교실응답시스템(Classroom Response System; CRS) 활용에 대한 인식과 학업성취도에 관한 연구

논문상세정보
' 교실응답시스템(Classroom Response System; CRS) 활용에 대한 인식과 학업성취도에 관한 연구' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 교육학
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
14,345 0

0.0%

' 교실응답시스템(Classroom Response System; CRS) 활용에 대한 인식과 학업성취도에 관한 연구' 의 참고문헌

  • 학생들이 인식하는 좋은 강의의 특성 연구: 국내 대학과 해외 대학의 강의 체험 분석을 중심으로
    민혜리 이희원 열린교육연구 19 (1) : 57 ~ 88 [2011]
  • Who Wants to Pass Math? Using Clickers in Calculus
    Strasser Strasser, N. Journal of College Teaching & Learning 7 (3) : 49 ~ 52 [2010]
  • Waking the dead: Using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom
    Guthrie, R. W. Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems [2004]
  • Using “Clicker 5” toEnhance Emergent Literacy in Young Learners
    Parette, H. P. Early Childhood Education Journal 36 (4) : 355 ~ 363 [2009]
  • Using clickers to improvestudent engagement and performance in an introductorybiochemistry class
    Addison Milner Wright Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 37 (2) : 84 ~ 91 [2009]
  • Using clickers to identify the muddiest points in large chemistry classes
    King King, D. B. Journal of Chemical Education 88 (11) : 1485 ~ 1488 [2011]
  • Using a personal response system in economics teaching
    Elliott Elliott, C. International Review of Economics Education 1 (1) : 80 ~ 86 [2003]
  • Use of an audience response system during peer teaching among physical therapystudents in human gross anatomy: Perceptions of peer teachers and students
    Wait Wait, R. K. Anatomical Sciences Education 2 (6) : 286 ~ 293 [2009]
  • Technology in support of good pedagogy: Electronic response systems and peer instruction in an economics classroom
  • Students’ Perceptions ofUsing Personal Response Systems (“Clickers”) with Cases in Science
    Herreid Kang Lundeberg Wolter Wolter, B. H. K. Journal of College Science Teaching 40 (4) : 14 ~ 19 [2011]
  • Student perception of clicker usage in nursing education
    Fifer Fifer, P. Teaching and Learning in Nursing 7 (1) : 6 ~ 9 [2012]
  • Promoting student-centeredactive learning in lectures with a personal response system
    Dantas Gauci Gauci, S. A. Kemm Williams Advances in Physiology Education 33 (1) : 60 ~ 71 [2009]
  • Learning to Click: An Evaluation of the Personal ResponseSystem Clicker Technology in Introductory Marketing Courses
    Dahl Sprague Sprague, E. W. Journal of Marketing Education 32 (1) : 93 ~ 103 [2010]
  • Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems incollege lecture halls
    Judson Judson, E. Sawada Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 21 (2) : 167 ~ 181 [2002]
  • Integrating clicker technology at nursingconferences: An innovative approach to research data collection
    Solecki, S. International Journal of Nursing Practice 16 (3) : 268 ~ 273 [2010]
  • Innovative Use of a Classroom Response System during Physics Lab
    Walgren Walgren, J. The Physics Teacher 49 (1) : 30 ~ 32 [2011]
  • Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic votingsystem
    Brown Draper Draper, S. W. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 : 81 ~ 94 [2004]
  • Firstyearstudents perceptions ofthe importance ofgood teaching: Not all things are equal
    Zimitat Research and Development in Higher Education 29 : 386 ~ 392 [2006]
  • Faculty viewpoints on teaching large-enrollmentscience courses with clickers
    MacArthur, J. L. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 30 (3) : 251 ~ 270 [2011]
  • Facilitating engagement of pre-service elementary teacherswith technology: Design and evaluation of effective multiple-choice science questions
    Milner-Bolotin, M. Paper presented at the International Conference on Educational Technology [2011]
  • Examining the effects of an electronic classroom responsesystem on student engagement and performance
    Bartsch Bartsch, R. A. Murphy Journal of Educational Computing Research 44 (1) : 25 ~ 33 [2011]
  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Personal Response Systemin the Classroom
    Collura Shaffer Shaffer, D. M. Teaching of Psychology 36 (4) : 273 ~ 277 [2009]
  • Engaging millennial learners: Effectiveness ofpersonal response system technology with nursing students in small and large classrooms
    Hunter-Revell Hunter-Revell, S. M. McCurry Journal of Nursing Education 49 : 272 ~ 275 [2010]
  • Efficacy of Personal ResponseSystems (“Clickers”) in Large, Introductory Psychology Classes
    Morling, B. Teaching of Psychology 35 (1) : 45 ~ 50 [2008]
  • Effects of audience response systems on student achievement and long-termretention
    Karaman Karaman, S. Social Behavior and Personality 39 (10) : 1431 ~ 1440 [2011]
  • Effect of using an audience response system on learning environment, motivationand long-term retention, during case-discussions in a large group of undergraduate veterinaryclinical pharmacology students
    Doucet Doucet, M. Medical teacher 31 (12) : 570 ~ 579 [2009]
  • Effect of personal response systems on studentperception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum
    FitzPatrick, K. A. Advances in Physiology Education 35 (3) : 280 ~ 289 [2011]
  • Do clickers depersonalize the classroom? An evaluation by shy students
    Bainum Lee Lee, J. B. Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the Western Psychological Association [2006]
  • Developing problem-solving skills through retrosynthetic analysis and clickers inorganic chemistry
    Flynn Flynn, A. B. Journal of Chemical Education 88 (11) : 1496 ~ 1500 [2011]
  • Crossing the Chasm with Classroom Response Systems
    Towns Towns, M. H. Journal of Chemical Education 87 (12) : 1317 ~ 1319 [2010]
  • Cooperative learning: An approach for large enrollment courses
    Cooper Cooper, M. Journal of Chemical Education 72 (2) : 162 ~ 164 [1995]
  • Context matters: Increasing understanding with interactive clicker case studies
    Lundeberg Lundeberg, M. A. Educational Technology Research and Development 59 (5) : 645 ~ 671 [2011]
  • Conserving time in theclassroom: The clicker technique
    Anderson, L. S. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology in the Schools 64 (8) : 1457 ~ 1462 [2011]
  • Combining Peer Discussion withInstructor Explanation Increases Student Learning from In-Class Concept Questions
    Smith, M. K. CBE-Life Sciences Education 10 (1) : 55 ~ 63 [2011]
  • Clicker”technology promotes interactivity in anundergraduate nutrition course
    Weerts, S. E. Journal of Nutrition Education Behavior 41 (3) : 227 ~ 228 [2009]
  • Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips
    Caldwell CBE-Life Sciences Education 6 : 9 ~ 20 [2007]
  • Clickers in teacher education:Student perceptions by age and gender
    Cheeseman, E. A. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 18 (1) : 35 ~ 55 [2010]
  • Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lectureclasses
    Mayer, R. E. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34 (1) : 51 ~ 57 [2009]
  • Clicker satisfaction for students in humandevelopment: differences for class type, prior exposure, and student talkativity
    Beckert, T. E. North American Journal of Psychology 11 (3) : 599 ~ 612 [2009]
  • Clickenomics: Using a Classroom Response System to Increase StudentEngagement in a Large-Enrollment Principles of Economics Course
    Salemi Salemi, M. K. Journal of Economic Education 40 (4) : 385 ~ 404 [2009]
  • Classroom response system-mediated science learning with Englishlanguage learners
    Fies Langman Langman, J. Language & Education : An International Journal 24 (2) : 81 ~ 99 [2010]
  • Changing the nature of lectures using a personalresponse system
    Maikunis, G. Innovations in Education & Teaching International 46 (2) : 199 ~ 212 [2009]
  • Business students’ perceptions, attitudes, andsatisfaction with interactive technology: An exploratory study
    Eastman, J. K. Journal of Education for Business 86 (1) : 36 ~ 43 [2011]
  • An electronic response system and conceptests in general chemistry courses
    Donovan Donovan, W. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 27 (4) : 369 ~ 389 [2008]
  • A study of classroom response system clickers: Increasingstudent engagement and performance in a large undergraduate lecture class on architecturalresearch
    Bachman Bachman, L. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 22 (1) : 5 ~ 21 [2011]
  • A primer on audience response systems: Current applications andfuture considerations
    Cain Cain, J. Robinson American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 72 (4) : 1 ~ 6 [2008]
  • A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course ExperienceQuestionnaire
    Ramsden Studies in Higher Educatuib 16 (2) : 129 ~ 150 [1991]
  • A Method for Writing Open-Ended Curved ArrowNotation Questions for Multiple-Choice Exams and Electronic-Response Systems
    Ruder Ruder, S. M. Straumanis Journal of Chemical Education 86 (12) : 1392 ~ 1396 [2009]