연구동향 분석
박사

Angoff와 Bookmark 방법을 활용한 초등학교 학업성취도평가의 기준설정에 관한 연구

홍소영 2011년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' Angoff와 Bookmark 방법을 활용한 초등학교 학업성취도평가의 기준설정에 관한 연구' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 교육학
  • angoff method
  • assessment of educational achievement
  • bookmark method
  • standard-setting
  • 기준설정
  • 북마크 방법
  • 앵고프 방법
  • 학업성취도 평가
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
14,402 2

2.8%

' Angoff와 Bookmark 방법을 활용한 초등학교 학업성취도평가의 기준설정에 관한 연구' 의 참고문헌

  • 현대교육평가(3판)
    성태제 [2010]
  • 현대교육평가
    성태제 [2007]
  • 타당도와 신뢰도
    성태제 [1996]
  • 초·중등학교 교육과정
    교육인적자원부 초?중등학교 교육과정 [2007]
  • 준거참조검사의 분할점수에 따른 오차손실 변동과 신뢰성 지수 추정
    김성숙 교육평가연구 [1998]
  • 준거지향평가의 기준 설정 방법 비교: 수행평가의 논술형을 중심으로
    양길석 [2000]
  • 준거지향검사 기준설정 방안의 비교분석
    김석우 윤명희 지은림 교육학연구 [1999]
  • 준거지향 평가기준설정을 위한 Rasch방법의 숙달 학습자 판정 일치도-원점수 및 Angoff방법과의 비교를 중심으로-
    백순근 최인희 준거지향평가 기준 설정을 위한 Rasch 방법의 숙달 학습자 판정 일치도: 원점수 및 Angoff 방법과의 비교를 중심으로 [2006]
  • 제7차 교육과정에 따라 초등학교 성취기준과 평가기준 예시 평가 도구 개발 연구:총론
    김진하 정구향 정미경 제7차 교육과정에 따라 초등학교 성취기준과 평가기준 예시평가도구 개발 연구: 총론 [2001]
  • 절대기준평가에서의 기준설정 방법에 관한 종합적 고찰과 학급검사에서의 기준설정 방안
    임인재 [1996]
  • 앵고프방법과 북마크 방법을 활용한 한국어능력시험의 기준 설정에 관한 연구
    장은아 [2007]
  • 문항반응이론에 기초한 준거설정 방법 비교
  • 박사
    문항반응이론에 근거한 평가기준 설정 방법의 활용가능성에 관한 경험적 연구
    최인희 [2006]
  • 목표지향 검사를 위한 준거설정 방법: 오답추출능력에 의한 준거설정 방법의 타당성
    성태제 [1991]
  • 대전의 동서지역 교육격차실태와 해소방안
    김경희 임선희 교육사회학연구 [2006]
  • 국가수준 학업성취도 평가에서의 성취수준 설정과 수준 분류의 일관성
    김경희(Kyunghee Kim) 교육평가연구 [2005]
  • 검사동등화를 이용한 앵고프 방법과 북마크 방법의 비교
  • Who made thee a judge? Selecting and training participants for standard setting. In Cizek(Ed.), Standard setting: Concepts, method, and perspectives (pp. 119-157)
    Raymond Reid Who made thee a judge? Selecting and training participants for standard setting. In Cizek(Ed.) [2001]
  • Vertical equating for state assessments: Issues and solutions in determination of adequate yearly progress and school accountability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(10). Available online at http://PAREonline.net/getvn
    Huynh Lissitz Vertical equating for state assessments: Issues and solutions in determination of adequate yearly progress and school accountability. Practical Assessment [2003]
  • Validation of educational measure. In Proceedings of the 1969 invitational conference on testing problems: Toward a theory achievement measurement, 35-52
    Cronbach Validation of educational measure. In Proceedings of the 1969 invitational conference on testing problems: Toward a theory achievement measurement [1969]
  • Validating the performance standards associated with passing scores
    Kane [1994]
  • Using an extended Angoff procedure to set standards on complex performance assessment
  • Use of the Rasch IRT model in standard setting: An item mapping method
  • The use of qualitative forms of evaluation for improving educational practice
    Eisner [1979]
  • The selection of upper and lower group for the validation of test items
    Kelly [1939]
  • The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne & M. Scriven(Eds.), Perspectives on curriculum evaluation, (pp. 39-83)
    Scriven The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler [1967]
  • The growth of educational methodology
    Glass [1969]
  • The effect of various factors on standard setting
  • The credibility and comparability of standards
  • The case for compromise in educational selecting and grading. In S. B. Anderson & J. S. Helmick(Eds), On educational testing(pp. 109-127)
    Hofstee The case for compromise in educational selecting and grading. In S. B. Anderson & J. S. Helmick(Eds) [1983]
  • The bookmark standard-setting method: A literature review
  • The bookmark standard setting procedure
  • The bookmark procedure: Psychological perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 249-281)
    Green Lewis Mitzel Patz The bookmark procedure: Psychological perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.) [2001]
  • The bookmark procedure for setting cut-scores and finalizing performance standards: strengths and weaknesses
    Lin [2006]
  • The assumption of the Rasch model-based item mapping approach in setting pass/fail standards
    Shen [2004]
  • The analytic judgement method for setting standards on complex performance assessment. In G. J. Cizek(Ed.), Standard setting: Concepts, method, and perspectives(pp. 283-312)
    Hambleton Plake The analytic judgement method for setting standards on complex performance assessment. In G. J. Cizek(Ed.) [2001]
  • The Bookmark standard setting procedure: Methodology and recent implementations
    The bookmark standard setting procedure: Methodology and recent implementations [1998]
  • TestAn 1.0: 고전검사이론에 의한 문항분석프로그램
  • Statistical methods for rates and proportion
    Fleiss [1981]
  • StandardsforEducationaland PsychologicalTesting
  • Standards setting
    Bunch Cizek [2007]
  • Standards and criteria: A response
    Block [1978]
  • Standard-setting procedures for the specification of performance levels on a standards-based assessment. Retrieved October 31, 2002 from http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeassess/asperf
    Kiplinger Standard-setting procedures for the specification of performance levels on a standards-based assessment. Retrieved October 31 [1997]
  • Standard setting: An alternative approach
    Impara Plake Standard setting: an alternative approach [1997]
  • Standard setting using cluster analysis. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Standard setting: Concepts, method, and perspectives (pp. 339-354)
    Soreci Standard setting using cluster analysis. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.) [2001]
  • Standard setting guidelines
    Cizek [1996]
  • Standard and criteria
    Glass [1978]
  • So much remains the same: Conception and status of validation in setting standards. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 53-88)
    Kane So much remains the same: Conception and status of validation in setting standards. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.) [2001]
  • Setting standards on tests containing computerized performance tasks
  • Setting standards in education: Choosing the best method for your assessment and population. Unpublished paper 2004 Educational Testing Service, Http://rip. tsars. uga. edu/ ~cramer/ 6600/ MorganPerieSetting StandardsinEducation
    Morgan Perie Setting standards in education: Choosing the best method for your assessment and population. Unpublished paper 2004 Educational Testing Service [2004]
  • Setting performance standards. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 433-470)
    Hambleton Pitoniak Setting performance standards. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.) [2006]
  • Setting performance standards. In R. A. Berk(Ed.), A guide to criterion-referenced test construction (pp. 169-198)
    Shepard Setting performance standards. In R. A. Berk(Ed.) [1980]
  • Setting performance standards through two-stage judgemental policy capturing
    Jaeger [1995]
  • Setting performance standards on educational assessments and criteria for evaluating the process. In G. J. Cizek(Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 89-116)
    Hambleton Setting performance standards on educational assessments and criteria for evaluating the process. In G. J. Cizek(Ed.) [2001]
  • Setting performance standards for student achievement: A report of the national academy of education panel in the evaluation of the NEAP trial state assessment: An evaluation of the 1992 achievement levels
  • Setting appropriate achievement levels for the national assessment of educational progress: Policy framework and technical procedures
  • Selection of judges for standard-setting
    Jaeger [1991]
  • Scale, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 508-600)
    Angoff Scale [1971]
  • Passing scores : a manual for setting standards of performance on educational and occupational tests
  • On the use of IRT models with judgemental standard setting procedures
    Kane [1987]
  • On score locations of binary and partial credit item and their application to item mapping and criterion-referenced interpretation
    Huynh [1998]
  • On item mapping and statistical rules for selecting binary items for criterion-referenced interpretation and Bookmark standard settings
    Huynh [2000]
  • Must all tests be valid? American Psychologist
    Ebel [1961]
  • 박사
    Modified angoff, bookmark, item-descriptor matching(IDM) 방법에 의한 진료수행시험(CPX)의 준거설정
    김나진 박사학위논문 이화여자대학교 대학원 [2010]
  • Item response theory : principles and applications
    Hambleton, Ronald K Item response theory: Principles and applications [1985]
  • Item disordinality with the bookmark standard-setting procedure
  • Is an Angoff standard an indication of minimal competence of examinees or of judges? Advances in Health Sciences Education
    [2008]
  • Instructional technology and the measurement oflearning outcomes: Some questions
    Glaser.R.L [1963]
  • Innovative methods for helping standard-Setting participants to perform their task: The role of feedback regarding consistency, accuracy, and impact. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Standard setting: Concepts, method, and perspectives (pp. 159-173)
    Reckase Innovative methods for helping standard-Setting participants to perform their task: The role of feedback regarding consistency [2001]
  • Implications for standard setting of the National Academy of Education evaluation of the National Assessment of Educational Progress achievement levels. In Proceedings of the joint conference on standard setting for large-scale assessments of the National Assessment Governing Board and the National Center for Educational Statistics, Vol. II (pp. 143-160). Washington, DC: U.S
    Shepard Implications for standard setting of the National Academy of Education evaluation of the National Assessment of Educational Progress achievement levels. In Proceedings of the joint conference on standard setting for large-scale assessments of the National Assessment Governing Board and the National Center for Educational Statistics [1995]
  • Fundamentals of item response theory
  • From tradition to innovation: standard setting on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 175-217)
    Bourque Loomis From tradition to innovation: standard setting on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.) [2001]
  • Find067. 미발행 컴퓨터 프로그램
    반재천 [2009]
  • Find TCC for Dichotomous Items. 미발행 컴퓨터 프로그램
    반재천 [2009]
  • Evaluation models for criterion-referenced testing: Views regarding mastery in standard setting
    Meskauskas [1976]
  • Evaluating with validity
  • Estimating and adjusting cut off scores: Features of selected methods
  • Essentials of educational measurement(2nd ed)
    Ebel [1972]
  • Educational Evaluation and Decision Making
    [1971]
  • Determination of optimal cutting scores in criterion-referenced measurement
    Berk [1976]
  • Criterion-referenced measurement
  • Conjectures on the rise and call of standard setting: An introduction to context and practice. In G. J. Cizek(Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 3-17)
    Cizek Conjectures on the rise and call of standard setting: An introduction to context and practice. In G. J. Cizek(Ed.) [2001]
  • Compromise models for establishing examination standards
    de Gruijter [1985]
  • Competency test development, validation, and standard setting. In R. M. Jaeger, & C. K. Tittle (Eds.), Minimum competency achievement testing: Motives, models, measures and consequences (pp. 367-396)
    Eignor Hambleton Competency test development [1980]
  • Comparison of Bookmark difficulty locations under different item response models
    Beretvas [2004]
  • Certification of student competence. In R. L. Linn(Ed.), Educational Measurement(3rd ed., pp. 485-514)
    Jaeger Certification of student competence. In R. L. Linn(Ed.) [1989]
  • Basic Principle ofcurriculum and instruction
    Tyler Basic principle of curriculum and instruction [1949]
  • Angoff와 북마크 방법에 의한 준거설정 적용가능성 비교
    김태은 [2004]
  • An iterative structured judgment process for establishing standards on competency tests: Theory and application
    Jaeger [1982]
  • An investigation of alternative methods for item mapping in national assessment of educational progress
    [2001]
  • An integrated judgement procedure for setting standard in complex, large-scale assessments. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Standard setting: Concepts, method, and perspectives (pp. 313-338)
    Jaeger Mills An integrated judgement procedure for setting standard in complex [2001]
  • Absolute grading standards for objective tests
    Nedelsky [1954]
  • A rationale for defining achievement levels using IRT estimated domain scores
  • A new standard-setting method for performance assessment: The domain profile judgement method and some field-test results
  • A modification to Angoff and bookmarking cut scores to account for the imperfect reliability of test scores
    MacCann [2008]
  • A method for reaching a compromise between absolute and relative standard in examination
    Beuk [1984]
  • A meta-analysis of the effects of modifications to the Angoff method on cutoff scores and judgement consensus
  • A comparison of Rasch-model based item map approach and Angoff method in setting standard for medical licensing examinations
    Shen [2001]
  • A comparison of Nedelsky and Angoff cutting score procedures using generalizability theory
  • A comparison of Angoff and Bookmark standard setting methods
    [2002]
  • A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales
    Khan.B.H [1960]
  • A clarification on the response probability criterion RP67 for standard settings based on bookmark and item mapping
    Huynh [2006]
  • A Consumer'sGuideto Setting PerformanceStandardsonCriterion-Referenced Tests
    Berk A consumer's guide to setting performance standards on criterion referenced tests [1986]
  • 2004년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구
    이양락 [2005]
  • 2003년 국가 수준 학업 성취도 평가 연구 -총론-
    2003년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구: 총론 [2004]