박사

유아미술창의성 측정도구 개발

박영주 2015년
논문상세정보
    • 저자 박영주
    • 기타서명 Development of artistic creativity scale for young children
    • 형태사항 26 cm: viii, 268 p.: 삽화
    • 일반주기 지도교수: 김종백, 국·영문초록수록, 부록: 교육기관 발송문. 외, 참고문헌: p. 182-231
    • 학위논문사항 홍익대학교 대학원, 학위논문(박사)-, 교육학과 교육심리전공, 2015. 2
    • DDC 22, 372.52
    • 발행지 서울
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2015
    • 발행사항 홍익대학교 대학원
    유사주제 논문( 0)

' 유아미술창의성 측정도구 개발' 의 참고문헌

  • 환경은 창의성을 어떻게 조형하는가?
    한순미 영재와 영재교육, 5(2), 167-188 [2006]
  • 홈페이지. www.kidsource.com
    자료검색일 [2013]
  • 홈페이지. www.csulb.edu
    자료검색일 [2014]
  • 홈페이지. www.criticalthinking.org
    자료검색일 [2014]
  • 홈페이지. www.britannica.co.kr
    자료검색일 [2014]
  • 한국현대미술사
    오광수 서울: 열화당 [2004]
  • 한국판 시지각 발달검사(K-DTVT)
    문수백 여광응 조용태 서울: 학지사 심리검사연구소 [2003]
  • 한국예술영재교육원 시각예술영재성의 재개념화
    서울: 계문사 [2012]
  • 한국 유,초,중등 미술표현 발달 측정을 위한 검사지 및 검사지 분석
    강병직 김영길 김정선 김정희 전성수 황연주 미술교육논총, 23(2), 101-136 [2009]
  • 한국 4, 5세 유아의 창의적 능력, 창의적 성격, 영역 창의성의 발달적 특성 연구
    이경화 유아교육연구,26(5), 191-218 [2006]
  • 퍼포먼스 미술이 유아의 창의성에 미치는 영향
    석유진 동아대학교 석사학위논문 [2014]
  • 통합적 인지와 창의적 사고의 도구 - 21세기 창의성 교육을 위한 미술교육의 역할 -
    김선아 미술교육논총,25(3), 47-70 [2011]
  • 박사
  • 초등학생용 창의적 성향 검사의 개발 및 타당화
    신문승 초등교육연구, 23(3), 267-291 [2010]
  • 체화된 인지이론이 미술교육에 주는 시사점
    강병직 미술과 교육,14(1), 73-98 [2013]
  • 체화된 인지 접근과 학문간 융합-인지과학 새 패러다임과 철학의 연결이 주는 시사
    이정모 김영정선생님 추모특집:철학사상, 38, 27-66 [2010]
  • 창의적 표현의 기회가 유아의 미술표현방식에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 중앙대학교
    오종숙 석사학위논문 [1988]
  • 창의적 문제해결 모형을 적용한 미술활동이 영재와 일반아동의 창의력, 공간능력, 도형유추능력에 미치는 영향
    최인혁 순천향대학교 박사학위논문 [2010]
  • 창의성과 학습동기의 관계
    강현숙 박병기 이영신 교육심리연구, 20(3), 651-678 [2006]
  • 창의성과 비판적 사고
    김영정 인지과학,13(4), 81-90 [2002]
  • 창의성 측정도구 TCT-DP의 한국유아 적용가능성 검증
    채선희 홍용희 교육평가연구, 14(2), 109-126 [2001]
  • 창의성 증진을 위한 교사역할 인식과 유아의 창의성
    박숙희 한국영유아보육학,56, 151-170 [2008]
  • 창의성 영역문제의 탐색 및 재접근
    한기순 영재교육연구,15(2), 1-34 [2005]
  • 박사
  • 창의성 교육
    성진숙 이혜주 조연순 서울: 이화여자대학교출판부 [2011]
  • 창의성 검사에 대한 심리측정학적 접근의 한계와 대안
    이신동 창의력 교육연구,4(1), 57-72 [2001]
  • 창의성 검사-창의성 계발을 위한 창의성 검사의 이해와 활용
    이종구 최인수 서울: 한국가이던스 [2004]
  • 창의력 교육의 실천과제: 교사의 입장을 중심으로 , 아동교육,9(1), 1-10김춘일, 김성구 (2001). 유아를 위한 미술교육
    김춘일 서울: 미진사 [2000]
  • 창의-인성교육프로그램 개발을 위한 유아의 창의성과 교육기관 적응의 관계연구. 한국유아교육
    박성희 박정희 보육행정연구, 15(4), 171-187 [2011]
  • 집과 컵의 입체 및 평면모형에 따른 유아의 그리기분석
    정향숙 중앙대학교 석사학위논문 [2001]
  • 종이조형 활동의 창의성 발달에 관한 연구: 유아기의 종이접기를 중심으로. 계명대학교
    윤영남 석사학위논문 [2009]
  • 조형도예표현력 측정도구 개발연구
    이진복 국민대학교 박사학위논문 [2013]
  • 점토를 활용한 입체표현이 만 5세 유아의 창의성에 미치는 영향. 숭실대학교
    공하영 석사학위논문 [2014]
  • 자유놀이 시간의 적목활동, 소꿉, 적목 영역에서의 자유놀이 운영. 제 2회 회원을 위한 워크샵, 새세대 육영회 부설 연수원
    지혜련 재인용 [1987]
  • 인지적 다원론과 시각예술교육
    백경미 미술과 교육,6(1), 99-117 [2005]
  • 인지와 창의성교육
    김재은 이연섭 홍순정 서울: 한국방송통신대학교 출판부 [2009]
  • 인지양식과 메타인지가 대학생의 정보탐색행위에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교
    최문정 박사학위논문 [2013]
  • 인지심리학
    Eysenck, Michael W 서울: 학지사 [2009]
  • 음악활동에서 관찰된 유아의 사회성 평가를 위한 측정도구 개발
    장혜원 숙명여자대학교 박사학위논문 [2009]
  • 유치원 수준별 교육과정 개발 방향 모색
    김석우 명선우 손원경 송연숙 이경화 정혜영 황해익 열린유아교육연구, 6(3), 157-180 [2001]
  • 유아의 창의적 특성과 교육적 시사
    최인수 미래유아교육학회지, 8(2), 103-29 [2001]
  • 유아의 창의적 성향의 놀이 행동 평가 도구 개발
    황윤세 유아교육연구, 28(4). 99-125 [2008]
  • 유아의 창의성과 그 관련 변인에 관한 연구
    김호 미래유아교육학회지, 13(1), 141-167 [2006]
  • 유아의 창의성과 관련된 교사와 유아 변인 탐색
    김호 노영희 열린유아교육연구, 12(4), 255-278 [2007]
  • 유아의 그리기표상능력의 바달 특성과 인지능력 및 재인기억과의 관계
    채영란 전남대학교 박사학위논문 [2007]
  • 유아의 감성지능과 창의성의 관련성 연구
    이영석 최종욱 미래유아교육학회지, 10(4), 139-172 [2003]
  • 유아용 통합창의성검사
    이경화 서울: 세종영재교육연구원 [2012]
  • 유아용 창의성 측정도구에 관한 고찰
    최인수 유아교육연구, 20(2), 139-167 [2000]
  • 유아발달
    조형숙 서울: 학지사 [2013]
  • 유아미술의 이해와 지도
    전성수 서울: 형설 [2012]
  • 유아미술과 수학 통합활동이 그리기 표상능력과 공간능력에 미치는 영향
    나명심 전남대학교 석사학위논문 [2007]
  • 유아를 위한 균형적 미술프로그램의 개발 및 효과
    윤현숙 유아교육학논집, 10(4), 25-49 [2006]
  • 유아들의 놀이와 수렴적 사고 및 확산적 사고의 기교에 관한 연구
    김숙이 한국아동학회 2008년도 학술대회발표 자료집, 107-108 [2008]
  • 유아교육기관에서 유아미술 교육의 운영실태: 경기도 유치원, 보육시설, 사설 미술학원을 중심으로
    신경숙 경원대학교 석사학위논문 [2006]
  • 박사
  • 유아교육개론
    김수향 서울: 양서원 [2009]
  • 유아교유기관의 창의적 역량 측정도구 개발 및 타당화
    김수영 정나영 유아교육연구, 33(3), 423-437 [2013]
  • 유아교실에서 발생하는 몰입과 미적경험: 자유선택활동시간을 중심으로
    오정희 최남정 유아교육연구,30(1), 173-197 [2010]
  • 유아 창의성 연구의 동향
    백진옥 이경화 GlobalCreativeLeader,2(1), 42-60 [2012]
  • 유아 종합 창의성 검사,전문가 지침서
    전경원 서울: 학지사 [2000]
  • 유아 음악적 창의성 검사도구의 개발 및 타당화
    김미영 전남대학교 박사학위논문 [2010]
  • 유아 미술성향 검사도구 타당화 연구
    지성애 유아교육연구.31(5), 277-298 [2011]
  • 유아 미술과 과학 통합활동이 과학적 문제해결력에 미치는 영향
    안경희 경인교육대학교 석사학위논문 [2008]
  • 유아 도형 창의성 검사 전문가 지침서
    전경원 서울: 학지사 [2001]
  • 유아 공간능력의 측정도구 개발
    홍혜경 유아교육연구, 21(4), 189-210 [2001]
  • 유 아동의 주제선호도 및 색채선호도에 관한 조사연구 : 6~7세의 자유화를 중심으로
    성경희 대구대학교 석사학위논문 [2004]
  • 예술적 창의성과 과학적 창의성
    김영정 대한토목학회지,53(8), 126-132 [2005]
  • 예술, 놀이: 자연탐색활동을 통한 과학-미술통합활동이 유아의 과학적 탐구능력과 그리기표상능력 및 자연친화적 태도에 미치는 영향
    채영란 한국유아교육학회 정기학술대회 논문집, 445-460 [2013]
  • 어린이집 교사의 미술활동 지도에 대한 탐색
    유영옥 교육인류학연구, 12(1), 65-103 [2009]
  • 알랭의 미적교육론: 인간이해에 대한 미학적 조명
    김영숙 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문 [1987]
  • 아동의 상상력 발달
    강승희 박동섭 허승희 서울: 학지사 [1999]
  • 아동발달의 평가와 측정
    이은해 서울: 교문사 [1995]
  • 시각적 사고를 활용한 창의성 신장 방안에 관한 이론적 연구
    이모영 미술교육논총, 20(3), 47-74 [2006]
  • 박사
  • 소집단 종이접기활동이 유아의 공간지각력 • 사회성 • 언어능력에 미치는 효과
    윤지은 중앙대학교 석사학위논문 [2012]
  • 서양미술사Ⅰ:고전예술편
    진중권 서울: 휴머니스트 [2008]
  • 사회복지조사방법론
    김영종 서울: 학지사 [2007]
  • 사고력 증진을 위한 프로그램 개발 연구
    허경철 계명행동과학, 4(1), 161-181 [1991]
  • 비판적 사고와 창의적 문제해결
    서민규 한국교양교육학회 학술대회자료집, 6, 251-262 [2012]
  • 부모의 양육태도와 유아의 창의성과의 관계
    최영희 최익정 한국지역사회생활과학회지, 15(3), 63-70 [2004]
  • 미학적 앎의 양식에 근거한 미술적 지식의 교육적 함의 - Eisner의 미학적 인식론을 중심으로 -
    이자현 조형교육,33, 429-457 [2009]
  • 박사
  • 미적 상상력의 다원성 고찰
    심락현 인문과학연구, 34, 345-371 [2012]
  • 미술활동에서 상상표현의 교수-학습방법
    장동호 미술교육연구논총, 25, 77-98 [2009]
  • 미술학습에서 비판적 사고의 검사
    최기호 미술교육논총, 27(3), 161-186 [2013]
  • 미술적 창의성에 대한 탐구
    김황기 미술교육논총, 24(3), 21-40 [2010]
  • 박사
  • 미술작품 감상활동이 유아의 창의성 발달에 미치는 영향
    박화윤 아동학회지, 22(2), 277-290 [2001]
  • 미술의 잠재적 공간: 창의력, 감응과 관습에 대한 도전(Addison, N, 2012 번역)
    최옥희 미술과 교육, 13(1), 21-38 [2012]
  • 박사
  • 미술교육에서 창의성에 관한 담론 고찰
    안금희 미술교육논총, 28,109-141 [2010]
  • 미술교육에서 창의성 연구의 관점과 접근 방안
    손지현 미술교육논총, 25(2), 1-30 [2011]
  • 박사
  • 미술과교육평가에 관한 연구
    이주연 조형교육, 21, 211-204 [2003]
  • 박사
  • 미술과 실기작품 평가에서 객관적 기준의 문제
    김수현 중등교육연구,6, 75-193 [1994]
  • 미술과 수학통합 활동이 유아의 수표상 능력에 미치는 영향
    변경애 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문 [2007]
  • 미술과 수학의 통합활동이 유아의 수학능력에 미치는 영향
    안선영 경인교육대학교 석사학위논문 [2013]
  • 미술 활동을 통해 나타나는 유아의 창의성에 관한 연구
    박성희 경남대학교 석사학위논문 [2011]
  • 무용정서표현성 구인 탐색 및 측정도구개발
    박현정 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문 [2009]
  • 명화와 음악 감상을 통합한 유아 동작교육 프로그램개발
    강설순 성지현 유아교육연구,32(5), 27-51 [2012]
  • 박사
  • 박사
  • 마음의 탐구
    김정오 서울: 시그마프레스 [2011]
  • 마르셀뒤샹의 창의성발달요인분석: 인성 및 환경요인을 중심으로
    문지원 서울대학교 석사학위논문 [2012]
  • 로웬펠트의 아동화발달단계 특징에 따른 우리나라 아동화발달단계 특징: 전도식기 평면표현발달특징을 중심으로
    박영주 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문 [2005]
  • 디자인 표현능력측정도구 개발연구, 초등학교 기초디자인영역을 중심으로
    안수나 서울교대 석사학위논문 [2003]
  • 디자인 창의성 평가도구 개발: 아동을 중심으로
    김은주 전북대학교 박사학위논문 [2007]
  • 두뇌구조학적 측면에서 본 정서지능과 창의적 사고와의 관계
    김경미 대한사고개발학회 2006년도 학술발표대회 발표논문집, 225-248 [2006]
  • 동화책을 활용한 그리 표상활동이 유아의 창의성 증진에 미치는 효과
    신은숙 숭실대학교 석사학위논문 [2014]
  • 동서양의 하모니를 위한 창의학
    전경원 서울: 학문사 [2005]
  • 대학생의 고용가능성 진단 도구 개발
    김성남 서울대학교 박사학위논문 [2009]
  • 다중지능이론에 기초한 유아 미술교육프로그램의 효과
    지성애 한국영유아보육학, 42, 181-207 [2005]
  • 다원적 근거에 기초한 창의성 진단 측정도구의 개발 및 타당화 연구. 숙명여자대학교
    김혜숙 박사학위논문 [1998]
  • 놀이미술을 통한 창의성 신장에 관한 연구: 6,7세 유아 중심으로
    김영화 전주대학교 석사학위논문 [2009]
  • 내가 만든 거 멋지지 않니?
    박영주 한국조형교육학회 창립 30주년 기념 논문집, 꼭 읽어야할 한국미술교육 40선(pp 341-354). 서울: 미진사 [2014]
  • 내, 외재도익 유형과 Big-5성격요인과의 관계연구
    송선희 최형주 하대현 한국교육학 연구, 10(1), 125-150 [2004]
  • 박사
  • 구조방정식모형
    최이규 서울: 무역정영사 [2006]
  • 교육학 주제별 용어사전
    김진희 이기문 서울: 지구문화사 [2001]
  • 교육과학기술부. 권준범 미술활동에 내재된 심리치료 요인에 대한 연구
    사향미술교육논총, 10, 21-42 [2003]
  • 교육과학기술부 2007년 개정 유치원 교유과정
    교육과학기술부 [2008]
  • 교육 만족도 조사 도구 개발 연구
    김영환 문수백 홍상황 서울: 학지사 [2013]
  • 과학 창의성 검사도구 개발과 과학영재아의 뇌기능분석. 한국교원대학교 대학원
    박경희 박사학위논문 [2004]
  • 경기지역 유치원의 유아미술활동 실태
    유경숙 유아교육,23(1), 5-27 [2014]
  • ひらめき腦をつくるパズル“デザインQ”, 馬場雄二, 이경덕 역
    Kenichiro, M. 서울; 브레인 월드 [2007]
  • 『사고력: 이론, 개발과 수업』
    김영채 서울: 교육과학사 [2004]
  • 『SPSS/AMOS 통계분석방법』
    송지준 서울: 21세기사 [2011]
  • Zimmerman, E. (2009). Reconceptualizing the role of creativity in arteducation theory and practice. Studies in Art Education, 50(4),382-399.
  • Zeki, S. (2001). Artistic creativity and the brain. Science, 293, 51-52.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need noinferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175.
  • Young, J. (2009). Moral panic its origins in resistance, ressentiment andthe translation of fantasy into reality. British Journal ofCriminology, 49(1), 4-16.
  • Yokochi, S., & Okada, T. (2005). Creative cognitive process of art making:A field study of a traditional chinese ink painter. Creativity ResearchJournal , 17(2-3), 241-255.
  • Wright, S. K. (1994). Assessment in the arts: is it appropriate in the earlychildhood years?. Studies in Art Education, 36, 28-43.
  • Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An interactionist model ofcreative behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior , 24(4), 279-290.
  • Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1989). Individual differences increativity: An interactionist perspective. In J. Glover, R. Ronning &C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Assessment, research,and theory, (pp. 3-32), NY: Plenum Press.
  • Winner, E. (1993). Exceptional artistic development: The role of visualthinking. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 27(4), 31-44.
  • Winner, E. (1982). Invented Worlds: The Psychology of the Arts. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Lewis, D. J. (1954). Afactor-analytic study of creative-thinking abilities. Psychometrika,19(4), 297-311.
  • Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). Themeasurement of individual differences in originality. PsychologicalBulletin, 50(5), 362-370.
  • Wilson, N. (2010). Social creativity: re-qualifying the creative economy.International journal of cultural policy, 16(3), 367-381.
  • Wilson, B. (1996). Arts standards and fragmentation: A strategy for holisticassessment. Arts Education Policy Review, 98(2), 2-9.
  • Wilner, E. (1975). Gathering the winds: Visionary imagination andradical transformation of self and society. Baltimore, Maryland: JohnsHopkins University Press.
  • Williams, Q. R., & Kamii, C. (1986). How do children learn by handlingobjects?. Young Children, 42(1), 23-26.
  • Williams, H. (1983). Perceptual and motor development. Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Why fly? : a philosophy of creativity. Norwood,NJ, Ablex. 이종연역(2005)
    Torrance, E. P. 서울; 학지사 [1995]
  • White, D. A., & Robinson, R. (2001). Critical thinking and artistic creation.Journal of Aesthetic Education, 35(2), 77-85.
  • Wheatley, C. (2001). Visual perceptual aspects of driving. PhysicalDisabilities, 24(3), 1-4.
  • Wexler?Sherman, C., Gardner, H., & Feldman, D. H. (1988). A pluralisticview of early assessment: The project spectrum approach. Theoryinto Practice, 27(1), 77-83.
  • Welsh, G. S. (1975). Creativity and intelligence: A personality approach.institute for research in social science. Chapel Hill, NC: Universityof North Carolina Press.
  • Wellman, H. M., Hickling, A. K., & Schult, C. A. (1997). Young children'spsychological, physical, and biological explanations. New Directionsfor Child and Adolescent Development, 1997 (75), 7-26.
  • Wellhousen, K., & Kieff, J. E. (2001). A constructivist approach to blockplay in early childhood. NY: Delmar, Thomson Learning.
  • Weisberg. R.(2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problemsolving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley&Sons.
  • Weisberg. R. (1988). Problem solving and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychologicalperspectives, (pp. 148-176), NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weisberg. R. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. NY: Freeman.
  • Weisberg, P. S., & Springer, K. J. (1961). Environmental factors increative function: A study of gifted children. Archives of GeneralPsychiatry, 5(6), 554-564.
  • Webster, P. R. (1977). A factor of intellect approach to creative thinkingin music. Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.
  • Was ist ein k?nstler . Genie-Heilsbringer-Antik?nstler.Deubner K?ln. 조이한, 김정근 역, 2010
    Krieger, V. 서울: 휴머니스트 [2007]
  • Warren, M. (1993). A hierarchical model for evaluation and treatment ofvisual perceptual dysfunction in adult acquired brain injury, part 1~2.American J ournal of Occupational Therapy, 47(1), 42-66.
  • Warnock, M. (1977). Educating the imagination. Royal Institute ofPhilosophy Lectures, 11, 44-60.
  • Ward, W. C. (1969). Creativity and environmental cues in nursery schoolchildren. Developmental Psychology, 1(5), 543-547.
  • Walton, K. L. (1993). How marvelous! Toward a theory of aesthetic value.Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 51(3), 499-510.
  • Wallas. G. (1926). The art of thought. NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.
  • Vygotsky, L. S.(2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal ofRussian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7-97.
  • Vygotsky, L. S.(1980). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 5(3), 6-18.
  • Visual thinking (Vol. 3). Oakland
    Arnheim, R. CA: University ofCalifornia Press, 김정오 역(2004), 서울; 이화여대출판부 [1972]
  • Vidal, R. V. V. (2004). The vision conference: Facilitating creativeprocesses. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(5), 385-405.
  • Vaugham, M. M. (1977). Musical creativity: its cultivation andmeasurement. Council for Research in Music Education, 50, 72-77.
  • Van Gundy. A. B. (1987). Creative problem solving; a guide for trainersand management. NY: Greenwood Press.
  • Van Camp, J. C. (2007). Originality in postmodern appropriation art. TheJournal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 36(4), 247-258.
  • Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G.(1996). Test for creative thinking-drawingproduction (TCT-DP). Frankfurt, Germany: Swets Test Services.
  • Urban, K. K. (2007). Assessing creativity: A componential model. In A-GTan, (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers, (pp. 167-186),Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte.
  • Urban, K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6(2), 272-280.
  • Urban, K. K. (2004). Assessing creativity: The test for creativethinking-drawing production (TCT-DP) the concept, application,evaluation, and international studies. Psychology Science, 46(3),387-397.
  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10.
  • Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson. C. (2002).Assessing creativity: A guide for educators. Storrs, CT: TheNational Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University ofConnecticut.
  • Treffinger, D. J. (1996). Dimensions of creativity. Sarasota, FL: Centerfor Creative Learning.
  • Torrance창의력 검사(도형)요강
    김영채 대구광역시: FPSP/현곡, R & D [2000]
  • Torrance,E.P.(1962).Guiding creative talent.Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1998). Torrance tests of creative thinking:Norms-technical manual: Figural (streamlined) forms A & B.Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1990). The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms?technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville,IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1988). Creativity as manifest in testing. In R. J.Sternverg,(Ed), The nature of creativity, (pp43-75), NY; CambridgeUniversity Press.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creativethinking-norms-technical manual research edition-verbal tests,forms A and B- figural tests, forms A and B. Princeton, NJ:Personnel Press.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1967). Understanding the fourth grade slump increative thinking: Final report. Athens, GA: University of GeorgiaPress.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1963). Education and the creative potential (Vol. 167).Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1959). Current research on the nature of creative talent.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 309-316.
  • Tomkins, S. S. (2008). Affect imagery consciousness: The CompleteEdition (Vol. 2). NY: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Tolstoy, L. (1899). What is art? Retrieved fromhttp://www.csulb.edu/~jvancamp/361r14.html.
  • Thurston, B. J., & Runco, M. A. (1999). Flexibility. In M. A. Runco & S.Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, (pp. 729?732). San Diego,CA: Academic Press.
  • The arts and the creation of mind
    Eisner, E. W. London: YaleUniversity Press. 강현석, 김혜숙, 박승배, 손민호, 이은적, 이자현, 황연주 공역(2007), 서울: 아카데미프레스 [2002]
  • Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., & Klein, S. R. (1997). Influences oforganizational culture and climate on individual creativity. TheJournal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 27-41.
  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. NY: Macmillan.
  • TCT-DP A형과 B형의 동형성 검증 : 대학생을 중심으로
    박숙희 창의력교육연구, 9(2), 113-125 [2009]
  • Strayer, J., & Roberts, W. (2004). Children's anger, emotionalexpressiveness, and empathy: Relations with parents’ empathy,emotional expressiveness, and parenting practices. SocialDevelopment, 13(2), 229-254.
  • Stokes, D. (2014). The role of imagination in creativity. In E. S. Paul andS. B. Kauffman(eds.) The Philosophy of Creativity: New Essays, (pp.157-198), NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Stevenson, L. (2003). Twelve conceptions of imagination. The BritishJournal of Aesthetics, 43(3), 238-259.
  • Sternberg, R. J., Forsyth, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R.K., Williams, W. M., Snook, S. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. et al. (2000).Practical intelligence in everyday life. NY: Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. L. (1996). Investing in creativity. AmericanPsychologist, 51, 677-688.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Sketch of a componential sub-theory of humanintelligence. In J. C. Kaufman, & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Theessential Sternberg: Essays on intelligence, psychology andeducation, (pp. 3-31). NY: Springer.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Thinking styles. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J.Sternberg(Ed.), The nature of creativity, (pp. 125-147), NY:Cambridge University Press.
  • Steinberg, D., & DeLoache, J. S. (1986). Preschool children's sensitivity toartistic style in paintings. Visual Arts Research, 12, 1-10.
  • Starkweather, E. K. (1964). Problems in the measurement of creativity inpreschool children. J ournal of Educational Measurement, 1(2),109-113.
  • Sroufe, L. A.(1997). Emotional development: The organization ofemotional life in the early years. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Solso, R. L. (1996). Cognition and the visual arts. Cambridge, Mass: MITpress.
  • Sobel, R. S., & Rothenberg, A. (1980). Artistic creation as stimulated bysuperimposed versus separated visual images. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 39(5), 953-961.
  • Sobel, D. M. (2006). How fantasy benefits young children's understandingof pretense. Developmental Science, 9(1), 63-75.
  • Simpson, R. M. (1922). Creative imagination. The American Journal ofPsychology, 33, 234-243.
  • Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, andsocial aspects. American psychologist, 55(1), 151-158.
  • Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership, and chance. In R. J.Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporarypsychological perspectives, (pp. 325-339), NY: Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Simon, H. (1986). The role of attention in cognition. In S. Friedman, K.Klivington and R. Peterson (Eds.), The brain, cognition andeducation. (pp. 105-120). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Sibley, F. (1965). Aesthetic and non-aesthetic. The Philosophical Review,74, 135-159.
  • Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensionalobjects. Science, 171, 701-703.
  • Seels, B. A. (1994). Visual literacy: The definition problem. In D. M. Moore & F. M. Dwyer (Eds.), Visual literacy: A spectrum of visual learning (pp. 97–112). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Scriven, M. & Paul, R. (1991). Goals of the national council forexcellence in critical thinking instruction. Santa Rosa, CA.:Foundation for Critical Thinking: Retrieved fromhttp://www.criticalthinking.org.
  • Schneck, C. M. (2001). Visual perception. In J. Case-Smith, A. S. Allen, &P. N. Pratt(Eds.), Occupational therapy for children(4th ed), (pp.382-411). St. Louis, MS: Mosby.
  • Schirrmacher, R. (2006). Art and creative development for youngchildren, (5th ed), NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
  • Savva, A., & Trimis, E. (2005). Responses of young children tocontemporary art exhibits: The role of artistic experiences.International journal of Education and the Arts, 6(13), 1-22.
  • Savva, A. (2003). Young pupils' responses to adult works of art.Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(3), 300-313.
  • Satisfaction : The science of finding true fulfillment,NY; Henry Holt and Company, 권준수 역
    Berns, G. 서울: 북섬 [2005]
  • Santa, J. L. (1977). Spatial transformations of words and pictures. Journalof Experimental Psychology- Human Learning and Memory, 3(4),418-427.
  • SPSS/AMOS를 이용한 알기 쉬운 통계분석
    성태제 서울: 학지사 [2010]
  • Russ, S. W. (2001). Primary-process thinking and creativity: Affect andcognition. Creativity Research Journal, 13(1), 27-35.
  • Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play inthe creative process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
  • Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development andpsychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. CreativityResearch J ournal, 13(3-4), 393-400.
  • Runco, M. A., & Bahleda, M. D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic,scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior,20(2), 93-98.
  • Runco, M. A. (2007). Achievement sometimes requires creativity. HighAbility Studies, 18(1), 75-77.
  • Runco, M. A. (2004). Everyone has creative potential. In R. J. Sternberg,E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential torealization, (pp. 21-30), Washington, DC: American PsychologicalAssociation.
  • Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: definition and developmentalissues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3?30.
  • Rowe, A. J. (2004). Creative intelligence. Discovering the innovativepotential in ourselves and others. Saddle River, NJ: PearsonEducation, Inc.
  • Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1995). Correlationsbetween avocations, scientific style, work habits, and professionalimpact of scientists. Creativity Research J ournal, 8(2), 115-137.
  • Rodin, A., & Gsell, P. (1984). Art: Conversations with Paul Gsell (No.26). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  • Robinson, J. (2007). Expression and expressiveness in art. PostgraduateJournal of Aesthetics, 4(2), 19-41.
  • Rimm, S. (1983). Identifying creativity (Part I). Gifted Children Today, 27,34-37.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1995). Oneself as another. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPress.
  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
  • Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The assessment of creative productsin programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly,35(3), 128-134.
  • Read, H. (1974). Education through art. London: Random House.
  • Pufal-Struzik, I. (1993). Differences in personality and self-knowledge ofcreative persons at different ages: A comparative analysis.Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 13(1-2), 71-90.
  • Puccio, G. J., & Murdock, M. C. (1999). Creativity assessment: Readingsand resources. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation Press.
  • Psouni, E., & Apetroaia, A. (2014). Measuring scripted attachment-relatedknowledge in middle childhood: The secure base script test.Attachment & Human Development, 16(1), 22-41.
  • Powell, G. (1972). Coleridge's "Imagination" and the infinite regress ofconsciousness. English Literary History, 39, 266-278.
  • Popovich, K. (2006). Exemplary content, curriculum, and assessment in arteducation. Art Education. 59(6), 33-39.
  • Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses ofTorrance's (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity ResearchJournal , 12(2), 103-114.
  • Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for contentgenerality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179-182.
  • Piaget, J. (1962). The relation of affectivity to intelligence in the mentaldevelopment of the child. Bulletin of Menninger Clinic, 26, 129-137.
  • Piaget, J. & Inhelder. B. (1969). The psychology of the child, NY: NewYork Books, Inc.
  • Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories toeducation mind. NY: Basic Books.
  • Perkins, D. N. (1988). Creativity and the quest for mechanism. In R. J.Sternberg & E. E, Smith (Eds). The psychology of human thought,(pp. 309-336). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pavlou, V., & Kambouri, M. (2007). Pupils' attitudes towards art teachingin primary school: an evaluation tool. Studies in EducationalEvaluation, 33(4), 282-301.
  • Parsons, M., Johnston, M., & Durham, R. (1978). Developmental stages inchildren's aesthetic responses. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 12(1),83-104.
  • Parsons, M. (1982). Aesthetic development. In J. M. Broughton & D. J.Freeman-Moir (eds.): The cognitive developmental psychology ofJames Mark Baldwin: Current theory and research in geneticepistemology, (pp. 389-433), Norwood, NJ: Ablex, S.
  • Park, E. D. (1995). Children's drawings of model houses : A developmentalstudy, Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign.
  • Osborne, H. (1982). Expressiveness in the arts. Journal of Aesthetics andArt Criticism, 41(1), 19-26.
  • Oakley, J. (1993). Morality and the emotions. London: Routledge.
  • O'Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (2006). Using the creative product semanticscale as a metric for results oriented business. Creativity andInnovation Management, 15(1), 34-44.
  • Novick, R. (1998). The comfort corner: Fostering resiliency and emotionalintelligence. Childhood Education, 74(4), 200-204.
  • Myszkowski, N., Storme, M., Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2014). Is visualaesthetic sensitivity independent from intelligence, personality andcreativity?. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 16-20.
  • Mumford, M. D. (2001). Something old, something new: RevisitingGuilford's conception of creative problem solving. CreativityResearch J ournal, 13(3-4), 267-276.
  • Moran, J. D. Ⅲ. (1988). Creativity in young children. MA: ERIC Digest.Retrieved from http://www.kidsource.com.
  • Meyers, H. M., & Gerstman, R. (2007). Creativity. Unconventionalwisdom from 20 accomplished minds. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Meusburger, P. (2009). Milieus of creativity: The role of places,environments, and spatial contexts. In P. Meusburger, J. Funke, & E.Wunder (Eds.): Milieus of creativity. An interdisciplinary approachto spatiality of creativity, (pp. 97-153), Dordrecht, Netherlands:Springer.
  • Meier, N. C. (1963). The Meier art tests, Bureau of educationalresearch and service. Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa.
  • Meier, N. C. (1928). A measure of art talent. Psychological monographs:General and Applied, 39(2), 184-199.
  • Meeker, M. (1978). Measuring creativity from the child’s point of view.The Journal of Creative Behavior, 12(1), 52-62.
  • McMillan, J. H. (2007). Classroom assessment. principles and practicesfor effective instruction. (4th ed). Boston. MA: Pearson.
  • McManus, I. C., & Furnham, A. (2006). Aesthetic activities and aestheticattitudes: Influences of education, background and personality oninterest and involvement in the arts. British Journal of Psychology,97(4), 555-587.
  • McKim, R. H. (1980). Experiences in visual thinking. 2th, Boston, MA:PWS Publishing.
  • McFee, J. K. (1998). Cultural diversity and the structure and practice ofart education. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association(NAEA).
  • McFee, J. K. (1968). Editorial: Why do we teach art in the publicschools?. Studies in Art Education, 9(2), 1-4.
  • McFarland, T. (1986). Imagination and its cognates. Studies in theLiterary Imagination, 19(2), 35-50.
  • Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R.(2004). Emotional intelligence: theory,findings, and implications, Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197-215.
  • Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional intelligence:new ability or eclectic traits?. American Psychologist, 63(6), 503-517.
  • Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P.Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotionalintelligence: Educational implications, (pp. 3?31), NY: Basic Books.
  • Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1995). Emotional intelligence and theconstruction and regulation of feelings. Applied and PreventivePsychology, 4(3), 197-208.
  • Mayer, J. D., & Hanson, E. (1995). Mood-congruent judgment over time.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 237-244.
  • Matthews, J. (2003). Drawing and painting: Children and visualrepresentation. London: Paul Chapman.
  • Martin, M., & Rubin, R. B. (1994). Development of a communicationflexibility scale. Southern Communication Journal , 59, 171-178.
  • Markman. E. M. (1978). Empirical versus logical solutions to part-wholecomparison problems concerning classes and collections. ChildDevelopment, 49, 168-177.
  • Markham, S. (1954). An item analysis of children's drawings of a house.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10(2), 185-187.
  • Mansfield, R. S., & Busse, T. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity anddiscovery: Scientists and their work. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
  • Malchiodi C. A. (1998). Understanding children’s drawings. NY: TheGuilford Press.
  • Mace, M. A., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: Agrounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making.Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 179-192.
  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Poweranalysis and determination of sample size for covariance structuremodeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.
  • Lubart, T. (2010). Cross-cultural perspective on creativity. In J. C.Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (eds), The cambridge handbook ofcreativity, (pp. 48-73). NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, L.(1987). Creative and mental growth. 8th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Lowenfeld, V. (1957). Creative and mental growth. (3rd edition), NY: TheMacmillan Co.
  • Lopes, D. M. (2005). Sight and sensibility. NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor,path, and structural analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
  • Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
  • Lingemann, L. S. (1982). Assessing creativity from a diagnosticperspective: the creative attribute profile. Master Thesis ofUniversity of Wisconsin?Madison.
  • Lindstrom, M. (1957). Children's art: A study of normal development inchildren's modes of visualization. Berkeley, CA: University ofCalifornia Press.
  • Lewis, H. P., & Mussen, P. H. (1969). The development of an instrumentfor evaluating children's artistic creativity. Studies in Art Education,10(3), 25-48.
  • Lessing, A. (1965). What is wrong with a forgery?. Journal of Aestheticsand Art Criticism, 23, 461-471.
  • Languages of art: An approach to a theory ofsymbol. Indianapolis, Indiana: Bobbs-Merrill Company. 김혜숙외(2002)
    Goodman, N. 서울: 이화여대출판부 [1968]
  • Langer. E. J. (2007). On becoming an artist: Reinventing yourselfthrough mindful creativity. 2th. NY: Random House Inc.
  • Kupperman, J. J. (1972). Aesthetic value. American philosophicalquarterly, 9(3), 259-264.
  • Krechevsky, M. (1998). Project spectrum: Preschool assessmenthandbook. Project Zero frameworks for early childhood education,Vol. 3, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Kostelnik, M. J., Soderman, A. K., & Whiren, A. P. (2007).Developmentally appropriate programs in early childhood education.(4th ed), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equationmodeling. NY: The Gilford press.
  • Klein. K. J., Bliese P. D., Kozolowski S. W. J., Dansereau. F., Gavin. M.B., & Griffin. M. A., et al. (2000). Multi level analytical techniques:Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. In K. J Klein &S. W. J. Kozlowski (eds). Multi level theory, research, and methodsin organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, (pp.512-553). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3–14.
  • Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education. 3rd ed, London:Routledge.
  • Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativityassessment. (Vol. 53), NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The fourc model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12.
  • Kaiser, H. F. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39: 31-36.
  • Joy, A., & Sherry Jr, J. F. (2003). Speaking of art as embodiedimagination: A multisensory approach to understanding aestheticexperience. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 259-282.
  • Jones, L. V. (1949). A factor analysis of the Stanford-Binet at four agelevels. Psychometrika, 14(4), 299-331.
  • Johnson, H. (1984). The art of block building. In E. S. Hirsch (Ed.), Theblock book (pp. 8?23). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
  • John Dewey and human development, In R. D.Parke, P. A. Ornstein, J. J. Rieser, & C. Zahn-Waxler (Eds.), Acentury of developmental psychology, Washington, DC: AmericanPsychological Association, 이민희, 정태연 역, (pp. 181-207)
    Cahan, E. D. 서울; 학지사 [1994]
  • Jellen, H. G., & Urban, K. K. (1986). The TCT-DP (Test for CreativeThinking-Drawing Production): An instrument that can be applied tomost age and ability groups. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly,3(11), 135-155.
  • Jeffrey, B., & Woods, P. (2003). The creative school: A framework forsuccess, quality and effectiveness. London: Routledge, Falmer.
  • Jamison, K .R. (1993). Touched by fire. NY: Free Press.
  • Jacob, F., & Ryan, T. (2001). Imagination in art and in science. KenyonReview, 23(2), 113-121.
  • J?reskog, K. G., & S?rbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equationmodeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL:Scientific Software International.
  • Ives, S. W. (1984). The development of expressivity in drawing. BritishJournal of Educational Psychology, 54(2), 152-159.
  • Ivcevic, Z., Brackett, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. (2007). Emotional intelligenceand emotional creativity. J ournal of Personality, 75(2), 199-236.
  • Itten, J. (1975). Design and form: The basic course at the Bauhaus andlater. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122-1131.
  • Isaksen, S. G., Puccio, G. J., & Treffinger, D. J. (1993). An ecologicalapproach to creativity research: Profiling for creative problemsolving. The Journal of Creative Behavior , 27(3), 149-170.
  • Hurlock, E. B., & Thomson, J. L. (1934). Children's drawings: anexperimental study of perception. Child development, 5(2), 127-138.
  • Hurlock, E. B. (1972). Child growth and development (5th ed.), NY:McGraw-Hill.
  • Horn, C. C. (1951). Horn art aptitude inventory. Chicago, IL: C. H.Stoelting company.
  • Horn, C. A., & Smith, L. F. (1945). The Horn art aptitude inventory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 29(5), 350-355.
  • Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, R. G. (2005). Thinking and reasoning: Areader’s guide. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Thecambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning, (pp. 1?9), NY:Cambridge University Press.
  • Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique ofmeasurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R.Ronning & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-75),NY: Plenum.
  • Hoaglund, J. (1976). Originality and aesthetic value. The British Journalof Aesthetics, 16(1), 46-55.
  • History of art criticism. NY: Dutton. 김기주 역(1997)
    Venturi, L. 서울: 문예출판사 [1964]
  • Herberholz, B. J., & Hanson, L. (1995). Early childhood art. Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill.
  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Consensual assessment.Encyclopedia of creativity, In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.),Encyclopedia of creativity, Vol. 1 (pp. 346?359). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Reality, intrinsic motivation,and creativity. American Psychologist, 53(6), 674-675.
  • Hennessey, B. A. (1995). Social, environmental, and developmental issuesand creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(2), 163-183.
  • Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M. & Martin, B. R. (2008). Creative knowledgeenvironments. Creativity Research Journal , 20(2), 196?210.
  • Hekkert, P., & van Wieringen, P. C. (1998). Assessment of aestheticquality of artworks by expert observers: An empirical investigation ofgroup decisions. Poetics, 25(5), 281-292.
  • Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expertand nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. TheAmerican J ournal of Psychology, 109(3), 389-407.
  • Hein, G. E. (1998). Learning in the museum. London: Routledge.
  • Hausman, J. J. (1958). Graphic and plastic arts. Review of EducationalResearch, 28, 169-179.
  • Harris, P. L. (2000). The work of the imagination. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Harris, D. (1960). The development and validation of a test of creativityin engineering. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44(4), 254-257.
  • Harrington, D. M., Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1987). Testing aspects of CarlRogers's theory of creative environments: child-rearing antecedentsof creative potential in young adolescents. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 52(4), 851-856.
  • Haller, C. S., & Courvoisier, D. S. (2010). Personality and thinking style indifferent creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, andthe Arts, 4(3), 149-160.
  • Guilford,J.P.(1967).Creativity: Yesterday,today and tomorrow.The JournalofCreativeBehavior,1(1),3-14.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1986). Creative talents: Their nature, uses anddevelopment. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1970). Creativity: Retrospect and prospect. The J ournal ofCreative Behavior , 4(3), 149-168.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist,14(8), 469-479.
  • Gude, O. (2004). Postmodern principles: In search of a 21st century arteducation. Art Education, 57(1), 6-14.
  • Grossman, E. (1980). Effects of instructional experience in clay modelingskills on modeled human figure representation in preschool children.Studies in Art Education, 22(1), 51-59.
  • Gross, D., & Harris, P. L. (1988). False beliefs about emotion: Children'sunderstanding of misleading emotional displays. International Journalof Behavioral Development, 11(4), 475-488.
  • Gregory, R. L. (1997). Mirrors in mind. NY: W.H. Freeman andCompany.
  • Greenwich, CT: JAIPressGetzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: Alongitudinal study of problem finding in art, NY: Wiley.
  • Gough, H. G. (1992). Assessment of creative potential in psychology andthe development of a creative temperament scale for the CPI. In J.C. Rosen & P. McReynolds (Eds.), Advances in psychologicalassessment Vol.8, (pp. 225-257). NY: Plenum Press.
  • Gotz, K. O., & Gotz, K. (1979, b). Personality characteristics ofprofessional artists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49(1), 327-334.
  • Gotz, K. O., & Gotz, K. (1979, a). Personality characteristics of successfulartists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49(3), 919-924.
  • Goodenough, F. L., & Harris, D. B. (1950). Studies in the psychology ofchildren's drawings: II 1928-1949. Psychological Bulletin, 47(5),369-433.
  • Goodenough, F. (1926). Draw-a-man-test. NY: World Book.
  • Golomb, C., & McCormick, M.(1995). Sculpture: The development ofthree-dimensional representation in clay. Visual Arts Research, 21(1),35-50.
  • Golomb, C. (2007). Representational conceptions in two-andthree-dimensional media: A developmental perspective. Psychology ofAesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(1), 32-39.
  • Goldman, A. (1995). Aesthetic value, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Goldfield, B. A., & Reznick, J. S. (1990). Early lexical acquisition: rate,content, and the vocabulary spurt. Journal of Child Language, 17,171-184.
  • Gl?veanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal forThe Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48-67.
  • George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1996). Motivational agendas in theworkplace: The effects of feelings on focus of attention and workmotivation. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research inOrganizational Behavior, Vol. 18. (pp.75-109),
  • George, D., & Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows step bystep: a simple guide and reference. Boston, MA; Allyn and Bacon.
  • Gentner, D. (1977). Children's performance on a spatial analogies task.Child Development, 48, 1034-1039.
  • Gendler, T. (2011). Imagination. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanfordencyclopedia of philosophy, Stanford, CA: Center for the Study ofLanguage and Information, Stanford University.
  • Gelman, S. A., & Kalish. C. W. (2006). Conceptual development. In D.Kuhn, R. S. Siegler, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.),Cognition, perception, and language, Handbook of child psychology.6th ed. Vol. 2. (pp. 687-733), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
  • Geary, D. C. (2006). Development of mathematical understanding. In D.Kuhn. R. S. Siegler, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.),Cognition, perception, and language, Handbook of child psychology:6th ed. Vol. 2. (pp. 777-810), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
  • Gazzaniga, M. S., & Heatherton, T. F. (2005). Psychological science:Mind. Brain, and Behavior (2th). NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Gaut, B. (2003). Creativity and imagination. . In B. Gaut & P. Livingston(Eds.), The creation of art (pp. 148?173). Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversity Press.
  • Gardner, H.(1999). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st century. NY: Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (2004). Changing minds: The art and science of changingour own and other people's minds. Boston, MA: Harvard BusinessPress.
  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice, areader. NY: Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (1989). Zero-based arts education: An introduction to ARTSPROPEL. Studies in Art Education, 30(2), 71-83.
  • Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind: The theory of multipleintelligences. NY: Basic books.
  • Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and brain: A cognitive approach tocreativity. NY: Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children'sdrawings. NY: Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (1970). Children's sensitivity to painting styles. ChildDevelopment, 41, 813-821.
  • G ndoğan, A., Arib, M., & G nen, M. (2013). Test of creative imagination:Validity and reliability study. Educational Sciences: Theory &Practice, 13(1). 15-20.
  • Fulghum, R. (2003). All I really need to know I learned inkindergarten: Reconsidered, revised & expanded with twenty-fivenew essays. NY: Random House LLC.
  • Freud, A. (1946). The role of transference in the analysis of children. InFreud, A, The psychoanalytical treatment of children, (pp. 28-37),NY: International Universities Press.
  • Forman, G. (1994). Different Media, Different Languages. In L. G. Katzand B. Cesarone (Eds), Reflections on the Reggio EmiliaApproach(pp. 41-54). Urbana-Champaign, IL; ERIC, Clearinghouse onElementary and Early Childhood Education.
  • Foreman, G. E., & Sigel, I. E. (1979). Cognitive development: Alife-span view. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  • Fletcher, T. S. (2011). Creative thinking in schools: Finding the "JustRight" challenge for students. Gifted Child Today, 34(2), 37-42.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new areaof cognitive?developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10),906-911.
  • Feldman, E. B. (1970). Becoming human through art: Aestheticexperience in the school. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Feldman, D. H. (2003). Key issues in creativity and development, InSawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman,D. H., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Creativity anddevelopment, (pp. 219-210), London: Oxford University Press.
  • Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientificcreativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity, (pp. 272?296), NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309.
  • Feagin, S. L. (1998). Presentation and representation. J ournal ofAesthetics and Art Criticism, 56, 234-240.
  • Ezan, P., & Lagier, J. (2009). How do children develop their aestheticsensibility?. Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for ResponsibleMarketers, 10(3), 238-247.
  • Elkins, J. (1993). From original to copy and back again. The BritishJournal of Aesthetics, 33(2), 113-120.
  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation.European J ournal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1),105-123.
  • Eisner, E. W. (2007). Assessment and evaluation in education and thearts. In L. Bresler, International Handbook of Research in ArtsEducation vol. 1, (pp. 423-426). NY: Springer.
  • Eisner, E. W. (1997). Educating artistic vision. NY: Macmillan.
  • Eisner, E. W. (1966). The development of information and attitude towardart at the secondary and college levels. Studies in Art Education,8(1), 43-58.
  • Eisner, E. W. (1965). Children's creativity in art: a study of types.American Educational Research Journal, 2(3), 125-136.
  • Eisner, E. W. (1962). A typology of creativity in the visual arts. Studiesin Art Education, 4(1), 11-22.
  • Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1998). Reward, intrinsic interest, andcreativity: New findings. American Psychologist, 53(6), 676-679.
  • Egan, K. (1997). The educated mind.: How cognitive tools shapes ourunderstanding. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Educational psychology: Windows onclassrooms(8th ed), Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 신종호, 김동민, 김정섭, 김종백, 도승이, 김지현, 서영석 공역(2011)
    Eggen, P. Kauchak, D. 서울: 학지사 [2010]
  • Duncum, P. (2004). Visual culture isn't just visual: multi-literacy,multi-modality and meaning. Studies in Art Education, 45, 252-64.
  • Duncum, P. (2002). Visual culture art education: Why, What and How.Journal of Art and Design Education, 21(1), 14-23.
  • Duffy, R. A. (1979). An analysis of aesthetic sensitivity and creativity withother variables in grades four, six, eight, and ten. The Journal ofEducational Research, 73(1), 26-30.
  • Duffy, R. A. (1978). An analysis of aesthetic sensitivity, creativity, artisticpotential, visual-haptic aptitude, cognitive style, personality, anddemographic variables in grades four, six, eight, and ten. Doctoraldissertation, University of Connecticut.
  • Dudek, S. Z., Bern?che, R., B?rub?, H., & Royer, S. (1991). Personalitydeterminants of the commitment to the profession of art. CreativityResearch J ournal, 4(4), 367-389.
  • Dudek, S. Z. (1974). Creativity in young children?attitude or ability?. TheJournal of Creative Behavior , 8(4), 282-292.
  • Domino, G. (1974). Assessment of cinematographic creativity. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 30(1), 150-154.
  • Do we think of good, old elements and principles ofdesign as the main substance of the criterion creativity whenevaluating children artworks?. 미술과 교육, 9(2), 1-17. 권명인, 이윤아역(2008)
    Marjan, P. 미술과 교육, 9(2), 19-33 [2008]
  • Dixon, J. (1979). Quality versus quantity: The need to control for the fluency factor in originality scores from the Torrance Tests. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2(2), 70–79.
  • Diakidoy, I. A. N., & Spanoudis, G. (2002). Domain specificity in creativitytesting: A comparison of performance on a general divergent?thinkingtest and a parallel, content?specific test. The Journal of CreativeBehavior, 36(1), 41-61.
  • Der formalismus in der ethik und die materialewertethik:(mit besonderer ber?cksichtigung der Ethik ImmanuelKants) (Vol. 2). Max Niemeyer. 이을상, 금교영 공역(1998)
    Scheler, M. 서울: 서광사 [1916]
  • Dennis, T. (2006). Emotional self-regulation in preschoolers: the interplayof child approach reactivity, parenting, and control capacities.Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 84-97.
  • Denham, S. A., Bassett, H. H., Brown, C., Way, E., & Steed, J. (2013). Iknow how you feel : Preschoolers’ emotion knowledge contributesto early school success. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 31,180-197.
  • Dellas, M. & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: Theindividual. Psychological Bulletin, 73(1), 55-73.
  • De Sousa, R. (1990). The rationality of emotion. Cambridge, MA: MitPress.
  • De Bono, E., & Zimbalist, E. (2010). Lateral thinking: A textbook ofcreativity. London: Penguin Books.
  • Day, B. (1994). Early childhood education: Creative learning activities.NY: Macmillan.(4th).
  • Davis, J., & Gardner, H. (1993). The arts and early childhood education: Acognitive developmental portrait of the young child as artist. In B.Spodek (Ed), Handbook of research in early childhoodeducation.(2nd), (pp.191-206). NY: Macmillan.
  • Davis, G. A. (1997). Identifying creative students and measuring creativity.In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education,2ed, (pp. 269-281), Needham Heights, MA: Viacom Company.
  • Davis, G. A. (1989). Testing for creative potential. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 14(3), 257-274.
  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error and the future of human life.Scientific American, 271(4), 144-144.
  • Dacey, J. S. (1989). Fundamentals of creative thinking. Lexington, MA:Lexington books.
  • Cunningham, W. A., & Zelazo, P. D. (2007). Attitudes and evaluations: Asocial cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in CognitiveSciences, 11(3), 97-104.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Key issues in creativity and developmentprepared by all authors, In. R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Creativity anddevelopment, (pp. 217-243), London: Oxford University Press.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for thestudy of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity.(pp. 313?328), NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. NY: Harper Collins.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience(Vol. 41), NY: Harper Perennial.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988), Society, culture, and person: A systems viewof creativity, In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp.325-339), NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Crowther, P. (1991). Creativity and originality in art. British Journal ofAesthetics, 31(4), 301-309.
  • Cropley, A. J. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28(3),125? 130.
  • Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: are creativitytests worth using?. Roeper Review, 23(2), 72-79.
  • Cropley, A. J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity.Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment inclinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. PsychologicalAssessment, 4(1), 5-13.
  • Collingwood, R. G. (1938). The principles of art (Vol. 11), London: OxfordUniversity Press.
  • Cole, P. M., & Kaslow, N. J. (1988). Interactional and cognitive strategiesfor affect regulation: Developmental perspective on childhooddepression. In L. Alloy (Ed.), Cognitive processes in depression (pp.310-341), NY: Guilford Press.
  • Cole, E. (1985). The effects of a cognitively-oriented aesthetic curriculumon the aesthetic judgement and response of four, six, and eight yearolds in an art museum program. Doctoral dissertation University ofToledo.
  • Cohn, N. (2012). Explaining I can’t draw: Parallels between the structureand development of language and drawing. Human Development,55(4), 167-192.
  • Cognitive practice and research frameworks in studioart setting, Journal of research in art and education, 7(2). (pp.39-59), Korean Society for education through art(KoSEA). 송보림역(2006)
    Sullivan, G. 미술과 교육, 7(2), 61-78 [2006]
  • Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Teaching talented art students:Principles and practices. NY: Teachers College Press, ColumbiaUniversity.
  • Chowaniak, J. (2011). Formation of preschool age children’s imaginationby artistic activity. The New Educational Review, 24(2), 107-117.
  • Chou, C. P., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structuralequation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equationmodeling: Concepts, issues, and applications(pp.37?54). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.
  • Child, I. L. (1964). Observations on the meaning of some measures ofesthetic sensitivity. The Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 49-64.
  • Chen, J. Q., Krechevsky, M., Viens, J., & Isberg, E. (1998). Building onchildren's strengths: The experience of project spectrum. ProjectZero frameworks for early childhood education, (Vol. 1), NY:Columbia University Teachers College Press.
  • Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A. J., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., & Xue, G.(2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes a cross-culturalexamination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal ofCross-Cultural Psychology, 33(2), 171-187.
  • Charyton, C., Hutchison, S., Snow, L., Rahman, M. A., & Elliott, J. O.(2009). Creativity as an attribute of positive psychology: The impactof positive and negative affect on the creative personality. J ournalof Creativity in Mental Health, 4(1), 57-66.
  • Chapman, L. H. (1978). Approaches to art in education. NY: HarcourtBrace Jovanovich.
  • Chan, D. W., & Zhao, Y. (2010). The relationship between drawing skilland artistic creativity :Do age and artistic involvement make adifference?. Creativity Research J ournal. 22(1). 27-36.
  • Cassirer, E. (1972). An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophyof human culture (Vol. 52). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of child development. In R. J.Sternberg, and C. A. Berg (eds.), Intellectual Development, (pp.161-196), NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carlson, J. G., & Hatfield, E. (1992). Psychology of emotion. San Diego,CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Carey, S., & Spelke, E.(1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptualchange. In L. A. Hirschfeld, & S. A. Gelman(Eds.), Mapping themind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 169-200), NY:Cambridge University Press.
  • Budd, M. (2002). Sibley’s Aesthetics. The Philosophical Quarterly,52(207), 237-246.
  • Buck, J. N. (1966). The house-tree-person technique: Revised manual.LA, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R.(1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
  • Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover,R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp.3-32). NY: Plenum.
  • Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation andother more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H.Kluwe(eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. (pp.65-116), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualisation and young children’s explorationof big ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3),319-341.
  • Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology/ Revue Canadienne dePsychologie, 22(5), 349-368.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U.(1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723-742.
  • Brittan, E. (1979). A study to investigate whether consistent cognitivefunctioning cuts across number, space, and time conceptualization.The Journal of Psychology, 103(1), 51-60.
  • Brittain. L. Creative and mental growth, 4th.NY: Macmillan. 서울교대미술교육연구회 역
    Lowenfeld, V. 서울: 미진사 [1975]
  • Briskman, L. (1980). Creative product and creative process in science andart. Inquiry, 23(1), 83-106.
  • Boughton, D. (1997). Reconsidering issues of assessment and achievementstandards in art education: NAEA Studies lecture. Studies in ArtEducation, 38(4), 199-213.
  • Bolton, N. (1972). The psychology of thinking. London: Methuen.
  • Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. 2th,NY: Routledge.
  • Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. ArtificialIntelligence, 103(1), 347-356.
  • Boden, M. A. (1979). The computational metaphor in psychology. In N.Bolton (ed). Philosophical problems in Psychology. London: Methuen.
  • Blankson, A. N., O’Brien, M., Leerkes, E. M., Marcovitch, S., Calkins, S.D., & Weaver, J. M. (2013). Developmental dynamics of emotion andcognition processes in preschoolers. Child Development, 84(1),346-360.
  • Bhattacharya, J., & Petsche, H. (2005). Drawing on mind's canvas:Differences in cortical integration patterns between artists and nonartists.Human Brain Mapping, 26(1), 1-14.
  • Bhattacharya, J., & Petsche, H. (2001). Musicians and the gamma band: asecret affair?. Neuro Report, 12(2), 371-374.
  • Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1993). Assessing creative products:Progress and potentials. In S. G. Isaksen, M. C. Murdock, R. L.Firestein, & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Nurturing and developingcreativity: The emergence of a discipline(Creativity Research),(pp. 331-349). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Bertinetto, A. (2011). Improvisation and artistic creativity. Proceedings ofthe European Society for Aesthetics, 3, 81-103.
  • Bernheim, G. D. (1964). The dimensionality of differential criteria in theart product: An empirical study. Studies in Art Education, 6(1),31-48.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests andGoodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures.Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
  • Beittel, K. R. (1956). Experimental studies of the aesthetic attitudes ofcollege students. Research in art education, seventh year book.Kutztown, Pa.: National Art Education Association.
  • Beeching, R. (1968). Organized problem solving in the visual arts. ArtEducation, 21(2), 27-28.
  • Becker, G. (2001). The association of creativity and psychopathology: Itscultural-historical origins. Creativity Research Journal , 13(1), 45-53.
  • Beardsley, M. C. (1965). Intrinsic value. Philosophy and PhenomenologicalResearch, 26(1), 1-17.
  • Beaney, M. (2005). Imagination and creativity. Milton Keynes, UK: OpenUniversity course AA308 Thought and Experience, Themes in thePhilosophy of Mind. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.
  • Basadur, M. S. (1994). Simplex: A flight to creativity. NY: CreativeEducation Foundation Press. (Spanish title: Simplex: un viaje hacia lacreatividad).
  • Bartel, C. (1985). Originality and value. British journal of aesthetics, 25,169-184.
  • Barron, F. (1990). Creativity and psychological health, Buffalo, NY:Creative Education Foundation.
  • Barron, F. (1988). Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Thenature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, (pp.76-98). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baillargeon, R. (1986). Representing the existence and the location ofhidden objects: Object permanence in 6-and 8-month-old infants.Cognition, 23(1), 21-41.
  • Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. CreativityResearch Journal, 11(2), 173-177.
  • Baer, J. (1993). Why you still shouldn't trust creativity tests. EducationalLeadership. 51(4), 80-83.
  • Artaud. A. Van Gogh le suicide de la societe. Paris: Gallimard.조동신 역, 2003
    서울: 숲 [1983]
  • Art and cognition : Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum
    Efland, A.D. NY: Teachers College Press. 강현석.김선아.김혜숙.안금희.이은적.이자현.황연주 공역(2006), 서울: 교육과학사 [2002]
  • Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of thecreative eye. Oakland, CA: University of California Press; 2th.
  • Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity. The magic synthesis. NY: Basic Books.
  • Antonietti, A. (1991). Why does mental visualization facilitateproblem-solving. In R. H. Logie & M. Denis (Eds.), Mental images inhuman cognition, (pp. 211-227), Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
  • Anderson, T., & Milbrandt, M. K. (2005). Art for life: Authenticinstruction in art. NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing thework environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 367-403.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime ofcreativity. NY: Crown House Publishing Limited.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. (Vol. 11). NY:Springer-Verlag.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1982). The social psychology of creativity: A componentialconceptualization. J ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43,997-1013.
  • Amabile, T. M(1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview press.
  • Alschuler, R. H., & Hattwick, L. A. (1943). Easel painting as an index ofpersonality in preschool children. American J ournal ofOrthopsychiatry, 13(4), 616-625.
  • Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., White, S. H., Parsons, J. L., Cotropia, K.K., Liu, H. C., & Ackerman, C. M. (1994). Young children's creativesolutions to realistic and fanciful story problems. The Journal ofCreative Behavior , 28(2), 89-106.
  • Alain, E. A. C. (1956). Propos, tI , Biblioth e`que de la Pleiade. Paris:Gallimard.
  • Aiken, N. E. (1998). The biological origins of art. Westport, Connecticut:Praeger.
  • Addison, N. (2011). Moments of intensity: affect and the making andteaching of art. International Journal of Art & Design Education,30(3), 363-378.
  • Acer, D., & ?mero lu, E. (2008). A study on the effect of aestheticeducation on the development of aesthetic judgment of Six-year-oldchildren. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(4), 335-342.
  • Abbott, D. H. (2010). Constructing a creative self-efficacy inventory: Amixed methods inquiry. Open Access Theses and Dissertations fromthe College of Education and Human Sciences, Unpublisheddissertation. University of Nebraska, Lincoln.