논문상세정보
-
- 저자 박상현
- 형태사항 26 cm
- 일반주기 지도교수: 권순용
- 학위논문사항 학위논문(박사)-, 서울대학교 대학원, 2018. 8, 체육교육과 스포츠사회학
- DDC 796
- 발행지 서울
- 언어 kor
- 출판년 2018
- 발행사항 서울대학교 대학원
유사주제 논문( 649)
박사
스포츠공공조직의 정치통제 연구 -대한체육회 회원(프로)종목단체를 중심으로- = Political Control of Sport Public Organization -Focusing on Member Organizations(Pro) of Korean Sport & Olympic Committee-
박상현
2018년
'
스포츠공공조직의 정치통제 연구 -대한체육회 회원(프로)종목단체를 중심으로- = Political Control of Sport Public Organization -Focusing on Member Organizations(Pro) of Korean Sport & Olympic Committee-' 의 주제별 논문영향력
| 주제 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 동일주제 총논문수 | 논문피인용 총횟수 | 주제별 논문영향력의 평균 |
| 488 | 0 |
0.0% |
주제별 논문영향력
' 스포츠공공조직의 정치통제 연구 -대한체육회 회원(프로)종목단체를 중심으로- = Political Control of Sport Public Organization -Focusing on Member Organizations(Pro) of Korean Sport & Olympic Committee-' 의 참고문헌
-
행정학(제5판)
-
행정통제론
-
행정안전부 지방의원 겸직금지 관련 법제처 법령심사위원회 법령 해석 결과 통보. 전자문서(선거의회과-3225)서울: 행정안전부 [2009]
-
한국행정연구원 공공기관 책임성 제고방안서울: 한국행정연구원 [2008]
-
한국 엘리트 스포츠 조직 간 관계에 대한 연구: 대한체육 회와 중앙가맹경기단체를 중심으로. 미간행 석사학위논문
-
태권도 지도자 이미지가 참여동기, 스포츠 가치관 및 태도 에 미치는 영향. 미간행 박사학위논문
-
체육단체 통합의 정책적 기조(基調)
-
체육계열 대학생의 스포츠 가치관과 태도 및 진로결정 자기 효능감의 관계. 미간행 석사학위논문
-
조직이론(제8판)
-
전별 공공조직의 내부조직화 현상: 비공식적 계서제화
-
사회계층에 따른 생활체육 참여자의 스포츠 가치관에 관한 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문
-
문화관광부 체육백서서울: 문화관광부 [2002]
-
대한축구협회 사단법인 대한축구협회 정관서울: 대한축구협회 [2017]
-
대한체육회 회원종목단체 현황서울: 대한체육회 [2017]
-
대한체육회 회원종목단체 경영공시대한체육회 홈페이지. http://g1.sports.or.kr/spm [2018]
-
대한체육회 시도체육회 현황서울: 대한체육회 [2017]
-
대한체육회 2017 대한체육회 사업편람서울: 대한체육회 [2017]
-
대한장애인체육회 시도장애인체육회 현황서울: 대한장애인체육회 [2017]
-
대한장애인체육회 가맹단체 현황서울: 대한장애인체육회 [2017]
-
대한야구소프트볼협회 사단법인 대한야구소프트볼협회 정관서울: 대한야구소프트볼협회 [2017]
-
대한민국배구협회 사단법인 대한민국배구협회 정관서울: 대한민 국배구협회 [2016]
-
대한민국농구협회 사단법인 대한민국농구협회 정관서울: 대한민 국농구협회 [2016]
-
대한골프협회 대한골프협회 정관경기: 대한골프협회 [2016]
-
대통령기록관 기록정보콘텐츠(대통령별)대통령기록관 홈페이지. http://www.pa.go.kr/portal/com/viewMainPage.do [2017]
-
기획재정부 2017년도 공공기관 지정세종: 기획재정부 [2016]
-
기획재정부 2017 나라살림 예산개요세종: 기획재정부 [2017]
-
기획재정부 2016 나라살림 예산개요세종: 기획재정부 [2016]
-
기획재정부 2015 나라살림 예산개요세종: 기획재정부 [2015]
-
기획재정부 2014 나라살림 예산개요세종: 기획재정부 [2014]
-
기획재정부 2013 나라살림 예산개요세종: 기획재정부 [2013]
-
기획재정부 2012 나라살림 예산개요세종: 기획재정부 [2012]
-
기획재정부 2011 나라살림 예산개요세종: 기획재정부 [2011]
-
국립국어원 표준국어대사전서울: 국립국어원 [2016]
-
공공조직론(제2판): 공 사조직의 비교
-
공공성과 그 문제들(The public and its problems). 정 창호, 이유선 역
-
공공기관론
-
공공기관 통제의 선행 요인과 성과 영향. 미간행 박사학위 논문
-
고교생들의 마라톤경기 참여에 따른 스포츠 가치관 및 태 도와의 관계. 미간행 석사학위논문
-
Wholey, J. S. (1997). Performance monitoring. In J. Mayne and E. Zapico-Goῇi (Eds.), Monitoring performance in the public sector. NB: Transaction Publisher.
-
Whitford, A. B. (2005). The pursuit of political control by multiple principals. The Journal of Politics, 67(1), 29–49.
-
Weingast, B. R. (1984). The congressional-bureaucratic system: A principal agent perspective(with applications to th SEC). Public Choice, 44(1), 147-191.
-
Weingast, B. R. (1981). Regulation, reregulation, and deregulation: The political foundations of agency clientele relationships. Law and Contemporary Problems, 44(1), 147-177.
-
Weingast, B. R. & Moran, M. J. (1983). Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. The Journal of Political Economy, 91(5), 765-800.
-
Verschuere, B. (2007). The autonomy-control balance in Flemish arm's length public agencies. Public Management Review, 9(1), 107-133.
-
Verhoest, K., Roness, P. G., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K. & MacCarthaigh, M. (2010). Autonomy and Control of State Agencies. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Tullock, G. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
-
Tannenbaum, A. S. (1962). Individual adjustment and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7(2), 236-257.
-
Standeven, J., & De Knop, P. (1999). Sport tourism. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
-
Selden, S. C., & Sowa, J. E. (2004). Testing a multi-dimensional model of organizational performance: Prospects and problems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 395-416.
-
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389.
-
Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 1-37.
-
Rossiter, C. (1956). The american Presidency. NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
-
Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
-
Ring, P. S., & Perry, J. L. (1985). Strategic management in public and private organizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 276-286.
-
Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Research note: Public and private managers' perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 567-574.
-
Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36(2), 233-244.
-
Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations((4th edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
-
Rainey, H. G. & Chun, Y. H. (2005). Public and private management compared. In Ferlie, E. et al. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
-
Rainey, H. G. & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447-469.
-
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public productivity review, 5(2), 122-140.
-
Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Perry, J. L., & Rainey, H. G. 1988. The public-private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy. Academy of management review, 13(2): 182-201.
-
Ouchi, W. G., & Maguire, M. A. (1975). Organizational control: Two functions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4), 559-569.
-
Ouchi, W. G. (1977). The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 95–113.
-
Organizational autonomy: Theory and public policy
-
Ogul, M. (1976). Congress oversees the bureaucracy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
-
Moe, T. M. (1987). An assessment of the positive theory of congressional dominance. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 475-520.
-
Moe, R. C. (2001). The emerging federal quasi government: Issue of management and accountability. Public Administration Review, 61(3), 290-312.
-
Meier, K. J. & O’Toole, L. J. J. (2006). Bureaucracy in a democratic state. Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
-
Mccubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G. & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 3(2), 243–277.
-
Marsden, P. V., Cook, C. R. & Knoke, D. (1994). Measuring organizational structures and environments. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(7), 891-910.
-
Lynn, L. E. (1981). Managing the public's business. New York, NY: Basic Books.
-
Lowi, T. J. (1979). The end of liberalism. New York, NY: Norton.
-
Leifer, R. & Mills, P. K. (1996). An information processing approach for deciding upon control strategies and reducing control lass in emerging organizations. Journal of Management, 22(1), 113-137.
-
Koop, C. (2011). Explaining the accountability of independent agencies: The importance of political salience. Journal of Public Policy, 31(2), 209-234.
-
Kaufman, H. (1981). The Administrative behavior of federal bureau chiefs. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
-
Jung, C. S., Chun, Y. H. & Oh, J. R. (2017). Examining relationships between legislative and presidential influences and organizational probity: Evidence from South Korean central government agencies. International Public Management Journal, 20(1), 132-159.
-
Jensen, C. & Meckling, H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economic, 3(4), 305-360.
-
International Olympic Committee(2015). Olympic charter. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee.
-
Huntington, S. P. (1952). The marasmus of th ICC: The commission, the railroads, and the public interest. The Yale Law Journal, 61(4), 467-508.
-
Hood, C., Scott, C., James, O., Jones, G. & Travers, T. (1999). Regulation inside government: Waste-watchers, quality police, and sleaze busters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Hood, C. James, O., Peters, B. G. & Scott, C. (2004). Controlling modern government: Variety, commonality and change. Northamton, MA: Edward Elgar.
-
Heinrich, C. J. & Fournier, E. (2004). Dimensions of publicness and performance in substance abuse treatment organizations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(1), 49-70.
-
Friederich, C. J. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In Friedrich, C. J. & Mason, E. S. (Eds.). Public policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
-
Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1(4), 335-350.
-
Fenno, R. F. J. (1966). The power of the purse: Appropriations politics in congress. Boston: Little, Brown.
-
Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
-
Dodd, L. & Schott, R. (1979). Congress and the administrative state. NY: Wiley.
-
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
-
Dahl, R. A. & Lindblom, C. E. (1953). Politics, economics, and welfare. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Daft, R. L. (2010). New era of management(10th edition). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
-
Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. 2000. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry, Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.
-
Chun, Y. H. & Rainey, H. G. (2005b). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in US fedeal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 529-557.
-
Chun, Y. H. & Rainey, H. G. (2005a). Goal ambiguity in US fedeal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 1-30.
-
Christensen, T. & Laegreid, P. (2001). New public management: The transformation of ideas and practice (Eds.). Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
-
Carter, N., Day, P. & Klein, R. (1992). How organization measure success. London: Routledge.
-
Calvert, R. L., McCubbins, M. D. & Weingast, B. R. (1989). A theory of political control and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 588–611.
-
Brewer, G. A. & Selden, S. C. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 413-439.
-
Boyne, G. A. (2003). What is public service improvement? Public Administration, 81(2), 211-227.
-
Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What's the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39, 97-122.
-
Bibby, J. F. & Davidson, R. H. (1972). On capitol hill: Studies in the legislative process. Hinsdale, Il: Dryden.
-
Bertelli, A. M. (2006). Delegating to the quango: Ex ante and ex post ministerial constraints. Governance, 19(2), 229-249.
-
Bertelli, A. M. (2005). Governing the quango: An auditing and cheating model of quasi-governmental authorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2), 239-261.
-
Bartel, A. P. & Harrison, A. E. (2005). Ownership versus environment: Disentangling the sources of public-sector inefficiency. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 135-147.
-
Ashworth, R., Boyne, G. A. & Walker, R. M. (2006) Subjctive and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. J. O’Toole & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management, 14-34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Ashworth, R., Boyne, G. A. & Walker, R. M. (2002). Regulatory problem in the public sector: Theories and cases. Policy and Politics, 30(2), 195-211.
-
Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2008). Organizational strategy, external regulation and public service performance. Public administration, 86(1), 185-203.
-
Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A. & Walker, R. M. (2011). Dimensions of publicness and organizaional performance: A review of the evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 21, 301-319.