연구동향 분석
박사

Renzulli의 격자무늬 이론 기반 ‘상호인지 영재성 검사’ 개발 및 타당화

신민 2018년

논문상세정보
    • 저자 신민
    • 기타서명 (A) study for the development and validation of ‘Co-cognitive for the giftedness’ scale based on Renzulli’s houndstooth theory
    • 형태사항 삽화: v, 184 p.: 26 cm
    • 일반주기 중앙대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다, 지도교수: 안도희, 참고문헌수록
    • 학위논문사항 2018. 2, 중앙대학교 대학원, 학위논문(박사)-, 교육학과 교육심리전공
    • 발행지 서울
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2018
    • 발행사항 중앙대학교 대학원
    유사주제 논문( 0)
인용/피인용

' Renzulli의 격자무늬 이론 기반 ‘상호인지 영재성 검사’ 개발 및 타당화' 의 참고문헌

  • 해외 영재교육 사례 연구(I)
    강병직 한국교육개발원 수탁연구 CR 2011-69 [2011]
  • 해양에 대한 호기심과 친근감 향상을 위한 해양갬프 프로그램의 적용: 2004~2012 년
  • 한국판 호기심 척도(K-CEI)의 타당화 연구
    김교헌 심미영 엄진섭(Jin Sup Eom) 이선희 한국심리학회지: 건강, 18(4), 747-762 [2013]
  • 한국어판 Gifted Rating Scale의 구인타당도
    이동혁 영재교육연구, 20(2), 595-619 [2010]
  • 학업소진척도(MBI-SS) 타당화 연구: 의대생 대상으로
    이동엽 이수연 아시아교육연구, 14(2), 165-187 [2013]
  • 학교상담: 중학생 영재와 평재 간 대인관계와 공감의 차이 및 상관 연구
    이종연 조은문 상담학연구, 10(2), 1149-1164 [2009]
  • 특허청. 발명 교육의 이론과 실제
    서울: 한국학교발명협회 [2001]
  • 박사
    통합적 접근에 기초한 아동의 창의성 측정도구 개발
    김종안 성균관 대학교 박사학위논문 [1998]
  • 최신영재교육학개론
    이신동 서울: 학지사 [2009]
  • 초등학생의 성격강점과 학습몰입의 관계: 행복의 매개 효과
    김은희 조옥귀 한국초등교육, 27(2), 299-314 [2016]
  • 초등학생 영재 판별을 위한 창의적 성향 검사 개발 연구
    신문승 한국 교원대학교 박사학위논문 [2010]
  • 초등학교 수학 영재 및 일반 아동의 정의적 특성 비교 연구
  • 초등학교 발명영재와 수학ㆍ과학영재의 창의적 성향 비교
    강충열 박문철 초등교육학연구, 23(1), 1-29 [2016]
  • 초등학교 미성취 영재의 자기조절 학습능력 신장을 위한 집단상담 프로그램 개발
    권순영 유형근 이승원 교원교육, 28(2), 165-187 [2012]
  • 초등영재와 일반학생의 학업스트레스, 스트레스 대처방식, 학업소진 비교 및 관계 분석
    안종혁 유미현 영재교육연구, 24(2), 169-189 [2014]
  • 초등수학영재 및 일반학생의 인지적 조합요인과 리더십의 관계 연구
    류성림 이정임 한국초등수학교육학회지, 16(3), 337-358 [2012]
  • 초등과학영재학생의 인성, 생애목표와 행복감의 관계
    장희선 영재교 육연구, 26(1), 161-185 [2016]
  • 초등과학영재아동과 일반아동 부모의 학습관여와 지적호기심 및 과학창의성의 관계 연구
    오종석 수산해양교육연구, 26(5), 1119-1128 [2014]
  • 초등과학 영재학급 학생들과 일반 학생의 인지적 특성 비교 분석
    백성혜 원정애 조은부 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), 307-316 [2006]
  • 초등 영재학생의 지적 정의적 행동 특 성 및 지도 방안 연구
    김현철 김흥원 윤여홍 윤초희 한국교육개발원 수탁연구 CR 2003-25 [2003]
  • 초등 영재학생과 일반학생의 완벽주의, 학업스트레스 및 학습몰입 비교
    민현숙 양연숙 영재교육연구, 22(1), 157-171 [2012]
  • 초등 영재학생과 일반학생의 성격 강점, 정서지능, 학 습몰입 비교 및 관계 분석
    박문숙 유미현 영재교육연구, 24(5), 829-849 [2014]
  • 초등 영재와 평재의 학습몰입 영향 변인 탐색: 지적 능력신념, 귀인성향, 부모지지 및 교사지지를 중심으로
    김옥분 김혜진 영재와영재교육, 14(1), 223-243 [2015]
  • 초등 영재와 일반 학생의 탄력성 및 학교 태도 관계 연구
    이미순 조영란 초등교육연구, 25(3), 159-180 [2012]
  • 초등 영재선별을 위한 평정척도의 타당화 연구
    박춘성 박사학위논문. 서울대학교 대학 원 [2006]
  • 초등 아동용 창의적 인성검사의 타당화 연구
    김종안 창의력교육연구, 3(1), 55-77 [2000]
  • 초 중등 학생용 집단 통합 창의성 검사 개발 및 표준 화
    유경훈 이경화 교육심리연구. 26(1), 291-305 [2012]
  • 체육영재 선발 및 육성을 위한 스포츠 심리학의 현장적용 사 례
    안정덕 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 10(10), 440-450 [2010]
  • 청소년의 또래애착, 사회적 책무성 및 대인관계문제 간의 관계
    안도희 정초하 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(4), 411-430 [2016]
  • 청소년의 게임 이용요인과 개인, 사회적 요인이 게임몰입과 게 임중독에 미치는 영향
    이희경 청소년학연구, 10(4), 355-380 [2003]
  • 청소년 사회적 책무성 척도 개발 및 타당화
    안도희 정초하 학습자중 심교과교육연구, 15(8), 615-638 [2015]
  • 청소년 기업영재의 기질 및 성격 특성
    이행은 최민경 영재교육연구, 23(1), 89-107 [2013]
  • 창의적 인성 체크리스트 개발 및 한국대학생과 미국대학생이 생각하는 창의적 인성 비교
  • 박사
    창의성의 구성요인과 훈련 효과
    이인순 성균관대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문 [1987]
  • 창의성 진단 측정도구의 개발 및 타당화
    김혜숙 교육심리연구, 13(4), 269-303 [1999]
  • 창의성 검사(창의성 계발을 위한 창의성검사의 이 해와 활용)
    이종구 최인수 서울: 한국가이던스 [2004]
  • 창의성 개념정립을 위한 탐색적 연구
    김혜숙 송인섭 교육심리연구, 13(3), 93-117 [1999]
  • 창의성
  • 중학생의 정신력 척도의 타당도 및 신뢰도 탐색
    강다연(Kang, Dayeon) 안도희(Ahn, Doehee) 교육 문화연구, 22(5), 127-154 [2016]
  • 중학생 영재의 지적ㆍ정의적 특성에 따른 효과적인 교수학습 전략 탐색
    김미숙 윤초희 조석희 진석언 한국교육개발원 수탁연구 CR, 40 [2004]
  • 중학교 영재학생과 일반학생의 시간관리 행동, 생활만 족도 비교 및 시간관리 행동과 생활만족도의 관계
    김선미 유미현 영재교육연구, 23(3), 315-333 [2013]
  • 중학교 발명영재와 일반학생의 특성 비교: 발명영재 특성 체크리스트 중심으로
    김기수 김기열 이정훈 함형인 실과교육연구, 20(2), 165-181 [2014]
  • 중학교 과학영재 학생과 일반학생의 리더십 특성, 정 서지능 비교 및 정서지능이 리더십에 미치는 영향
    유미현 이영한 영재교육연구, 22(4), 943-966 [2012]
  • 종목별 운동선수의 경쟁상태불안에 관한 연구
    주진만 한국체육과학회 지, 17(3), 451-459 [2008]
  • 전 미란, 전영석, 조석희, 진석언 한눈에 보는 영재 교육
  • 잘되는 나를 만드는 최고의 습관 (이동희 역)
    고다마 미쓰오 서울: 전 나무숲 [2008]
  • 박사
    자기보고식 창의성 측정 도구의 타당화 연구
    홍송이 서울대학교 대학 원 석사학위논문 [2002]
  • 박사
    인지적 조합요인과 리더십의 관계연구
    김효정 석사학위 논문. 고려대학교교육대학원 [2008]
  • 인식론적 신념, 성취목표지향성, 자기조절학습 및 학업성취간 의 관계
    문병상 초등교육연구, 22(4), 49-68 [2009]
  • 의과대학생들의 완벽주의, 성취목적 및 학문적 효능감 간의 관계
    김옥분 안도희 한국의학교육, 18(2), 141-152 [2006]
  • 음악재능 청소년의 열정이 성취목적과 유능감에 미치는 영향
    안도희 정재우 교육학연구, 47(1), 74-92 [2009]
  • 유아의 연령과 성에 따른 창의성 발달
    전경원 창의력교육연구, 3(1), 29-53 [2000]
  • 유아용 영재판별도구의 개발 및 타당화 연구
    김누리 송인섭 영재와 영재교육, 5(2), 63-78 [2006]
  • 유아영재교육의 이해
  • 유아영재 판별도구의 타당도 탐색
    전미란 진석언 최승언 탁은정 아 시아교육연구, 7(1), 19-39 [2006]
  • 유아 창의적 특성 검사
    전경원 서울: 학지사 [2003]
  • 우리나라 중학생 영재의 지적ㆍ정의적 특성
    김미숙 윤초희 조석희 아시아교육연구, 6(3), 25-58 [2005]
  • 요인분석의 관행과 문제점
    이순묵 한국심리학회: 산업 및 조직, 7(1), 1-26 [1994]
  • 온라인 학습에서 학습몰입요인, 몰입수준, 학업성취 간의 관련성 탐구
    김연경 박성익 열린교육연구, 14(1), 93-115 [2006]
  • 영재학생과 일반학생의 학업동기 비교: 메타분석
    박병기 송효완 이정화 황진숙 교육심리연구, 30(2), 315-344 [2016]
  • 영재학생과 일반학생의 초기의지와 지속의지 및 몰입에 관한 연구영재학생과 일반학생의 초기의지와 지속의지 및 몰입에 관한 연 구
    홍승표 학습자중심교과교육연구, 12(1), 443-459 [2012]
  • 영재학생 식별 편람
    김정휘 서울: 원미사 [1998]
  • 영재학급과 일반학급에서의 학습경험에 따른 초등학교 영재학생의 자기효능감, 학습동기, 학습몰입 비교
    남희영 ( Heeyoung Nam ) 진석언 ( Sukun Jin ) 교사와 교육 (구 교 육논집), 33(단일호), 89-104. [2014]
  • 영재학급 대상자 선발을 위한 관찰 추천 영재판별모 형 개발 연구
    류지영 정현철 영재교육연구, 20(1), 257-287 [2010]
  • 영재의 학업성취에 영향을 주는 심리적 요인들: 자기결정성, 학습목표지향성, 자기효능감, 지능관 및 자기조절학습전략을 중심으로
    조선미 영재교육연구, 21(3), 611-630 [2011]
  • 영재의 심리적 특성과 정서발달을 위한 상담
    윤여홍 한국심리학회지: 일반, 19(1), 79-101 [2000]
  • 영재아의 학교적응과 사회성숙도에 관한 연구
    김정원 이주현 교육심 리연구, 11(3), 271-294 [1997]
  • 영재아동의 정서적 특성에 관한 임상연구: 정신건강을 위한 지 도
    윤여홍 영재교육연구, 6(1), 53-71 [1996]
  • 영재성의 측정 및 영재선별 방안에 관한 연구
    신세호 임선하 임인재 서울: 한국교육개발원 [1984]
  • 영재들의 낙관성 수준에 관한 연구
    김언주 윤현석 영재교육연구, 12(1), 77-95 [2002]
  • 영재교육진흥법
    교육부 법제처. http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=60620&ancYd=20000128&ancNo=06215&efYd=20020301&nwJoYnInfo=N&efGubun=Y&chrClsCd=010202#0000 (검색일: 2017. 2. 20.) [2000]
  • 영재교육의 이론과 방법
    Davis, Gary A. 서울: 학문사 [2001]
  • 영재 청소년의 학업탄력성 척도 개발
    김홍희 한기순 영재교육연구, 24(2), 289-312 [2014]
  • 영재 교육을 위한 사고력의 구성 개념 정립과 프로그램 개발
    이경숙 이신동 영재와영재교육, 8(2), 125-147 [2009]
  • 영재 잠재영재 일반학생의 학교 소진 경험 및 주관적 안녕에 관한 연구
    홍승표 영재와영재교육, 9(1), 75-96 [2010]
  • 역 창의성 계발과 교육
    박숙희 이경화 최병연 서울: 학지사 [2004]
  • 아동용 성취동기 척도 개발에 관한 연구
    기현주 박성옥 신귀순 영재 교육연구, 14(1), 1-27 [2004]
  • 심리검사 번안에 대한 통합적 접근
    손원숙 한국심리학회지: 일반, 22(2), 57-80 [2003]
  • 심리검사
    탁진국 서울: 학지사 [1996]
  • 스포츠영재의 스포츠영재성
    윤영길 한국스포츠심리학회지, 22(4), 17-32 [2011]
  • 스포츠영재성의 발화 환경
    윤영길 전재연 체육과학연구, 24(2), 244-255 [2013]
  • 수학 퍼즐이 영재학생과 일반학생의 수학적 성향에 미치는 영향
    박경빈 전미란 황광일 영재교육연구, 17(3), 443-462 [2007]
  • 수학 영재아들을 위한 행동특성검사지의 개발과 활용에 관한 연구
    송상헌(Song, Sang Hun) 학교수학, 2(2), 427-457 [2000]
  • 수학 영재 판별 도구 개발 연구 (Ⅰ)-기초연구 편
    김명숙 김홍원 송상헌 한국교육개발원 수탁연구 CR96-26 [1996]
  • 수학 성취도에 있어서의 성별 차이에 대한 고찰
    권오남 박경미 한국 여성학, 11(단일호), 202-232. [1995]
  • 사회복지실천과 척도개발: 표준화된 척도를 중심으로
    엄명용 조성우 서울: 학지사 [2005]
  • 비인지적 영역 영재교육 효과성에 관한 메타분석
    조선미 한기순 영 재교육연구, 24(1), 45-61 [2014]
  • 부모용 유아 영재성 평정 척도 개발
    장영숙 미래유아교육학회지, 14(2), 1-23 [2007]
  • 부모양육 태도와 부모소진 및 자녀 학업소진의 관계
    김보영 ( Bo Young Kim ) 신효정 ( Hyo Jung Shin ) 이상민 ( Sang Min Lee ) 한은아 ( Eun A Han ) 한국교육학연구(구 안암교육학연구), 17(1), 270-293 [2011]
  • 발명영재상 수립을 위한 발명영재의 특성 이해
  • 발명영재 요인 및 발명영재교 육 내용표준 체계에 관한 연구
    김용익 박기문 오명희 이진우 전철만 한국실과교육학회지, 24(4), 19-43 [2011]
  • 발명영재 선발도구 분석
    김용익 한국실과교육학회지, 25(2), 45-61 [2012]
  • 발레영재교육 인프라 구축을 위한 외국 발레학교의 현황 연구
    정희자 ( Hee Ja Jung ) 한국무용교육학회지, 16(1), 21-41 [2005]
  • 미국 영재교육법률의 변천 과정에 관한 연구
    강병직 영재교육연구, 23(5), 649-669 [2013]
  • 몰입에 대한 학습동기와 인지전략의 관계
    이은주 교육심리연구, 15(3), 199-216 [2001]
  • 대학생의 희망과 학습시간이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향
    조한익 교육 심리연구, 21(2), 349-365 [2007]
  • 대학생의 애착과 우울의 관계에서 희망의 매개효과 검증
    이주영 최희철 상담학연구, 13(2), 819-838 [2012]
  • 대학생의 성취동기가 진로결정 및 취업준비행동에 미치는 영 향
    손영화 한국사회과학연구, 29(1), 235-253 [2010]
  • 대학생용 창의적 성격검사의 개발 및 타당화 연구
    이신동 교육심리연 구, 16(2), 43-61 [2002]
  • 남학생은 여학생보다 창의적인가? 영 재들의 과학 창의성을 중심으로
    신지은 정현철 최승언 한기순 한국지구과학회지, 23(4), 324-333 [2002]
  • 김연아의 영재적 특성과 영재성 발현 촉진 요인
    서용석 송규근 한국 사회체육학회지, 61(단일호), 49-64. [2015]
  • 기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 척도 개발
  • 긍정심리학. [안신호, 이진 환, 신현정, 홍창희, 김미아 역]. 서울: 시그마프레스
    Baumgardner, S. R. Crothers, M. K. (원본출간년도: 2008) [2009]
  • 국악 영재 발굴을 위한 영재성 평가 방안
    김선희 국악교육연구, 4(1), 31-54 [2010]
  • 과학영재의 특성 분석
    이명자 ( Myung Ja Lee ) 교육학논총, 23(1), 127-140 [2002]
  • 과학영재의 스트레스, 완벽성, 낙관성과 학업성취도의 관계 에 대한 연구
    송경애 하종덕 영재교육연구, 14(1), 47-64 [2004]
  • 과학영재와 일반학생의 지능, 완벽주의 성향 및 스트레스
    김소아 박상우 영재교육연구, 17(1), 173-191 [2007]
  • 과학영재와 일반아의 창의적 사고, 인성, 환경 과 과학영역의 창의적 수행에서의 성차
    김명숙 이종희 정대련 아동학회지, 24(3), 1-13 [2003]
  • 과학영재아동의 적응, 자기지각, 사회적 지지 및 스트레스에 관한 연구
    김현지 이국행 이영환 영재교육연구, 13(2), 73-94 [2003]
  • 과학영재 중학생에서의 진로유형과 자아개념의 상관 연구
    김소아 박상우 영재교육연구, 14(2), 129-148 [2004]
  • 과학 영재학생들의 일상에서 나타나는 몰입과 창의성 에 대한 연구
    백성혜 이남주 한국과학교육학회지, 34(2), 147-153 [2014]
  • 과학 영재의 행동 특성 분석
    이항로 한국지구과학회지, 32(3), 294-305 [2011]
  • 과학 영재와 일반 학생의 도덕 판단력 비교 및 중 고등학교 과학 영재의 도덕 판단력 발달 경향
    박은이 유미현 홍훈기 국제과학영재학 회지, 2(1), 1-11 [2008]
  • 과학 영재교육 대상자 선발방법으로써 교사 추천제 분석: 학생의 과학적 태도, 탐구력, 사고력, 문제 해결력, 창의성을 중심으로
    박민정 전동렬 한국과학교육학회지, 28(2), 111-119 [2008]
  • 과학 영재 교육프로그램 개발
    김영수 이기종 과학과 과학교육 논문 지 (구 과학교육논총), 14(단일호), 13-39. [1989]
  • 과학 영재 교육체제의 개발
    이기종 과학과 과학교육 논문지 (구 과학 교육논총), 22(단일호), 23-32. [1997]
  • 「인지적 특성에 의한 영재유형간 판별분석」
    강승희 윤초희 한국심리학 회지: 발달, 18(3), 63-80 [2005]
  • 「구조방정식모델링의 이해와 적용」
    문수백 서울: 학지사 [2009]
  • “한국대학생이 생각하는 한국과 미국의 암묵적 창의성에 대한 비교연구.”
    성은현 영재교육연구, 17(2), 365-391 [2007]
  • “창의적 인성 검사 개발”
    하주현 교육심리연구, 14(2), 187-210 [2000]
  • Worrell, F. C., & & Schaefer, B. A. (2004). Reliability and validity of learning behaviors scale(LBS) scores with academically talented students: A comparative perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48 (4), 287-308.
  • Wong, M. M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Motivation and academic achievement: The effects of personality traits and the quality of experience. Journal of Personality, 59 (3), 539-573.
  • Williams, F. (1980). Creativity assessment packet(CAP): Mannual. Buffalo, NY: D. O. K. publishers.
  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66 (5), 297-333.
  • Weng, H. C., Hung, C. M., Liu, Y. T., Cheng, Y. J., Yen, C. Y., Chang, C. C., & Huang, C. K. (2011). Associations between emotional intelligence and doctor burnout, job satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Medical Education, 45 (8), 835-842.
  • Weisberg, J., & Sagie, A. (1999). Teachers' physical, mental, and emotional burnout: Impact on intention to quit. The Journal of Psychology, 133 (3), 333-339.
  • Webb, J. T.(1993). Nurturing social-emotional development of gifted children. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, and A. H. Passow(Eds.), International handbook for research on giftedness and Talent . (pp. 525-538). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Walberg, H. J., Tasi, S., Weinstein, T., Gabriel, C. L., Rasher, S. P., Rosecrans, T., Rovai, E., Ide, J., Trujillo, M., & Vukosavich, P. (1981). Childhood traits and environmental conditions of highly eminent adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25 (3), 103-107.
  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (1988). Developing a comprehensive approach to scope and sequence: Curriculum alignment. Gifted Child Today, 11 (5), 42-45.
  • Vallerand, R. J., Rousseau, F. L., Grouzet, F. M., Dumais, A., Grenier, S., & Blanchard, C. M. (2006). Passion in sport: A look at determinants and affective experiences. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 28 (4), 454-478.
  • Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., L onard, M., Gagn , M., & Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l'ame: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (4), 756-767.
  • Vallerand, R. J., & Miquelon, P. (2007). Passion for sport in Athletes. In S. Jowette & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 249-263). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Vallerand, R. J. (2008). On the psychology of passion: In search of what makes people's lives most worth living. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49 (1), 1-13.
  • Vail, P. L. (1990). Gifts, talents, and the dyslexias: Wellsprings, springboards, and finding Foley’s rocks. Annals of Dyslexia, 40 (1), 1-17.
  • Urban, K. K. (1995, August). Creativity-A componential approach. In Post conference China meeting of the 11th world conference on gifted and talented children. Beijing, China, August (pp. 5-8).
  • Unsworth, N. A. S. H., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2009). Examining the relations among working memory capacity, attention control, and fluid intelligence from a dual-component framework. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51 (4), 388-402.
  • Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1982). Perspective-taking and altruism. Psychological Bulletin, 91 (1), 143-173.
  • Tzuriel, D., Bengio, E., & Kashy-Rosenbaum, G. (2011). Cognitive modifiability, emotional-motivational factors, and behavioral characteristics among gifted versus nongifted children. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10 (3), 253-279.
  • Treffinger, D. J. (1980). Fostering independence and creativity. Talents and Gifts, 3 (4), 214-224.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1995). Insights about creativity: Questioned, rejected, ridiculed, ignored. Educational Psychology Review, 7 (3), 313-322.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg, The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. (pp. 43-75.). NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1980). Growing up creatively gifted: A 22-year longitudinal study. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 5 (3), 148-158.
  • Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. Handbook of gifted education, 3 , 45-59.
  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness . NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives . New York: Macmillan.
  • Sytsma, R. E., Renzulli, J. S., & Berman, K. B. (2002). Operation Houndstooth: The Co-Cognitive Factors Scales . (Unpublished instrument), The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
  • Sytsma, R. E. (2003). Co-cognitive factors and socially constructive giftedness: Distribution, abundance, and relevance among high school students . (Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut).
  • Strycharczyk, D., & Clough, P. (2015). Developing mental toughness(2nd ed.): Coaching strategies to improve performance, resilience and wellbeing . London: Kogan Page.
  • Stipek, D. J., Lamb, M. E., & Zigler, E. F. (1981). OPTI: A measure of children’s optimism. Educational Psychological Measurement, 41 (1), 131-143.
  • Stipek D. J., & Granlinski, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in children's achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (3), 361-371.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34 (1), 1-31.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2005). WICS: A model of positive educational leadership comprising wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. Educational Psychology Review, 17 (3), 191-262.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2 (4), 347-365.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Song, K. H., & Porath, M. (2006). Common and domain-specific cognitive characteristics of gifted students: An integrated model of human abilities. High Ability Studies, 16 (2), 229-246.
  • Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, I. E ., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (2), 321-335.
  • Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2002). Hope theory. In C. R., Snyder, S. J. Lopez. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 257-276). UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Snyder, C. R., Lapointe, A. B., Crowson, J. J., & Early, S. (1998). Preferences of high and low hope people for self-referential input. Cognition and Emotion, 12 (6), 807-823.
  • Snyder, C. R., Hoza, B., Pelham, W. E., Rapoff, M., Ware, L., Danovsky, M., Highberger, L., Rubinstein, H., & Stahl, K. J. (1997). The development and validation of the children's hope scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22 (3), 399-421.
  • Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., Yoshinobu, L., Gibb, J., Langelle, C., & Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(4), 570-585.
  • Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological inquiry, 13(4), 249-275.
  • Snyder, C. R. (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measure, and applications . Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25 (3), 518-524.
  • Silverman, L. K. (1994). The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society. Roeper Review, 17(2), 110-116.
  • Siegle, D., & Powell, T. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48 (1), 21-29.
  • Shorey, H. S., Snyder, C. R., Yang, X., & Lewin, M. R. (2003). The role of hope as a mediator in recollected parenting, adult attachment, and mental health. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 22 (6), 685–715.
  • Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis . NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18 (2), 158-176.
  • Shaunessy, E., & Karnes, F. A. (2004). Instruments for measuring leadership in children and youth. Gifted Child Today, 27 (1), 42-47.
  • Seligman, M. E. (2011). Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. New York, NY: Random House.
  • Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 79-88.
  • Schultz, R. A. (2000). Examining the effects of block scheduling on gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 23 (5), 24-33.
  • Schroth, S. T., & Helfer, J. A. (2008). Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32 (2), 155-179.
  • Schmitz, C., & Galbraith, J. (1985). Investigation of the leadership abilities of intellectually gifted students. (Unpublished dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa).
  • Schenkel, L. A. (2002). Optimal educational experiences and their relationship to self-concept and flow in adolescent high-ability and gifted learners (Doctoral dissertation, College of William and Mary).
  • Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16 (2), 201-228.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V. & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3 (1), 71-92.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students a cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33 (5), 464-481.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). “Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study.” Journal of organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
  • Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students
    Callahan, C. M. Gavin, M. K. Hartman, R. K. Reis, S. M. Renzulli, J. S. Siegle, D. Smith, L. H. Sytsma, R. E. Westberg, K. L. White, A. J. https://gifted.education.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/612/2014/08/Scales-for-Rating-the-Behvioral-Characteristics-of-Superior-Students.pdf (검색일: 2017. 2. 23) [2013]
  • Sayler, M. F. (2009). Gifted and thriving: A deeper understanding of meaning of GT. In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.). International handbook on giftedness . (pp. 215-230). New York, USA: Springer.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
  • Runco, M. A. (2007). Achievement sometimes requires creativity. High Ability Studies, 18 (1), 75-77.
  • Rotter, J. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45 (4), 489-493.
  • Roe, A. (1961). The psychology of the scientist. Science, 134 (3477), 456-459.
  • Risemberg, R., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1992). Self‐regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15 (2), 98-101.
  • Rimm, S., & Davis, G. A. (1976). GIFT: An instrument for the identification creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 10 (3), 178-182.
  • Rimm, S. B. (1983). PRIDE: Preschool and kindergarten interest descriptor . Watertown, Wis. USA: Educational Assessment Service.
  • Renzulli, J. S., Koehler, J. L., & Fogarty, E. A. (2006). Operation houndstooth intervention theory: Social capital in today's schools. Gifted Child Today, 29 (1), 14-24.
  • Renzulli, J. S., Hartman, R. K., & Callahan, C. M. (1971). Teacher identification of superior students. Exceptional Children, 38 (3), 211-214.
  • Renzulli, J. S., & Sytsma, R. E. (2008). Intelligences outside the normal curve: Co-cognitive traits that contribute to giftedness. In Plucker, J. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2008). Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says. (pp. 57-84). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (Eds.). (2004). Identification of students for gifted and talented programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Renzulli, J. S., & Hartman, R. K. (1971). Scale for rating behavioral characteristics of superior students. Exceptional Children, 38 (3), 243-248.
  • Renzulli, J. S., & D’Souza, S. (2014). Intelligences outside the normal curve: Co-cognitive factors that contribute to the creation of social capital and leadership skills in young people In J. A., Plucker, & C. M., Callahan, (2008). Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 343-362). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Renzulli, J. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive trailts and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84 (1), 33-58.
  • Renzulli, J. (1998). The three-ring conception of giftedness. In S. M. Baum, S, M. Reis, & L. R. Maxfield (Eds.), Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students (pp. 1-28). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Renzulli, J. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184.
  • Reis, S. & Renzulli, J. (2003). The school wide enrichment model: Developing creative and productive giftedness. In Colangel, N. & Davis, G. A. (3rd Eds.), Handbook of gifted education . (pp. 184-203). NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Rea, D. W. (2000). Optimal motivation for talent development. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23 (2), 187-216.
  • Putnam, R. (2001). Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2 (1), 41-51.
  • Putman, D. (1997). Psychological courage. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 4 (1), 1-11.
  • Privette, G. (1983). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (6), 1361-1368.
  • Portes, A. (1998).“Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology.”Annual Review of Sociology 24(1): 1-24.
  • Piirto, J. (1999). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. (2nd Ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
  • Piechowski, M. M. (1986). The concept of developmental potential. Roeper Review, 8 (3), 190-197.
  • Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosebich, J. (2003). Gifted rating scale(GRS) . San Antonio, TX: The psychological corporation.
  • Peterson, C., Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. (1993). Learned helplessness: A theory for the age of personal control. US: Oxford University Press.
  • Perkins-Gough, D. (2013). The significance of grit: A conversation with Angela Lee Duckworth. Educational Leadership, 71 (1), 14-20.
  • Perkins, D. N. (1988). 11 Creativity and the quest for mechanism. In R. J. Sternberg, & E, E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 309-336). NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Daley, C. E. (1999). Relation of hope to self-perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88 (2), 535–540.
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P. M., Kulieke, M. J., & Krasney, N. (1988). Personality dimensions of gifted adolescents: A review of the empirical literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32 (4), 347-352.
  • Noldon, D., & Sedlacek, W. (1996). Race differences in attitudes, skills, and behaviors among academically talented students. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 8 (2), 43-56.
  • Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35 (3), 266-284.
  • Neber, H. (2004). Teacher identification of students for gifted programs: Nominations to a summer school for highly-gifted students. Psychology Science, 46 (3), 348-362.
  • Naylor, F. D. (1981). A state-trait curiosity inventory. Australian Psychologist, 16 (2), 172-183.
  • Myers, D. G. (1992). The pursuit of happiness: What makes a person happy-and why . NY: William Morrow & Company.
  • Moon, J. (1991). Korean gifted and non-gifted children's attitudes toward family, teacher, friend and self as seen through sentence completion test . In the 9th World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children. Hague, Netherlands.
  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., & Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. MI: The University of Michigan.
  • Meier, S. T., & Schmeck, R. R. (1985). The burned-out college student: A descriptive profile. Journal of College Student Personnel. 26 (1), 63-69.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52 (5), 509-516.
  • McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47 (2), 144-154.
  • McCarthy, M. E., Pretty, G. M., & Catano, V. (1990). Psychological sense of community and student burnout. Journal of College Student Development. 31 (3), 211-216.
  • McCarney, S. B., & Anderson, P. D. (1989). Gifted evaluation scale, technical manual. (2nd Eds.) Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services.
  • Maslow, A. (1968). Some educational implications of the humanistic psychologies. Harvard Educational Review, 38 (4), 685-696.
  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, B. W., & Leiter, M. P.(2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52 (1), 397-422.
  • Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99-113.
  • Marzooghi, R., Sheikholeslami, R., & Shamshiri, B. (2009). Comparing achievement goal orientations of Iranian gifted and nongifted schoolchildren. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9 (10), 1990-1993.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 1 (1), 5-34.
  • Marland, S. P. Jr. (1972). Education of the Gifted and Talented, Volume 1: Report to the Congress of the United States by the US Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
  • Manning, S. (2006). Recognizing gifted students: A practical guide for teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42 (2), 64-68.
  • Maignan, I., ＆ Ferrell, O. C.(2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3-19.
  • Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2007). The moderating effect of passion on the relation between activity engagement and positive affect. Motivation and Emotion, 31 (4), 312-321.
  • MERİ , M., 박지윤, 정영미, 박용한. 한국과 터키 과학고등학교 남녀 학생들의 수학 학습에서의 학습전략 및 학습동기 비교
    과학영재교육, 9(1), 1-10 [2017]
  • Lovecky, D. V. (1998). Spiritual sensitivity in gifted children. Roeper Review, 20 (3), 178-183.
  • Lovecky, D. V. (1992). Exploring social and emotional aspects of giftedness in children. Roeper Review, 15 (1), 18-25.
  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
  • Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80 (1), 75-86.
  • Litman, J. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition and Emotion, 19 (6), 793-814.
  • Lindholm, C. (1990). Charisma. UK: Basil Blackwell.
  • Li, H., Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y., Kumtepe, A. T., & Mo, G. (2008). Validation of the gifted rating scales–school form in China. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52 (2), 160-169.
  • Lee, D., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (2006). The reliability and validity of a Korean-translated version of the gifted rating scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24 (3), 210-224.
  • Lamkins, A. (1977). A model: Planning, designing and evaluating identification and instructional programs for gifted, talented and/or potentially gifted children . Albany, NY: New York State Department of Education.
  • Labonte, R. (1999). Social capital and community development: practitioner emptor. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 23(4), 430-433.
  • Kreitler, S., Kreitler, H., & Zigler, E. (1974). Cognitive orientation and curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 65 (1), 43-52.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages . (Vol. 2). Essays on Moral Development, San Francisco: Harper and Row.
  • Knowles, C., Hansen, E., & Dibrell, C. (2008). Measuring firm innovativeness: Development and refinement of a new scale. Journal of Forest Products Business Research, 5 (5), 1-24.
  • Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54 (3), 757–765.
  • Khatena-Torrance 창의적 성격검사: 한국판 표준화 검사요강
    김영채 대구: 계명대학교 [2002]
  • Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (1976). Khatena-Torrance creative perception inventory . Il: Stoelting Company.
  • Khatena, J., & Morse, D. T. (1994). Khatena-Morse multi-talent perception inventory. Binsonville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
  • Kaufmann, F. (2000). Gifted education and the romance of passion. Gifted Child Today, 23 (6), 20, 21-49.
  • Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82 (3), 291-305.
  • Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (1996). Leadership and the gifted. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29 (1), 1-12.
  • KEDI 리더십 특성검사(간편형) 개발 및 타당화 연구
    유경재 유호현 전미란 영재교육연구, 23(1), 109-128 [2013]
  • Jones, J. W., Neuman, G., Altmann, R., & Dreschler, B. (2001). Development of the sports performance inventory: A psychological measure of athletic potential. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15 (3), 491-503.
  • Johnson, K. (2001). Integrating an affective component in the curriculum for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 24 (4), 14-18.
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). NY: Guilford Press.
  • Jennett, H. K., Harris, S. L., & Mesibov, G. B. (2003). Commitment to philosophy, teacher efficacy, and burnout among teachers of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33 (6), 583-593.
  • Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 20 (4), 134-140.
  • Janos, P. M., & Robinson, N. (1985). Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien(Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 149-195). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Jacobs, S. R., & Dodd, D. (2003). Student burnout as a function of personality, social support, and workload. Journal of College Student Development, 44 (3), 291-303.
  • Jackson, S. E., & Maslach, C. (1982). After-effects of job-related stress: Families as victims. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 3 (1), 63-77.
  • Jackson, S. A., Martin, A. J., & Eklund, R. C. (2008). Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30 (5), 561-587.
  • Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18 (1), 17-35.
  • Irving, L. M., Snyder, C. R., Cheavens, J., Gravel, L., Hanke, J., Hilberg, P., & Nelson, N. (2004). The relationships between hope and outcomes at the pretreatment, beginning, and later phases of psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 14 (4), 419-443.
  • Hunsaker, S. L., Finley, V. S., & Frank, E. L. (1997). An analysis of teacher nominations and student performance in gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41 (2), 19-24.
  • Houndstooth theory
    Berman, K. B. Renzulli, J. Sytsma, R. E. www.gifted.uconn.edu (검색일: 2017. 2. 23.) [2000]
  • Hoge, R. D., & Cudmore, L. (1986). The use of teacher-judgment measures in the identification of gifted pupils. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2 (2), 181-196.
  • Hermans, H. J. (1970). A questionnaire measure of achievement motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54 (4), 353.
  • Heller, K. A., Perleth, C., & Lim, T. K. (2005). The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. Conceptions of Giftedness, 2 , 147-170.
  • Heller, K. A., & Perleth, C. (2008). The munich high ability test battery (MHBT): A multidimensional, multimethod approach. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50 (2), 173-188.
  • Heinzen, T. E., Mills, C., & Cameron, P. (1993). Scientific innovation potential. Creativity Research Journal, 6 (3), 261-269.
  • Hall, M., & Farkas, G. (2011). Adolescent cognitive skills, attitudinal/behavioral traits and career wages. Social Forces, 89 (4), 1261-1285.
  • Gove, F. L., & Keating, D. P. (1979). Empathic role-taking precursors. Developmental Psychology, 15 (6), 594-600.
  • Gould, D., Dieffenbach, K., & Moffett, A. (2002). Psychological characteristics and their development in Olympic champions. Journal of applied sport psychology, 14(3), 172-204.
  • Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (8), 1398-1405.
  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). NJ: Lawrence Eelbaum.
  • Gilman, R., Dooley, J., & Florell, D. (2006). Relative levels of hope and their relationship with academic and psychological indicators among adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25 (2), 166–178.
  • Gilliam, J. E., Carpenter, B. O., & Christensen, J. R. (1996). Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scale . Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Gifted evaluation scale: Third edition(GES-3)
    Arthaud, T. J. McCarney, S. B. Hawthorne Educational Services . https://www.hawthorne-ed.com/images/gifted/samples/swf_files/h04150sb.pdf (검색일: 2017. 2. 23) [2009]
  • Gerber, M., Feldmeth, A. K., Lang, C., Brand, S., Elliot, C., Holsboer-Trachsler, E., & P hse, U. (2015). The relationship between mental toughness, stress, and burnout among adolescents: A longitudinal study with Swiss vocational students. Psychological Reports: Employment Psychology & Marketing, 117 (3), 703-723.
  • George, P. G., & Scheft, T. (1998). Children's thoughts about the future: Comparing gifted and nongifted students after 20 years. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21 (2), 224-239.
  • Gardner, H. (1993b). Multiple intelligence . NY: Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (1993a). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences . NY: Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (1988). Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 1 (1), 8-26.
  • Gan, Y., Shang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2007). Coping flexibility and locus of control as predictors of burnout among Chinese college students. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 35(8), 1087-1098.
  • Gagn , F. (2013). The DMGT: Changes within, beneath, the beyond. Talent Development & Excellence, 5 (1), 5-19.
  • Gagn , F. (2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In B. MacFarlance, & T. Stambaugh, (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce BanTassel-Baska (pp. 61-80). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Gagn , F. (2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development through DMGT-based analysis. In K. A., Heller, F. J., M nks, R., Subotnik, & R. J., Sternberg, (Eds.) International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 67-79). Kidington, UK: Elsevier.
  • Gagn , F. (1994). Are teachers really poor talent detectors? Comments on Pegnato and Birch's study of the effectiveness and efficiency of various identification techniques. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38 (3), 124-126.
  • Gagn , F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definition. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 103-112.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Cultivating positive emotions to optimize health and well-being. Prevention & Treatment, 3 (1), 1-25.
  • Fowler, D. (1990). Democracy’s next generation. Educational Leadership 48 (3), 10-15.
  • Feshbach, N. D., & Hoffman, M. A. (1978). Sex differences in children's reports of emotion-arousing situations . Symposium presented at the meeting of the western psychological association, San Francisco, April 19-22.
  • Feldhusen, J. F., Denny, T., & Condon, C. F. (1965). Anxiety, divergent thinking, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56 (1), 40-45.
  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). A conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 112-127). NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Feist, G. J. (1999). 14 The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg, Handbook of creativity (pp. 273-296). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Farkas, G. (2003). Cognitive skills and noncognitive traits and behaviors in stratification processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 29 (1), 541-562.
  • Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., Beal, S. A., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 , 1-12.
  • Elliott, T. R., Witty, T. E., Herrick, S. M., & Hoffman, J. T. (1991). Negotiating reality after physical loss: hope, depression, and disability. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61(4), 608-613.
  • Elliott, S. N., Argulewicz, E. N., & Turco, T. L. (1986). Predictive validity of the scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students for gifted children from three sociocultural groups. The Journal of Experimental Education, 55 (1), 27-32.
  • Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Development, 38 (4), 1025-1034.
  • Elhoweris, H. (2008). Teacher judgment in identifying gifted/talented students. Multicultural Education, 15 (3), 35-38.
  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P.A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101 (1), 91-119.
  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
  • Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In A. Wigfield, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57-88). CA: Academic press.
  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
  • Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., &Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101.
  • Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Tsukayama, E., Berstein, H., & Ericsson, K. A. (2011). Deliberate practice spells success: Why grittier competitors triumph at the national spelling bee. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2 (2), 174-181.
  • Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166-174.
  • Dirkes, M. A. (1983). Anxiety in the gifted: Pluses and minuses. Roeper Review, 6(2), 68-70.
  • Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (2), 276-302.
  • Delcourt, M. A. (1993). Creative productivity among secondary school students: Combining energy, interest, and imagination. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37 (1), 23-31.
  • Davis, H. B., & Connell, J. P. (1985). The effect of aptitude and achievement status on the self-system. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29 (3), 131-136.
  • Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Characteristics of gifted students. Education of the gifted and talented, 5, 32-53.
  • Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. (1982). Group inventory for finding interests:(GIFFI) I and II: Instruments for identifying creative potential in the junior and senior high school. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 16 (1), 50-57.
  • Davis IV, H., & Zaichkowsky, L. (1998). Explanatory style among elite ice hockey athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87 (3), 1075-1080.
  • Dauber, S. L., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremely talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34 (1), 10-14.
  • Danish, S. J., & Kagan, N. (1971). Measurement of affective sensitivity: Toward a valid measure of interpersonal perception. The Journal of Counseling Psychology, 18 (1), 51-54.
  • Curtis, A. (1998). Agency–community partnership in landcare: Lessons for state-sponsored citizen resource management. Environmental Management, 22 (4), 563-574.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Good business: Flow, leadership and the making of meaning . New York: Viking.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience . New York: Harper Collins.
  • Cross, T. M. (2014). The gritty: Grit and non-traditional doctoral student success. Journal of Educators Online, 11 (3), 1-30.
  • Collins, A. E. (2013). Achievement and aspirations in mathematics and science: Associations with gifted students' flow experiences (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University).
  • Coles, R. (1998). The moral intelligence of children. Family Court Review, 36 (1), 90-95.
  • Clough, P., Earle, K., & Sewell, D. (2002). Mental toughness: The concept and its measurement. In I. M. Cockerill, Solutions in sport psychology , (pp. 32-43). UK: Cengage Learning EMEA.
  • Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  • Cholpan, B. E. McCain, M. L. Caronell, J. L., & Hagen, R L. (1985). Empathy: Review of available measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (3) 635-653.
  • Chang, E. C. (Ed.) (2001). Optimism and pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice . Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
  • Chan, D. W. (2000). Identifying gifted and talented students in Hong Kong. Roeper Review, 22 (2), 88-93.
  • Chambel, M. J., & Curral, L. (2005). Stress in academic life: Work characteristics as predictors of student well‐being and performance. Applied Psychology, 54 (1), 135-147.
  • Carbonneau, N., Vallerand, R. J., Fernet, C., & Guay, F. (2008). The role of passion for teaching in intrapersonal and interpersonal outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (4), 977-987.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling: Perspectives on the present and the future. International Journal of Testing, 1(3-4), 327-334.
  • Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1980). Theories of the creative process: A review and a perspective. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 14 (2), 91-132.
  • Brown, S. W., Renzulli, J. S., Gubbins, E. J., Siegle, D., Zhang, W., & Chen, C. H. (2005). Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(1), 68-79.
  • Brandwein, P. F., & Passow, A. H. (1988). Gifted young in science: Potential through performance. Washington, DC., US: National Science Teachers Association.
  • Bracken, B. A., & Brown, E. F. (2006). Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted and talented students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24 (2), 112-122.
  • Berman, S. (1997). Children’s social consciousness and the development of social responsibility . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1981). Mathematical ability: Is sex a factor?. Science, 212 (4491), 118-121.
  • Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The hopelessness Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 (6), 861-865.
  • Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., & Doleck, T. (2016). How does GRIT impact college students' academic achievement in science?. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4 (1), 33-43.
  • Baum, S. M., Olenchak, F. R., & Owen, S. V. (1998). Gifted students with attention deficits: Fact and/or fiction? Or, can we see the forest for the trees?. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42 (2), 96-104.
  • Battistich, V., Watson, M., Solomon, D., Schaps, E., & Solomon, J. (1991). The child development project: A comprehensive program for the development of prosocial character. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development, Vol. 1. Theory; Vol. 2. Research; Vol. 3. Application (pp. 1-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Basadur, M., Taggar, S., & Pringle, P. (1999). Improving the measurement of divergent thinking attitudes in organizations. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33 (2), 75-111.
  • Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In A, M. George, & E. S. Randall (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling . (pp. 269-296). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Balchin, T. (2008). A creativity feedback package for teachers and students of design and technology (in the UK). Design And Technology Education: An International Journal, 10 (2), 31-43.
  • Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation . Oxford, England: Van Nostrand.
  • Aspinwall, L. G., & Staudinger, U. M. (2003). A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology . Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
  • Arasteh, A. R., & Arasteh, J. D. (1976). Creativity in human development: An interpretive and annotated bibliography. MA: Schenkman Publishing Company.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Colorado : Westview Press.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity . NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Allalouf, A., Hambleton, R. K., & Sireci, S. G. (1999). Identifying the causes of DIF in translated verbal items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36 (3), 185-198.
  • 5요인 성격특성과 학업 소진과의 관계
  • "청소년들의 관계성(교사-학생), 정서조절 및 학습몰입 간의 관계"
    안도희(Ahn, Doehee) 유다미(Yu, Damee) 열린교육연구, 23(3), 219-239 [2015]
  • "영재와 평재 고등학생들의 성공에 대한 인식, Grit, 열망 및 성취목적 비교"
    신민 안도희 영재교육연구, 25(4), 607-628 [2015]