연구동향 분석
박사

가짜뉴스와 팩트체크 효과 연구 : 수용자의 심리적 기제를 중심으로

염정윤 2018년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 가짜뉴스와 팩트체크 효과 연구 : 수용자의 심리적 기제를 중심으로' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 가짜뉴스
  • 거짓 정보 노출
  • 거짓 정보 전파
  • 신념 일치
  • 정보원 우호도
  • 주장의 강도
  • 팩트체크
  • 편향적 정보처리
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
216 0

0.0%

' 가짜뉴스와 팩트체크 효과 연구 : 수용자의 심리적 기제를 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • 오택섭 설진아 마동훈 김해영 SNS 정치발언의 사실 검증 [2012]
  • 한국형 가짜 뉴스에 대응하는 법. <경향신문>
    박은하 URL: http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=201703251717011 [2017]
  • 한국언론학회(편), <정치적 소통과 SNS> (403-437쪽)
    경기: 나남
  • 한국갤럽 테러방지법 국정원 정보 수집 권한 강화 찬반[전자매체본]. <한국갤럽 데일리오피니언>, 200호
    URL: http://www.gallup.co.kr/gallupdb/reportContent.asp?seqNo=732&pagePos=1&selectYear=0&search=1&searchKeyword=%C5%D7%B7%AF [2016]
  • 한국갤럽 동성결혼, 동성애에 대한 여론조사[전자매체본]. <한국갤럽 데일리 오피니언>
    URL: http://www.gallup.co.kr/gallupdb/reportContent.asp?seqNo=837&pagePos=1&selectYear=0&search=1&searchKeyword=%B5%BF%BC%BA [2017]
  • 프랑스 끌레미의 ‘2017 언론주간’ 들여다보기
    진민정 <미디어리터러시>, 1호, 76-79 [2017]
  • 풍자 텔레비전 프로그램의 시청에 영향을 미치는 정서적 인지적 요인
    유경한 <방송과 커뮤니케이션>, 16권 4호, 119-160 [2015]
  • 팩트체킹 뉴스 의미와 한계
    정은령 <관훈저널>, 143호, 19-25 [2017]
  • 팩트체크에 대한 언론수용자 인식. <신문과방송>
    김선호 김위근 8월호, 24- 26 [2017]
  • 청소년 수용자들의 뉴스 리터러시 교육 효과 연구-파당적 뉴스에 대한 프레이밍과 객관보도규범 교육효과를 중심으로
    이미나 <시민교육연구>, 43권 1호, 111-155 [2011]
  • 청소년 미디어교육 프로그램 내용과 효과에 관한 연구
    나경애 이상식 <한국언론학보>, 54권 3호, 349-373 [2010]
  • 좋은 루머, 나쁜 루머, 양가적 루머?
    나은영 차유리 <언론정보연구>, 52권 2호, 103-166 [2015]
  • 조은아 , 1, 12). 美 대선판 뒤흔든‘독버섯’…국내도 가짜 뉴스 주의보, <동아일보>, A12면
    박훈상 차길호 URL: http://news.donga.com/3/all/20170112/82333625/1#csidx29599f87efbef3ab90229c2bf186aae [2017]
  • 저널리즘 공공성 실현을 위한 한국형 팩트체킹 모델 연구
    마동훈 서울: 한국언론진흥재단 [2013]
  • 자동화된 사실 확인(fact checking) 기술(technology)의 현황과 한계
    오세욱(Se-Uk, Oh) <사이버커뮤니케이션학보>, 34권 3호, 137-180 [2017]
  • 언론중재 및 피해구제 등에 관한 법률
    3 1 [2011]
  • 언론의 위기와 가짜 뉴스 파동
    임종섭 <관훈저널>, 142호, 87-93 [2017]
  • 신 (新)‘카더라통신’의 동기적 요인효과
    차유리 <한국언론학보>, 59권 2호, 157-195 [2015]
  • 소셜 미디어 환경에서의 미디어 리터러시 구성요인 검증
    김성미 서윤경 안정임 <한국방송학보>, 26권 6호, 129-176 [2012]
  • 소비자의 부정적 브랜드 루머의 수용과 확산
  • 서울 지역 20 대 유권자의 팟캐스트 이용과 정치참여에 관한 연구
    김정혜 황하성 <사회과학연구>, 19권 3호, 151-184 [2012]
  • 사용확산모형을 적용한 소비자의 온라인 소셜 네트워크 활용에 대한 연구
    나종연 <소비자학연구>, 21권 2호, 443-472 [2010]
  • 반현 포털 뉴스 이용동기가 이용행위에 미치는 영향 연구
    조정현 <사이버커뮤니케이션학보>, 17호, 193-231 [2006]
  • 박아란 일반 국민들의 ‘가짜 뉴스’에 대한 인식 [전자매체본]. <미디어 이슈>, 3권 3호
    오세욱 URL: http://www.kpf.or.kr/site/kpf/research/selectMediaPdsView.do?seq=574068 [2017]
  • 박아란 <가짜 뉴스 현황과 문제점>
    오세욱 정세훈 서울: 한국언론진흥재단 [2017]
  • 미세먼지 위험에 대한 공중들의 정보탐색과 처리에 대한 연구: 인지된 정보 수집 능력, 언론 정보원 신뢰, 책임 귀인과 경험 정도의 조절 효과 분석
  • 미디어 리터러시 국내외 동향 및 정책 방향[전자매체본]. <코카포커스>, 67호, 1-27
    김양은 홍유진 URL: http://www.kocca.kr/cop/bbs/view/B0000141/1809547.do?menuNo= [2013]
  • 미디어 리터러시 교육 활성화를 통한 가짜뉴스 대응. (한국언론진흥재단 가짜뉴스와 미디어 리터러시 교육 세미나)
    양정애 URL: http://www.kpf.or.kr/site/kpf/ex/board/View.do?cbIdx=246&bcIdx=18396 [2017]
  • 미 대선 시기 가짜 뉴스(Fake News) 관련 논란과 의미
    김유향 <이슈와논점>, 1242호, 1-4 [2016]
  • 대학생들의 스마트 광고 이용동기, 사회심리적 속성이 맞춤형 스마트 광고 만족도에 미치는 영향: 사회적 동조, 혁신성, 온라인 프라이버시 염려 인식 변인을 중심으로
    이정기 <정치커뮤니케이션 연구>, 38권, 41-72 [2015]
  • 뉴스 보도의 정확성 연구. <언론과 사회>
    우병동 봄권 11호, 34-65 [2002]
  • 기업태도가 소비자의 기업루머 신뢰에 미치는 영향
  • 기업 루머의 생성과 확산: 이론적 고찰. <커뮤니케이션학 연구>
    김현주 5권 단일호, 264-291 [1997]
  • 가짜뉴스의 개념화와 규제수단에 관한 연구
    권오성(Osung Kwon) 황용석(Yongsuk Hwang) <언론과법>, 16권 1호, 53-101 [2017]
  • 가짜뉴스와 언론 신뢰의 위기- 현황 분석과 대응 방안 탐색 -
    정의철 홍숙영 <한국위기관리논집>, 13권, 43-60 [2017]
  • 가짜 뉴스의 현황과 원인, 그리고 대응 방안[전자매체본]. <KISA Report>, 2호, 3-7
    한상기 URL: http://www.kisa.or.kr/public/library/IS_View.jsp?mode=view&p_No=158&b_No=158&d_No=324&cPage=&ST=TC&SV= [2017]
  • 가짜 뉴스와 사실확인 보도
    이준웅 <관훈저널>, 143호, 33-40 [2017]
  • 가짜 뉴스에 대한 법률적 쟁점과 대책
    박아란 신문과 방송 4월호, 12-19 [2017]
  • 가짜 뉴스에 대응하는 미국의 미디어교육
    류동협 <미디어리터러시>, 1호, 86-89 [2017]
  • 가짜 뉴스(Fake News)의 경제적 비용 추정과 시사점
    백다미 정민 <한국경제주평>, 736호, 1-15 [2017]
  • 가짜 뉴스 관련 논점과 페이스북・구글의 대응 방안 [전자매체본]. <KISA Report>, 2호, 8-16
    최홍규 URL: http://www.kisa.or.kr/public/library/IS_View.jsp?mode=view&p_No=158&b_No=158&d_No=324&cPage=&ST=TC&SV= [2017]
  • “소비자의 소셜 미디어를 통한 정보공유 활동에 대한 연구”
    이경미 한혜주 <소비자학연구>, 25권 2호, 21-44 [2014]
  • van Strien, J. L., Kammerer, Y., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2016). How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 245-252.
  • van Egeren, L. F. (2009). A cybernetic model of global personality traits. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(2), 92-108.
  • Yang, Z. J., McComas, K. A., Gay, G., Leonard, J. P., Dannenberg, A. J., & Dillon, H. (2011). Information seeking related to clinical trial enrollment. Communication Research, 38(6), 856-882.
  • Yang, Z. J., Aloe, A. M., & Feeley, T. H. (2014). Risk information seeking and processing model: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 20-41.
  • Yang, Z. J., & Kahlor, L. (2013). What, me worry? The role of affect in information seeking and avoidance. Science Communication, 35(2), 189-212.
  • Wood, W., Kallgren, C. A., & Preisler, R. M. (1985). Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(1), 73-85.
  • Wood, R. (2000). Work Motivation: Theory, research and practice introduction to the special issue. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 317-318.
  • Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of communication, 59(1), 40-56.
  • Wilson, R. (2016, 11, 6). Final newpaper endorsement count: Clinton 57, Trump2. The Hill. Retrived from http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidentialraces/304606-final-newspaper-endorsement-count-clinton-57-trump-2
  • Wert, S. R., & Salovey, P. (2004). A social comparison account of gossip. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 122.
  • Weenig, M. W., Groenenboom, A. C., & Wilke, H. A. (2001). Bad news transmission as a function of the definitiveness of consequences and the relationship between communicator and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 449.
  • Weeks, B. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2014). Electoral consequences of political rumors: Motivated reasoning, candidate rumors, and vote choice during the 2008 US presidential election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(4), 401-422.
  • Wardle, C. (2017, 2, 16). Fake news. It’s complicated. First Draft News. Retrived from https://firstdraftnews.com/fake-news-complicated/
  • Wang, J., Zhu, R., & Shiv, B. (2011). The lonely consumer: Loner or conformer? Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1116-1128.
  • Vraga, E. K., Tully, M., Akin, H., & Rojas, H. (2012). Modifying perceptions of hostility and credibility of news coverage of an environmental controversy through media literacy. Journalism, 13(7), 942-959.
  • Vraga, E. K., Tully, M., & Rojas, H. (2009). Media literacy training reduces perception of bias. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(4), 68-81.
  • Vraga, E. K., & Tully, M. (2015). Media literacy messages and hostile media perceptions: Processing of nonpartisan versus partisan political information. Mass Communication and Society, 18(4), 422-448.
  • Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2017). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 1461444817712086.
  • Vargo, C. J., & Guo, L. (2017). Networks, Big Data, and Intermedia Agenda Setting: An Analysis of Traditional, Partisan, and Emerging Online US News. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1077699016679976.
  • Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577-585.
  • Uberti, D. (2016, 12, 15). The real history of fake news. Columbia Journalism Revew. Retrived from https://www.cjr.org/special_report/fake_news_history.php
  • Tynan, D. (2016, 8, 24). How Facebook powers money machines for obscure political ‘news’ sites. The Guardian. Retrived from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/aug/24/facebook-clickbaitpolitical-news-sites-us-election-trump
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
  • Turner, J. (2007). The messenger overwhelming the message: Ideological cues and perceptions of bias in television news. Political Behavior, 29(4), 441-464.
  • Toffler, A., & Alvin, T. (1981). The third wave. New York, NY: Bantam books.
  • Thorson, E. (2016). Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication, 33(3), 460-480.
  • Tan, W. K., & Tang, C. Y. (2013). Does personality predict tourism information search and feedback behaviour? Current Issues in Tourism, 16(4), 388-406.
  • Tan, A. S., Lee, Ch. J., & Chae, J. (2015). Exposure to Health (Mis) Information: Lagged Effects on Young Adults' Health Behaviors and Potential Pathways. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 674-698.
  • Taber, C. S., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31(2), 137-155.
  • Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.
  • Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3), 572–585.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2008). “She said what?” “He did that?” Believing false rumors. Harvard Public Law Working Paper, 08(56), 1-26.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Sundaram, D. S., Mitra, K., & Webster, C. (1998). Word-of-Mouth Communications: A motivational Analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 527–531.
  • Sudhir, S., & Unnithan, A. B. (2014). Measuring consumer motivations to share rumors: Scale development. International Journal of Online Marketing, 4(3), 51-67.
  • Subramanian, S. (2017, 2, 15). Inside the Macedonian fake-news complex. Wired. Retrived from https://www.wired.com/2017/02/veles-macedonia-fakenews/
  • Strong, S. I. (2017). Alternative facts and the post-truth society: Meeting the challenge. University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online, 165(1), 137-146.
  • Stevens, L. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1995). Motivation and cognition in social life: A social survival perspective. Social Cognition, 13(3), 189-214.
  • Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, 261-302.
  • Staksrud, E., lafsson, K., & Livingstone, S. (2013) Does the use of social networking sites increase children’s risk of harm? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 40-50.
  • Spivak, C. (2010). The fact-checking explosion: in a bitter political landscape marked by rampant allegations of questionable credibility, more and more news outlets are launching truth-squad operations. American Journalism Review, 32(4), 38-44.
  • Southwell, B. G., & Thorson, E. A. (2015). The prevalence, consequence, and remedy of misinformation in mass media systems. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 589-595.
  • Song, H., & Kwon, N. (2012). The relationship between personality traits and information competency in Korean and American students. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(7), 1153-1162.
  • Smith, A., & Banic, V. (2016, 12, 9). Fake news: How a partying Macedonian teen earns thousands publishing lies. NBC. Retrived from http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/fake-news-how-partyingmacedonian-teen-earns-thousands-publishing-lies-n692451
  • Singer J. L. (1980). The power and limits of television: a cognitive-affective analysis. In P. Tannenbaum (ed.) The Entertainment Function of Television (pp. 36-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Silverman, C. (2016, 12, 30a). Here are 50 of the biggest fake news hits on facebook from 2016. BuzzFeed News. Retrived from https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/top-fake-news-of-2016?utm_term=.tcRMlxyvQ#.giMVQkmb0
  • Silverman, C. (2016, 11, 17b). This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News On Facebook. BuzzFeed News. Retrived from https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-newsoutperformed-real-news-onfacebook?utm_term=.qdjwmRJr4#.qiBoL7mkK
  • Siddiqui, F., & Svrluga, S. (2016, 12, 5). N.C. man told police he went to D.C. pizzeria with gun to investigate conspiracy theory. Washington Post. Retrived from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2016/12/04/d-cpolice-respond-to-report-of-a-man-with-a-gun-at-comet-pingpong-restaurant/?utm_term=.aecd91aed533
  • Shibutani, T. (1966). Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merril.
  • Shane, S. (2017, 1, 18). From headline to photograph, a fake news masterpiece. New York Times. Retrived from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/18/us/fake-news-hillary-clintoncameron-harris.html
  • Senra, R. (2016, 4, 17). Na semana do impeachment, 3 das 5 not cias mais compartilhadas no Facebook s o falsas. BBC Brasil. Retrived from http://www.bbc.com/portuguese/noticias/2016/04/160417_noticias_falsas_redes_brasil_fd
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279.
  • Schultz, F., Utz, S., & G ritz, A. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public relations review, 37(1), 20-27.
  • Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2012). Theories of personality (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Schaedel, S. (2016, 10, 24). Did the pope endorse Trump? FactCheck.org. Retrived from http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/did-the-pope-endorse-trump/
  • Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658-1664.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
  • Rubin, A. M., & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement a uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14(2), 246- 268.
  • Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578–586.
  • Rosnow, R. L., & Fine, G. A. (1976). Rumor and gossip: The social psychology of hearsay. New York, NY: Elsevier.
  • Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Inside rumor: a personal journey. American Psychologist, 46, 484–496.
  • Rosnow, R. L. (1974). On rumor. Journal of Communication, 24(3), 26-38.
  • Ritson, M., & Elliott, R. (1999). The social uses of advertising: an ethnographic study of adolescent advertising audiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 260-277.
  • Reid, S. A. (2012). A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 381-399.
  • Ratneshwar, S., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Comprehension's role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 52-62.
  • Rains, S. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: a metaanalytic review. Human Communication Research, 39(1), 47-73.
  • Rafienia, P., Azadfallah, P., Rasoulzadeh-Tabatabaiei, K., & Fathi-Ashtiani, A. (2008). The role of extraversion, neuroticism and positive and negative mood in emotional information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(2), 392-402.
  • Prasad, J. (1935). The psychology of rumor: a study relating to the great Indian earthquake of 1934. British Journal of Psychology, 26, 1–15.
  • Polkinghorne, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Pingree, R. J., Brossard, D., & McLeod, D. M. (2014). Effects of journalistic adjudication on factual beliefs, news evaluations, information seeking, and epistemic political efficacy. Mass Communication and Society, 17(5), 615-638.
  • Picazo-Vela, S., Chou, S. Y., Melcher, A. J., & Pearson, J. M. (2010). Why provide an online review? An extended theory of planned behavior and the role of Big157 Five personality traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 685-696.
  • Pfau, M., & Louden, A. (1994). Effectiveness of adwatch formats in deflecting political attack ads. Communication Research, 21(3), 325-341.
  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of consumer research, 10(2), 135-146.
  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Heesacker, M. (1981b). Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 40(3), 432-440.
  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981a). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(5), 847-855.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.
  • Pervin, L. A., & John, O. P. (1996). Personality : Theory & research. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Perloff, R. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236-262.
  • Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 188–214.
  • Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2017, September 12). Who falls for fake news? The roles of analytic thinking, motivated reasoning, political ideology, and bullshit receptivity. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3023545
  • Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
  • Papacharissi, Z., & Mendelson, A. L. (2007). An exploratory study of reality appeal: Uses and gratifications of reality TV shows. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(2), 355-370.
  • Oxford Dictionaries (n.d.). Word of the Year 2016 is. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016
  • Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63, 33-44.
  • Oberhelman, D. D. (2007). Coming to terms with Web 2.0. Reference Reviews, 21(7), 5-6.
  • O'Sullivan, P. B., & Geiger, S. (1995). Does the watchdog bite? Newspaper ad watch articles and political attack ads. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(4), 771-785.
  • O'Flynn, I. (2006). Deliberative democracy and divided societies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133(4), E835-E842.
  • Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Ubel, P. A. (2013). The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform. Medical care, 51(2), 127-132.
  • Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2015). The Effect of Fact‐Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on US State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 628-640.
  • Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330.
  • Niederdeppe, J., Hornik, R. C., Kelly, B. J., Frosch, D. L., Romantan, A., Stevens, R. S., Barg, F. K., Weiner, J., & Schwartz, J. S. (2007). Examining the dimensions of cancer-related information seeking and scanning behavior. Health Communication, 22(2), 153-167.
  • Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
  • Nabi, R. L., Stitt, C. R., Halford, J., & Finnerty, K. L. (2006). Emotional and cognitive predictors of the enjoyment of reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the uses and gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 8(4), 421-447.
  • Myers, S., Sen, S., & Alexandrov, A. (2010). The moderating effect of personality traits on attitudes toward advertisements: A contingency framework. Management & Marketing, 5(3), 3–20.
  • Moore, K., & McElroy, J. C. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 267– 274.
  • Mondak, J. J., & Halperin, K. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 335-362.
  • Moldovan, S., Goldenberg, J., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2011). The different roles of product originality and usefulness in generating word-of-mouth. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 109-119.
  • Mohammed, S., Mathieu, J. E., & Bartlett, L. B. (2002). Technical–administrative task performance, leadership task performance, and contextual performance: Considering the influence of team- and task-related composition variables. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(7), 795–814.
  • Mitchell, T. R. (1982). Motivation: New directions for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 80-88.
  • Mitchell, A., & Holcomb, J. (2016). State of the news media 2016. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/06/15/state-of-thenews-media-2016/
  • Min, Y. (2002). Intertwining of campaign news and advertising: The content and electoral effects of newspaper ad watches. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 927-944.
  • Meraz, S. (2011). Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agendasetting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 176–194.
  • McWilliam, G. (2000). Building stronger brands through online communities. Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 43-54.
  • McQuail, D. (2005). Mass communication theory (5th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa P. T. Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509-516.
  • McClung, S., & Johnson, K. (2010). Examining the motives of podcast users. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 17(1), 82-95.
  • Matthes, J., & Valenzuela, S. (2012, May). Who Learns from Cross-Cutting Exposure? Motivated Reasoning, Counterattitudinal News Coverage, and Awareness of Oppositional Views. Conference Papers -- International Communication Association, 1-38.
  • Martin, R., Hewstone, M., & Martin, P. Y. (2007). Systematic and heuristic processing of majority and minority-endorsed messages: The effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(1), 43-56.
  • Martens, H., & Hobbs, R. (2015). How media literacy supports civic engagement in a digital age. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(2), 120-137.
  • Martens H. (2010). Evaluating media literacy education: Concepts, theories and future directions. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2, 1–22.
  • Marsh, E. J., & Tversky, B. (2004). Spinning the stories of our lives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(5), 491-503.
  • Marietta, M., Barker, D. C., & Bowser, T. (2015). Fact-checking polarized politics: Does the fact-check industry provide consistent guidance on disputed realities? The Forum, 13(4), 577-596.
  • Marett, K., & Joshi, K. D. (2009). The decision to share information and rumors: Examining the role of motivation in an online discussion forum. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 47-68.
  • Maksl, A., Ashley, S., & Craft, S. (2015). Measuring news media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 6(3), 29-45.
  • Maheswaran, D., Mackie, D. M., & Chaiken, S. (1992). Brand name as a heuristic cue: The effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(4), 317-336.
  • Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in lowmotivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 13-25.
  • Luo, M. M., & Remus, W. (2014). Uses and gratifications and acceptance of Webbased information services: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 281-295.
  • Luarn, P., Huang, P., Chiu, Y. P., & Chen, I. J. (2016). Motivations to engage in word-of-mouth behavior on social network sites. Information Development, 32(4), 1253-1265.
  • Lowrey, W. (2017). The emergence and development of news fact-checking Sites: Institutional logics and population ecology. Journalism Studies, 18(3), 376- 394.
  • Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098-2109.
  • Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In Arthur Lupia Jr., Mattew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin(Eds.), Elements of reason(pp. 183~213). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: The role of online skills and internet selfefficacy. New media & Society, 12(2), 309-329.
  • Liu, C. H., Lee, H. W., Huang, P. S., Chen, H. C., & Sommers, S. (2016). Do incompatible arguments cause extensive processing in the evaluation of arguments? The role of congruence between argument compatibility and argument quality. British Journal of Psychology, 107(1), 179-198.
  • Lin, T. B., Li, J., Deng, F., & Lee, L. (2013). Understanding new media literacy: An explorative theoretical framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 160.
  • Lewis, J., & Jhally, S. (1998). The struggle over media literacy. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 109-120.
  • Levendusky, M. S. (2013). Why do partisan media polarize viewers?. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 611-623.
  • Lee, L., Chen, D. T., Li, J. Y., & Lin, T. B. (2015). Understanding new media literacy: The development of a measuring instrument. Computers & Education, 85, 84- 93.
  • Lee, H., & Oh, H. J. (2017). Normative mechanism of rumor dissemination on twitter. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 164-171.
  • Lang, F. R., John, D., L dtke, O., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Short assessment of the Big Five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 548-567.
  • Kwon, N., & Song, H. (2011). Personality traits, gender, and information competency among college students. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 87-107.
  • Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological bulletin, 108(3), 480-498.
  • Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 636-647.
  • Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790-816.
  • Ko, H., Cho, C. H., & Roberts, M. S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 57-70.
  • Knoll, J., & Proksch, R. (2017). Why we watch others' responses to online advertising–investigating users' motivations for viewing user-generated content in the context of online advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications, 23(4), 400-412.
  • Kimmel, A. J., & Audrain-Pontevia, A. F. (2010). Analysis of commercial rumors from the perspective of marketing managers: Rumor prevalence, effects, and control tactics. Journal of Marketing Communications, 16(4), 239-253.
  • Kim, K. S., Sin, S. C. J., & Tsai, T. I. (2014). Individual differences in social media use for information seeking. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(2), 171-178.
  • Kim, H. (2016). The role of emotions and culture in the third-person effect process of news coverage of election poll results. Communication Research, 43(1), 109-130.
  • Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2007). Critical media literacy, democracy, and the reconstruction of education. In D. Macedo & S.R. Steinberg (Eds.), Media literacy: A reader (pp. 3-23). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2005). Toward critical media literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 369-386.
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). The uses and gratifications approach to mass communication. Beverly Hills, CS: Sage Publications.
  • Katz, E., & Foulkes, D. (1962). On the use of the mass media as “escape”: Clarification of a concept. Public opinion quarterly, 26(3), 377-388.
  • Kamins, M. A., Folkes, V. S., & Perner, L. (1997). Consumer responses to rumors: Good news, bad news. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6(2), 165-187.
  • Kahne, J., Lee, N. J., & Feezell, J. T. (2012). Digital media literacy education and online civic and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 6, 1-24.
  • Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732–735.
  • Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection, Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407-424.
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2000). Beyond the school yard: Relationships as moderators of daily interpersonal conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 923-935.
  • Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: NYU press.
  • Jarman, J. W. (2016). Influence of political affiliation and criticism on the effectiveness of political fact-checking. Communication Research Reports, 33(1), 9-15.
  • Jamieson, K. H. (2012). Cable news networks increase amount and public accessibility of incivility. FlackCheck. org.
  • Jain, S. P., & Maheswaran, D. (2000). Motivated reasoning: A depth-ofprocessing perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 358-371.
  • Hwang, Y., & Jeong, S.-H. (2016). Information insufficiency and information seeking. Science Communication, 38(6), 679-698.
  • Hullett, C., & Boster, F. (2001). Matching messages to the values underlying value-expressive and social-adjustive attitudes: Reconciling an old theory with a contemporary measurement approach. Communication Monographs, 68(2), 133-153.
  • Hullett, C. R. (2002). Charting the process underlying the change of valueexpressive attitudes: The importance of goal-relevance in matching effect. Communication Monographs, 69, 158–178.
  • Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Batey, M., & Lee, A. (2012). A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 561-569.
  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Houston, D. A., & Fazio, R. H. (1989). Biased processing as a function of attitude accessibility: Making objective judgments subjectively. Social Cognition, 7(1), 51-66.
  • Holbert, R. L. (2005). A typology for the study of entertainment television and politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(3), 436-453.
  • Hochschild, J. L., & Einstein, K. L. (2015). Do facts matter? Information and misinformation in American politics. Political Science Quarterly, 130(4), 585- 624.
  • Hobbs, R., Donnelly, K., Friesem, J., & Moen, M. (2013). Learning to engage: How positive attitudes about the news, media literacy, and video production contribute to adolescent civic engagement. Educational Media International, 50(4), 231-246.
  • Hobbs, R., & Frost, R. (2003). Measuring the acquisition of media‐literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 330-355.
  • Hobbs, R. (1998). The seven great debates in the media literacy movement. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 16-32.
  • Hicks, A., Comp, S., Horovitz, J., Hovarter, M., Miki, M., & Bevan, J. L. (2012). Why people use Yelp. com: An exploration of uses and gratifications. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2274-2279.
  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?. J ournal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
  • Heller, D., Judge, T. A., & Watson, D. (2002). The confounding role of personality and trait affectivity in the relationship between job and life satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(7), 815-835.
  • Heinstr m, J. (2005). Fast surfing, broad scanning and deep diving: The influence of personality and study approach on students' information-seeking behavior. Journal of documentation, 61(2), 228-247.
  • Heinstr m, J. (2003). Five personality dimensions and their influence on information behaviour. Information Research, 9(1), 1-24.
  • Heath, C., Bell, C., & Sternberg, E. (2001). Emotional selection in memes: the case of urban legends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1028- 1041.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1-22.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1995). Context‐dependent variation in social stereotyping 3: Extremism as a self‐categorical basis for polarized judgement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 341-371.
  • Hart, W., Albarracin, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. & Merrill, L. (2009) Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555– 588.
  • Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K. (1999). Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 80(2), S230-S245.
  • Graves, L., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2016). Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: A field experiment examining motivations for factchecking. Journal of Communication, 66(1), 102-138.
  • Graves, L., & Glaisyer, T. (2012). The fact-checking universe in Spring 2012. New America Foundation.
  • Gottfried, J. A., Hardy, B. W., Winneg, K. M., & Jamieson, K. H. (2013). Did fact checking matter in the 2012 presidential campaign?. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1558-1567.
  • Gomez, R., Gomez, A., & Cooper, A. (2002). Neuroticism and extraversion as predictors of negative and positive emotional information processing: comparing Eysenck's, Gray's, and Newman's theories. European Journal of Personality, 16(5), 333-350.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216- 1229.
  • Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 165-180.
  • Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, a. (2012). Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief. Science, 336(6080), 493–496.
  • Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., Raso, C., & Ha, S. E. (2011). Personality traits and participation in political processes. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 692-706.
  • Garrett, R. K., Nisbet, E. C., & Lynch, E. K. (2013). Undermining the corrective effects of media‐based political fact checking? The role of contextual cues and na ve theory. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 617-637.
  • Garrett, R. K., & Weeks, B. E. (2013, February). The promise and peril of realtime corrections to political misperceptions. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1047-1058). ACM.
  • Gao, Q., & Feng, C. (2016). Branding with social media: User gratifications, usage patterns, and brand message content strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 868-890.
  • Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M.W. (2009). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Fridkin, K., Kenney, P. J., & Wintersieck, A. (2015). Liar, liar, pants on fire: How fact-checking influences citizens’ reactions to negative advertising. Political Communication, 32(1), 127-151.
  • Frey, D.(1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol.19, pp. 40~80). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38(S1), 127-150.
  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
  • Fiske, S. T. (2001). Social and societal pragmatism: Commentary on Augustinos, Gaskell, and Lorenzi-Cioldi. In K. Deaux, & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the social: bridging research traditions (pp. 249–253). New York, NY: Blackwell.
  • Fetzer, J. H. (2004). Disinformation: The use of false information. Minds and Machines, 14(2), 231-240.
  • Festinger, L., Cartwright, D., Barber, K., Fleischl, J., Gottsdanker, J., Keysen, A., & Leavitt, G. (1948). A study of a rumor: its origin and spread. Human Relations, 1(4), 464-486.
  • Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Hmielowski, J. D., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: Testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 590-611.
  • Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual review of psychology, 54(1), 297-327.
  • Fayombo, G. A. (2010). The relationship between personality traits and psychological resilience among the Caribbean adolescents. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 2(2), 105-116.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1953). The structure of human personality. London, UK: Methuen.
  • Ewen, R. B. (1998). Personality: A topical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5-24.
  • Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S.(1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth. TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M., & Lockhart, L. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 53-69.
  • Dillard, J. P., Weber, K. M., & Vail, R. G. (2007). The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. Journal of Communication, 57, 613–631.
  • Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144- 168.
  • Diddi, A., & LaRose, R. (2006). Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an Internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 193-210.
  • Dichter, E. (1966). How word-of-mouth advertising works. Harvard Business Review, 44(6), 147-160.
  • DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches. Prashant, DC: American Psychological Association. DiFonzo, N., Bourgeois, M. J,. Suls, J., Homan, C., Stupak, N., Brooks, B.P., Ross,
  • DeYoung, C. G. (2010). Toward a theory of the Big Five. Psychological Inquiry, 21(1), 26-33.
  • Darnton, R. (2017, 2, 13). The true history of fake news. NYR Daily. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2017/02/13/the-true-history-of-fakenews/
  • D. S., & Bordia, P. (2013). Rumor clustering, consensus, and polarization: Dynamic social impact and self-organization of hearsay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 378–99.
  • Costa, P. T. Jr ., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
  • Costa P. T. Jr, & Widiger, T. A. (1994). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253.
  • Connolly, K., Chrisafis, A., McPherson, P., Kirchgaessner, S., Haas, B., Phillips, D., & Hunt, E. (2016, 12, 2). Fake news: an insidious trend that’s fast becoming a global problem. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/dec/02/fake-news-facebook-uselection-around-the-world
  • Collinson, S. (2017, 2, 16). An amazing moment in history: Donald Trump's press conference. CNN. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/16/politics/donald-trump-pressconference-amazing-day-in-history/index.html
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Chung, C., & Darke, P. (2006). The consumer as advocate: Self-relevance, culture, and word of-mouth. Marketing Letters, 17(4), 269–279.
  • Cho, H., & Choi, J. (2010). Predictors and the role of attitude toward the message and perceived message quality in gain-and loss-frame antidrug persuasion of adolescents. Health communication, 25(4), 303-311.
  • Chen, X., (2016). The influences of personality and motivation on the sharing of misinformation on social media. iSchools. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/89327/Chen145.pdf?sequence=1
  • Chen, S., Duckworth, K., & Chaiken, S. (1999). Motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Psychological Inquiry, 10(1), 44-49.
  • Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Chen, D.-T., Wu, J., & Wang, Y.-M. (2011). Unpacking new media literacy. Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9(2), 84-88.
  • Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
  • Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-460.
  • Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 241.
  • Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766.
  • Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. San Diego, CA: Academic.
  • Carpenter, C. J. (2015). A Meta‐Analysis of the ELM's Argument Quality Processing Type Predictions. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 501- 534.
  • Budak, C., Agrawal, D., & El Abbadi, A. (2011, March). Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 665-674). ACM.
  • Buckingham, D., Banaji, S., Carr, D., Cranmer, S., & Willett, R. (2005). The media literacy of children and young people: A review of the research literature. London, UK: Ofcom.
  • Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (2013). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Bordia, R., & DiFonzo, N. (2005). Psychological motivations in rumor spread. In G. A. Fine, C. Heath, & V. Campion-Vincent (Eds.), Rumor mills: The social impact of rumor and legend (pp. 87–101). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Bordia, P., & DiFonzo, N. (2002). When social psychology became less social: Prasad and the history of rumor research. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 49-61.
  • Bohner, G., Ruder, M., & Erb, H. P. (2002). When expertise backfires: Contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 495-519.
  • Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B., & Chaiken, S. (1995) The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information, European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 33-68.
  • Bimber, B., & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning online: The Internet in US elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Berinsky, A. J. (2015). Rumors and health care reform: experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 1-22.
  • Berghel, H. (2017). Alt-News and Post-Truths in the" Fake News" Era. Computer, 50(4), 110-114.
  • Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2013). Emotion and virality: what makes online content go viral?. GfK Marketing Intelligence Review, 5(1), 18-23.
  • Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134.
  • Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586- 607.
  • Benkler, Y., Faris, R., Roberts, H., & Zuckerman, E. (2017). Breitbart-led rightwing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Revew. Retrieved from https://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart-mediatrump-harvard-study.php
  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–167.
  • Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 43-51.
  • Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media Literacy: A report of the national leadership conference on media literacy. Aspen, CO.: Aspen Institute
  • Ashley, S., Poepsel, M., & Willis, E. (2010). Media literacy and news credibility: Does knowledge of media ownership increase skepticism in news consumers?. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2(1), 37-46.
  • Arpan, L. M., Raney, A. A. (2003). An experimental investigation of news source and the hostile media effect. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 265-281.
  • Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M. J., & Gallois, C. (2007). Group allegiances and perceptions of media bias: Taking into account both the perceiver and the source. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 266-279.
  • Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1996). Can the press monitor campaign advertising? An experimental study. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1(1), 72-86.
  • Amazeen, M. A. (2015). Revisiting the epistemology of fact-checking. Critical Review, 27(1), 1-22.
  • Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. (1947). The psychology of rumor. Oxford, England: Henry Holt.
  • Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236.
  • Alexandrov, A., Lilly, B., & Babakus, E. (2013). The effects of social-and selfmotives on the intentions to share positive and negative word of mouth. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(5), 531-546.
  • <팩트체킹 진실을 여는 문>
    정재철 서울: 한솔수북 [2017]
  • <사회 미디어교육 현황 및 운영 전략 연구>
    강신규 김광재 장은미 서울: 한국언론진흥재단 [2017]
  • 6, 1). "가짜 뉴스 방지법"… 안호영 의원 등 17명 발의. <연합뉴스>. URL: http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2017/06/01/0200000000AKR20170601086200055
    이윤승 HTML?input=1195m [2017]
  • 5, 4). ‘가짜 뉴스’ 칼빼든 정치권…처벌강화 법안 줄줄이 발의. <파이낸셜뉴스>
    김호연 URL: http://www.fnnews.com/news/201705041742313390 [2017]
  • 2016 언론수용자 의식조사
    한국언론진흥재단 서울: 한국언론진흥재단 [2016]
  • 2, 6). 가짜 뉴스 세상을 어떻게 현혹하나
    배용진 하주희 <주간조선>, 2465호 [2017]
  • 2, 25). 노컷일베 프리덤뉴스…가짜 뉴스에 대처하는 방법. <미디어오늘>
    김서중 URL: http://www.mediatoday.co.kr/?mod=news&act=articleView&idxno=135285 [2017]