박사

건강이슈유형에 따른 상황적 헬스커뮤니케이션 메시지 모델 연구 : 귀인이론과 감정의 인지평가이론을 중심으로

김수진 2015년
논문상세정보
    • 저자 김수진
    • 기타서명 A Study on Situational Health Communication Message Model Corresponding to Health Issue Type : Based on Attribution Theory and the Cognitive Appraisal Theory of Emotion
    • 형태사항 xvii, 394 p.: 삽화
    • 일반주기 지도교수: 차희원, 참고문헌: p. 268-304
    • 학위논문사항 언론홍보영상학과,, 이화여자대학교 대학원:, 2015. 2. 졸업, 학위논문(박사)-
    • DDC 600
    • 발행지 서울 :
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2015
    • 발행사항 이화여자대학교 대학원,
    유사주제 논문( 0)

' 건강이슈유형에 따른 상황적 헬스커뮤니케이션 메시지 모델 연구 : 귀인이론과 감정의 인지평가이론을 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • 헬스 커뮤니케이션의 메시지ㆍ수용자ㆍ미디어 전략
    백혜진 이혜규 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스 [2013]
  • 행동활성화체계와 행동억제체계가 인터넷 게임중독자의 비합리적 의사결정에 미치는 영향
    김소연 김혜미 장문선 한국심리학회지: 건강, Vol. 18, No. 1,69-85 [2013]
  • 폭음행위의 이해 : 계획행동이론의 적용과 확장
    차동필 한국언론학보, 49권 3호, pp. 346-372 [2005]
  • 쟁점유형별 공중의 문제인식 및 정보추구행동에 미치는 매스미디어의 영향에 관한 연구
    차동필 한국방송학보. 16(3). 458-489 [2002]
  • 위기유형과 관계관리에 따른 위기 커뮤니케이션 전략 연구
    차희원 홍보학연구, 6(2). pp. 189-232 [2002]
  • 우리나라 조직의 사과 수사학: 신문에 난 사과광고문의 내용과 수용여부 분석
    김영욱 광고학연구, 17(1), 179-207 [2006]
  • 소셜미디어 헬스커뮤니케이션 캠페인 효과모델에 관한 연구: 트위터 공중의 건강신념 및 미디어관련 인식이 커뮤니케이션 행동과 건강행동에 미치는영향을 중심으로
    유선욱 서강대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2011]
  • 상황이론의 블로거 공중 세분화 적용 연구
    박노일 홍보학 연구, 14권 3호,pp.69-104 [2010]
  • 반복측정 자료의 분석
    김현철 교육과학사 [2005]
  • 대한치매학회 www
    thedementia.co.kr
  • 대한비만학회 www
    kosso.or.kr
  • 광고 형태의 메시지와 퍼블리시티 형태의 메시지가 소비자의 태도변화에 미치는 영향력에 대한 연구: 제품에 대한 관여도를 중심으로
    유종숙 정만수 조삼섭 광고학연구. 제 18권 3호, pp. 29-51 [2007]
  • 공중의 커뮤니케이션 행동에 영향을 미치는 상황적 변인들에 대한 연구 : 성희롱 문제에 대하여
    김인숙 홍보학 연구, 제5권 1호, pp. 62-84 [2001]
  • 공중의 커뮤니케이션 특성과 수돗물직접음용태도 및 의도에 관한 연구: 상황이론의 재해석
    문비치 박건희 윤여전 이유나 정지은 광고학연구, 제20권 3호, pp.7-28 [2009]
  • 공중유형과 메시지 프레이밍이 건강위험 커뮤니케이션 태도에미치는 영향
    김수진 차희원 한국언론학보, 제53권 2호, pp. 231-253 [2006]
  • 공중 관여도와 미디어 신뢰도에 따른 기업 명성의 미디어 의제 설정 효과 연구
    차희원 한국언론학보, 제48권 6호, pp. 274-303 [2004]
  • 거시적 차원의 저출산 대비 PR전략: 사회 생태학적 모델과 소셜마케팅,홍보, 미디어 옹호의 통합적 접근
    백혜진 <한국 PR 학회> 기획 세미나 [2013]
  • 「구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 16.0」
    이학식 임지훈 법문사 [2009]
  • Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of consumer research, 341-352.
  • Yan, C., Dillard, J.P., & Shen, F. (2012). Emotion, Motivation, and thePersuasive Effects of Message Framing, Journal of Communication , 62,pp. 682-700.
  • Yan, C., Dillard, J. P., & Shen, F. (2010). The effects of mood, messageframing, and behavioral advocacy on persuasion. Journal ofCommunication , 60(2), 344-363.
  • Wolf B, Nyanzi B, Katongole G, Ssesanga D, Ruberantwari A, & Whitworth, J.(2005). Evaluation of home-based voluntary counselling and testingintervention in rural Uganda. Health Policy and Planning, 20, 109-116.
  • Witte, K., &Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications foreffective public health campaigns. Health Education &Behavior , 27(5),591-615.
  • Witte, K. (1998). Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extendedparallel process model to explain fear appeal success and failures. In304P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds), The handbook ofcommunication and emotion, (pp. 423-450). New York: AcademicPress.
  • Weiner, B., Perry, R. B., & Magnussen, J. (1988). An attributional analysis ofreactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 55,738?-748.
  • Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions.
  • Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Theories of Motivationfrom an Attributional Perspective, Educational Psychology Review , Vol.12, No. 1, 1-14
  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgement of responsibility: A foundation for a theory ofsocial onduct. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Weiner, B. (1993). On Sin Versus Sickness, A Theory of PerceivedResponsibility and Social Motivation, American Psychologist , Vol. 48,No. 9, 957-965
  • Weiner, B. (1990). History of motivational research in education. Journal ofEducational Psychology , 82, 616-622.
  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation andemotion. Psychology Review , 92, 548?-573.
  • Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivatedbehavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal ofpersonality and social psychology , 39 (2), 186.
  • Wallack, L., Dorfman, L., Jernigan, D., & Themba, M. (1993). Media advocacyand public health: power for prevention.
  • Wallack, L., & Dorfman, L. (2001). Putting policy into health communication. 303Public communication campaigns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 389-406.
  • Wallack, L., & Corbett, K. (1987). Alcohol, tobacco and marijuana use amongyouth: An overview of epidemiological, program and policy trends.Health Education Quarterly . 223-249.
  • Walker, J. (2001). Control and the psychology of health . Philadelphia:: OpenUniversity Press.
  • Wagenaar, A. C., Harwood, E. M., Toomey, T. L., Denk, C. E., & Zander, K.M. (2000). Public opinion on alcohol policies in the United States:Results from a national survey. Journal of public health policy ,303-327.
  • Viswanath, K. & Emmons, K. M. (2006). Message Effects and SocialDeterminants of Health: Its Application to Cancer Disparities, Journalof Communication , Volume 56, Issue Supplement s1, pp. S238?S264.
  • Visser, M. J., Makin, J. D., & Lehobye, K. (2006). Stigmatizing attitudes of thecommunity towards people living with HIV/AIDS, Journal ofCommunity & Applied Social Psychology, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp. 42?58.
  • Vaughan, P. & Rogers, E. M. (2000). A Staged Model of CommunicationEffects: Evidence from an Entertainment-Education Radio Soap Operain Tanzania, Journal of Health Communication , Vol. 5, Issue. 3. pp.203-227.
  • Turner, M., M., & Underhill, J., C. (2012). Motivating Emergency PreparednessBehaviors: The Differential Effects of Guilt Appeals and ActuallyAnticipating Guilty Feelings, Communication Quarterly , 60:4, 549-559.
  • Turner, M. M. (2007). Using emotion in risk communication: The angeractivism model. Public Relations Review , 33 (2), 114-119.
  • Thompson, T. L., Dorsey, A., Parrott, R., & Miller, K. (2003). Handbook ofHealth Communication, Routledge Communication Series, Routledge.
  • Thayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. London: OxfordUniversity Press.
  • Taylor, S.E., Lichtman, R.R. & Wood, J.V. (1984). Attributions, beliefs aboutcontrol, and adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 46, 489-502.
  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moralbehavior. Annual review of psychology , 58 , 345-372.
  • Sutton, S. (2002). Using social cognitive models to develop health behaviourinterventions: problems and assumptions, Chapter 11, in Changinghealth behaviour, Rutter D, Quine L Eds. Buckingham: OpenUniversity Press.
  • Strange, J. J., & Leung, C. C. (1999). How anecdotal accounts in news and infiction can influence judgments of a social problem’s urgency, causes,and cures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 25 (4), 436-449.
  • Story M, Kaphingst KM, Robinson-O'Brien R, Glanz K (2008). Creating healthy foodand eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev PublicHealth. 29: 253-272.
  • Stokols, D. (1992). Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: towarda social ecology of health promotion. American Psychologist , 47 (1),6-22.
  • Spradlin, A. (1998). The price of ‘‘passing’’: A lesbian perspective onauthenticity in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly ,11, 598-605.
  • Sontag, S. (1978). Illness As Metaphor and AIDS and Its Metaphors, St.Martin’s.
  • Social Science Information , 21, 555-570Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A componentprocess approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches toemotion (pp. 293-317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Smith, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1996). Message framing and persuasion: Amessage processing analysis. Personality and Social PsychologyBulletin , 22, 257?268.
  • Smith, R. A. (2007). Language of the lost: An explication of stigmacommunication. Communication Theory , 17, 462485.
  • Smith, C. A., & Pope, L. K. (1992). Appraisal and emotion: the interactionalcontribution of dispositional and situational factors. In M. S. Clark(Ed.), Emotion and social behavior (pp. 32?62). Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
  • Sly, D. F., Arheart, K. L., Dietz, N., Trapido, E. J., Nelson, D., Rodriguez, R.D., et al.(2005). The outcome consequences of defunding theMinnesota youth tobacco use prevention program. PreventiveMedicine, 41 , 503-510.
  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., &MacGregor, D. G. (2002). Rational actorsor rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioraleconomics. The Journal of Socio-Economics , 31(4), 329-342.
  • Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current directionsin psychological science, 15(6), 322-325.
  • Slater, M. D., Rouner, D., &Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and supportfor controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal ofCommunication , 56 (2), 235-252.
  • Slater, M. D., Lawrence, F., & Comello, M. L. G. (2009). Media influence onalcohol-control policy support in the US adult population: theintervening role of issue concern and risk judgments. Journal ofhealth communication , 14 (3), 262-275.
  • Slater, M. D., Chipman, H., Auld, G., Keefe, T., Kendall, P. (1992). InformationProcessing and Situational Theory: A Cognitive Response Analysis,Journal of Public Relations Research , 4(4), pp. 189-203.
  • Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaborationlikelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion.Communication Theory , 12, 173?191.
  • Slater, M. D. (2006). Specification and misspecification of theoreticalfoundations and logic models for health communication campaigns.Health Communication , 20, 149?57.
  • Slater, M. D. (1999). Integrating application of media effects, persuasion, andbehavior change theories to communication campaigns: Astages-of-change framework, Health Communication , 11(4), 335-354
  • Simmons, R. E. (1990). Communication campaign management. New York:Longman.
  • Sherman, D. K., Mann, T., & Updegraff, J. A. (2006). Approach/avoidancemotivation, message framing, and health behavior: Understanding thecongruency effect. Motivation and Emotion , 30 (2), 164-168.
  • Shen, L., & Dillard, J.P. (2007). The Influence of BehavioralInhibition/Approach Systems and Message Framing on the Processingof Persuasive Health Messages, Communication Research, Vol. 34,Number. 4, pp. 433-467.
  • Shaver, K. G., & Drown, D. (1986). On causality, responsibility, andself-blame: A theoretical note. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 50, 697-702.
  • Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, andblameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., &Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay ofnews frames on cognitive complexity. Human CommunicationResearch , 30 (1), 102-120.
  • Shah, D. V., Domke, D., &Wackman, D. B. (1996). “To Thine Own Self BeTrue” Values, Framing, and Voter Decision-Making Strategies.Communication Research , 23 (5), 509-560.
  • Shafir, E., Simonson, I., &Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49(1), 11-36.
  • Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice.Cognition , 49, 11?.36.
  • Schneider, T.R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D., Zullo,J. and Rothman, A. (2001). The effects of message framing and ethnictargeting on mammography use among low-income women. HealthPsychology, 20, 256?266.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects, Journal of Communication. 49(1), 103-122.
  • Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A. E., & Johnstone, T. E. (2001). Appraisal processesin emotion: Theory, methods, research . Oxford University Press.
  • Scherer, K. R. (1982). Emotion as a precess: function, origin, and regulation.
  • Salmon, C.T. & Atkin, C. (2003). Using media campaigns for healthpromotion, The Routledge Handboook of Health Communication,Salovey, P., Schneider, T. R., & Apanovitch, A. M. (2002). Message framing inthe prevention and early detection of illness. In J. P. Dillard & M.
  • Sallis, J. F., Cervero, R. B., Ascher, W., Henderson, K. A., Kraft, M. K., &Kerr, J.(2006). An ecological approach to creating active livingcommunities. Annu. Rev. Public Health , 27 , 297-322.
  • Rutter, D. & Quine, L. (2002). Social cognition models and changing healthbehaviors. Changing health behaviour: Intervention and research withsocial cognition models , 1-27.
  • Rutter, D. & Quine, L. (2002). Changing Health Behavior: Intervention AndResearch With Social Cognition Models, edited by Derek Rutter andLyn Quine, Open University Press.
  • Ruth, J. A., Brunel, F. F., & Otnes, C. C. (2002). Linking thoughts to feelings:investigating cognitive appraisals and consumption emotions in amixed-emotions context. Journal of the Academy of MarketingScience , 30(1), 44-58.
  • Rudolph, U., Roesch, S. C., Greitemeyer, T., & Weiner, B. (2004). Ameta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from anattributional perspective. Cognition and Emotion , 18, 815-848.
  • Rotter, J. B.(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
  • Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Rothman, A.J., Salovey, P., Turvey, C. and Fishkin, S.A. (1993). Attributionsof responsibility and persuasion: increasing mammography utilizationamong women over 40 with an internally-oriented message. HealthPsychology, 12, 39?47.
  • Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P.(1999). The systematic influence of gain-and loss-framed messages on297interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personalityand Social Psychology Bulletin , 25 (11), 1355-1369.
  • Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P.(1999). The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messageson interest in and use of different types of health behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 25, 1355?1369.
  • Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthybehavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin , 121, 3?19.
  • Rothenberg, A. (1971). On anger. American Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 86-92Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategicuse of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior:How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication , 56, 202?20.
  • Roseman, I. J.,Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors,and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology , 67, 206-221.
  • Roschelle, A. R., & Kaufman, P. (2004). Fitting in and fighting back: Stigmamanagement strategies among homeless kids. Symbolic Interaction ,27(1), 23-46.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals andattitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93?114.
  • Rimon, J.G. II. (2001). Behavior Change Communication in Public Health:Beyond Dialogue Moving Toward Convergence. Presented at the UNRoundtable on Development Communication, Managua, Nicaragua.
  • Rimal, R. N., & Adkins, A. D. (2003). Using computers to narrowcast healthmessages: The role of audience segmentation, targeting, and tailoringin health promotion. In T.T. Thompson, A.M.Dorsey, K.I.Miller, &R.Parrott(Eds.), Handbook of health communication(pp. 497-513). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Reyna, C., Henry, P. J., Korfmacher, W., & Tucker, A. (2006). Examining theprinciples in principled conservatism: the role of responsibilitystereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions.Journal of personality and social psychology , 90 (1), 109.
  • Pyszczynski, T. A., & Greenberg, J. (1981). Role of disconfirmed expectanciesin the instigation of attributional processing. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology , 40 (1), 31.
  • Promoting Health in Multicultural Populations: A Handbook forPractitioners. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 41-72.
  • Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search ofhow people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Americanpsychologist , 47(9), 1102.
  • Pfau, M., & Parrot, R. (1993). Persuasive communication campaigns. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
  • Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory andpractice (pp. 391?407). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Garling, T., & Slovic, P. (2006). Affect and DecisionMaking: A "Hot" Topic, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 19:79-85.
  • Peters, E., Lipkus, I., &Diefenbach, M. A. (2006). The functions of affect inhealth communications and in the construction of health preferences.Journal of Communication , 56(s1), S140-S162.
  • Peters, E. M., Burraston, B., & Mertz, C. K. (2004). An Emotion?Based Modelof Risk Perception and Stigma Susceptibility: Cognitive Appraisals ofEmotion, Affective Reactivity, Worldviews, and Risk Perceptions in theGeneration of Technological Stigma. Risk Analysis , 24(5), 1349-1367.
  • Perse, E. M., Nathanson, A. I., &McLeod, D. M. (1996). Effects ofspokesperson sex, public service announcement appeal, andinvolvement on evaluations of safe-sex PSAs. Health Communication ,8 (2), 171-189.
  • Pechmann, C., Zhao, G., Goldberg, M. E., & Reibling, E. T. (2003). What toconvey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents? The use ofprotection motivation theory to identify effective message themes.Journal of Marketing, 67 , 1-18.
  • Passyn, K., & Sujan, M. (2006). Self-accountability emotions and fear appeals:Motivating Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research , 32(4), 583-589.
  • O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness ofgain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging diseasedetection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal ofCommunication , 59, 296?16.
  • O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or thedisadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of therelative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framedmessages. Communication Yearbook , 30, 1?43.
  • O’'Keefe, D. (2000). Guilt and social influence. In M. Roloff (Ed.),Communication yearbook, (vol. 23, pp. 67?-101). Thousand Oaks, CA:294Sage Publications.
  • Oliver, J. E., & Lee, T. (2005). Public opinion and the politics of obesity inAmerica. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 30, 923?54.
  • Okka, B., Tekin, C. S., Durduran, Y., & Bodur, S. (2014). Health behaviours,perceived self-efficacy and health locus of control tendency invocational school of health students. HealthMed , 8(3).
  • Ogden, J., and Jubb, A. (2008). How consistent are beliefs about cause andsolutions to illness: an experimental study. Psychology Health andMedicine , 13, 505-515.
  • Ogden, J and Flannagan, Z. (2008). Beliefs about the causes and solutions toobesity: A comparison of GPs and lay people. Patient Education andCounselling, 71; 72-78.
  • Oatley, K., & Jenkins, J. M. (1996). Understanding Emotions. Cambridge, MA:Blackwell.
  • Oatley, K. (1992). Best laid schemes: The psychology of emotions. New York:Cambridge University Press.
  • O'Keefe, D. J. (2002). Guilt as a mechanism of persuasion. In J. P. Dillard &M. Pfau(Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory andpractice (pp. 329-344). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Noar, S. M. (2006). A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass mediacampaigns: Where do we go from here?. Journal of healthcommunication , 11 (1), 21-42.
  • Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., & Porticella, N. (2011). Attributions ofresponsibility for obesity: Narrative communication reduces reactivecounterarguing among liberals. Human Communication Research ,37 (3), 295-323.
  • Niederdeppe, J., Porticella, N., & Shapiro, M. A. (2012). Using theory toidentify beliefs associated with support for policies to raise the priceof high-fat and high-sugar foods. Journal of health communication ,17 (1), 90-104.
  • Niederdeppe, J., Bu, L., Borah, P., Kindig, D., & Robert, S. (2008). Messagedesign strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants ofhealth and population health disparities. Milbank Quarterly , 86, 481?13.
  • Neuwirth, K., & Frederick, E. (2004). Peer and social influence on opinion expression:Combining the theories of planned behavior and the spiral of silence.Communication Research, 31(6), 669?703.
  • Nan, X. (2012). Communicating to young adults about HPV vaccination:Consideration of message framing, motivation, and gender. Healthcommunication , 27 (1), 10-18.
  • Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the Framing Effects of Emotion Do DiscreteEmotions Differentially Influence Information Accessibility, InformationSeeking, and Policy Preference?. Communication Research , 30(2),224-247.
  • Nabi, R. L. (2002). Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes, a test of thecognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs , 69, 204-216.
  • Myhre, L., June A. Flora, S. (2000). HIV/AIDS communication campaigns:progress and prospects. Journal of Health Communication , 5(sup1),29-45.
  • Murray-Johnson, L., & Witte, K. (2006). Looking Toward the Future: HealthMessage Design Strategies, Thompson et al (Eds), Handbook of HealthCommunication (p.475). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Moors, A., & Scherer, K. R. (2013). The role of appraisal in emotion.Handbook of cognition and emotion , 131-155.
  • Moore, J. & Reinardy, S. (2005). A rhetorical analysis of the message of theTarget Market anti-tobacco campaign . Paper presented at theInternational Communication Association Conference.
  • Moore, J. & Greenwood, K. (2005). Unselling the cigarette: A content analysis292of persuasive elements of two types of national anti-tobaccoadvertisements . Paper presented at the Association for Education inJournalism and Mass Communication Conference.
  • Moore, A. & Scherer, K.R. (2013). The Role of Appraisal in Emotion,"Handbook of cognition and Emotion", edited by Michael D. Robinson,Edward R. Watkins, Eddie Harmon-Jones.
  • Montano, D.E. and Kasptzyk, D. (2002) The theory of reasoned action and thetheory of planned behavior. In Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K. and Lewis, F.M.(eds), Health Behavior and Health Education , 3rd edn. Jossey-Bass,San Francisco, CA, pp. 67?98.
  • Mitchell, M., Brown, K., Morris-Villagran, M., & Villagran, P. (2001). Theeffects of anger, sadness and happiness on persuasive messageprocessing: A test of the negative state relief model. CommunicationMonographs , 68(4), 347-359.
  • Miller, C. T., & Major, B. (2000). Coping with stigma and prejudice. The socialpsychology of stigma , 243-272.
  • Meisenbach, R.J. (2010). Stigma Management Communication: A Theory andAgenda for Applied Research on How Individuals Manage Moments ofStigmatized Identity, Journal of Applied communication Research, 38;3,268-292.
  • Marinier, R. & Laird, J. (2006). A Cognitive Architecture Theory ofComprehension and Appraisal. In Robert Trappl, editor, Cyberneticsand Systems, Volume 2, pp. 589-594.
  • Mann, T., Sherman, D., & Updegraff, J. (2004). Dispositional Motivations andMessage Framing: A Test of the Congruency Hypothesis in CollegeStudents. Health Psychology , Vol 23(3), pp. 330-334.
  • Major, L. H. (2009). Break it to me harshly: The effects of intersecting newsframes in lung cancer and obesity coverage. Journal of HealthCommunication , 14, 174?88.
  • Maibach, E., & Murphy, D. A. (1995). Self-efficacy in health promotionresearch and practice: conceptualization and measurement. HealthEducation Research , 10(1), 37-50.
  • Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framingand issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361-367.
  • Lundell, H. C. (2012). Health Nonprofit Communication about SocialDetermination of Health and Health Disparities (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Lindsey, L. L. M. (2005). Anticipated guilt as behavioral motivation: Anexamination of appeals to help unknown others through bone marrowdonation. Human Communication Research , 31, 453?481.
  • Lindsay-Hartz, J., De Rivera, J., & Mascolo, M. F. (1995). Differentiating guiltand shame and their effects on motivation.
  • Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York: InternationalPress.
  • Levin, I., Schneider, S., & Gaeth, G. (1998). All frames are not created equal:A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. OrganizationalBehaviour and Human Decision Processes , 76, 149 ? 188.
  • Leventhal, H., Benyamini,Y., & Shafer, C. (2007). Lay beliefs about health andillness. In S. Ayers, A. Baum, C. McManus, S. Newman, K. Wallson, J.Weinman, & R. West (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psychology,health and medicine(end ed., pp. 124-128). Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversity Press.
  • Leventhal, H. (1970), "Findings and Theory in the Study of FearCommunications," in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.2905, ed. Leonard Berkowitz, New York: Academic Press, 119-186.
  • Lerner, J.S. & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond Valence: Toward A Model ofEmotion-Specific Influences on Judgement And Choice, Cognition AndEmotion , 14(4), 473-493.
  • Lerner, J. S., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker:how appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 19(2), 115?37.
  • Lee, S.Y., Hwang, H., Hawkins, R., & Pingree, S. (2008). Interplay of NegativeEmotion and Health Self-Efficacy on the Use of Health Informationand Its Outcomes, Communication Research , 35(3), 358-381.
  • Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the Frame Into Focus: TheInfluence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , Vol. 86(2), pp. 205-218.
  • Lazarus,R.S.(1991).Emotion and adaptation.New York:Oxford University Press.
  • Lazarus,R.S.(1966).Psychologicalstressandthecoping process.NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
  • Lazarus, R. S., & Lazarus, B. N. (1994). Passion and emotion: Making senseof our emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lawrence, R.G. (2004). Framing Obesity: The Evolution of News Discourse ona Public Health Issue, The Harvard International Journal ofPress/Politics , 9(3), pp. 56-75.
  • Lawrence, R. G. (2004). Framing obesity: The evolution of news discourse ona public health issue. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics ,9, 56?5.
  • Lawrence, R. (2002). American values and the news about children’s health.Issue, 12.
  • Kymalaninen, J. A., & Weisman, A. (2004). Reactions toward mental, physical,and substance-abuse disorders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,34 , 1883-1899.
  • Kuppin, S., and Carpiano, RM (2006). Public conceptions of serious mentalillness and substance abuse, their causes and treaments: findingsfrom the 1996 general social survey. American Journal of PublicHealth, 96; 1766-71.
  • Kotler, P. (1996). Marketing Management , 9th ed. Prentice Hall, EnglewoodCliffs, NJ.
  • Kotler, P. (1972). A generic concept of marketing, Journal of Marketing , 36,46-54.
  • Koplan, J. P., Liverman, C. T., & Kraak, V. I. (2005). Preventing childhoodobesity: health in the balance: executive summary. Journal of theAmerican Dietetic Association , 105(1), 131-138.
  • Kirkwood, W.G. & Brown, D. (1995). Public Communication About the Causesof Disease: The Rhetoric of Responsibility, Journal of Communication45(1), 55- 76.
  • Kim, S. H., & Willis, L. A. (2007). Talking about Obesity: News Framing ofWho Is Responsible for Causing and Fixing the Problem, Journal ofHealth Communication , 12: 359-376.
  • Kim, J. N., Shen, H., & Morgan, S. (2011). Information behaviors and problemchain recognition effect: Applying situational theory of problemsolving in organ donation issues. Health Communication, 26(2), 171∼184.
  • Kim, J. N., Ni, L., & Sha, B. L. (2008). Breaking down the stakeholderenvironment: Explicating approaches to the segmentation of publicsfor public relations research. Journalism &Mass CommunicationQuarterly , 85 (4), 751-768.
  • Kim, J. N., & Ni, L. (2013). Integrating formative and evaluative research intwo types of public relations problems: A review of researchprograms within the strategic management approach. Journal ofPublic Relations Research , 25, 1-29.
  • Kim, J. N. (2006). Communicant activeness, cognitive entrepreneurship, and asituational theory of problem solving. Unpublished doctoraldissertation. University of Maryland, College Park.
  • Kim, H. J., & Cameron, G. T. (2011). Emotions Matter in Crisis: The Role ofAnger and Sadness in the Publics' Response to Crisis News Framingand Corporate Crisis Response, Communication Research , 38(6),826-855.
  • Ketelaar, T., & Tung Au, W. (2003). The effects of feelings of guilt on thebehaviour of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaininggames: An affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotionin social interaction. Cognition &Emotion , 17 (3), 429-453.
  • Kersh, R., & Morone, J. A. (2005). Obesity, courts, and the new politics ofpublic health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law , 30 (5),839-868.
  • Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism:287effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal ofpersonality and social psychology , 64(5), 740.
  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. Americanpsychologist , 28 (2), 107.
  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In Nebraskasymposium on motivation . University of Nebraska Press.
  • Kelley, H. H. & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution Theory And Research, AnnalReview of Psychology , 31: 457-501.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. AmericanPsychologist , 39, 341?350.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decisionunder risk. Econometrica , 47, 263 ? 292.
  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergentperceptions of the causes of behavior (p. 16). Morris town, NJ:General Learning Press.
  • Jin, Y. (2009). The effects of public’s cognitive appraisal of emotions in criseson crisis coping and strategy assessment. Public Relations Review, 35 ,310-313.
  • Izard, C. E., Libero, D. Z., Putnam, P., &Haynes, O. M. (1993). Stability ofemotion experiences and their relations to traits of personality.Journal of personality and social psychology , 64 (5), 847.
  • Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. East Norwalk, CT, US:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Iyengar,S.(1991).Is anyone responsible? How Television Frames Politicalissues.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.
  • Iyengar, S. (1996). Framing responsibility for political issues. Annals of theAmerican Academy of Political and Social Science , 546, 59?0.
  • Iyengar, S. & Kinder, D. R.(1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hyden, L. C. (1997). Illness and narrative. Sociology of health &illness , 19 (1),48-69.
  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, J. J. (1953). Communication andpersuasion . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Hoeken, H., & Hustinx, L. (2007). The Impact of Exemplars on ResponsibilitySterotypes in Fund-Raising Letters, Communication Research , Vol. 34,No. 6, 596-617.
  • Hinyard L, Kreuter M. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool forhealth education behavior change: a conceptual, theoretical, andempirical overview. Health Education & Behavior . 34:777?792.
  • Hibbard, J. H., &Peters, E. (2003). Supporting informed consumer health caredecisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use ofinformation in choice. Annual Review of Public Health , 24(1), 413-433.
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relation, New York; Wiley.
  • Harmon, M. M. (1995). Responsibility as paradox: A critique of rationaldiscourse on government . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Han, S., Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2007). Feelings and consumer decisionmaking: The appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of ConsumerPsychology, 17 , 158-168.
  • Hallahan, K.(1999). Seven models of framing: implications for publicrelations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 205-242.
  • Hallahan, K. (2000). Enhancing Motivation, Ability, and Opportunity to ProcessPublic Relations Messages, Public Relations Review , 26(4): 463-480.
  • Hall, A. (2003). Reading realism: Audiences' evaluations of the reality ofmedia texts. Journal of Communication , 53 (4), 624-641.
  • Guttman, N. (2000). Public health communication interventions: Values andethical dilemmas . Sage Publications.
  • Guttman, N. (1996). Values and Justification in Health CommunicationInterventions: An Analytic Framework, Journal of Healthcommunication , Vol.1, pp. 365-396.
  • Guttman, N. & Salmon, C.T. (2004). Guilt, Fear, Stigma And Knowledge Gaps:Ethical Issues in Public Health Communication Interventions, Bioethics ,Vol.18, No. 6. 531-552.
  • Guttman, N. & Ressler, W.H. (2001). On Being Responsible: Ethical Issues inAppeals to Personal responsibility in Health Campaigns, Journal ofHealth communication, Vol.6, pp. 117-136.
  • Grunig, J. E. (1989). Publics, audiences and market segments: Models ofreceivers of campaign messages. In C. T. Salmon (Ed.), Informationcampaigns: Managing the process of social change (pp. 197∼226).Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Grunig, J. E. (1978). Defining publics in public relations: The case ofsuburban hospital, Journalism Quarterly , 55. pp. 109-118.
  • Grunig, J. E. & Hunt, T. (1994). Managing Public Relations. NY: Holt, Rinehart,& Winston.
  • Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in thepersuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology , 79, 701?21.
  • Green, M. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal ofCommunication , 56, S163?183.
  • Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition.Cognition and Emotion , 4, 269?288.
  • Gratch, J., & Marsella, S. (2004). A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Cognitive Systems Research, 5(4), 269-306.
  • Goodall, C. E., Slater, M. D., & Myers, T. A. (2013). Fear and AngerResponses to Local News Coverage of Alcohol?Related Crimes,Accidents, and Injuries: Explaining News Effects on Policy SupportUsing a Representative Sample of Messages and People. Journal ofCommunication , 63(2), 373-392.
  • Gollust, S.E., Niederdeppe, J., & Barry, C.L. (2013). Framing theConsequences of Childhood Obesity to Increase Public Support forObesity Prevention Policy, American Journal of Public Health , Vol.103, No. 11, pp. e96-e102.
  • Goldman, L., & Glantz, S. A. (1998). Evaluation of anti-smoking advertisingcampaigns. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279 ,772-777.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2008). Health Behavior and HealthEducation: Theory, Research and Practice(4th eds.). San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, Inc.
  • Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychologicalbulletin , 117 (1), 21.
  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinionon nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal ofSociology, 95 , 1?37.
  • Gamson, W. A. (2001). Promoting political engagement. In W. L. Bennett andR. M. Entman(Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future ofdemocracy (pp. 56?74). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American psychologist , 43(5),349-358.
  • Frey, D. & Rogner, O. (1987). The relevance of psychological factors in theconvalescence of accident patients. In G. R. Semin and B. Krahe(Eds), Issues in Contemporary German Psychology, Sage, London.
  • French, S. L. (2003). Reflections on healing: Framing strategies utilized byacquaintance rape survivors. Journal of applied Communicationresearch , 31 (4), 209-319.
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upwardspirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13(2),172-175.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Cultivating positive emotions to optimize health andwell-being. Prevention &Treatment , 3(1), 1a.
  • Frankish, C., Lovato, C., & Shannon, W. J. (1999). Models, theories, andprinciples of health promotion with multicultural populations.
  • Folkman. S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Studyof emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150-170.
  • Fitness, J., & Fletcher, G. J. (1993). Love, hate, anger, and jealousy in closerelationships: a prototype and cognitive appraisal analysis. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology , 65(5), 942.
  • Fisher, W. R. (1989). Clarifying the narrative paradigm, CommunicationMonographs , Vol. 56, Issue 1, 55-58.
  • Fishbein, M., & Yzer, M. C. (2003). Using theory to design effective healthbehavior interventions. Communication Theory, 13, 164?83.
  • Fishbein, M., & Cappella. J. N. (2006). The role of theory in developingeffective health communications, Journal of Communications, 56(s1),s1~s17.
  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I.(1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fedewa, B. A., Burns, L. R., &Gomez, A. A. (2005). Positive and negativeperfectionism and the shame/guilt distinction: adaptive andmaladaptive characteristics. Personality and individual differences ,38 (7), 1609-1619.
  • Farrelly, M. C., Healton, C. G., Davis, K. C., Messeri, P., Hersey, J. C., &281Haviland, M. L. (2002). Getting to the truth: Evaluating nationaltobacco counter marketing campaigns. American Journal of PublicHealth, 92 (6), 901-907.
  • Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication , 43, 51-58.
  • Elvin, J. (2001). Individual rights going up in smoke. Insight on the News, 17,48.
  • Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. Handbook of affective sciences , 572 , V595.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. V. (2001). Approach and avoidance motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology , 13, 73?2.
  • Elliot, A. J.(1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
  • Ekman, P. (2004). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings toimprove communication and emotional life. New York: Owl Books.
  • Eiser, J. R., Van der Pligt, J., Raw, M., & Sutton, S. R. (1985). Trying to stopsmoking: Effects of perceived addiction, attributions for failure andexpectancy of success. Journal of Behavioral Medicine . Vol. 8, No. 4.
  • Dorfman, L., Wallack, L., & Woodruff, K. (2005). More Than a Message:Framing Public Health Advocacy to Change corporate Practices,Health Education & Behavior , Vol. 32(3): 320-336.
  • Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role inpersuasive health communication. Communication Monographs , 72,144?168.
  • Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and Persuasion Emotional Responsesto Public Service Announcements. Communication Research , 27 (4),461-495.
  • Diefenbach, M. A., Miller, S. M., & Daly, M. (1999). Specific worry aboutbreast cancer predicts mammography use in women at risk for breastand ovarian cancer. Health Psychology , 18, 532?536.
  • Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Chicago: Swallow.
  • Devos-Comby, L. & Devos T.(2001). Social norms, social value, and judgmentsof responsibility, Swiss Journal of Psychology , 60 (1), 35-46.
  • DePalma, M., Madey, S. F., Tillman, T. C., & Wheeler, J. (1999). Perceivedpatient responsibility and belief in a just world affect helping. Basicand Applied Social Psychology , 21 (2), 131-137.
  • Dahlstrom, M. F. (2010). The role of causality in information acceptance innarratives: An example from science communication. CommunicationResearch .
  • Coombs, W.T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: Thedevelopment and application of situational crisis communicationtheory. Corporate Reputation Review , 10, 1-14.
  • Coombs, W. T., Fediuk, T. A., & Holladay, S. J. (2007). Furtherexplorations of post-crisis communication and stakeholder anger: Thenegative communication dynamic model. A paper presented at the 9thInternational Public Relations Research Conference, Miami, FL.
  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputationand crisis management. Journal of Communication Management , 10(2),123-137.
  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2005). Exploratory study of stakeholderemotions: Affect and crisis. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. J. Hartel (Eds.), Research on emotion in organizations: Volume 1: Theeffect of affect in organizational settings (271-288). New York:Elsevier.
  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2004). Reasoned action in crisiscommunication: An attribution theory based approach to crisis279management. In D. P. Millar & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Responding tocrisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication (pp. 95-115).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protectreputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisiscommunication theory. Management Communication Quarterly , 16,165-186.
  • Coombs, W. T. (2010). Parameters for crisis communication. In W. T. Coombs& S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp.65-90). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: Thedevelopment and application of situational crisis communicationtheory. Corporate Reputation Review , 10, 163-176.
  • Coombs, W. T. (2006). The protective powers of crisis response strategies:Managing reputational assets during a crisis. Journal of PromotionManagement , 12, 241-260.
  • Coombs, W. T. (2004). Impact of past crises on current crisis communication.Journal of Business Communication , 41, 265-289.
  • Claeys. An-Sofie, Cauberghe. Verolien, & Vyncke, P. (2010). RestoringReputation in Times of Crisis: An Experimental Study of TheSituational Crisis Communication Theory And The Moderating Effectsof Locus of Control, Public Relations Review , 36, p. 256-262.
  • Chowdhury, M. S., & Shahabuddin, A. M. (2007). Self-Efficacy, Motivation and278Their Relationship to Academic Performance of Bangladesh CollegeStudents. College Quarterly , 10 (1), 1-9.
  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinionformation in competitive elite environments. Journal ofCommunication , 57, 99?118.
  • Choi, Y., & Lin, Y. (2009). Consumer responses to Mattel product recallsposted on online bulletin boards: Exploring two types of emotion.Journal of Public Relations Research , 21, 198-207.
  • Cho, S. H., & Gower, K. K. (2006). Framing effect on the public’'s response tocrisis: Human interest frame and crisis type influencing responsibilityand blame. Public Relations Review , 32, 420?-422.
  • Cho, H. & Salmon, C.T. (2007). Unintended Effects of Health CommunicationCampaigns, Journal of Communication , Volume 57, Issue 2, pages 293?317
  • Cesario, J, Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory Fit and Persuasion:Transfer From "Feeling Right.", Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology , Vol 86(3), Mar 2004, 388-404.
  • Cavanaugh, L. A., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (2007). Appraising the appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of ConsumerPsychology , 17, 169-173.
  • Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 26(6), 741-751.
  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioralactivation, and affective responses to impending reward andpunishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology , 67, 319?333.
  • Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and thepublic good. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cappella, J. N. (2006). Integrating Message Effects and Behavior ChangeTheories: Organizing Comments and Unanswered Questions, Journal ofCommunication , Volume 56, Issue Supplement s1, pp. S265?S279.
  • Cameron, L. D., & Leventhal, H. (Eds.). (2003). The self-regulation of healthand illness behavior. London: Routledge.
  • Cabanac, M. (1992). Pleasure: the common currency. Journal of theoreticalBiology , 155(2), 173-200.
  • Burleson, B. B., & Planalp, S. (2000). Producing emotion(al) messages.Communication Theory , 10(2), 221-250.
  • Bryant & D.Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory andresearch (pp. 61-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Brunel, F.F. & Nelson, M. (2003). Message Order Effects and GenderDifferences in Advertising Persuasion, Journal of Advertising Research ,Volume 43, Issue 03, pp 330-341.
  • Brissette, I., Leventhal, H., & Leventhal, E. A. (2003). Observer ratings ofhealth and sickness: Can other people tell us anything about ourhealth that we don’'t already know? Health Psychology , 22, 471?-478.
  • Brickman, P., Rabinowitz, V.C., Karuza, J., Coates, D., Cohn, E & Kidder, L.(1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist , 37,368-84.
  • Brenders, D. A. (1989). Perceived control and the interpersonal dimension ofhealth care. Health Communication , 1 (2), 1 17-1 3 5.
  • Bradley, M. (2000). Emotion and motivation. In: Cacioppo, JT.; Tassinary, LG.;Berntson, GG., editors. Handbook of psychophysiology. New York:Cambridge University Press; p. 602-642.
  • Boudewyns, V., Turner, M.M., & Paquin, R.S. (2013). Shame-Free GuiltAppeals: Testing the Emotional and cognitive Effects of Shame andGuilt Appeals, Psychology & Marketing , Vol. 30, Issue. 9, pp. 811-825.
  • Boiarsky, G., Rouner, D., &Long, M. (2013). Effects of ResponsibilityAttribution and Message Source on Young Adults' Health Attitudesand Behaviors. Journal of health communication , 18 (7), 881-894.
  • Blumer, H. (1966). The mass, the public, and public opinion. In B. Berelson &M. Janowitz (Eds.), Reader in public opinion and communication (2nded., pp.43?50). New York: Free Press.
  • Blendon, R. J., Hyams, T. S., & Benson, J. M. (1993). Bridging the gap betweenexpert and public views on health care reform. JAMA , 269 (19),2573-2578.
  • Berone, M., Miyazaki, A., & Taylor, L. (2000). The Influence of Cause-RelatedMarketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn DeserveAnother?, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 28, 248-262.
  • Berman, L.F. & Kawachi, I. (2000). Social Epidemiology, Oxford UnivesityPress, New York.
  • Benyamini, Y. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Health Psychology,books.google.com
  • Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, apologies: A theory of imagerestoration discourse. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Bennett, R. (1998). Shame, guilt and responses to non-profit and publicsector ads. International Journal of Advertising , 17 , 483-500.
  • Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1995). Personalnarratives about guilt: Role in action control and interpersonalrelationships. Basic and applied social psychology , 17 (1-2), 173-198.
  • Barry, C. L., Brescoll, V. L., Brownell, K. D., & Schlesinger, M. (2009). Obesitymetaphors: How beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support forpublic policy. Milbank Quarterly , 87, 7?7.
  • Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds?. Perspectives onpsychological science , 1 (1), 28-58.
  • Barone, M.J., Miyazaki, A.D. & Taylor, K.A. (2000) ‘The influence ofcause-related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turndeserve another?’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 28,248?262.
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioralchange. Psychological Review. 84: 191-215.
  • Atkinson, J.W. (1964). Motives in fantasy, action and society. Princeton, NJ:Van Nostrand.
  • Atkin, C., & Salmon, C. (2010). Communication campaigns, In C. Berger, M. Roloff, & D. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), Handbook of communicationscience (2nd ed., pp. 419-435). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Atkin, C. (2001). Impact of public service advertising: Research evidence andeffective strategies. Retrieved October , 16 , 2004.
  • Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., Clark, M. A., & Fugate, M. (2007). Normalizingdirty work: Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint. Academy of Management Journal , 50, 149-174.
  • Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality . New York: Columbia University274Press.
  • Armitage, C.J. & Corner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of plannedbehaviour: a meta-analytical review. British Journal of SocialPsychology, 40, 471-499.
  • Arheart, K. L., Sly, D. F., Trapido, E. J., Rodriguez, R. D., & Ellestad, A. J. (2004). Assessing the reliability and validity of anti-tobaccoattitudes/beliefs in the context of campaign strategy. PreventiveMedicine, 39 , 909-918.
  • Antecol, M. (1998). Effects of individually-focused v. structurally-focusedarguments in anti-smoking television commercials. Dissertationpresented at the University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
  • Andersen, P. A., Guerrero, L. K., &Trost, M. R. (1998). Communication andemotion: Basic concepts and approaches. Handbook of communicationand emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts , 3-27.
  • An, S., & Kang, H. (2011). Stigma-Reducing Components inDirect-to-Consumer Prescription Ads: Onset Controllability, OffsetControllability, and Recategorization, Health Communication , Vol. 26,No. 5, 468-478.
  • Allen, M. W., & Caillouet, R. H. (1994). Legitimation endeavors: Impressionmanagement strategies used by an organization in crisis. Communications Monographs , 61 (1), 44-62.
  • Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556-574.
  • Alhakami, A. S., & Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of the inverserelationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Riskanalysis , 14(6), 1085-1096.
  • Albert, D. & Steinberg, L. (2011). Judgment and Decision Making inAdolescence, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 211- 224.
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting socialbehaviour. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall.
  • Ajzen, I.(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  • Ajzen, I. (2011). Design and evaluation guided by the theory of plannedbehavior. Sociological psychology Evalaluation , Guilford Publications,74-100.
  • Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual andmethodological considerations. Retrieved May 17, 2006.
  • Ajzen, I. (2003). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual andmethodological considerations. Retrieved April 14, 2003, fromUniversity of Massachusetts, Department of Psychology Web site:http://wwwunix.oit.umass.edu/aizen
  • Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation andreasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social PsychologyReview, 6, 107?122.
  • Ajzen, I. (2001). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire:Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved June 24,from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement. pdf.
  • Ajzen, I. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction ofbehavior in personality and social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp.1-63). NewYork: Academic Press.
  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. InJ. Kuhl., & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to272behavior (pp.11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Adler, N. E., & Stewart, J. (2009). Reducing obesity: Motivating action whilenot blaming the victim. Milbank Quarterly, 87, 49?70.
  • 284Grunig, J. E. (1976). Communication behaviors in decision and nondecisionsituations. Journalism Quarterly , 53, 232?263.