
    김소희 한정선 교육정보미디어연구, 13(2), 79-106 [2007]
  • 사이버대학 학습자들의 인구학적 특성에 따른학업성취도와 수업만족도 분석- S대학교 사례를 중심으로 -
    정봉영 교육정보미디어연구, 10(3), 127-150 [2004]
  • 사용자 감성을 기반으로 한 유저 인터페이스에 관한 연구: 아날로그적 경험을 중 심으로. 미간행 석사학위논문
    이여리 숙명여자대학교 대학원 [2012]
  • 사례기반학습을 위한 사례 설계 원리 개발 연구. 미간행 박사학위논문
    연은경 서울대학 교 대학원 [2013]
  • 메타인지 활동 촉진을 위한 어포던스 기반 e-포트폴리오 설계 전략 개발. 미간행 석사학위논문
    이나현 중앙대학교 대학원 [2014]
  • 멀티미디어 교과서
    이만재 이상선 서울: 안그라픽스 [2002]
  • 디지털텍스트의 감성적 어포던스에 대한 다차원적 분석
    김윤정 나일주 이진경 최유미 2013 한국교육공학회 춘계학술대회 자료집, 291-304 [2013]
  • 디지털교과서 매개 커뮤니케이션 환경에 감성적 반응유발가능성 (Emotional Affordance)을 위한 이모티콘 지원도구 개발에 관한 연구
    김광일 박태정 임철일 교육정보미디어, 18(2), 199-225 [2012]
  • 디지털 대체를 활용한 포럼연극 수업설계 모형 개발. 미간행 박사학위논문
    김선희 서울 대학교 대학원 [2014]
  • 대학의 강의식 수업에서 교수의 효율적인 교수 행동 요인분석. 미간행 박사학위 논문
    권영성 연세대학교 대학원 [2006]
  • 뇌 기반 교수-학습에서 동기유발
    김유미 열린유아교육연구, 8(1), 93-110 [2003]
  • 국어과 온라인 토론학습에서 교사의 학습 촉진 멘트의 유형이 학습자의 참여도, 성취도, 만족도에 미치는 영향. 미간행 석사학위논문
    정미정 이화여자대학교 대학원 [2004]
  • 구성주의 기반의 학습이론 탐구
    조규락 교육공학연구, 19(3), 3-40 [2003]
  • 교육방법의 이론과 실제
    정명화 서울: 학지사 [2005]
  • 교육ᆞ심리ᆞ사회 연구방법론
    이종승 경기: 교육과학사 [2009]
  • 교수자를 위한 웹기반 수업제작도구. 미간행 석사학위논문
    백경민 국민대학교 대학원 [2003]
  • 교수설계 이론과 모형 제2판
    임철일 파주: 교육과학사 [2012]
  • 교수-학습 방법의 이론과 실제
    박성익 서울: 교육과학사 [1997]
  • 광고에 있어서 시각언어의 의미제공성(Affordance)에 관한 연구: 2000~2002년 잡 지광고에 나타난 비주얼을 중심으로. 미간행 석사학위논문
    한우일 홍익대학교 대학원 [2002]
  • 건축 공간의 경험 구조로서 지원성 적용 연구
    김수진 한국 실내디자인 학회 논문집, 13(6), 48-56 [2004]
  • 개인 감성기반 교육시스템 프레임워크 개발. 미간행 석사학위논문
    황금숙 경희대학교 대 학원 [2011]
  • 감정 심리학
    이훈구 서울: 이너북스 [2010]
  • 감성적 인터페이스 디자인을 위한 스토리텔링 접근
    손영우 이선아 황신웅 감성과학, 12(1), 19-32 [2009]
  • 감성적 웹디자인의 효용성 고찰
    염정 장호현 디자인지식저널, 10, 66-79 [2009]
  • 감성기반 상호작용 e-러닝 환경에서 프로파일 활용한 학습 콘텐 츠 타입 추천
    신민철 정경석 최용석 정보과학회논문지: 소프트웨어 및 응용, 39(1), 36-44 [2012]
  • 감성공학의 개념과 연구 및 응용방법
    이구형 대한인간공학회지, 17(1), 91-102 [1998]
  • 감성-경험 기반의 서비스디자인 프로세스에 대한 연구
    나건 이경아 한국디자인문화학회 지, 17(2), 399-410 [2011]
  • 「인간과 컴퓨터의 상호작용: 인컴학을 향하여」
    김희철 파주: (주) 사이텍미디어 [2006]
  • e-Learning 환경에서 학습정서가 학습동기에 미치는 영향. 미간행 석사학위논문
    김승호 세종대학교 대학원 [2013]
  • e-Learning 컨텐츠 설계
    조미헌 파주 : 교육과학사 [2010]
  • Zhang, P. (2008). Motivational affordances: Fundamental reasons for ICT design and use. Communications of the ACM (CACM), 51(11), 145-147.
  • Zembylas, M. (2008). Adult learners’ emotions in online learning. Distance Education, 29(1), 71-87.
  • Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: What I have learned so far. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 165-184). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Zakharov, K., Mitrovic, A., & Johnston, L. (2008). Towards Emotionally-Intelligent Pedagogical Agents. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
  • Young, M. F., Barab, S. A., & Garrett, S. (2000). Agent as detector: An ecologicalpsychology perspective on learning by perceiving-acting systems. In D.Jonassen, & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical Foundations of LearningEnvironments (pp. 147-173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • You, H. C., & Chen, K. (2007). Applications of affordance and semantics in product design. Design Studies, 28(1), 23-38.
  • Wu, Y., Wang, T., & Chu, X. (2009). Affective modeling and recognition of learning emotion: Application to E-learning. Journal of Software, 4(8), 859-866.
  • Wrede, O. (2003). Web-logs and discourse: web-logs as a transformational technology for highereducation and academic research. Paper presented at the Blogtalk Conference.
  • Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. (2005). Origin, direction and impact of emotions in social online learning. Learning and instruction, 15(5), 449-464.
  • Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 179-187.
  • Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S.(2000). Expectancy-Value Theory of AchievementMotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.
  • Wentling, T. L., Waight, C., Gallaher, J., La Fleur, J., Wang, C., & Kanfer, A. (2000). e-learning-A review of literature. Retrieved from http://learning.ncsa.uiuc.edu/papers/elearnlit.pdf.
  • Weinschenk, S. (2011). 100 Things Every Designer Needs To Know About People. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Webb, M. E. (2005). Affordances of ICT in science learning: Implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705-735.
  • Weare, K. (Ed.). (2004). Developing the Emotionally Literate School. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Experimental evaluation of polite interaction tactics for pedagogical agents. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces.
  • Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Mayer, R. E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Collins, H. (2008). The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(2), 98-112.
  • Wang, M., & Kang, M. (2006). Cybergogy for engaged learning: A framework for creating learner engagement through information and communication technology. Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, B. R. (1981). Nursing research: design statistics and computer analysis. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.
  • Walter, A. (2011). Designing for Emotion. New York, NY: A Book Apart.
  • Vuorela, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2004). Experienced emotions, emotion regulation and student activity in a web-based learning environment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 423-436.
  • Volet, S., & Wosnitza, M. (2004). Social Affordances and Students’ Engagement in Cross-National Online Learning An Exploratory Study. Journal of Research in International Education, 3(1), 5-29.
  • Virzi, R. A. (1992). Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough?. Human Factors. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34(4), 457-468.
  • Veletsianos, G. (2010). Contextually relevant pedagogical agents: Visual appearance, stereotypes, and first impressions and their impact on learning. Computers & Education, 55(2), 576-585.
  • Veermans, M., & Jarvela, S. (2004). Generalized achievement goals and situational coping in inquiry learning. Instructional Science, 32(4), 269-291.
  • Van Merri nboer, J. J., & Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 5-13.
  • Van Gorp, T., & Adams, E. (2012). Design for Emotion. Boston, MA: Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier.
  • Van Den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1-14). Enschede, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • V rlander, S. (2008). The role of students’ emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2), 145-156.
  • Ulich, D., & Mayring, P. (1992). Psychologie der Emotionen. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer. Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485–498.
  • Tzvetanova, S. (2008). A design methodology for emotional interface. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
  • Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., & Patrick, H. (2003). Teacher discourse and students’ affect and achievement-related behaviors in two high mastery/high performance classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 103, 357-382.
  • Tung, F. W., & Deng, Y. S., (2007). Increasing Social Presence of Social Actors in E-learning environments: Effects of Dynamic and Static Emoticons on Children. Displays, 28(4-5), 174-180.
  • Tullis, T., & Albert, B. (2008). Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing and presenting usability metrics. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kauffman Publishers.
  • Tufte, E. R., & Graves-Morris, P. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information (Vol. 2). Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
  • Tripp, S. D., & Bichelmeyer, B.(1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31-44.
  • Tractinsky, N. (2004). Toward the study of aesthetics in information technology. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 25th Annual ICIS.
  • Tracey, M. W. (2001). The construction and validation of an instructional systems design model incorporating multiple intelligences. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Wayne State University.
  • Tiger, L. (1992). The pursuit of pleasure. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company.
  • Tian, F., An, B., Zheng, D., Qin, J., Zheng, Q., & Yang, Y. (2011). E-Learning oriented emotion regulation Mechanism and strategies in interactive text applications. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2011 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design.
  • Thompson, R. A. (2011). Emotion and emotion regulation: Two sides of the developing coin. Emotion Review, 3(1), 53-61.
  • Tan, T. H., Lin, M. S., Chu, Y. L., & Liu, T. Y. (2012). Educational Affordances of a Ubiquitous Learning Environment in a Natural Science Course. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 206-219.
  • Sylwester, R. (1994). How emotions affect learning. Educational Leadership, 52, 60-60.
  • Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2(1), 23-49.
  • Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Students' beliefs about mobile devices Vs. desktop computers in South Korea and the United States. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1328-1338.
  • Strongman, K. T., & Russell, P. N. (1986). Salience of emotion in recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24(1), 25-27.
  • Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Stewart, J. L., Silton, R. L., Sass, S. M., Fisher, J. E., Edgar, J. C., Heller, W., & Miller, G. A. (2010). Attentional bias to negative emotion as a function of approach and withdrawal anger styles: an ERP investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76(1), 9-18.
  • Steen, H. L. (2008). Effective eLearning design. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 526-532.
  • Spector, J. M. (2012). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sparrow, T., & Knight, A. (2006). Applied Emotional Intelligence: The Importance of Attitudes in Developing Emotional Intelligence (Vol. 25). Mississauga, Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Skinner, E. A. (1995). Perceived control, motivation and coping (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Siemens, G. (2002). Instructional design in elearning: Article, Elearnspace. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/InstructionalDesign.htm
  • Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface. Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3rd Ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Shen, L., Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2009). Affective e-Learning: Using" Emotional" Data to Improve Learning in Pervasive Learning Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 176-189.
  • Shen, L., Callaghan, V., & Shen, R. (2008). Affective e-Learning in residential and pervasive computing environments. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 461-472.
  • Shelton, C., & Stern, R. (2003). Understanding Emotions in the Classroom. New York, NY: National Professional Resources.
  • Shaffner, R. D. (2005). Social and personality development. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publications.
  • Sha, L., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., & Zhang, B. H. (2012). Understanding mobile learning from the perspective of self‐regulated learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 366-378.
  • Severino, S., & Messina, R. (2011). Group dynamics in on-line and face-to-face interactions: an experimental study on learning methods. Sociology Mind, 1(02), 65.
  • Seif El-Nasr, M., Morie, J., & Drachen, A. (2011). A Scientific Look at the Design of Aesthetically and Emotionally Engaging Interactive Entertainment Experiences. In D. Gokcay & G. Yildirim (Eds.). Affective Computing and Interaction: Psychological, Cognitive and Neuroscientific Perspectives (pp. 281-307). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • Seels, B., & Richey, R. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  • Sedig, K., & Parsons, P. (2012). Interactivity of Information Representations in e-Learning Environments. In H. Wang (Ed.), Interactivity in E-learning: Case Studies and Frameworks (pp. 29-50). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Sebe, N., Cohen, I., Huang, T. S., & Gevers, T. (2004, August). Skin detection: A bayesian network approach. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.
  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2, 385-407.
  • Schwarz, N. (2000). Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 433-440.
  • Schutz, P. A., Hong, J. Y., Cross, D. I., & Osbon, J. N. (2006). Reflections on investigating emotion in educational activity settings. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 343-360.
  • Schutz, P. A., & Lanehart, S. L. (2002). Introduction: Emotions in education. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 67-68.
  • Schutz, P. A., & DeCuir, J. T. (2002). Inquiry on emotions in education. Educational. Psychologist, 37(2), 125-134.
  • Schutz, P. A., & Davis, H. A. (2000). Emotions and self-regulation during test taking. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 243-256.
  • Schutte, N. S, Malouff, J. M., Price, I., Walter, S., Burke, G., & Wilkinson, C. (2008). Person-situation interaction in adaptive emotional functioning. Current Psychology, 27, 112-111.
  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Scherer, K. R., Banziger, T., & Roesch, E. B., (Eds.) (2010). A blueprint for affective computing: A sourcebook. Series in Affective Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Scherer, K. R., & Tran, V. (2001). Effects of emotion on the process of organizational learning. In I. Nonaka (Ed.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 369-392). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Scherer, K. R., & Ellgring, H. (2007). Are facial expressions of emotion produced by categorical affect programs or dynamically driven by appraisal?. Emotion, 7(1), 113-130.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion :Evidence for the component process model. Cognitionand Emotion, 23(7), 1307-1351.
  • Schank, R. C. (1994). Goal-based scenarios. In R. C. Schank & E. Langer (Eds.), Beliefs, Reasoning and Decision-Making Psycho-logic in honour of Bob Abelson. (pp. 1-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Savery, J. (2009). Problem based approach to instruction. Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume III: Building a Common Knowledge Base, 3, 143.
  • Sasaki, M. (1994). Affordance-The New Cognitive Theory. Iwanami Library of Science.
  • Sansone, C. & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Does what we feelaffect what we learn?: Some answers and newquestions. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 507-515.
  • Sanders, E. B. N. (1992). Converging perspectives: Product development research for the 1990s. Design Management Journal, 3(4), 49–54.
  • Saad , R. G., & Kira, D. (2006). The emotional state of technology acceptance. Issues in informing science and information technology, 3, 529-539.
  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178.
  • Rudd, J., Stern, K., & Isensee, S. (1996). Low vs. high-fidelity prototyping debate. Interactions, 3(1), 76-85.
  • Rubio, D. M. , Berg-Weger, M. , Tebb, S. S. , Lee, E. S. & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research. 27(2), 94-104.
  • Rowe, J. (2005). Since Feeling is First: Narrative Inquiry toward understanding Emotion in online teaching and learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  • Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332.
  • Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in screen text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14. Retrieved from http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol14.2/rourke_et_al.html.
  • Roth, E. M., Patterson, E. S., & Mumaw, R. J. (2002). Cognitive Engineering: Issues in User-Centered System Design. In J. J. Marciniak (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Software Engineering (3rd ed.) (pp. 163-179). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Rosiek, J. (2003). Emotional scaffolding: An exploration of the teacher knowledge at the intersection of student emotion and the subject matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(5), 399-412.
  • Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Baylor, A. L., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2008). Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students’attitudes and beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2741-2756.
  • Romero, E. J., & Watson, G. S. (2010). An analysis of job ads in ID&T: Implications for ID&T programs & future professionals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  • Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Rodrigo, M. M. T., & De Baker, R. S. (2011). Comparing the incidence and persistence of learners’ affect during interactions with different educational software packages. In R. A. Calvo and S. D'Mello (Eds.), New perspectives on affect and learning technologies (pp. 183-200). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., Gaggioli, A, Botella, C., & Alca iz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: The link between presence and emotions. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(1), 45-56.
  • Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2004). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2, 1099-1130.
  • Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Reilly, J. R., Gallagher-Lepak, S., & Killion, C. (2012). “Me and My Computer”: Emotional Factors in Online Learning. Nursing education perspectives, 33(2), 100-105.
  • Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (Eds.). (2009). Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (2013). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.) (1983). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of their Current Status. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • Reeves, B., & Reed, J. L. (2009). Total Engagement: Using Games and Virtual Worlds to Change the Way People Work and Businesses Compete. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications and Cambridge University Press.
  • Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Elements within the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 24-33.
  • Reeve, J. (2001). Understanding motivation and emotion. FortWorth, TX: Harcourt College.
  • Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: toward an ecological psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Salminen, M., Laarni, J., & Kallinen, K. (2006). Phasic emotional reactions to video game events: A psychophysiological investigation. Media Psychology, 8, 343-367.
  • Ravaja, N., & Kivikangas, J. M. (2008). Psychophysiology of digital game playing: The relationship of self-reported emotions with phasic physiological responses. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Measuring Behavior 2008.
  • Raudaskoski, S. (2003). The Affordances of Mobile Application. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Cost Action (Vol. 269).
  • Quinn, C. (2006). Making it matter to the learner: e-Motional e-learning. Learning Solutions magazine. Retrieved from http://www.quinnovation.com/eMotional-eLearning.pdf.
  • Quesenbery, W. (2003). The five dimensions of usability. In M. J. Alberts & B. Mazur (Eds.), Content and Complexity: Information Design in Technical Communication (pp. 81–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Prendinger, H., & Ishizuka, M. (2005). The empathic companion: A character-based interface that addresses users' affective states. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3-4), 267-285.
  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994). Human-computer interaction. Essex, UK: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd..
  • Porayska-Pomsta, K., Mavrikis, M., & Pain, H. (2008). Diagnosing and acting on student affect: the tutor’s perspective. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(1-2), 125-173.
  • Podilchak, W. (1991). Distinctions of fun, enjoyment and leisure. Leisure Studies, 10(2), 133-148.
  • Plutchik, R. (2001). The nature of emotions. American Scientist, 89, 344-350.
  • Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  • Pink, D. H. (2006). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. New York, NY: Penguin.
  • Picard, R. W., Vyzas, E., & Healey, J. (2001). Toward machine emotional intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(10), 1175-1191.
  • Picard, R. W., Papert, S., Bender, W., Blumberg, B., Breazeal, C., Cavallo, D., Machover, T., Resnick, M., Roy, D., & Strohecker, C. (2004). Affective learning - a manifesto. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 253-269.
  • Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Peterson, B. J. (2007). An instructional design model for heuristics. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University.
  • Pennington, M. C. (1996). The "cognitive-affective filter”" in teacher development: Transmission-based and interpretation-based schemas for change. System, 24(3), 337-350.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-106.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students' learning and performance: the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, Elsevier, 36(1), 36-48.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L., Stupnisky, R. H., & Raymond, P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedants and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531–549.
  • Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. Bibliothek der Universit t Konstanz.
  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals andachievement emotions:Testing a model of their joint relations with academicperformance. J ournal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115-135.
  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583-597.
  • Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2009). Goals, emotions, and emotion regulation: Perspectives of the control-value theory of achievement emotions. Human Development, 52, 357-365.
  • Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christensen, A. L. Reschley, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Pekrun, R. (2011). Emotions as drivers of learning and cognitive development. In R. A. Calvo and S. D'Mello (Eds.), New perspectives on affect and learning technologies (pp. 23-39). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Pekrun, R. (2009). Emotions at school. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 575 - 605). New York, NY: Routledge Taylor.
  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341.
  • Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology 41, 359-376.
  • Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of management information systems, 24(3), 45-77.
  • Patten, B., Arnedillo S nchez, I., & Tangney, B. (2006). Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Computers & education, 46(3), 294-308.
  • Parrott, W. G. (2004). The nature of emotion. In M. Brewer and M. Hewstone (Eds.), Emotions and motivation (pp. 5-20). Oxford, UK: Basil-Blackwell.
  • Parrott, W. G. (2001). Emotions in social psychology. London: Psychology Press.
  • Parrish, P. E. (2009). Aesthetic principles for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 511-528.
  • Parrish, P. E. (2005). Embracing the aesthetics of instructional design. Educational Technology, 45(2), 16–25.
  • Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ortony, A., Norman, D. A., & Revelle, W. (2005). Affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. In J. M. Fellous & M. A. Arbib (Eds.), Who needs emotions: The brain meets the machine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Op't Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2001). What to learn from what we feel? the role of students' emotions in the mathematics classroom. In S. Volet & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 149-167). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
  • Op't Eynde, P., & Turner, J. E. (2006). Focusing on the complexity of emotion issues in academic learning: A dynamical component systems approach. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 361-376.
  • Oliver, M. (2005). The Problem with Affordance. E-learning, 2(4), 402-413.
  • Oatley, K. (2004). The bug in the salad: the uses of emotions in computer interfaces. Interacting with Computers. Human Computer Interaction in Latin America, 16(4), 693-696.
  • O'Regan, K. (2003). Emotion and E-learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning. Networks, 7(3), 78-92.
  • Nunamaker, J. F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. M. (2001). Systems development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 89–106.
  • Nummenmaa, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2008). University students' emotions, interest and activities in a web‐based learning environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 163-178.
  • Nummenmaa, M. (2007). Emotions in a web-based learning environment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Turku.
  • Norman, D. A., Ortony, A., & Russell, D. M. (2003). Affect and machine design: Lessons for the development of autonomous machines. IBM Systems Journal, 42(1), 38-44.
  • Norman, D. A., & Ortony, A. (2003). Designers and users: Two perspectives on emotion and design. Paper presented at the Symposium on foundations of interaction design.
  • Norman, D. A. (2007). The design of future things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Norman, D. A. (2002). The design of everyday things (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic books
  • Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordances, Conventions, and Design. In Interactions, 6(3), 38-41.
  • Norman, D. A. (1998). The invisible computer: why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information appliances are the solution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Norman, D. A. (1990). Cognitive artifacts. Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego.
  • Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Moss, H., & Damasio A., (2001). Emotion, cognition, and the human brain. Academy of Sciences, 935, 98-100.
  • Morie, J. F., Williams, J., Dozois, A., & Luigi, D. P. (2005). The Fidelity of Feel: Emotional Affordance in Virtual Environments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
  • Morie, J. F., Iyer, K., Valanejad, K., Sadek, R., Miraglia, D., Milam, D., Luigi, D., Leshin, J., & Williams, J. (2003). Sensory Design for Virtual Environments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 2003 Conference.
  • Moneta, G. B., & Kekkonen‐Moneta, S. S. (2007). Affective learning in online multimedia and lecture versions of an introductory computing course. Educational Psychology, 27(1), 51-74.
  • Miller, C., Veletsianos, G., & Hooper, S. (2006). Demystifying aesthetics: An exploration of emotional design. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (CATE) conference.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 377-390.
  • Mesquita, B., Frijda, N. H., & Scherer, K. R. (1997). Culture and emotion. Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 2, 255-297.
  • McTavish, M. (2010). Affordances and recontextualizations: A multiple case study of young children's engagement with information literacy in school and out-of-school contexts. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of British Columbia.
  • McQuiggan, S. W., & Lester, J. C. (2007). Modeling and evaluating empathy in embodied companion agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4), 348-360.
  • McLeod, D. B., & Adams, V. M. (1989). Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag Publishing.
  • McLean, P. D. (1990). The triune brain in evolution: Role in paleocerebral functions. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Graphics Interface.
  • Mayring, R., & Von Rhoeneck, C. (2003). Learning emotions: The influence of affective factors on classroom learning, Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
  • Masum, S. M., & Ishizuka, M. (2005). An Affective Role Model of Software Agent for Effective Agent-based E-Learning by Interplaying between Emotions and Learning. WEBIST, 2005, 449-456
  • Martin, B. L., & Briggs, L. J. (1986). The affective and cognitive domains: Integration for instruction and research. Educational Technology.
  • Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2012). The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 150-160.
  • Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2011). The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 150–160.
  • Mao, X., & Li, Z. (2009). Implementing emotion-based user-aware e-learning. Paper presented at the CHI'09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
  • Malmivuori, M. L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 149-164.
  • Maldonado, H., Lee, J., Brave, S., Nass, C., Nakajima, H., Yamada, R., Iwamura, K., & Morishima, Y. (2005). We Learn Better Together: Enhancing eLearning with Emotional Characters. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Sixth International Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference.
  • Maier, J. R., Fadel, G. M., & Battisto, D. G. (2009). An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice. Design Studies, 30(4), 393-414.Maier, J. R., Sandel, J., & Fadel, G. M. (2008). Extending the affordance structure matrix–mapping design structure and requirements to behavior. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th International DSM Conference.
  • Maier, J. R., Ezhilan, T., & Fadel, G. M. (2007). The Affordance Structure Matrix: A Concept Exploration and Attention Directing Tool for Affordance Based Design. Paper presented at ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
  • Maier, J. R., & Fadel, G. M. (2009). Affordance Based Design Methods for Innovative Design, Redesign and Reverse Engineering. Research in Engineering Design, 20(4), 225-239.
  • Maier, J. (2011). Affordance Based Design: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Applications. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
  • MacFadden, R. J., Herie, M., Maiter, S., Dumbrill, G. (2005). Achieving high touch in high tech: A constructivist, emotionally-oriented model of web-based instruction. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 25(1/2), 21-44.
  • MacFadden, R. J. (2005). Souls on Ice: Incorporating emotion in web-based education. In R. J. MacFadden, B. Moore, M. Herie & D. Schoech (Eds.), Web-based education in the human services: Models, methods, and best practices. (pp. 79-98). New York, London, Victoria: The Haworth Press.
  • M ller, J., & K ller, O. (2001). Frame of reference effects following the announcement of exam results. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(2), 277-287.
  • Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing research, 35(6), 382-386.
  • Lynch, P., & Horton, S. (2009). Web Style Guide: Basic Design Principles for Creating Web Sites (3rd Ed.) New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Lowenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective science, pp. 619-642. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Louwerse, M. M., Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., & Mitchell, H. H. (2005). Social cues in animated conversational agents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(6), 693-704.
  • Longanecker, C. (2013). Give Your Website Soul With Emotionally Intelligent Interactions. In Smashing Magazine (Ed.), Emotional Design Elements (Smashing eBooks Series Book 40). Smashing Media GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Emotional-Design-Elements-Smashing-eBooks-ebook/dp/B00B25BI2G.
  • Lohr, L. L. (2008). Creating Graphics for Learning and Performance: Lessons in Visual Literacy (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Lisetti, C. L., & Schiano, D. J. (2000). Automatic facial expression interpretation: Where human-computer interaction, artificial intelligence and cognitive science intersect. Pragmatics & cognition, 8(1), 185-235.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69-78.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A. (2006). Emotion research in education: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the integration of affect, motivation, and cognition. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 307-314.
  • Lim, Y. K., Donaldson, J., Jung, H., Kunz, B., Royer, D., Ramalingam, S., Thirumaran, S., & Stolterman, E. (2008). Emotional experience and interaction design. In C. P. R. Beale (Ed.), Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 116-129). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Lim, C., & Yeon, E. (2009). Review of current studies in instructional design theory in Korea: major trends and future directions. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(3), 357-364.
  • Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
  • Levine, L. J., & Pizarro, D. A. (2004). Emotion and memory research: A grumpy overview. Social Cognition, 22(5), 530-554.
  • Lester, J. C., Voerman, J. L., Towns, S. G., & Callaway, C. B. (1997). Cosmo: A life-like animated pedagogical agent with deictic believability.
  • Leshin, C., Pollock, J., & Reigeluth, C. (1992). Instructional design: Strategies and tactics for improving learning and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Lepper, M. R., & Woolverton, M. (2002). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education, 135-158.
  • Leony, D., Mu oz-Merino, P. J., Pardo, A., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2013). Provision of awareness of learners’ emotions through visualizations in a computer interaction-based environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(13), 5093-5100.
  • Leontidis, M., Halatsis, C., & Grigoriadou, M. (2011). Using an affective multimedia learning framework for distance learning to motivate the learner effectively. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6(3), 223-250.
  • Lehman, R. (2006). The role of emotion in creating instructor and learner presence in the distance education experience. Journal of Cognitive Affective Learning, 2(2), 12–26.
  • Lehman, B., Matthews, M. D’Mello, S., & Person, N. (2008). What are you feeling? Investigating student affective states during expert human tutoring sessions. In B. Woolf, E. Aimeur, R. Nkambou & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 50–59). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Lee, J. (2012). Development of a visual summarizer design model for digital learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University.
  • Lee, I. (2012). Research Trends on Emotional Factors in the e-Learning Context. International Journal for Educational Media, 6, 14–22.
  • Lee H. (2013). Enhancing learner's emotional engagement through a gameful interface in E-learning systems. Unpublished Master Dissertation, KAIST.
  • LeDoux, J. E. (1998). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International journal of human-computer studies, 60(3), 269-298.
  • Laukenmann, M., Bleicher, M., Fu , S., Gl ser-Zikuda, M., Mayring, P., & Von Rh neck, C. (2003). An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 489-507.
  • Larsen, R. J., & Prizmic, Z. (2004). Affect regulation. In R. Baumeister & K. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation research (pp. 40-60). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Kytta, M. (2003). Children in Outdoor Contexts: Affordances and Independent Mobility in the Assessment of Environment Child Friendliness. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Finland: Helsinki University of Technology.
  • Kyoukanryoku de hit wo nerae. Shikaku Design Kenkyujo Co., Ltd
    Hiroyuki, U. 안상락 [2008]
  • Kurvinen, E. (2004). Emotions in action: a case in mobile visual communication. In D. McDonagh, P. Hekkert, J. van Erp & D. Gyi (Eds.) Design and emotion: the experience of everyday things. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Design and Emotion.
  • Kumar, A., Kumar, P., & Basu, S. C. (2001). Student perceptions of virtual education: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 2001 Information Resources Management Association International Conference.
  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology and Society, 5, 8-22.
  • Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R. W. (2001). An Affective Model of Interplay Between Emotions and Learning: Reengineering Educational Pedagogy-Building a Learning Companion. Paper presented at the Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.
  • Kopp, C. B. (1989). Regulation of distress and negative emotions: A developmental view. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 343355.
  • Konradt, U., Filip, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2003). Flow experience and positive affect during hypermedia learning. British journal of educational technology, 34(3), 309-327.
  • Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives - The development of an augmented re- ality platform for environmental simulations. Education Tech Research, 56, 203–228.
  • Kirschner, P. A., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 47-66.
  • Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and instruction, 12(1), 1-10.
  • Kelly, R. (2010). Online Teaching Challenge: Creating an Emotional Connection to Learning, part 1. Retrieved From http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/onlineteaching -challenge-creating-an-emotional-connection-to-learning-part-1/.
  • Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (2004) Learning motivation and e-learning design: a multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media. 29(3), 229-239.
  • Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (1988). Use of the ARCS motivation model in courseware design. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 401-434.
  • Keller, J. M. (1983). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Enschede, The Netherlands: Toegepaste Onderwijskunde, Technische Hogeshool Twente.
  • Kay, R. H., & Loverock, S. (2008). Assessing emotions related to learning new software: The computer emotion scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1605-1623.
  • Kapoor, A., Mota, S., & Picard, R. W. (2001). Towards a Learning Companion that Recognizes Affect. Retrieved from http://vismod.media.mit.edu/pub/tech-reports/TR-543.pdf.
  • Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187.
  • Juutinen, S., Huovinen, T., & Yalaho, A. (2011). Technophobia as an emotional obstacle in e-learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Ireland International.
  • Juutinen, S., & Saariluoma, P. (2010). Emotional obstacles for e-learning-a user psychological analysis. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/ 2010/Juutinen_Saariluoma.pdf.
  • Juutinen, S., & Saariluoma, P. (2007). Usability and emotional obstacles in adopting e-learning-A case study. Paper presented at the IRMA International conference.
  • Juutinen, S., & Saariluoma, P. (2006). Some emotional Obstacles of E-learning. Digital Learning New Delhi, India: IGNOU.
  • Jung, J. H., Schneider, C., & Valacich, J. (2010). Enhancing the motivational affordance of information systems: The effects of real-time performance feedback and goal setting in group collaboration environments. Management Science, 56(4), 724-742.
  • Jones, T. S., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 63-80.
  • Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395-408.
  • Jonassen, D., & Land, S. (Eds.). (2012). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial intelligence in education, 11(1), 47-78.
  • Johnson, R. R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2010). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Jenkins, J. M., Oatley, K., & Stein, N. (Eds.). (1998). Human emotions: A reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Jarvenoja, H., & Jarvela, S. (2005). How students describe the sources of their emotional and motivational experiences during the learning process: A qualitative approach. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 465–480.
  • Jang, S. (2011). An instructional support system design model for ill-structured problem-solving in online learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University.
  • J. J. Gibson의 생태학적 지각이론과 그림 이해: R. Arnheim의 이론과 비교분석을 통하여
    이모영 미학예술학연구, 19, 315-339 [2004]
  • Izard, C. E. (2001). Emotional intelligence or adaptive emotions? Emotion, 1, 249–257.
  • Izard, C. E. (1991). Psychology of emotions. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Iverson, K. M. (2005). E-learning games: Interactive learning strategies for digital delivery. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Isen, A. M. (2000). Positive affect and decision making, In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.) Handbook of Emotions, New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Isaac, J. D., Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Other people as a source of interest in an activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 239-265.
  • Human Computer Interaction(HCI)과 감정연구
    이혜리 한국영상학회논문집, 7(1), 143-160 [2009]
  • Hughes, M., Ventura, S., & Dando, M. (2007). Assessing social presence in online discussion groups: A replication study. Innovations in Education and teaching International, 44(1), 17-29.
  • Hsu, J. (2008). The secrets of storytelling. Scientific American Mind, 19(4), 46-51.
  • Horton, W. (2012). E-Learning by Design (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  • Holson, L. M. (2004). Out of Hollywood, rising fascination with video games. The New York Times on the Web. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/10/technology/10GAME.htm.
  • Hewett, T. T., Baecker, R., Card, S., Carey, T., Gasen, J., Mantei, M., Perlman, G., Strong, G., & Verplank, W. (1992). ACM SIGCHI curricula for human-computer interaction. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Herrington, J., Oliver, R. & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. 19(1), 59-71.
  • Henderson, K. A., & Ainsworth, B. E. (1999). Motivations and constraints to physical activity for African American and American Indian women: The Cross Cultural Activity Participation Study. Paper presented at the American Alliance of Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance Conference.
  • Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of educational research, 58(1), 47-77.
  • Head, A. J. (1999). Design Wise: A guide for evaluating the interface design of information resources. Information Today. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Haynes, S. N., Richard, D., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological assessment, 7(3), 238-247.
  • Hattie, J. (1992). Measuring the Effects of Schooling. Australian Journal of education, 36(1), 5-13.
  • Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91-97.
  • Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. (2012). The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Waltham, MA: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Hartson, R. (2003). Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(5), 315-338.
  • Hart, C. (2008). Literature Reviewing and Argumentation. In The Postgraduate's Companion (Eds.), Gerard Hall and Jo Longman. UK: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Hart, C. (2001). Doing a Literature Search: A Guide for the Social Sciences. London, UK: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Hargreaves, D. (2011). The challenge for the comprehensive school: culture, curriculum and community (Vol. 43). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2003). Students’ distress with a web‐based distance education course: An ethnographic study of participants’ experiences. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4(2) Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde10/articles/hara.htm.
  • Hannula, M. S. (2006). Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 165-178.
  • Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 2, 115-140.
  • Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192.
  • Hammond, M. (2009). What is an affordance and can it help us understanding the use if ICT ineducation? Education and Information Technologies, 1-13.
  • Haake, M., & Gulz, A. (2009). A look at the roles of look & roles in embodied pedagogical agents–a user preference perspective. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19(1), 39-71.
  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348.
  • Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American psychologist, 53(1), 5-26.
  • Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson's affordances. Psychological Review, 101, 336–342.
  • Gratch, J., & Marsella, S. (2004). A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Cognitive Systems Research, 5(4), 269-306.
  • Grant, J. S., & Davis, L. L. (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(3), 269-274.
  • Graesser, A. C., Rus, V., D’Mello, S. K., Jackson, G. T., Robinson, D. H., & Schraw, G. (2008). AutoTutor: Learning through natural language dialogue that adapts to the cognitive and affective states of the learner. In D. H. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 95-125). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Graesser, A. C., Chipman, P., Haynes, B. C., & Olney, A. (2005). AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 612-618.
  • Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Automated analysis of essays and open-ended verbal responses. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, Planning, Measures, and Psychometrics (pp. 307-325). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Goodyear, P. (2011). Emerging methodological challenges for educational research. In L. Markauskaite, P. Freebody & J. Irwin (Eds.), methodological choice and design: Scholarship, policy and practice in social and educational research (pp. 253-266). London, UK: Springer.
  • Goleman, D. (1997). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
  • Goldstein, E. B. (2007). Sensation and Perception (7th edition). New York, NY: Brooks Cole Publishing.
  • Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Hall, N., & Haag, l. (2006). Academic emotions from a socio-cognitive perspective: Antecedents and domain specificity of students' affect in the context of Latin instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 289-308.
  • Glaser-Zikuda, M., Fub, S., Laukenmann, M., Metz, K., & Randler, C. (2005). Promoting students’ emotions and achievement- instructional design and evaluation of the ECOLE-approach. Learning and Instruction, 15, 481-495.
  • Gillani, B. B. (2003). Learning theories and the design of e-learning environments. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  • Gielo-Perczak, K., & Karwowski, W. (2003). Ecological models of human performance based on affordance, emotion and intuition. Ergonomics, 46(1-3), 310-326.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • Geen, R. G. (1991). Social motivation. Annual review of psychology, 42(1), 377-399.
  • Gaver, W. W. (1996). Situating action II: Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111-129.
  • Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The international Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
  • Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review. Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72.
  • Garrett, J. J. (2002). The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
  • Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational Research: An Introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Galitz, W. O. (1993). User-interface screen design. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Frijda, N. H., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In H. R. Markus & S. Kitayama (Eds.), Emotion and culture (pp.51-87). New York, NY: American Psychological Association.
  • Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., L dtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Sutton, R. E. (2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 705-716.
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678-686.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review ofGeneral Psychology, 2, 300-319.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. H. (2003). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.
  • Frasson, C., & Chalfoun, P. (2010). Managing Learner's Affective States in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In R. Nkambou, J. Bourdeau & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 339-358). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Fragopanagos, N., & Taylor, J. G. (2005). Emotion recognition in human-computer interaction. Neural Networks, 18(4), 389–405.
  • Forbes-Riley, K., & Litman, D. (2011). Designing and evaluating a wizarded uncertainty-adaptive spoken dialogue tutoring system. Computer Speech & Language, 25(1), 105-126.
  • Fencott, C. (1999). Towards a Design Methodology for Virtual Environments. Paper presented at the International Workshop on User Friendly Design of Virtual Environments.
  • Feidakis, M., Daradoumis, T., & Caball , S. (2011). Emotion measurement in intelligent tutoring systems: what, when and how to measure. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS).
  • Evans, D. (2001). Emotion: The Science of Sentiment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structureand acquisition. American psychologist, 49(8), 725-747.
  • Erickson, T. (1990) 'Working with Interface Metaphors', In B. Laurel (Ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design (pp. 65-73). Reading Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Erez, A., & Isen, A. M. (2002). The influence of positive affect on the components of expectancy motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1055-1067.
  • Engelberg, D., & Seffah, A. (2002). A framework for rapid mid-fidelity prototyping of web sites. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IFIP 17th World Computer Congress - TC13 Stream on Usability: Gaining a Competitive Edge WC’2002.
  • Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2010). A guide for novice researchers: Design and development research methods. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference, InSITE.
  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1986). A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion. Motivation and emotion, 10(2), 159-168.
  • Efklides, A., Kourkoulou, A., Mitsiou, F., & Ziliaskopoulou, D. (2006). Metacognitive knowledge of effort, personality factors, and mood state: Their relationships with effort-related metacognitive experiences. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 33-49.
  • EQ - Qu es la Inteligencia Emocional. Madrid: EDAF S.A. 홍명 희 역 (1997). EQ : 감성 지능 개발 학습법
    Boeck, K. Martin, D. 서울: 해냄 [1996]
  • Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In A. Wigfield &J. S. Eccles (Eds), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57-88). London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. New York:, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Duchastel, P. (1997). A Web-based model for university instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 25, 221-228.
  • Du Boulay, B. (2011). Towards a Motivationally Intelligent Pedagogy: How Should an Intelligent Tutor Respond to the Unmotivated or the Demotivated?. In R. A. Calvo & S. D'Mello (Eds.), New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies (pp. 41-52). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Do, S. L., & Schallert, D. L. (2004). Emotions and Classroom Talk: Toward a Model of the Role of Affect in Students' Experiences of Classroom Discussions. Journal of educational psychology, 96(4), 619-634.
  • Dickey, M. D. (2011). The pragmatics of virtual worlds for K-12 educators: investigating the affordances and constraints of Active Worlds and Second Life with K-12 in-service teachers. Educational technology research and development, 59(1), 1-20.
  • Dickey, M. D. (2004). The impact of web-logs (blogs) on student perceptions of isolation and alienation in a web-based distance-learning environment. Open Learning, 19(3), 279-291.
  • Dickey, M. D. (2003). Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical affordances and constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning. Distance education, 24(1), 105-121.
  • Devine, P. G., Evett, S. R., & Vasquez-Suson, K. A. (1996). Exploring the interpersonal dynamics of intergroup contact. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context Volume Ⅲ (pp. 423–464). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., L dtke, O., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 25-35.
  • Deterding, S. (2011). Situated motivational affordances of game elements: A conceptual model. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts.
  • Desmet, P. M. A. (2002). Designing emotions. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Delft University of Technology.
  • Demir, E. (2008). The Field of Design and Emotion: Concepts, Arguments, Tools and Current Issues. METU JFA, 1(1), 135-152.
  • De Angeli, A., & Johnson, G. I. (2004). Emotional intelligence in interactive systems. In D. McDonagh, P. Hekkert, J. van Erp & D. Gyi (Eds.), Design and Emotion, (pp. 262-266) London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
  • Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Goldsmith, H. (Eds.) (2003). Handbook of affective sciences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Orcutt, S., Strobel, K., Kirsch, E., Lit, I., & Martin, D. (2003). Feelings Count: Emotions and Learning. The Learning Classroom: Theory Into Practice. Stanford University School of Education.
  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error and the future of human life.Scientific American, 271(4), 144-144.
  • D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012). AutoTutor and affective AutoTutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 2(4), 1-23.
  • D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2011). The half-life of cognitive-affective states during complex learning. Cognition & Emotion, 25(7), 1299-1308.
  • D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2009). Automatic detection of learner’s affect from gross body language. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 23, 123–150.
  • D'Mello, S. K., Lehman, B., & Graesser, A. (2011). A motivationally supportive affect-sensitive autotutor. In R. A. Calvo & S. D'Mello (Eds.), New perspectives on affect and learning technologies (pp. 113-126). Springer New York.
  • D'Mello, S. K., Craig, S. D., Witherspoon, A., McDaniel, B., & Graesser, A. (2008). Automatic  detection of learner’s affect from conversational cues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(1–2), 45–80.
  • D'Mello, S. K., & Calvo, R. (2011). Significant Accomplishments, New Challenges, and New Perspectives. In R. A. Calvo & S. D'Mello (Eds.), New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies (pp. 255-272). New York: Springer.
  • Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Praha: Lidov Noviny. Cited on page.
  • Currin, L. (2003). Feelin'groovy: experts now believe that e-learning must elicit positive emotions to succeed. eLearn Magazine October 2003.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Craig, S. D., Mello, S., Witherspoon, A. Sullins, J. & Graesser, A (2004). Emotions during learning: The first steps toward an affect sensitive intelligent tutoring system. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education.
  • Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E., Tsapatsoulis, N., Votsis, G., Kollias, S., Fellenz, W., & Taylor, J. G. (2001). Emotion recognition in human-computer interaction. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 18(1), 32-80.
  • Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to" prejudice". Journal of personality and social psychology, 88(5), 770-789.
  • Conrad, R. M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2004). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons/Jossey-Bass.
  • Conrad, R. M. (2002). Community, social presence, and engagement in online learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alberta.
  • Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies?. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(2), 113-124.
  • Conati, C., & Maclaren, H. (2009). Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(3), 267-303.
  • Conati, C. (2011). Combining cognitive appraisal and sensors for affect detection in a framework for modeling user affect. In R. Calvo & S. D'Mello (Eds.), Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Conati, C. (2002). Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16(7-8), 555-575.
  • Collie, K. R., Mitchell, D., & Murphy, L. (2000). Skills for online counseling: Maximum impact at minimum bandwidth. Cybercounseling and cyberlearning: Strategies and resources for the millennium. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
  • Cochrane, T., & Bateman, R. (2010). Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile web 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 1–14.
  • Cobb, S. (2009). Social presence and online learning: a current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3), 241-254.
  • Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, R., & Kinsel, E. (2007). Role adjustment for learners in an online community of inquiry: Identifying the challenges of incoming online learners. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 2(1), 1-16.
  • Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 13(4), 269-292.
  • Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2006). Understanding emotional presence in an online community of inquiry. Paper presented at the 12th Annual SLOAN-CALN Conference.
  • Clark, R. U., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-Learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  • Cikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
  • Churchill, D., & Churchill, N. (2008). Educational affordances of PDAs: A study of a teacher’s exploration of this technology. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1439-1450.
  • Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43-54.
  • Chuah, K. M., Chen, C. J., & Teh, C. S. (2011). Emotional affordances in virtual reality-based learning environments: Theoretical and practical consideration. Saarbr cken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
  • Chen, P., & Krauss, A. (2004). Interrater agreement. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman & T. Liao (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 512-514). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Cassarino, C. (2003). Instructional Design Principles for an eLearning Environment: Acall for definitions in the field. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(4), 455-461.
  • Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 26(6), 741-751.
  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2004). Self-regulation of action and affect. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 13-39). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Scaling back goals and recalibration of the affect system are processes in normal adaptive self-regulation: understanding ‘response shift’phenomena. Social Science & Medicine, 50(12), 1715-1722.
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: a control-process view. Psychological review, 97(1), 19-35.
  • Campos, J. J., Mumme, D. L., Kermoian, R., & Campos, R. G. (1994). A functionalist perspective on the nature of emotion. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 59(2‐3), 284-303.
  • Calvo, R. A., & D'Mello, S. K. (2010). Affect detection: An interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. Affective Computing, 1(1), 18-37.
  • Calvo, M. G., & Nummenmaa, L. (2007). Processing of unattended emotional visual scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 347-369.
  • Buxton, B. (2010). Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Burleson, W. (2011). Advancing a multimodal real-time affective sensing research platform. In R. A. Calvo & S. D'Mello (Eds.), New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies (pp. 97-112). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Burger, R. E. (1993). Color management systems. San Francisco, CA: The Color Resource.
  • Bulger, M., Mayer, R. E., & Almeroth, K. C. (2006). Engaged by design: Using simulations to promote active learning. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2006(1), 1770-1777.
  • Buff, A., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Pauli, C. (2011). Activating positive affective experiences in the classroom:“"Nice to have”" or something more?. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 452-466.
  • Buck, R. (1984). Nonverbal receiving ability. In R. Buck (Ed.), The communication of emotion (pp. 209–242). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Brown, A. R., & Voltz, B. D. (2005). Elements of effective e-learning design. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(1), 217–226.
  • Breazeal, C., & Brooks, R. (2005). ‘Robot Emotion: a functional perspective.’ In J. M. Fellous & M. A. Arbib (Eds.), Who Needs Emotions?: The Brain Meets the Robot, Series in Aff ective Science (pp. 271–210). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Brave, S., & Nass, C. (2002). Emotion in human-cㅅomputer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 53, 81-96.
  • Branham, S. (2001). Creating physical personalities for agents with faces: Modeling trait impressions of the face. Paper presented at Proceedings of the UM2001 Workshop on Attitudes, Personality, and Emotions in User-Adapted Interactions.
  • Boekaerts, M. Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self–regulation: Theory, research, and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Boekaerts, M. (2003). Towards a model that integrates motivation, affect and learning. British Psychological Society, 1(1), 173-189.
  • Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition andmotivation. European Psychologist, 1(2), 100-112.
  • Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 149-167.
  • Blanchard, E., & Frasson, C. (2004). An autonomy-oriented system design for enhancement of learner’'s motivation in e-learning. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
  • Bidwell, S., & Jensen, M. F. (2004). Using a search protocol to identify sources of information: the COSI model. Etext on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Information Resources. Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive//2060905/nichsr/ehta/ehta.html.
  • Bichelmeyer, B. A., Marken, J., Harris, T., Misanchuk, M., & Hixon, E. (2009). Fostering affective development outcomes. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base Volume III (pp. 249-273). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2013). Extending self-regulated learning to include self-regulated emotion strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 37(3), 558-573.
  • Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental Psychology (5th ed.). Toronto: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. Bell, P., & Winn, W. (2000). Distributed cognitions, by nature and by design. Theoretical foundations of learning environments, 123-145.
  • Beaird, J., Farley, J., & Simoneau, L., (2010). The principles of beautiful web design, second edition (2nd ed.). Collingwood, Vic.: SitePoint Pty.
  • Baylor, A. L., & Kim, Y. (2004). Pedagogical agent design: The impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity, and instructional role. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paragua u (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 592-603). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). Do emotions improve or hinder the decision making process? In K. D. Vohs, R. F. Baumeister, R. F. & G. Loewenstein (Eds.), Do emotions help or hurt decision making (pp. 11–31). New York, NY: Russell Sage Publications.
  • Barab, S. A., Cherkes-Julkowski, M., Swenson, R., Garrett. S., Shaw, R. E., & Young, M. (1999). Principles of self-organization: Ecologizing the learner-facilitator system. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 349-390.
  • Barab, S. A., & Roth, W. M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 3-13.
  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L., & Pyke, C. (2001). A taxonomy of student engagement with educational software: An exploration of literate thinking with electronic text. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(3), 213-234.
  • Azevedo, R., & Strain, A. C. (2011). Integrating cognitive, metacognitive, and affective regulatory processes with MetaTutor. In R. Calvo & S. D’Mello (Eds.), Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Averill, J. R. (2004). A tale of two snarks: Emotional intelligence and emotional creativity compared. Psychological Inquiry, 228-233.
  • Augustine, A. A., & Hemenover, S. H. (2009). On the relative effectiveness of affect regulation strategies: A meta-analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 1181–1220.
  • Astleitner, H., & Leutner, D. (2000). Designing instructional technology from an emotional perspective. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 497-510.
  • Astleitner, H. (2000). Designing emotionally sound instruction: The FEASP-approach. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(4), 209-219.
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in theworkplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48(2), 97-125.
  • Ashby, P. E., Baylor, A. L., Doerr, C. E., & Rosenberg-Kima, R. B. (2009). Changing middle-school students’ attitudes and performance regarding engineering with computer-based social models. Computers & Education, 53(2), 209-215.
  • Artino, A. R., & Jones II, K. D. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170-175.
  • Arroyo, I., Ferguson, K., Johns, J., Dragon, T., Mehranian, H., Fisher, D., Barto, A., Mahadevan, S., & Woolf, B. (2007). Repairing disengagement with non invasive interventions. Paper presented at the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education.
  • Arnone, M. P., & Small, R. V. (1999). Evaluating the Motivational Effectiveness of Children's Websites. Educational Technology, 39(2), 51-55.
  • Allen, M. W. (2013). Michael Allen's Guide to E-Learning: Building Interactive, Fun, and Effective Learning Programs for Any Company. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Gabriel, Y. (2001). Emotion, Learning and Organisational Change: Towards and Integration of Psychoanalytic and other perspectives. Journal of Organisational Change Management, Special Issue on ‘Organisational Change and Psychodynamics’, 14(5), 435-451.
  • Allen, M. W. (2011). Michael Allen's Online Learning Library: Successful e-Learning Interface. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect, and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 391–405.
  • Adams, C. D. (1996). Creating caring communities.' What it takes to make real change in real schools. ERIC-Paper No. ED396415.
  • 3차원 가상세계 역할놀이에서 학습자 간 상호작용에 관한 탐색적 연구
    이정은 조영환 홍서연 교육정보미디어연구, 20(1), 27-50 [2014]
  • (사이버대학의 학습전략) 스마트러닝
    박종선 서울: 교문사 [2013]