박사

자기효능감에 대한 진성리더십의 영향 : 자기주도학습의 매개효과와 성실성의 조절효과를 중심으로 = The Effect of Authentic Leadership on Self-efficacy : Focused on the Mediating Role of Self-regulated Learning and the Moderating Role of Conscientiousness

손형찬 2016년
논문상세정보
' 자기효능감에 대한 진성리더십의 영향 : 자기주도학습의 매개효과와 성실성의 조절효과를 중심으로 = The Effect of Authentic Leadership on Self-efficacy : Focused on the Mediating Role of Self-regulated Learning and the Moderating Role of Conscientiousness' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 일반 경영
  • 진성리더십
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
756 0

0.0%

' 자기효능감에 대한 진성리더십의 영향 : 자기주도학습의 매개효과와 성실성의 조절효과를 중심으로 = The Effect of Authentic Leadership on Self-efficacy : Focused on the Mediating Role of Self-regulated Learning and the Moderating Role of Conscientiousness' 의 참고문헌

  • 진정성이란 무엇인가
    윤정구 한언출판사 [2012]
  • 진성리더십이 자기주도학습 능력 및 조직유효성에 미치는 영향: C의료 바이오기업 구성원을 대상으로
    송영수 이영수 HRD연구, 16(3), 81-112 [2014]
  • 진성리더십이 부하의 태도와 행동에 미치는 영향 : 상사신뢰의 매개효과 검증
    문혜강 배성현 서인덕 안성익 한국경영학회, 30(1), 435-461 [2015]
  • 중소기업 최고경영자의 변혁적 리더십이 기업성과에 미치는 영향: 학습지향성, 시장지향성, 혁신성의 매개효과를 중심으로
    박권홍 정대용 경영교육연구, 62, 245-270 [2010]
  • 자기조절학습 전략이 학업성과에 미치는 영향 : e-learning 사회복지 교과목을 중심으로. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society
    권금주 한국자료분석학회, 12(3), 1717-1728 [2010]
  • 자기결정성 학습동기, 메타인지, 자기주도적 학습능력 및 학습몰입과 학업성취 간의 구조적 관계 분석
    이지혜 충북대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문 [2009]
  • 우리 기업의 정보시스템 특성과 사용자의 자기조절 특성이 학습 성과에 미치는 영향
    이동만 최종민 경영학연구, 18(2), 43-84 [2008]
  • 성취목표지향성과 자기조절학습과의 관련성 검토
    양명희 오종철 교육심리연구, 20(1), 745-764 [2006]
  • 성인학습자의 자기주도성과 인구학적 및 사회심리학적 변인 연구
    유귀옥 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문 [1997]
  • 기업 사이버 교육생의 자기조절학습능력, 만족도, 학습몰입, 학업지속의향 간의 관계
    설현남 이상회 정애경 주영주 대한전자공학회, 49(2), 65-74 [2012]
  • Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Wang. P., Wang, H., Schaubroeck, J., & Avolio, B. J. (2010). Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 901-914.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic Leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure?. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
  • Walumbwa, F. O. (2008). Authentic Leadership to Follower Behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(4), 992-1014.
  • Tough, A. (1979). The adult's learning projects: A fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning. Toronto, ON: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
  • Smith, G. M. (1967). Usefulness of Peer Ratings of Personality in Educational Research. Educational Psychological Measurement, 27, 967-984.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and Academic Motivation. Educational Psychology, 26, 207-231.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton-Miffilin.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2000). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  • Pintrich,P.R.,& DeGroot,E.V.(1990).Motivationaland self-regulated learningcomponentsofclassroom academicperformance. Journalof EducationalPsychology,82(1),33-40.
  • Oddi, L. F. (1986). Development and validation of an instrument to identify self-directed continuing learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 36, 97-107.
  • Mustrave-Marquart, D., & Bromley, S. P. (1997). Personality, academic attribution, and substance use as predictors of academic achievement in college students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(2), 501-511.
  • Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11(2/3), 145-165.
  • Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
  • Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership development. In Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (pp. 241-258). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695-706.
  • Lousbury, J. W., Sundstrom, E., Loveland, J. M., & Gibson, L. W. (2002). Intelligence, “Big Five” personality traits, and work drive as predictors of course grade. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 1231-1239.
  • Long, H. B. (1992). Philosophical, psychological and practical justifications for studying self-direction in learning. In Long, H. B., & associates (Eds.), Research and application in self-directed learning (pp. 9-24). Norman, OU: Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education.
  • Konovsky, M. A., & Organ, D. W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(3), 253-256.
  • Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Chicago, IL: Follett.
  • Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a Conceptualization of Optimal Self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26.
  • Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1286-1298.
  • Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869-879.
  • Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. In Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 382-394). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
  • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
  • George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership : Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.
  • Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343-372.
  • Friedman, H. S., Tucker, J. S., Schwartz, J. E., Martin, L. R., Tomlinson-Keasey, C., Wingard, D. L., & Criqui, M. H. (1995). Childhood conscientiousness and longevity: Health behaviors and cause of death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 696-703.
  • Ellinger, A. D. (2004). The concept of self-directed learning and its implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6, 158-177.
  • Digman, J. M., & Takemoto-Chock, N. K. (1981). Factors in the Natural Language of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, and Interpretation of Six Major Studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16(2), 149-170.
  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Five robust trait dimensions: Development, stability, and utility. Journal of Personality, 57(2), 195-214.
  • Dewey, J. (1933). The School and society. Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241-1255.
  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R; Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Christensen, A. J., Ehlers, S. L., Wiebe, J. S., Moran, P. J., Raichle, K., Ferneyhough, K., & Lawton, W. J. (2002). Patient personality and mortality: A 4-year prospective examination of chronic renal insufficiency. Healthy Psychology, 21(4), 315-320.
  • Chien, M. (2004). The relationship between self-directed learning readiness and organizational effectiveness. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 4, 285-288.
  • Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Buss, A. H. (1989). Personality as traits. American Psychologist, 44(11), 1378-1388.
  • Brookfield, S. (1985). The continuing educator and self-directed learning in the community. In Brookfield, S. (Ed.), New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 25, 75-85. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Brockett, R. G. (1985). The relationship between self-directed learning readiness and life satisfaction among older adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 35, 210-219.
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Schmitt, N., & Borman, W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980). Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 39-66.
  • Bandura, A., 1986. Social foundations of thought and action : A social cognitive theory. Englewood cliffs, NJ :Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman & Company.
  • Bandura, A. (1977), “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215.
  • Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F. & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15,801-823.
  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315-338.