연구동향 분석
박사

AAC 그림상징 유형에 따른 지적장애 아동의 동작 및 상태 상징인식 비교 연구

연석정 2017년

논문상세정보
    • 저자 연석정
    • 기타서명 Perception of Ewha-AAC Graphic Symbols for Verbs and Adjectives in Children with Intellectual Disabilities
    • 형태사항 삽화: x, 126 p.
    • 일반주기 지도교수: 김영태, 참고문헌: p. 84-93
    • 학위논문사항 2017. 8. 졸업, 학위논문(박사)-, 이화여자대학교 대학원:, 언어병리학과,
    • DDC 000
    • 발행지 서울 :
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2017
    • 발행사항 이화여자대학교 대학원,
    유사주제 논문( 167)
인용/피인용
' AAC 그림상징 유형에 따른 지적장애 아동의 동작 및 상태 상징인식 비교 연구' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 총류
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
167 0

0.0%

' AAC 그림상징 유형에 따른 지적장애 아동의 동작 및 상태 상징인식 비교 연구' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국판 맥아더-베이츠 의사소통발달 평가
    곽금주 배소영 서울: 마인드프 레스 [2011]
  • 한국어 기반의 보완대체 의사소통 모바일 애플리케이션 분석 연구
    연석정 특수교육, 26(2), 81-109 [2017]
  • 한국 웩슬러 유아 지능검사(Korean-Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of intelligence: K-WIPPSI)
    곽금주 박광배 박혜원 서울: 특수교육 [2001]
  • 한국 웩슬러 아동 지능검사(Korean-Weschler intelligence Scale for children: K-WISC-III)
    곽금주 김청택 박혜원 서울: 특수교육 [2001]
  • 한국 대학생과 미국 대학생의 AAC 사회어 그림상징 인식에 대한 문화적 차이
    강로원 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문 [2016]
  • 파라다이스 보완대체 의사소통 기초능력 평가 (Paradise AAC Assessment: PAA)
    김영태 김정연 박은혜 서울: 파라다이스 복지재단 [2008]
  • 태블릿 PC 기반 보완대체의사소통의 어휘 선택 경로가 일반아동과 지적장애아동의 AAC 어휘표현 정확도 및 선호도에 미치는 영향
  • 지적장애아동과 특수교사의 AAC 상징인식 비교연구: 감정을 나타 내는 상징 중심으로
    채수정 특수교육, 13(2), 215-237 [2014]
  • 자폐범주성아동과 또래간 감정을 나타내는 AAC 상징 인식 비교 연구
    홍기형 ( Kihyung Hong ) 채수정 ( Soojung Chae ) 특수아동교육연구, 17(3), 1-21 [2015]
  • 이화-AAC 상징체계의 상징투명도와 명명일치도 특성 비 교연구: 명사, 동사, 형용사를 중심으로
    김영태 박은혜 연석정 보완대체의사소통연구, 4(1), 45-63 [2016]
  • 이화-AAC 상징체계 개발 연구: 어휘 및 그래픽상징의 타당화
    김경양 김영태 박은혜 연석정 임장현 홍기형 보완대체의사소통연구, 4(2), 19-40 [2016]
  • 의사소통판의 애니메이션 효과가 실어증 환자의 목표 상징 식별에 미치는 영향
    송기범 최양규 특수교육저널: 이론과 실천, 12(4), 523~535 [2011]
  • 음성산출 의사소통 콘텐츠 및 시스템 개발 기초연구: AAC 관련전문가의 경험 및 요구분석을 중심으로
    김경양(Kyung Yang Kim) 김정연 ( Jung Yeon Kim ) 박은혜(Eun Hye Park) 특수교육저널: 이론 과 실천, 11(4). 345-374 [2010]
  • 언어치료사를 위한 한국어 문법
    이봉원 서울: 학지사 [2015]
  • 언어장애인을 위한 보완 대체의사소통용 어 휘 상징체계 수립에 관한 문헌연구
    Allaire, J. Snell, M. 박은혜 언어청각장애연구, 9(3), 118-138 [2004]
  • 애니메이션이 지적장애아동의 AAC 상징인식에 미치는 효 과
    이희연 홍기형 특수교육, 12(2), 185-202 [2013]
  • 애니메이션과 제스처 영상을 이용한 AAC 동작어 상징 학습 효과
    김미수 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문 [2011]
  • 아동 언어장애의 진단 및 치료
    김영태 서울: 학지사 [2014]
  • 스마트 AAC 문자형 (버전 1
    0) [애플리케이션]. https://web.projectaac.or.kr:8443
  • 스마트 (버전 2.0
    마이토키 2) [애플리케이션]. http://www.mytalkie.co.kr
  • 수용 ․ 표현 어휘력 검사(Receptive Expressive Vocabulary Test: REVT)
  • 보완대체 의사소통에 대한 언어치료사들의 인식 및 사용 실태 조 사연구
    김영태 박은혜 특수교육, 6(1), 27-39 [2007]
  • 보완대체 의사소통 상징체계 수립을 위한 기초 문헌 연구
    김정연 박은혜 언어청각장애연구, 9(1), 100-129 [2004]
  • 나의 AAC 일반 (버전 1.0
    1) [애플리케이션]. http://www.myaac.co.kr/web
  • 그림의 사실성과 색상 및 의미 유형이 상징 식별에 미치는 영향
    송기범 최양규 특수교육저널: 이론과 실천, 11(2), 387~399 [2010]
  • 그림상징 유형에 따른 학령전기 아동의 개념이해 및 선호 도
    박현주 이효주 보완대체의사소통연구, 4(1), 65-82 [2016]
  • van der Merwe, E., & Alant, E. (2004). Associations with Minspeak™ icons. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37(3), 255-274.
  • van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2011). Assessing preferences for AAC options in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1422-1431.
  • van der Meer, L., Didden, R., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J.(2012). Comparing three augmentative and alternative communication modes for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24(5), 451-468.
  • Worah, S., McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Benedek-Wood, E. (2015). A comparison of two approaches for representing AAC vocabulary for young children. International journal of speech-language pathology, 17(5), 460-469.
  • Wilkinson, K. M., Carlin, M., & Thistle, J.(2008). The role of color cues in facilitating accurate and rapid location of aided symbols by children with and without Down syndrome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(2), 179-193.
  • Wilkinson, K. M., & Snell, J.(2011). Facilitating children’s ability to distinguish symbols for emotions: The effects of background color cues and spatial arrangement of symbols on accuracy and speed of search. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(4), 288-301.
  • Wilkinson, K. M., & Light, J.(2011). Preliminary investigation of visual attention to human figures in photographs: Potential considerations for the design of aided AAC visual scene displays. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 54(6), 1644-1657.
  • Wilkinson, K. M, Carlin, M., & Jagaroo, V.(2006). Preschoolers’speed of locating a target symbol under different color conditions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(2), 123-133.
  • Widgit website. Available from: http://www.widgit.com/symbols/about_symbols/ index.htm (accessed 12 June 2017)
  • Visser, N., Alant, E., & Harty, M. (2008). Which graphic symbols do 4-year-old children choose to represent each of the four basic emotions? Augmentative and alternative communication, 24(4), 302-312.
  • Tsai, M.(2013). Adults’preference between picture communication symbols(PCSs) and gus communication symbols(GUSs) used in AAC. Research in Development Disabilities, 34(10), 3536-3544.
  • Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. M.(2015). Building evidence-based practice in AAC display design for young children: Current practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(2), 124-136.
  • Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S.(2002). Grammatical Issues in Graphic Symbol Communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18 (3), 192–204.
  • Son, S. H., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. E.(2006). Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9(4), 389-395.
  • Sigafoos, J., Green, V. A., Payne, D., Son, S. H., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. E.(2009). A comparison of picture exchange and speech-generating devices: Acquisition, preference, and effects on social interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(2), 99–109.
  • Sevcik, R., Romski, M. A., & Wilkinson, K.(1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7(3), 161-170.
  • Semantic Compaction Systems(2009). Minspeak. Retrieved from http://www. minspeak.com
  • Schlosser, R., Shane, H., Sorce, J., Koul, R., Bloomfield, E., Debrowski, L., DeLuca, T., Miller, S., Schneider, D., & Neff, A.(2012). Animation of graphic symbols representing verbs and prepositions: Effects on transparency, name agreement, and identification, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 342-358.
  • Schlosser, R., Shane, H., Sorce, J., Koul, R., & Bloomfield, E.(2011). Identifying performing and under performing graphic symbols for verbs and prepositions in animated and static formats: A research note. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(3), 205-214.
  • Schlosser, R., & Sigafoos, J.(2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 102-123.
  • Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R.(1988). Augmentative and alternative communication systems: Considerations for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4(2), 83-93.
  • Park, E. H., Kim, Y. T., Lim, J, H., Kim, K. Y., Yeon, S. J., Hong, K. H. Park, K. T. & Lee, Y. S.(2014). Development of Korean AAC program: Culturally Appropriate Symbols & Linguistic Features. Presentation at the 16th biennial conference of International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Lisbon.
  • Nigam, R.(2006). Sociocultural development and validation of lexicon for Asian-Indian individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1(4), 245-256.
  • Musselwhite, C. R., & Ruscello, D. M.(1984). Transparency of three communication symbol systems. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 27(3), 436-443.
  • Mizuko, M., & Reichle, J.(1989). Transparency and recall of symbols among intellectually handicapped adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54(4), 627–633.
  • Mizuko, M.(1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3(3), 129-136.
  • Mirenda, P., & Locke, P. A.(1989). A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54(2), 131-140.
  • Mineo, B., Peischl, D., & Pennington, C.(2008). Moving targets: The effect of animation on identification of action word representation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(2), 162-173.
  • Miller, J., & Allaire, J.(1987). Augmentative communication. In M. Snell(Ed.), Systematic instruction of person with severe handicaps(3rd ed.)(pp. 273-297). NY: Macmillan.
  • Meder, A. M., & Wegner, J. R.(2015). iPads, mobile technologies, and communication applications: A survey of family wants, needs, and preferences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(1), 27-36.
  • McClure, M., & Rush E.(2007). Selecting symbols sets: Implications for AAC users, clinicians, & researchers. Presentation at the American Speech Language Hearing Association Convention. Boston, MA.
  • Mayer-Jonson R.(2008). The picture communication symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
  • Loncke, F.(2014). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Models and applications for educators, speech-language pathologists, psychologists, caregivers, and users. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing Inc.
  • Lloyd, L., & Fuller, D.(1986). Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: A proposed superordinate classification. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2(4), 165-171.
  • Light, J., Worah, S., Bowker, A., Burki, B., Drager, K. & D’Silva, K.(2008). Children’s representations of early language concepts: Implications for AAC symbols. Presentation at the American Speech Language Hearing Association Convention, Chicago, IL.
  • Light, J., Page, R., Curran, J., & Pitkin, L.(2007). Children’s ideas for the design of AAC assistive technologies for young children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(4), 274-287.
  • Light, J., Drager, K., & Nemser, J.(2004). Enhancing the appeal of AAC technologies for young children: Lessons from the toy manufacturers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(3), 137-149.
  • Light, J., Beukelman, D., & Reichle, J.(2003). Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice.
  • Light, J., & Drager, K.(2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 204-216.
  • Light, J., & Drager, K.(2002). Improving the design of augmentative and alternative technologies for young children. Assistive Technology, 14(1), 17-32.
  • Jagaroo, V., & Wilkinson, K.(2008). Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience in aided AAC, The potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(1), 29-42.
  • Huer, M. B.(2000). Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(3), 180-185.
  • Hill, K.(2010). Advances in augmentative and alternative communication as quality-of-life technology. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America, 21(1), 43-58.
  • Haupt, L., & Alant, E. (2001). The iconicity of picture communication symbols for rural Zulu children. The South African journal of communication disorders, 49, 40-49.
  • Gross, D., Soken, N., Rosengren, K. S., Pick, A. D., Pillow, B. H., & Melendez, P. (1991). Childern's understanding of action lines and the static representation of speed of locomotion. Child Development, 62(5), 1124- 1141.
  • Fuller, D., & Loyd, L.(1987). A study of physical and semantic characteristics of a graphic symbol system as predictors of perceived complexity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3(1), 26-35.
  • Fuller, D. Lloyd, L., & Schlosser, R.(1992). Further development of an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy, Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 8(1), 67-74.
  • Fujisawa, K., Inoue, T., Yamana, Y., & Hayashi, H.(2011). The effect of animation on learning action symbols by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(1), 53-60.
  • Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of applied Behavior analysis, 25(2), 491-498.
  • Drager, K. D., & Reichle, J. E. (2001). Effects of discourse context on the intelligibility of synthesized speech for young adult and older adult listeners: Applications for AAC. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(5), 1052-1057.
  • DeKlerk, H. M., Dada, S., & Alant, E.(2014). Children's identification of graphic symbols representing four basic emotions: Comparison of Afrikaansspeaking and Sepedi-speaking children. Journal of communication disorders, 52, 1-15.
  • Dattilo, J., & Mirenda, P.(1987). An application of a leisure preference assessment protocol for persons with severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12(4), 306-311.
  • Dada, S., Huguet, A., & Bornman, J.(2013). The iconicity of picture communication symbols for children with English additional language and mild intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(4), 360-373.
  • Chae, S.(2013). Culture and Graphic Symbols in Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Special Education Research, 12(2), 61-80.
  • Callaghan, T. C.(2000). Factors affecting graphic symbol understanding in the third year: Language, similarity and iconicity. Cognitive Development, 15(2), 207–236.
  • Callaghan, T. C.(1999). Early understanding and production of graphic symbols. Child Development, 70(6), 1314–1324.
  • Bornman, J., Alant, E., & Du Preez, A.(2009). Translucency and learnability of Blissymbols in Setswana-speaking children: An exploration. Augmentative and alternative communication, 25(4), 287-298.
  • Bloomberg, K., Karlen, G. R. & Lloyd, L. L.(1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of speech and Hearing Research, 33(4), 717-725.
  • Blissymbolic communication international website. Available from: http://www. blissymbolics.org/index.php/about-blissymbolics (accessed 12 June 2017)
  • Binger, C., & Light, J. (2006). Demographics of preschoolers who require AAC. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37(3), 200-208.
  • Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P.(2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
  • Basson, M., & Alant, E. (2004). The iconicity and ease of learning of picture communication symbols: a study with Afrikaans-speaking children. The South African journal of communication disorders, 52, 4-12.
  • Barton, A., Sevcik, R. A., & Romski, A. M.(2006). Exploring visual-graphic symbol acquisition by pre-school age children with developmental and language delays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(1), 10-20.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.(2004). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Technical report.
  • American Psychiatric Association.(2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC.
  • Alant, E., Life, H., & Harty, M.(2005). Comparison of the learnability and retention between Blissymbols and CyberGlyphs. International journal of language & communication disorders, 40(2), 151-169.
  • AAC 그림상징 표현과제에서 나타난 일반 및 지적장애아동의 논항 구조에 따른 어순전략 수행도 특성
    신유영 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문 [2014]