연구동향 분석
박사

인식공유에 기반한 공공조직의 조직학습 사례연구

안지선 2015년

논문상세정보
    • 저자 안지선
    • 기타서명 The case study of organizational learning based on shared recognition in public organization
    • 형태사항 iv, 167 p.: 26 cm: 삽화
    • 일반주기 지도교수: 홍아정, 참고문헌수록
    • 학위논문사항 학위논문(박사)-, 2015. 8, 인적자원개발학과, 중앙대학교 대학원
    • 발행지 서울
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2015
    • 발행사항 중앙대학교 대학원
    유사주제 논문( 0)
인용/피인용

' 인식공유에 기반한 공공조직의 조직학습 사례연구' 의 참고문헌

  • 행정조직과 기업조직의 조직문화 비교
    김호정 한국행정학보, 38(3), 49-67 [2004]
  • 학습조직의 세 가지 메커니즘: 지식 공유, 생산적인 담론, 그리고 정체성 공유가 팀 효과성에 미치는 영향
    김문주 윤정구 조직과 인사관리연구, 36(1), 31-65 [2012]
  • 학습심리학. 양용칠 역
    Driscoll, M. P. 서울: 교육과학사, 2007 [2004]
  • 팀 자본인가, 팀 동적역량인가
    윤정구 정예지 경영학연구, 42(1), 53-83 [2013]
  • 최고 수준 전문가와 보통 수준 전문가의 특성 비교 분석
    배진현 성문주 성은모 오헌석 아시아교육연구, 10(4), 105-135 [2009]
  • 질적연구설계: 상호 작용적 접근. 이명선 외 역
    Maxwell, J. A. 서울: 군자출판사, 2009 [2005]
  • 질적연구방법: 다섯가지 접근. 조흥식 외 공역
    Cresswell, J. W. 서울: 학지사,2010 [2007]
  • 질적 연구에서의 신뢰도와 타당도. 엄미란 외 역
    Kirk, J. Miller, M. L. 서울: 군자출판사, 2007 [1985]
  • 질적 연구 방법의 이해
    유기웅 서울: 박영사 [2012]
  • 지식창조기업. 장은영 역
    Nonaka, I. Takeuchi, H. 서울: 세종서적, 1998 [1995]
  • 지식경영의 기반구조와 지식관리시스템의 프로세스가 조직학습과 성과에 미치는 영향
    김호열 정경수 경영학연구, 36(2), 257-296 [2007]
  • 지식경영과 학습조직의 비교연구
    김찬중 한국비즈니스리뷰, 5(2), 53-71 [2012]
  • 지식경영개론
    이동욱 이태식 서울: 도서출판 구미서관 [2004]
  • 지방이전 대상기관 구성원들의 심리상태가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향
    최윤정 한국사회와 행정연구, 24(1), 221-243 [2013]
  • 지방공무원의 조직몰입과 혁신행태가 지식관리에 미치는 영향
    박국흠 지방정부연구, 12(2), 7-28 [2008]
  • 조직화이론. 배병룡 역
    Weick, K. E. 서울: 율곡출판사, 1990 [1979]
  • 조직학습의 이론적 조망
    권석균 인사조직연구, 3(1), 121-164 [1995]
  • 조직이론: 조직의 8가지 이미지. 박상언, 김주엽 공역
    Morgan, G. 서울: 경문사, 2012 [2006]
  • 조직시민행동과 직무태도의 관계에 미치는 조직동일시와 소진의 역할
  • 조직변화 내부과정의 구조화: 조직 정체성, 납득 및 선택
    김명환 국가정책연구,27(1), 5-35 [2013]
  • 정성연구방법론과 사례연구. 강윤수 외 역
    Merriam, S. B. 서울: 교우사, 2005 [1998]
  • 전직지원활동에 참여한 퇴직자의 특성과 전환학습 수준이 고용가능성에 미치는 영향
    송영선 이은주 이희수 한국HRD연구, 6(3), 61-88 [2011]
  • 자본주의 이후의 사회. 이재규 역
    Drucker, P. F. 서울: 한국경제신문사, 2002 [1994]
  • 역량중심 인적자원개발의 비판과 쟁점 분석
    오헌석 경영교육논총, 47(8),191-213 [2007]
  • 양면성(Ambidexterity)을 통한 역동적 역량의 구현: 역사적 조망과이의 효과적 구축을 위한 핵심과제
    이현 이홍 인사조직연구, 17(2), 95-124 [2009]
  • 양면성 조직의 조직문화 연구
    문형구 장용선 인사조직연구, 19(2), 169-200 [2011]
  • 실천공동체. 손민호, 배을규 공역
    Wenger, E. 서울: 학지사, 2007 [1998]
  • 실재의 사회적 구성. 하홍규 역
    Berger, P. Luckman, T. 서울: 문학과 지성사, 2014 [1967]
  • 소통행위이론Ⅰ: 행위합리성과 사회적 합리화. 서규환 심광섭 노진철 김기욱 최문규 공역
    Habermas, J. 서울: 의암출판, 1995 [1981]
  • 사회적자본의 지각이 지식활동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 금융기관을 중심으로
    김재구 장용선 인사관리연구, 30(1), 59-91 [2006]
  • 사회적 자본과 인적자원개발(Ⅱ): 기업의 사회적자본과 경쟁력 (149-205)
    김미란 김안국 유한구 이영현 서울: 한국직업능력개발원 [2007]
  • 사회인지적관점에서 조직학습 역량요인이 조직변화몰입에 미치는 영향
    설현수 이윤수 조대연 기업교육연구, 15(2), 135-154 [2013]
  • 사회복지조직의 조직학습 영향요인
    권순애 한국사회복지행정학, 14(1), 87-112 [2012]
  • 비고츠키와 교육
    한순미 서울: 교육과학사 [1999]
  • 복잡성 이론과 조직학습:자기조직적 질서와 발현적 학습의 모색
    장승권 정명호 인사 조직연구, 6(2), 37-80 [1998]
  • 백경선. 사회문화적 관점에서 조직학습 역량구축 진단도구 타당화 연구
    조대연 평생교육학연구, 13(2), 1-22 [2007]
  • 마이클 포터의 경쟁전략. 조동성 역
    Porter, M. E. 서울: 21세기북스, 2008 [1980]
  • 대화자들의 관계: 유사와 차이
    박은영 프랑스문화예술연구, 11, 1-15 [2004]
  • 노나카의 지식경영(2판). 나상억 역
    Konno, N. Nonaka, I. 서울: 21세기북스, 2009 [1998]
  • 기업의 지식경영 실행에 관한 질적 연구: S기업의 지식경영 실천 사례
    현경택 홍아정 지식경영연구, 11(1), 129-146 [2010]
  • 구성주의 이론, 관점, 그리고 실제. 조부경 역
    Fosnot, C. T. 서울: 양서원,2001 [1996]
  • 교과수업 맥락에서의 인지발달과 학습 3판. 강영하 역
    Byrnes, J. P. 서울: 아카데미프레스, 2011 [2008]
  • 공공･민간조직 비교연구 메타분석: Sayre명제의 재검증
    전영한 행정논총,47(2), 61-93 [2009]
  • 공공부문의 조직특성이 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문
    장다정 국민대학교 [2013]
  • 공공기관의 조직문화, 학습조직, 조직효과성의 관계에 관한 연구
    이상철 한국행정학보, 46(4), 181-205 [2012]
  • 공공기관에서 조직문화의 매개효과를 통한 CoP활동 및 조직학습유형이 조직성과에 미치는 효과 분석
    김시태 임세영 직업교육연구, 28(4), 55-76 [2009]
  • 경영성과 제고를 위한 공공기관의 조직문화유형 분석: 공익형공공기관과 기업형 공공기관의 비교
    권영주 이상철 한국행정학보, 42(3), 143-164 [2008]
  • von Krogh, G., & Roos, J. (1995). A perspective on knowledge, competence andstrategy. Personnel Review, 24(3), 56-76.
  • von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in knowledge creation. California ManagementReview, 40(3), 133-153.
  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. In C. T. Fonsot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp.3-7). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • van Den Bosch, F. A., Volberda, H. W., & De Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution offirm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational formsand combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551-568.
  • Zahra, S. A., &George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review,reconceptualization, and extension. Academy ofmanagement review, 27(2), 185-203.
  • Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review,40(4), 45-58.
  • Yin, R. K. (Ed.). (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wood, T., & Caldas, M. (1997). Organizational identity: A new framework tounderstand organizational intervention and change. In Annual Meeting ofthe Academy of Management (August), Boston.
  • Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic ManagementJournal, 24(10), 991-995.
  • Wiig, K. M., 1997, Knowledge management: Where did it come from and where will it go?, Expert Systems with Applications, 13(1): 1-14.
  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and theprocess of sensemaking and organizing. Organization Science, 16(4),409-421.
  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization:Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Inc.
  • Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C. (1996). Evolution and revolution: Mastering thedynamics of innovation and change. California Management Review, 38(4),8-30.
  • Tuomi, I. (2002). The future of knowledge management. Lifelong Learning inEurope(LLinE), 7(2), 69-79.
  • Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge?. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973-993.
  • Tsoukas, H. (2003). Do we really understand tacit knowledge?. In M. Easterby-Smith, & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learningand knowledge management (pp.410-427). Malden, MA: Blackwell PublishingLtd.
  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
  • Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects ofnetwork position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation andperformance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature andmicrofoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. StrategicManagement Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroupbehavior. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergrouprelations (2nd ed.), (pp.7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  • Swanson, R. A., & Holton Ⅲ, E. F. (2009). Foundations of human resourcedevelopment. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
  • Stringer, J. (1999). Sensemaking in organizations. Journal of College StudentDevelopment, 40(3), 324-326.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. London, UK:Sage Publications.
  • Stenmark, D. (2001). Leveraging tacit organizational knowledge. Journal ofManagement Information Systems, 17(3), 9-24.
  • Starbuck, W. H., & Milliken, F. J. (1988). Executives’ perceptual filters: Whatthey notice and how they make sense. In D. C. Hambrick (Ed.), Theexecutive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp.35?65). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Starbuck, W. H. (1983). Organizations as action generators. AmericanSociological Review, 48(1), 91-102.
  • Stalk, G. (1988). Time-the next source of competitive advantage. HarvardBusiness Review, 48. 91-102.
  • Snook, N. N. Nohria, & R. Khurana (2011). The handbook for teachingleadership: Knowing, doing, and being, (pp.3-21). Los Angeles: SAGEPublications Limited.
  • Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2005). Existing knowledge,knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction inhigh-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 346-357.
  • Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic management in an enactedworld. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 724-736.
  • Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125-134.
  • Sidhu, J. S., Commandeur, H. R., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). The multifacetednature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, andspatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18(1), 20-38.
  • Shrivastava, P. (1983). A typology of organizational learning systems. Journalof Management Studies, 20(1), 7-28.
  • Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511.
  • Schein, E. H. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key to organizationallearning. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 9-20.
  • Ring, P. S., & Perry, J. L. (1985). Strategic management in public and privateorganizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints. Academyof Management Review, 10(2), 276-286.
  • Rainey, H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and privateorganizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal ofPublic Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447-470.
  • Prusak, L., & Cohen, D. (2001). How to invest in social capital. HarvardBusiness Review, 79(6), 86-97.
  • Powell, W. W., & Friedkin, R. (1986). Politics and programs: Organizationalfactors in public television decision making. In DiMaggio, P. J. (Ed.). Nonprofit enterprise in the arts. (pp.245-269). Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.
  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tact dimension (with a new foreword by Amartya Sen). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.
  • Plaskoff, J. (2003). Intersubjectivity and community building: Learning to learnorganizationally. In M. Easterby-Smith, & A. L. Marjorie (Eds.), TheBlackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management(pp.161-184). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
  • O’Donnell, C. R., & Tharp, R. G. (2012). Integrating cultural communitypsychology: Activity settings and the shared meanings of intersubjectivity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(1-2), 22-30.
  • Oswick, C., Anthony, P., Keenoy, T., Mangham, I. L., & Grant, D. (2000). Adialogic analysis of organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies,37(6), 887-902.
  • O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. & Caldwell, D. F. (1991), People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.
  • O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamiccapability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in OrganizationalBehavior, 28, 185-206.
  • Nonaka, I. (1988). Toward middle-up-down management: Acceleratinginformation creation. Sloan Management Review, 29(3), 9-18.
  • Nicolini, D., & Meznar, M. B. (1995). The social construction of organizationallearning: Conceptual and practical issues in the field. Human Relations,48(7), 727-746.
  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and theorganizational advantage. Academy of Management Review. 23(2). 242-265.
  • Mikic, S., White, G., & Razak, A. A. (2009). A knowledge review: Implicationsfor future research and practical application. International Journal ofBusiness and Management, 4(1), 26-31.
  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Meyers, P. W. (1990). Non-linear learning in large technological firms: Periodfour implies chaos. Research Policy, 19, 97-115.
  • Matzat, U. (2010). Reducing problems of sociability in online communities:Integrating online communication with offline interaction. AmericanBehavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1170-1193.
  • Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, andActivity, 3(1), 25-45.
  • Marsh, S. J., & Stock, G. N. (2006). Creating dynamic capability: The role ofintertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation. Journalof Product Innovation Management, 23(5), 422-436.
  • Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21-49.
  • Mael, F. & Ashforth, B. E. (1992), Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
  • Ligorio, M. B., Cesareni, D., & Schwartz, N. (2008). Collaborative virtualenvironments as means to increase the level of intersubjectivity in adistributed cognition system. Journal of Research on Technology inEducation, 40(3), 339-357.
  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox inmanaging new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1),111-125.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheralparticipation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptivecapacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy ofManagement Review, 31(4), 833-863.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learningand development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1992), Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
  • Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review. 35(1), 37-50.
  • Karl E. Weick의 조직화 이론. 오석홍, 손태원, 이창길(편). 조직학의주요이론
    윤견수 서울: 법문사, 2011 [2011]
  • Karata??Ozkan, M., & Murphy, W. D. (2010). Critical theorist, postmodernistand social constructionist paradigms in organizational analysis: Aparadigmatic review of organizational learning literature. InternationalJournal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 453-465.
  • Jerolmack, C. (2009). Humans, animals, and play: Theorizing interaction whenintersubjectivity is problematic. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 371-389.
  • Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999-1015.
  • Jacobs, C., & Coghlan, D. (2005). Sound from silence: On listening inorganizational learning. Human Relations, 58(1), 115-138.
  • Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of management review, 30(1), 146-165.
  • Ikujiro Nonaka의 지식창조이론. 오석홍, 손태원, 이창길(편). 조직학의주요이론
    정명호 서울: 법문사, 2011 [2011]
  • Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science,19(3), 265-288.
  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes andthe literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
  • Hill, L. A. (1992). Becoming a manager: Mastery of a new identity. Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
  • Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: Thereconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure ofestablished firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
  • Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view:Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010.
  • Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). Leadership in a (permanent)crisis. Harvard Business Review, 87(7/8), 62-69.
  • Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. C. Nystorm, &W. H. Starbuck (Eds.). Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 1.),(pp.3-27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hatch, M. J. & Schultz, M. (2002), The dynamics of organizational identity. Human relations, 55(8), 989-1018.
  • Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy formanaging knowledge?. Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106-116.
  • Hall, B. M. (2011). How cognitive requirement of prompt and time in courseare correlated with intersubjectivity within threaded discussions. Doctoraldissertation, Capella University, Minnesota.
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitativeresearch. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitativeresearch (pp.163-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Greenwald, A. G., & Ronis, D. L. (1978). Twenty years of cognitive dissonance:Case study of the evolution of a theory. Psychological Review, 85(1), 53.
  • Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. StrategicManagement Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 109-122.
  • Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996), Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370-403.
  • Gill, J. H. (2000). The tacit mode: Michael Polanyi's postmodern philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). The organizational learning of safety incommunities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(1), 7-18.
  • Garud, R., & Nayyar, P. R. (1994). Transformative capacity: Continualstructuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic ManagementJournal, 15(5), 365-385.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitivepresence, and computer conferencing in distance education. AmericanJournal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
  • Gallagher, A., & Fellenz, M. R. (1999). Measurement instruments as a tool foradvancing research in organizational learning. Organizational Learning, 1,418-442.
  • Fiol. C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. The Academy ofManagement Review, 10(4), 803-813.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
  • Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning:Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6),783-796.
  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M. & Harquail, C. V. (1994), Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
  • Duncan, R. (1979). Organizational learning: Implications for organizationaldesign. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 75-123.
  • Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286-307.
  • Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation inlarge firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202.
  • Dennen, V. P., & Wieland, K. (2007). From interaction to intersubjectivity:Facilitating online group discourse processes. Distance Education, 28(3),281-297.
  • Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W., & Beers, M. C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan management review, 39(2), 43-57.
  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizationsmanage what they know. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Dalkir, K. (2011). Knowledge management in theory and practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284-295.
  • Cybert, R. & March, J. (1965). A behavioral theory of the firm. EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Crossley, N. (1996). Intersubjectivity: The fabric of social becoming (Vol. 4). London: SAGE Publications Limited.
  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., White, R. E., & Djurfeldt, L. (1995). Organizational learning: Dimensions for a theory. The International Journalof Organizational Analysis, 3(4), 337-360.
  • Cook, S. D., & Yanow, D. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. Journalof Management Inquiry, 2(4), 373-390.
  • Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generativedance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381-400.
  • Collins, H. (1993). The structure of knowledge. Social Research, 60(1), 95-116.
  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A newperspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1), 128-152.
  • Chun, Y. H., & Rainey, H. G. (2005). Goal ambiguity and organizationalperformance in US federal agencies. Journal of Public AdministrationResearch and Theory, 15(4), 529-557.
  • Choo, C. W. (2001). The knowing organization as learning organization. Education & Training, 43(4), 197-205.
  • Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. (2003). Social identity and organizational learning. InM. Easterby-Smith, & A. L. Marjorie (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook oforganizational learning and knowledge management (pp.535-556). Malden,MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Cepeda, G., & Vera, D. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and operationalcapabilities: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of BusinessResearch, 60(5), 426-437.
  • Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Jerram, C. (2002). A sensemaking model ofknowledge management in organizations. European Conference onInformation Systems, 10, 894-904.
  • Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrativeframework for managing knowledge across boundaries. OrganizationScience, 15(5), 555-568.
  • Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizationalculture: Based on the competing values framework. New York: John Wiley& Sons.
  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.
  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning andcommunities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, andinnovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
  • Brodtrick, O. (1998). Organizational learning and innovation: Tools forrevitalizing public services. International Review of Administrative Sciences,64(1), 83-96.
  • Brinklow, T. (2004). Domains, ontologies, models and the knowledge creationcycle. Brighton Business School Occasional/Working Paper Series. 4(3). 1-20.
  • Brewer, W. F. (1987). Schemas versus mental models in human memory. In P. Morris (Ed.), Modelling cognition (pp.187-197). Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Boyne, G. (2002). Public and private management: What's the difference?. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 97-122.
  • Bougon, M. G., Weick, K. E., & Binkhorst, D. (1977). Cognition inorganizations: An analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 22(4), 606-639.
  • Boisot, M., & McKelvey, B. (2010). Integrating modernist and postmodernistperspectives on organizations: A complexity science bridge. Academy ofManagement Review, 35(3), 415-433.
  • Bober, M. J., & Dennen, V. P. (2001). Intersubjectivity: Facilitating knowledgeconstruction in online environments. Educational Media International, 38(4),241-250.
  • Birkinshaw, J. & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47-55.
  • Bhatt, G. D. (2002). Management strategies for individual knowledge andorganizational knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 31-39.
  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and processmanagement: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of ManagementReview, 28(2), 238-256.
  • Barney, J. B. (1986). “Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, andbusiness strategy,” Management Science. 32(10): 1231-1241.
  • Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1998). Grounding forintersubjectivity and learning. Fourth Congress of the International Societyfor Cultural Research and Activity Theory (June 7-11).
  • Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F.(1989), Social Identity Theory and the Organization, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning Ⅱ: Theory, method,and practice. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
  • Argyris, C. (1977). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard BusinessReview, 55(5), 115-125.
  • Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge inorganizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571-582.
  • Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 82(1), 150-169.
  • Argote, L. (2011). Organizational learning research: Past, present and future. Management Learning, 42(4), 439-446.
  • Arbussa, A., & Coenders, G. (2007). Innovation activities, use of appropriationinstruments and absorptive capacity: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 36(10), 1545-1558.
  • Ancona, D. (2011). Sensemaking: Framing and acting in the unknown. In S. A.
  • Alok, K. (2012). Organizational learning: Trends in the social construction of afield. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(2), 247-258.
  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.
  • Akgun, A. E., Lynn, G. S., & Byrne, J. C. (2003). Organizational learning: Asocio-cognitive framework. Human Relations, 56(7), 839-868.
  • (Ed.). 학습조직의 5가지 수련. 박광량, 손태원 공역
    Senge, P. M. 서울: 21세기북스, 1996 [1994]
  • (Ed.). 교수설계 이론과 모형. 최욱 외 역
    Reigeluth, C. M. 서울: 아카데미프레스, 2010 [1999]
  • (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design andimplementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • (2001). Knowledge andorganization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2),198-213.
  • (1999). On organizational learning. Malden, MA: BlackwellPublishing Ltd.
  • (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). London: SAGEPublications Limited.