논문상세정보
-
- 저자 윤정현
- 형태사항 26 cm
- 일반주기 지도교수: 노태희
- 학위논문사항 2017. 8, 과학교육과, 서울대학교 대학원, 학위논문(박사)-
- DDC 507
- 발행지 서울
- 언어 kor
- 출판년 2017
- 발행사항 서울대학교 대학원
유사주제 논문( 221)
박사
중등 화학 수업에서 스마트 기기를 활용한 개념 적응적 개별화 학습과 소집단 학습의 효과 = The Influences of Individualized Learning Adapted to Student’s Conception and Small Group Learning Using Smart Devices in Secondary Chemistry Classes
윤정현
2017년
'
중등 화학 수업에서 스마트 기기를 활용한 개념 적응적 개별화 학습과 소집단 학습의 효과 = The Influences of Individualized Learning Adapted to Student’s Conception and Small Group Learning Using Smart Devices in Secondary Chemistry Classes' 의 주제별 논문영향력
| 주제 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 동일주제 총논문수 | 논문피인용 총횟수 | 주제별 논문영향력의 평균 |
| 103 | 0 |
0.0% |
주제별 논문영향력
' 중등 화학 수업에서 스마트 기기를 활용한 개념 적응적 개별화 학습과 소집단 학습의 효과 = The Influences of Individualized Learning Adapted to Student’s Conception and Small Group Learning Using Smart Devices in Secondary Chemistry Classes' 의 참고문헌
-
화학 개념 학습에서 협동적 CAI와 상호동료교수적 CAI의 효과: 개 념 이해와 언어적 상호작용
-
협력적 지식창출 가정의 규명: 활동이론을 통한 e 러닝설계안 작성 활동의 분석
-
협동학습 전략의 교수 효과: 중학교 물상 수업에 LT모델의 적용Cha, Jeong-Ho Kwon, Eun-Jue Lim, Hee-Jun Noh, Suk-Goo Noh, Taehee 권은주 노석구 노태희 임희준 차정호 한국과학교육학회지, 17(2), 139-147 [1997]
-
협동적 CAI에서 소집단 구성 방법에 따른 언어적 상호작용Cha, Jeong-Ho Kim, Kyung-Sun Noh, Taehee Park, Hye-Young 김경순 노태희 박혜영 차정호 대한화학회지, 49(6), 575-583 [2005]
-
한국교육학술정보원 스마트교육 수업 시나리오: 스마트교육 및 수업 시나리 오 개요한국교육학술정보원 교육자료 TM2012-35 [2012]
-
토론 과정에서 사회적 합의 형성을 강조한 개념 학습 전략: 교수 효 과 및 소집단 토론에서의 언어적 상호작용
-
차별화 교수지원 스마트툴의 설계 및 개발 연구: 사용자 중심 설계
-
암석단원 학습을 위한 스마트폰 애플리케이션 개발 및 효과
-
박사
-
스마트 교육의 의미와 전망
-
스마트 교육 경험 집단과 비 경험 집단 간 활용 의도 경로계수 차 이 분석
-
소집단 과학 학습에서 유화성에 따른 집단 구성의 교수 효과 및 언 어적 상호작용
-
상황인지 기반 스마트 러닝 모형 연구
-
교육과학기술부 인재대국으로 가는 길: 스마트 교육 추진 전략교육과학기 술부 [2011]
-
과학과 교육과정(별책 9)
-
과학 협동학습에서 집단주의 성향에 따른 소집단 구성의 교수 효과와 언어적 상호작용
-
zdemir, S. (2010). Supporting printed books with multimedia: A new way to use mobile technology for learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 135-138.
-
Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers & Education, 94, 1-17.
-
Zhu, Q., Guo, W., & Hu, Y. (2012) Mobile learning in higher education: Students acceptance of mobile learning in three top Chinese universities. Bachelor's thesis, Jonkoping University, Jonkoping, 2012.
-
Zhai, X., Zhang, M., & Li. M. (2016). One-to-one mobile technology in high school physics classrooms: Understanding its use and outcome. British Journal of Educational Technology,
-
Zangyuan, O. (2003). The application of adaptive learning environment on oxidation-reduction web-title. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(4), 383-405.
-
Yee, K., & Hargis, J. (2008). iPhones and smartphones. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(4), 8-9.
-
Wood, C., Jackson, E., Hart, L., Plester, B., & Wilde, L. (2011). The effect of text messaging on 9- and 10-year-old children’s reading, spelling and phonological processing skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(1), 28–36.
-
Williams, A. J., & Pence, H. E. (2011). Smart phones, a powerful tool in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(6), 683-686.
-
Wexler, S., Schlenker, B., Brown, J., Metcalf, D., Quinn, C., Thor, E., Van Barneveld, A., & Wagner, E. (2007). Research report on mobile learning: What it is, why it matters, and how to incorporate it into your learning strategy. Santa Rosa, CA: eLearning Guild.
-
Wang, M. (1980). Adaptive instruction: Building on diversity. Theory into Practice, 19, 122-128.
-
Walsh, E., & Cho, I. (2012). Using evernote as an electronic lab notebook in a translational science laboratory. Journal of Laboratory Automation, 20(10), 1-6.
-
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Vahey, P., Tatar, D., & Roschelle, J. (2007). Using handheld technology to move between private and public interactions in the classroom. In M. van't Hooft & K. Swan (Eds.), Ubiquitous Computing in Education: Invisible Technology, Visible Impact. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
-
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2012). Turning on mobile learning: Global themes. UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile Learning. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021 /002164/216451E..pdf
-
Treleaven, L. (2004). A knowledge-sharing approach to organizational change: A critical discourse analysis. In H. Tsoukas & N. Mylonopoulos (Eds.), Organizations as Knowledge Systems: Knowledge, Learning and Dynamic Capabilities. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/ 9780230524545
-
Traxler, J. (2005). Defining mobile learning. Paper presented at the IADIS International Conference on Mobile Learning. Malta.
-
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
-
Thomchick, E. (1997). The use of collaborative learning in logistic classes. Journal of Business Logistics, 18(2), 191-205.
-
Tennyson, R. D., & Christensen, D. L. (1989). Educational research and theory perspectives on intelligent computer-assisted instruction. In 11th Annual Proceeding of Selected Research Paper presented at the 1989 Annual Convention of the AECT.
-
Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183-219.
-
Sung, Y.-T., Hou, H.-T., Liu, C.-K., & Chang, K.-E. (2010). Mobile guide system using problem-solving strategy for museum learning: A sequential learning behavioural pattern analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 106-115.
-
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.
-
Song, S. H., & Keller, J. M. (2001). Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 49(2), 5-22.
-
Snir, J., Smith, C. L., & Raz, G. (2003). Linking phenomena with computing underlying models: A software tool for introducing students to the particulate model of matter. Science Education, 87(6), 794-830.
-
Singhanayok C., & Hooper, S. (1998). The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on students' achievement, option selections, and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(2), 17-36.
-
Singer, J. E., Wu, H., & Tal, R. (2003). Students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter. School Science and Mathematics, 103(1), 28-44.
-
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2, 1-8.
-
Shuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. (2013). The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners. UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile Learning.
-
Shon, M. (1999). Cooperative learning approach to CAI. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1), 159-178.
-
Shih, J. L., Chuang, C. W., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). An inquiry-based mobile learning approach to enhancing social science learning effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 50–62.
-
Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2003). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen & P. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed., pp. 605-620). Mahan: LEA.
-
Scott, K. M., Nerminathan, A., Alexander, S., Phelps, M., & Harrison, A. (2017). Using mobile devices for learning in clinical settings: A mixed-methods study of medical student, physician and patient perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 176–190.
-
Schubert, W. H. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New Yor k: MacMillan Publishing Company.
-
Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201-224.
-
Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Using peer teams to lead online discussions. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2002(1), p.Art. 1.
-
Ross, J. A., & Smyth, E. (1995). Differentiating cooperative learning to meet the needs of gifted learners: A case for transformational leadership. Journal for the Education of the Gifted December, 19(1), 63-82.
-
Rogers, Y., & Price, S. (2008). The role of mobile devices in facilitating collaborative inquiry in Situ. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 1-21.
-
Renzi, S., & Klobas, J. (2000). Steps toward computer supported collaborative learning for large classes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 317-328.
-
Reiser, R., & Dempsey, J. (2006). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merririll Prentice Hall.
-
Reilly, M., & Shen, H. (2012). Personalized multi-user view and content synchronization and retrieval in real-time mobile social software applications. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 78(4), 1185-1203.
-
Reilly, M., & Shen, H. (2011). Shared note-taking: A smartphone-based approach to increased student engagement in lectures. Paper presented at the 11th International Workshop on Collaborative Editing Systems in conjunction with ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
-
Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M L. L., Terwel, J., & Eden, P. (2009). Effects on participation of an experimental CSCL programme to support elaboration: Do all students benefit? Computers & Education, 52(1), 113-125.
-
Poslani, Z. (2003). M-learning and its applications in 21st century. New Delhi: Asia Publishing House.
-
Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 78-102.
-
Park, O., & Lee, J. (2003). Adaptive instructional systems. In D. H. Jonassen & P. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Mahan: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
-
Park, O. C. (1996). Adaptive instructional system. In Jonassen. D. (Ed.), Hand book of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
-
Paramythis, A., & Loidl-Reisinger, S.(2004). Adaptive Learning Environments and e-Learning Standards. Electronic Journal on e-Learning, 2(1), 181-194.
-
O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J., Taylor, J., Sharples, M. & Lefrere, P. (2005). Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring/in a mobile environment. Retrieved fro m www.mobilearn.org/download/results/guidelines.pdf
-
Oliveira, A. W., & Sadler, T. (2008). Interactive patterns and conceptual converge nce during student collaborative in science. Journal of Research in Science T eaching, 45(5), 634-658.
-
Noh, T., & Scharmann, L. C. (1997). Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students’ conceptions and problem-solvi ng ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 199-217.
-
Ng, W., Nicholas, H., Loke, Seng., & Torabi, T. (2009). Designing effective pedagogical systems for teaching and learning with mobile and ubiquitous devices. In T.T. Goh (Eds.). Multiplatform E-learning Systems and Technologies. Mobile Devices for Ubiquitous ICT-Based Education. Hershey New York, USA.
-
Murphy, M. A., & Davidson, G. V. (1991). Computer-based adaptive instruction: Effects of learner control on concept learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(2), 51-54.
-
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classroom. Maidenhead-Philadephia: Open university Press.
-
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theoretical principles of distance education. New York: Routledge.
-
MoLeNet (2007). What is the mobile learning? Retrieved from http://www.molene t.org.uk/
-
Milrad L. (2003), Mobile learning: Challenges, perspectives, and reality, In K. Nyiri (Ed.). Mobile Learning: Essays on Philosophy, Psychology and Education. Passagen Verlag Vienna, Austria.
-
Messinger, J. (2011). M-learning: An exploration of the attitudes and perceptions of high school students versus teachers regarding the current and future use of mobile devices for learning. Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/ 34/87/3487951.html
-
Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 11(2), 121–134.
-
Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006). Mapping children's discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1817-1841.
-
Liu, T-C., Peng, H., Wu, W-H., & Lin, M-S. (2009). The effects of mobile natural-science learning based on the 5E learning cycle: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 344-358.
-
Liu, M., Scordino, R., Geurtz, R., Navarrete, C., Ko, Y., & Lim, M. (2014). A look at research on mobile learning in K–12 education from 2007 to the present. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 325–372.
-
Lin, Y-T., Chang, C-H., Hou, H-T., & Wu, K-C. (2015). Exploring the effects of employing Google Docs in collaborative concept mapping on achievement, concept representation, and attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(3), 1-20.
-
Laat, M. & Vally, V. (2003). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31, 7-39.
-
Kumar, N., Belhumeur, P. N., Biswas, A., Jacobs, D. W., Kress, W. J., Lopez, I. C., & Soares Jo o V. B. (2012). Leafsnap: A computer vision system for automatic plant species identification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7577, 502-516.
-
Korucu A. T., & Alkan A. (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925–1930.
-
Koole, M. L. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile Learning: Transforming The Delivery of Education and Training. Edmonton, AB: AU Press, Athabasca University.
-
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives: The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203-228.
-
Kirschner, P. A., Strijibos, J., Krejins, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 47-66.
-
Kirschner, P. A., Beersa, P. J., Boshuizena, H. P. A., & Gijselaersc, W. H. (2007). Coercing knowledge construction in collaborative learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 403-420.
-
Kinshuk, S. J., Sutinen, E., & Goh, T. (2003). Mobile technologies in support of distance learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 1(1), 60-68.
-
Kiger, D., Herro, D., & Prunty, D. (2012). Examining the influence of a mobile learning intervention of third grade math achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 61–82.
-
Keskin, N, O., & Metcalf, D. (2011). The current perspective, theories and practices of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 202-208.
-
Keller, J. M., & Subhiyah, R. (1993). Course interest survey. Florida State University.
-
Keller, F. S. (1974). Ten years of personalized instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 1, 4-9.
-
Keagen, D. (2005). The incorporation of mobile learning into mainstream education and training. Paper presented at Proceedings of mLearn 2005-4th World Conference on m-Learning, Cape Town, South Africa, 25-28 October 2005.
-
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium.
-
Jimenez-Aleixandre M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: an overview. In S. Erduran, & M. P. Jimen z-Aleixandre, Argumentation in Science Education: Recent Developments and Future Directions. New York: Springer.
-
Jarvela, S., Naykki, P., Laru, J., & Luokkanen, T. (2007). Structuring and regulating collaborative learning in higher education with wireless networks and mobile tools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 71-79.
-
Hwang, W.-Y., & Chen, H. S. L. (2012). Users familiar situational contexts facilitate the practice of EFL in elementary schools with mobile devices. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 101–125.
-
Hwang, G.-J., Wu, P.-H., & Ke, H.-R. (2011). An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2272–2280.
-
Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C. & Yang, S. J. H. (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 81–91.
-
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.
-
Huang, Y. M., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2010). Effectiveness of a mobile plant learning system in a science curriculum in Taiwanese elementary education. Computers & Education, 54(1), 47-58.
-
Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 27-40.
-
Hooper, S. (1992). Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 21-38.
-
Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Teaching science through online, peer discussions: Speak easy in the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 839-857.
-
Han, J. H., & Finkelstein, A. (2013). Understanding the effects of professors’ pedagogical development with clicker assessment and feedback technologies and the impact on students’ engagement and learning in higher education. Computers & Education, 65, 64-76.
-
Hamilton, N., & Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5-30.
-
Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437-469.
-
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2011). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. New York: Springer.
-
Glaser, R. (1977). Adaptive education: Individual diversity and learning. New York: Holt.
-
Gilbert, J. (2007). Knowledge, the disciplines, and learning in the digital age. Educational Research of Policy and Practice, 6, 115-122.
-
Georgiev, T., Geirgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004). M-learning–a new stage of e-learning. Retrieved from http://ecet.ecs.ru.acad.bg/cst04/Docs/sIV/428.pdf
-
Gay, G., Rieger, R., & Bennington, T. (2002). Using mobile computing to enhance field study. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
-
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive presence. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2149/740
-
Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of science-related attitudes: Handbook. Hawthorn, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research.
-
FitzPatrick, K. A., Finn, K. E., & Campisi, J. (2011). Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(3), 280-289.
-
Dodge, B. (2001). Five rules for writing a great WebQuest. Learning & Learning with Technology, 28(8), 6–9.
-
Dodds, P., & Fletcher, J. D. (2004). Opportunities for new "smart" learning envir onments enabled by next generation Web capabilities. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(4), 391-404.
-
Ding, N., & Harskamp. E.(2006). How partner gender influences female students’ problem solving in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5), 331–343.
-
Corno, L., & Snow, R. E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences am ong learners. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, M acmillan.
-
Cook, V. (2012). Learning everywhere, all the time. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 78(3), 48-51.
-
Clark, D. B., & Slotta, J. D. (2000). Evaluating media-enhancement and source authority on the internet: The knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 859-871.
-
Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Tsai, C.-C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618–1627.
-
Charitonos, K., Blake, C., Scanlon, E., & Jones, A. (2012). Museum learning via social and mobile technologies: (How) can online interactions enhance the visitor experience? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 802-819
-
Chang, C.-S., Chen, T.-S., & Hsu, W.-H. (2011). The study on integrating WebQuest with mobile learning for environmental education. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1228–1239.
-
Chang, B. Y. (2012). Smartphone-based chemistry instrumentation: Digitization of colorimetric measurements. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 33(2), 549-552.
-
Caudill, J. G. (2007). The growth of m-learning and the growth of mobile computing: Parallel developments. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-8.
-
Byrda, K. S., & Caldwell, B. S. (2011). Increased memory load during task completion when procedures are presented on mobile screens. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(5), 643-658.
-
Brusilovsky, P. (1998) Adaptive educational systems on the world wide web: A review of available technologies. Retrieved from http://www-aml.es. umassedu/stern/webits/itsworkshop/Brusilovsky.html
-
Bingham, T., & Coner, M. (2010). The new social learning: A guide to transforming organizations through social media. California: Berrett-Koehler Publisher.
-
Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317-337.
-
Anderson, L. W. (1995). Individualized instruction. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), Inte rnational Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Cambridge, UK: Per gamon.
-
Ally, M. (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Athabasca University: AU Press.
-
Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159-174.
-
Aiello, N. C., & Wolfe, L. M. (1980). A meta-analysis of individualized instruction in science. Boston: American Educational Research Association.
-
Acar, B., & Tarhan, L. (2008). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ understanding of metallic bonding. Research in Science Education, 38, 401– 420.
-
2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 중학교 교육과정(별책 3)
-
"유아 스마트매체 활용에 따른 상호작용 및 사회,정서행동 양상 분석; 자유선택활동에서 생태학적 관점을 중심으로"김은하 ( Eun Ah Kim ) 유구종 ( Ku Jong Yoo ) 윤향실 ( Hyang Sil Yun ) 조희정 ( Hee Jung Cho ) 열린 유아교육연구, 19(3), 159-186 [2014]