박사
STEAM 모형에 기반한 초등영재 프로그램이 독립연구능력에 미치는 효과 = The Effects of STEAM Model based Gifted Program for Elementary Students on Independent Research Skill
김소연
2018년
'
STEAM 모형에 기반한 초등영재 프로그램이 독립연구능력에 미치는 효과 = The Effects of STEAM Model based Gifted Program for Elementary Students on Independent Research Skill' 의 주제별 논문영향력
| 주제 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 동일주제 총논문수 | 논문피인용 총횟수 | 주제별 논문영향력의 평균 |
| 4 | 0 |
0.0% |
주제별 논문영향력
' STEAM 모형에 기반한 초등영재 프로그램이 독립연구능력에 미치는 효과 = The Effects of STEAM Model based Gifted Program for Elementary Students on Independent Research Skill' 의 참고문헌
-
한국정보화진흥원 미래사회의 새로운 가능성과 ICT의 역할 [2010]
-
서울경제신문 과학적 창의인재가 나라의 미래를 바꾼다 [2009]
-
호프만 새로운 인문주의자는 경계를 넘어라. 황상익 외(2005). 고즈원재인용 [1996]
-
한국정보화진흥원 미래연구백서: 데이터로 보는 미래사회 전망(0413) [2011]
-
한국정보화진흥원 IT & futures strategy: 트랜드로 보는 미래사회의 5대 특징과 준비과제(1020.) [2009]
-
한국과학창의재단 현장 적용 사례를 통한 융합인재교육(STEAM)의 이해. 현안보고 OR 2012-02서울: 한국과학창의재단 [2012]
-
한국과학창의재단 제3차 영재교육진흥종학계획 수립연구. 과학영재교육정책 연구 최종보고서서울: 한국과학창의재단 [2012]
-
한국과학창의재단 융합인재교육(STEAM) 실행방향 정립을 위한 기초연구. 한국과학창의재단 연구보고서 2012-12서울: 한국과학창의재단 [2012]
-
하이브리드카 만들기의 STEAM 수업자료 개발. 융합인재교육 (STEAM) 9월 월례워크숍 자료집, 37-74
-
편 융합이란 무엇인가: 융합의 과거에서 미래를 성찰한다. (pp. 21-40)
-
통섭의 기능
-
통섭은 제대로 된 융합을 위한 철학
-
탄샤오위에 노벨상 수상자 36인의 학습법서울: 문학수첩리틀북스 [2006]
-
박사
-
박사
-
초등과학 영재교육의 방향과 과제
-
박사
-
창의인성교육의 현장 적용성 제고 방안, 연구보고 CRO 2010-2
-
창의성을 기르는 과학기술의 STEM 융합교육 프로그램 개발
-
주제 중심 통합적 접근에 의한 기술교과 교육프로그램 개발
-
인간의 얼굴을 한 과학
-
융합인재교육(STEAM) 수업 모델 연구. 한국의 다빈치 교육, 융합 인재교육(STEAM) 2011년도 성과발표회 자료집
-
융합인재교육 파이오니어 양성과정 연수 및 STEAM 추진사업 안 내. 연수자료집 35-39
-
왜 창의인재인가: 창의성 교육의 실효성 강화 방안. 2010년 제1차 미래교육공동체포럼. 교육과학기술부
-
영재교육 최적화를 통한 창조적 인재육성을 위한 제3차 영재교육 진흥 종합계획(2013~2017)
-
영재교육 최적화를 통한 창조적 인재육성을 위한 ‘제 3차 영재교육 진흥종합계획 2013-2017’
-
연세국어사전
-
스노우 두 문화: 과학과 인문학의 조화로운 만남을 위하여, 오용석 옮김서울: 사이언스북스 [2001]
-
수학영재학생들의 독립연구 절차와 교사의 역할. 박사학위논문
-
박은혜, 김영태 교육 및 임상현장 적용을 위한 단일대상연구
-
박은혜, 김영태 단일대상 연구
-
미래 인재의 조건과 고등교육방향
-
도승이, 이정규, 김누리, 성은현 한국영재교육의 방향 모색. 융합형 창의인재 육성
-
국가과학기술위원회 제2차 과학기술인재 육성지원 기본계획(‘11-’15) [2011]
-
교육의 틀을 바꿔야 대한민국이 산다
-
교육과학기술부 초중등학교 교육과정 총론. 제2009-41호 [2009]
-
교육과학기술부 창의적 과학기술인재대국을 위한 ‘제 2차 과학기술인재 육성 및 지원 기본계획’ 2011-2015서울: 교육과학기술부 [2011]
-
교육과학기술부 창의인재와 선진과학기술로 여는 미래 대한민국2011년 업무보고 [2010]
-
교육과학기술부 융합인재교육(STEAM) 추진성과 보고(2011.12.20). 한국 의 다빈치 교육, 융합인재교육(STEAM) 2011년도 성과발표회 자료집한국 과학창의재단 [2011]
-
교육과학기술부 융합인재교육(STEAM 활성화 방안. 융합인재교육 (STEAM) 수도권 설명회(2011.7.11)한국과학창의재단 [2011]
-
교육 및 임상현장 적용을 위한 단일대상연구(이은경, 최양규 공역). 서울: Cengaga Learning
-
과학, 인문학, 그리고 대학: 과학과 인문학을 아우르는 학문 이야기
-
공업계열 전문계 고등학교 전기 전자 통신 분야의 활동 중심 STEM 교육프로그램 개발
-
Yakman, G. G. (2010). What is the point of STΣ@M? A brief overview. Retrieved from http://www.steamedu.com/2006-2010_Short_What_IS_STEAM.pdf.
-
Yakman, G. G. (2008). STΣ@M Education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education. Retrieved from http://www.steamedu.com/2088_PATT_Publication.pdf.
-
Weisberg, Robert W. Creativity: understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons./ 「창의성」김미선 역시그마프레스, 2009 [2006]
-
Ward, V. (1961). Educating the gifted: An axiomatic approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
-
W Gifted students and process skill. In Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (Ed) Method and materials for teaching the gifted. 이화국, 김언주, 문정화(역) (2003). 영재교육의 방법과 치료
-
VanTassel-Baska, J., Zuo, L., Avery, L. D., & Little, C. A. (2002). A curriculum study of gifted student learning in the language arts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 30-44.
-
VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G. M., Reis, R. R., Poland, D. L., & Avery. L. D. (1998). A national pilot study of science curriculum effectiveness for high-ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42. 200-211.
-
VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L. D., Little, C. A., & Hughes, C. E. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation of curriculum innovation: The impact of the William and Mary units in schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 244-272.
-
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners. Denver, CO: Love.
-
Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
-
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (ed.) (2004). Curriculum For Gifted and Talented Students. Thousand Oaks, California Press.
-
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1998). Excellence in educating gifted and talented learners, (3rd ed.). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.
-
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C(2009). 21st Century Skills. Jossey-Bass.
-
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., Doval, K. B. (1994). Creative problem solving; an overview in Runco, M. A(Eds.), Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity(pp. 233-236). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
-
Treffinger, D. J. (1975). Teaching for self-directed learning: A priority of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 46-59.
-
Toulmin, s. (1953). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson.
-
Topper, D. (1990). Natural science and visual art: Reflections on the interface. In Elizabeth, G. (Ed.). Beyond History of Science: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Schofield, 296-310.
-
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
-
The Science Council (2010). Priorities for Science and Innovation Policy 2010-2015.
-
Tanner, L. N. (1997). Dewey's laboratory school: Lesson for today. New York: Teacher's College Press.
-
Strosberg, Aliane Art and scienceAbbeville Press./ 「예술과 과학」김 승윤 역, 을유문화사, 2002 [2001]
-
Sternberg, R. E. (2003). Giftedness according to the theory of successful intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifed education(3rd ed., pp. 88-99). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
-
Starco, A. J. (1988). Effects of the revolving door identification model on creative productivity and self-efficacy. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 291-297.
-
Snow, C. P. (1964). The two cultures: And a second look. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
-
Schweizer, P. D. (1982). John constable, rainbow science, and english color theory. The Art Bulletin, 64, 424-445.
-
Schmitt, W. H.(2011). STEM reform: Which way to go? Paper presented at the National Research Council Workshop on Successful STEM Education in K-12 Schools. Retrieved on June 15.
-
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
-
Sanders, M. (2009). STEAM, STEM education, STEM mania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
-
Sanders, M. (2006, November). A rationale for new approaches to STEM education and STEM education graduate programs. Paper presented at the 93rd Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference, Nashville, TN.
-
STEMA 교육론
-
STEM!! 교육이 융합의 철학을 품다
-
STEAM 통합교육 수업자료 제작을 위한 PDIE 모형 개발. 대한공 업교육학회 학술대회 발표논문
-
STEAM 교육의 특성화고 수업적용기법. 수업혁신팀 전체 워크숍 자료집, 107-151
-
STEAM 교육론
-
Root-Bernstein Robert & Michele Root-Bernstein (2004). Artistic scientists and scientific artists: the link between polymathy and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. et al. (Eds.) Creativity: from potential to realization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
-
Root-Bernstein Robert & Michele Root-Bernstein Spark of genius. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. / 「생각의 탄생」박종성 역에코의 서 재, 2007 [1999]
-
Rogers, K. (1986). Do the gifted think and learn differently? Airview of recent research and its implications of instruction. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 17-39.
-
Repco, A. F., Szostak, R., & Buchberger, M. P. (2014). Introduction to interdisciplinary studies. London: Sage Publication.
-
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Storrs, CT: Creative Learning Press.
-
Renzulli, J. S. (1994). School for Talent Development: A Practical Plan For Total School Improvement. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
-
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness. A developmental model for creative productivity. In R, J. Sternberg & J. E. Davison (Eds.), Conception of Giftedness. Cambridge University Press.
-
Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for education excellence. Mansfeild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
-
Pink, D. (2006). "A Whole New Mind" Why Right-Brainers Will the Future", Riverhead Books. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 2007.
-
Park. K., & Lee, H. Integrative STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education: Contemporary Trends and Issues
-
Olenchak, F. R., & Renzulli, J. S. (1989). The effectiveness of the Schoolwide Enrichment Model on selected aspects of elementary school change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 36-46.
-
National Research Council [NRC]. (2010). Conceptual framework for new science education standards. Available at: accessed Mar. 14, 2012. http://www.nationalacademies.org/bose/Standards_FrameworkHomepage.html.
-
NSB(2007). A National Action Plan for Addressing the critical needs of the U.S Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education System(Publication No. NSB-07-114). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
-
NRC(2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas.
-
NGA(2007). Innovation America: A compact for postsecondary education. Washington, D.C: U.S. NGA Center for Best Practice.
-
Moore, B. (2001). Developing of Research skill for gifted students. In Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (Ed) Methods and materials for teaching the gifted. New York: Prufrock Press, Inc.
-
Mansilla, V. B., Miller, W. C., & Gardner, H. (2000). On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation (pp. 17-38). New York: Teacher's College Press.
-
Luma Support Group(2002). Finnish Knowledge in Mathematics and Science in 2002.
-
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. London: Hutchinson.
-
Klein, J., & Newell, W. (1997). Advancing interdisciplinary studies [in:] handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices and change, eds. J. gaff, J. ratcliff.
-
Kemp, M. (1990). The science of art. New Haven: Yale University Press.
-
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Karnes, F. A., & Riley, T. L. (1996). Competition: Maximizing your abilities. Waco, TX: Prufock Press.
-
Kaplan, S. N., & Gould, B. (2002). Independent Study. California: E2E.
-
Johnsen, S. K., & Goree, K. (2005). Independent Study for Gifted Learners. New York: Prufrock Press, Inc.
-
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
-
Ingram, J. B. (1979). Curriculum integration and lifelong education. NY: Pergamon Press Inc.
-
Hindle, B. (1981). Emulation and invention. New York: New York University Press.
-
Henry, S. L. (1989). Paul Klee's pictorial mechanics from physics to the picture plane. Pantheon, 47, 147-165.
-
Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Beer, S. (2000). When theory meets practice in the world of school. In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation (pp. 1-16). New York: Teacher's College Press
-
Gorham, E., & Kelly, J. (2014). Multiauthorship, and indicator of the trend toward team research in ecology. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 95(3), 243-249
-
Gardner, H. (2009). Five Minds for the Future. Harvard Business School Press.
-
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
-
Frost, R. O., Marten, P. A., Lahart, C., & Rogenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 14. 449-468.
-
Fogarty, R.& Stoehr, J. (1995). Integrating curriculum with multiple intelligences: Teams, Themes & Threads. Corwin Press.
-
Feldhusen, J. F., & Kolloff, P. B. (1986). The Purdue three-stage enrichment model for gifted education at the elementary level. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing for the gifted and talented. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
-
Eisely, L. (1978). The star thrower. New York: Times Books.
-
Eiduson, B. (1962). Scientist: Their psychological world. New York: Basic Books.
-
Edgerton, S. Y. (1984). Galileo, Florentine 'Disegno' and the 'Strange Spottednesse' of the moon. Art Journal, 44, 225-232.
-
Dugard, P., File, P., & Todman, J. (2012). Single-case and small-n experimental designs: a practical guide to randomization tests(2ed). New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
-
Drake, S. M. (2007). Creating standards-based integrated curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
-
Drake, S. M. (1993). Planning integrated curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum development.
-
Drake, S. M. (1991). How Our Team Dissolved the Boundaries. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 21-22.
-
Domestic Policy Council, Office of Science and Technology Policy(Feb, 2005). American Competitiveness Initiative.
-
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi.
-
Dewey, J. (1899). The school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Department for Education and Skills (2004). SILF: Science & Innovation Framework 2004-2014.
-
Department for Business, Innovation and Skill(BIS) (2010). Science and Mathematics Secondary Education for the 21st Century.
-
Delcourt, M. A. (1993). Creative productive among secondary school students: combining energy, interest, and imagination. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 23-31.
-
Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 58-64.
-
David S. W. (2009). Evolution for Everyone: How Darwin's theory can change the way we think about our lives. New York: Delta Trade Paperbacks.
-
Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 45-63.
-
DTI, DfES(2006). Science and innovation investment framework 2004-2014: next steps.
-
Colangelo, N., & Kelly, K. R. (1993). A study of student, parent, and teacher attitudes toward gifted programs and gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 107-110.
-
Clark, K. (1981). Moments of vision. London: Murray.
-
Clark, A. C., & Ernst, J. V. (2007). A model for the integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The Technology Teacher, 66(4), 24-26.
-
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697.
-
Chandrasekhar, S. (1979). Beauty and the quest for beauty in science. physics today, July, 25-30.
-
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? : A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11
-
Betts, G. T., & Kercher, J. K. (1999). The autonomous Learner Model: Optimizing ability. Greeley, CO:ALPS Publications.
-
Betts, G. T(1985). The autonomous Learner Model for gifted and talented, Greeley, CO:ALPS Publications.
-
Avery, L., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2001). Changing teacher behavior: The struggle to provided level instruction in the regular classroom. Manuscript submitted for publication.
-
Antliff, R. M. (1988). Bergson and Cubism: A Reassessment. Art Journal. 47, 341-349.
-
American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS)(2010). New Challenges, New Strategies Building Excellence in Undergraduate STEM Education. National Science foundation, Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics(TUES).
-
American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS)(1990). Science for All Americans: Project 2061. NY: Oxford University Press.
-
Amabile, T. M. (1966). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westveiw Press.
-
Aikin, W. M(1943). Thirty schools tell their story. New York: Harper & Brothers.
-
Aikin, W. M(1942). The story of the eight-year study: With conclusions and recommendations. New York: Harper & Brothers.
-
2장 융합은 얼마나: 이론상의 가능성과 실천상의 장벽에 관하여
-
2월). 외국의 STEAM/STEAM 교육 사례