연구동향 분석
박사

문제발견 전략을 도입한 초등과학탐구수업의 실행 분석 및 변화 탐색

김종영 2017년

논문상세정보
    • 저자 김종영
    • 형태사항 26 cm: 247
    • 일반주기 지도교수: 신명경
    • 학위논문사항 경인교육대학교 교육전문대학원, 초등과학교육, 학위논문(박사)-, 2017. 8
    • 발행지 인천
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2017
    • 발행사항 경인교육대학교 교육전문대학원
    유사주제 논문( 0)
인용/피인용

' 문제발견 전략을 도입한 초등과학탐구수업의 실행 분석 및 변화 탐색' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국교육과정평가원 수업전문성 제고를 위한 멘토링 체제 연구-국어, 사회, 과학 교과를 중심으로
    한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRI 2009-7 [2009]
  • 학업정서의 영역성 탐색 : 영역일반성, 영역특수성, 영역 복합성 비교
    송인섭 최지혜 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(4), 227-243 [2011]
  • 학습환경과 심리적 제변인과의 상관연구
    조하희(Ha Hee Cho) 광운대학교 인문사 회과학논문집, 27, 171-198 [1998]
  • 박사
    학습정서와 자기조절학습의 관계
    한지영 석사학위논문. 경희대학교 [2011]
  • 학습상황에서의 정서의 존재: 학습정서의 원천과 역할
    김민성 아시 아교육연구, 10(1), 73-98 [2009]
  • 학생의 질문을 강화한 소집단 과학 수업에서의 효과 : 중학교 1학년 ‘물질의 세 가지 선택’, ‘분자의 운동’단원을 중심으로
    이숙경 서울대학교. 석사학 위논문 [2003]
  • 탐구질문하기 활동을 통한 초등학생의 문제 인식과 학습 환경에 대한 인식변화
    김효숙 신명경 이희순 초등과학교육, 29(2), 124-133 [2010]
  • 탐구 개방 정도에 따른 초등학교 5학년 과학 수업의 특성 비교 분석
    김종영 신명경 이승훈 한국현장과학교육학회지, 11(1), 44-58 [2017]
  • 초등학생들과 초등예비교사들이 관찰활동에서 생성한 과학적 의문의 유형
    권용주 박국태 이혜정 정진수 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), 1018-1027 [2004]
  • 초등학생 과학학습정서 검사 도구 개발
    김동현 박사학위논문. 한국 교원대학교 [2014]
  • 초등학생 과학 학습정서 검사 도구 개발
    김동현 김효남 한국과학교 육학회지, 33(7), 1367-1384 [2013]
  • 박사
    초등학교 아동의 과학적 문제발견 능력에 영향을 미치는 관 련변수 분석
    이혜주 박사학위논문. 이화여자대학교 [2004]
  • 초등학교 수학 학습 환경에 관한 인식 및 선호 조사연구
    정주자 한국교원대학교. 박사학 위논문 [2008]
  • 초등학교 과학 현장개선연구의 탐색: 수업담화유형분석을 중 심으로
    신명경 경인교육대학교 과학교육연구소. 과학교육논총, 19, 233-245 [2006]
  • 초등학교 ‘좋은’ 수업의 특성 연구: 담화행위(act), 유도행위, 교수행동요소, 바로잡기(repair)를 중심으로
    고창규 열린교육연구, 14, 25-49 [2006]
  • 초등 과학수업 실태 점검 및 개선방안연구
    곽영순 한국지구과학회 지, 32(4), 422-434 [2011]
  • 초ㆍ중학생들의 과학탐구능력 측정도구의 개발
    권재술 김범기 한국 과학교육학회지, 14(3), 251-264 [1994]
  • 초 중등 학생들의 과학 흥미도 조사
    곽영순 김찬종 이양락 정득실 한국지구과학회지, 27(3), 260-268 [2006]
  • 창의적 사고와 문제발견 사고의 연력에 따른 차이
    하주현 교육심리 연구, 17(1), 315-331 [2003]
  • 창의성 교육의 새로운 접근: 문제찾기
    김정섭 윤경미 전윤식 학 국교육학회, 41(3), 215-238 [2003]
  • 지구과학 교실에서의 구성주의 교수 실행과 과학 교수 상호 작용의 탐색적 분석
    신명경 한국지구과학학회지, 31(1), 521-530 [2010]
  • 중학생의 물리학습에 대한 흥미의 다차원적 분석
    박승재 임성민 한 국과학교육학회지, 20(4), 491-504 [2000]
  • 중학생의 과학적 탐구 문제 설정 과정에 대한 사례적 분석
    김재우 박사학위논문. 서울대학교 [2000]
  • 중학생 자유주제 과학탐구의 문제해결 유형과 탐구수준 평가 연구
    강은형 박사학위논문. 서울대학교 [2001]
  • 중학교 과학수업에서 학생의 질문에 영향을 미치는 요인과 질문유형
    이명숙 석사학위논문. 서울대학교 [2003]
  • 중등학교 학생들의 과학불안도 측정도구 개발 및 과학불안 경향성 분석
    이재천 과학교육논문집, 3(1), 343-343 [1993]
  • 정서와 교육
    정명화 서울: 학지사 [2005]
  • 신뢰도와 타당도
    성태제 학지사 [2002]
  • 수업관찰과 분석
    주삼환 서울: 원미사 [1998]
  • 선언적 과학 지식의 생성 과정에 대한 과학철학적 연구: 귀납적, 귀추적, 연역적 과정을 중심으로
    강민정 권용주 박윤복 정진수 한국과 학교육학회지, 23(3), 215-228 [2003]
  • 서울대학교 교육연구소 교육학 대백과사전
    서울: 하우동설 [1998]
  • 서울대학교 과학교육연구소 성공적인 중학과학 탐구수업을 위한 길 라잡이 자료
    서울대학교 [2005]
  • 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학탐구실험에서 언어적 상호작용의 변화와 특성
    성숙경 박사학위논문. 한국교원대학교 [2005]
  • 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과 학 탐구실험 과정에서 학생-학생 상호작용 양상 분석
    강성주 성숙경 이상권 이현영 장상실 최병순 한국 과학교육학회지, 22(3), 660-670 [2002]
  • 물리적 환경변인과 행동특성과의 관련성
    김정환 교육심리연구, 3(2), 51-66 [1989]
  • 동료 코칭이 초등교사의 언어적 상호작용에 미치는 영향
    한 신 한국교원대학교. 박사학 위논문 [2013]
  • 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학글쓰기 의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용
    Hand, B. 곽경화 남정희 장경화 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), 922-936 [2008]
  • 국내외 교실학습 연구Ⅱ: 우리나라, 핀란드, 호주의 중학교 과학 수업을 중심으로
    한국교육과정평가원 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRI 2008-1-1 [2008]
  • 국가수준의 과학에 관련된 정의적 특성의 평가체제 개발
    김효남 정완호 정진우 한국과학교육학회지, 18(3), 357-369 [1998]
  • 구조화 정도가 다른 문제 상황에서 문제발견에 대한 제 변인의 상대적 기여도 분석
    이혜주 초등교육연구, 18(2), 123-148 [2005]
  • 구성주의적 학습환경설계모델의 특성과 차이점 비교분석 연 구
    송해덕 교육학연구, 38(1), 187-212 [1998]
  • 교실에서의 실질적 과학탐구로서 과학적 논증 기회에 대한 이론적 고찰
    박영신 한국지구과학학회지. 27(4), 401-415 [2006]
  • 교실 수업에서 안내된 상호 질문 활동이 중학생의 힘 관련 단원 학습에 미치는 영향
    박은주 석사학위논문. 서울대학교 [1998]
  • 과학적 탐구의 본질에 대한 분석 및 탐구력 신장을 위한 학습지도 방법에 관한 연구
    조희형 한국과학교육학회지, 12(1), 61-73 [1992]
  • 과학적 창의성 모델의 제안-인지적 측면을 중심으로-.
    박종원 한국 과학교육학회지, 24(2), 375-386 [2004]
  • 과학적 질문 공유ㆍ해결학습이 초등학생의 과학 수업에 미치 는 효과
    박정인 석사학위논문. 부산교육대학교 [2007]
  • 과학영재학교 교수활동에 관한 학생인식 및 과학수업에서 상 호작용 유형
    박수경 한국지구과학회지, 26(1), 30-40 [2005]
  • 과학영재와 일반학생의 문제발견의 차이 및 문제발견에 영향 을 미치는 제 변인 분석
    윤경미 박사학위논문. 부산대학교 [2004]
  • 과학영재들의 문제발견 활동 분석 및 문제발견과 문제해결과 의 관계
    류시경 박사학위논문. 경북대학교 [2008]
  • 과학글쓰기를 활용한 학생주도 모둠 탐구활동에 의한 초등 과학 수업 변화 탐색
    김종영 신명경 한국지구과학회지, 35(2), 147-158 [2014]
  • 과학교육의 이론과 실제
    조희형 교육과학사 [2005]
  • 과학교육론
  • 과학교육
    박승재 교육과학사 [1985]
  • 과학교과에 대한 학생들의 흥미도 실태 조사
    김상달 이상균 최성봉 대한지구과학교육학회지, 3(3), 191-197 [2010]
  • 과학과 탐구과정의 하위 요 소 추출 및 위계화(연구보고 RR 98-6)
    김주훈 신동희 이범흥 이양락 홍미영 한국교원대학교 교과교육공 동연구소 [2000]
  • 과학과 수업모형
    정완호 서울: 교육과학사 [1997]
  • 과학 완구 만들기 활동이 초등학생의 과학 흥미도 및 개념 이해도에 미치는 효과
    권난주 복영선 초등과학교육, 26(3), 243-251 [2007]
  • 과학 영재들의 문제해결 과정에서 나타나는 탐구적 글쓰기 및 언어 적 상호작용의 특성에 대한 사례연구
    이은경 박사학위논문. 한국교원 대학교 [2010]
  • 과학 수업에서 공진화적 접근을 통한 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석과 교사 질문 촉진 프로그램의 효과
    송하영 박사학위논문. 경 북대학교 [2015]
  • 과학 및 과학 교수학습에 대한 과학교사의 인식론적 이해의 탐색
    김찬종 신명경 유은정 이선경 최종림 한혜진 한국과학교육학회지, 30(2), 218-233 [2010]
  • 과학 교수 학습과 수행평가
    조희형 최경희 교육과학사 [2000]
  • 박사
    고등학생의 교과별 학업에 대한 정서 연구
    최경아 석사학위논문. 서 울대학교 [2012]
  • 객관주의와 구성주의: 대립에서 대화로
    강인애 교육공학연구 13(1), 3-19 [1997]
  • van Zee, E. H., & Robert, D. (2001). Using pedagogical inquiries as a bas is for learning to teach : Prospective teachers' reflection upon positi ve science learning experiences. Science Education, 85(6), 733-759.
  • van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Reflective discourse : Developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 209-228.
  • Zembylas, M. (2004b). Young children’s emotional practices while engaged in long term science investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 693-719.
  • Zembylas, M. (2004a). Emotional issues in teaching science : A case study of a teacher’s views. Research in Science Education, 34(4), 343-364.
  • Yager, R. E. (1991) The constructivist learning model : Towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher 58(6), 52-57.
  • Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14, 91-102.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Wellington, J. (1998). Practical work in science : Time for a reappraisal. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science : Which way now? (pp. 6-8). New York: Routledge.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. (Newly revised and edited by A. Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Thinking Science 모둠별 활동에 나타나는 교사 도움과 학생 반응의 특성
    신애경 최병순 하은정 한국과학교육학회지, 25(2), 212-221 [2006]
  • Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & White, L. R. (1994). CLES : An instrument for monitoring the development of constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
  • Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitering constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 293-302.
  • Tafoya, E., Sunal, D. W., & Knecht, P. (1980). Assessing inquiry potential : A tool for curriculum decision makers. School Science and Mathmatics, 89(1), 43-48.
  • Taba, H., & Elzey, F. F. (1968). Teaching strategies and thought process. In T. H. Ronald (Ed.), Teaching : Vantage points for study. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott.
  • Suchman, J. R. (1960). Inquiry training in the elementary school, The Science Teaching, 27(7), 42-47.
  • Stern, G. G. (1970). People in context-measuring person-environment congruence in education and industry, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Skidmore, D. (2000). From pedagogical dialogue to dialogical pedagogy. Language and Education, 14(4), 283-296.
  • Singh, A., Yager, S. O., Yutakom, N., Yager, R. E., & Ali, M. M. (2012). Constructivist teaching practices used by five teacher leaders for the Iowa chautauqua professional development program. International Journal of Environment & Science Education, 7(2), 197-216.
  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sinatra, R., & Annacone, D. (1984). Questioning strategies to promote cognitive inquiry in social studies. Social Studies, 75(1), 18-23.
  • Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 613-642.
  • Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse : A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lesson. Science Education, 90(4), 605-631.
  • Scott, P. H. (2007). Challenging gifted learners through classroom dialogue. In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners. Routledge.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1962). The Teaching of science as inquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 177-199.
  • Scalise, K., Claegens, J., Krystyniak, R., Mebane, S., Wilson, M., & Stacy, M. A. (2003). Perspectives of chemistry : Teaching conceptual understanding of student learning in chemistry at the understanding of student learning in chemistry at the secondary and university levels. USA: UC Regents.
  • Sawada, D., Piburn, M., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I., & Judson, E. (2000). Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) training guide. (ACEPT Technical Report No. IN00-2). Tempe, AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
  • Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Does what we feel affect what we learn? : Some answer and new question. Learning and Instruction, Leaning and Instruction. 15 107-515
  • Rutherford, F. J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 80-84.
  • Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem discovery, divergent thinking and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 211-220.
  • Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Roychoudhury, A., & Roth, W. M. (1996). Interaction in an open-inquiry physi cs laboratory. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 423-445.
  • Royce, C. A., & Holzer, M. A. (2003). What would it be like without...? : Examining nonrenewable resources through inquiry-based activities challenges students to consider consequences of human consumption. Science Teacher, 70(4), 20-24.
  • Quek, C. L., Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2002). Gender differences in the perceptions of chemistry laboratory classroom environments. Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 18(2), 164-182.
  • Quek C. L., Fraser B. J., & Wong A. F. L. (2001). Determinants and effects of perceptions of chemistry classroom learning environments in secondary school gifted education classes in Singapore. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Fremantle, Australia.
  • Piburn, M., Sawada, D., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I., & Judson, E. (2000). Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) : Reference manual(ACEPT Technical Report No. IN00-3). Tempe, AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W. & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance : The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48.
  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions : Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.
  • Pekrun, R. (1992). “The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators.” Applied Psychology, 41(4), 359-376.
  • Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 345–375.
  • Oh, P. S., Shin, M. K., & Yager, R. E. (2003). Pattern of teacher questioning discourse in Korean science classrooms. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 24(2), 61-73.
  • National Research Council(NRC). (2013). Next generation science standards : For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council(NRC). (2007). Taking science to school : Learning and teaching : Science in grade K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council(NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standard : A guide of teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council(NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Exploration in personality. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
  • Mumford, M. D., Reiter Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem finding revisited. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2000). Analysing discourse in the science classroom. In R. Miller, J. Leach & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education : the contribution of research (pp. 126-142). Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Minnis, D. L., & Shrable, K. (1970). Teacher's manual : Improving questioning strategies. CA: San Anselmo.
  • Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 107-114.
  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7(2), 183-213.
  • Mayer, W. V. (1978). Biology teachers’ handbook (3rd ed.). NY: John Wiley and sons.
  • Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37.
  • Maloney, D. P. (1994). Research on problem solving : Physics. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), handbook of research on science teaching and learning, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  • Mallow, J. V. (1981). New cures for science anxiety. Curriculum Review, 20(4), 389-391.
  • Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology, NY: McGraw Hill.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990) Talking science : Language, learning, and values. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
  • Lee, S. U., & Fraser, B. J. (2001a). High school science classroom learning environments in Korea. ED 452088.
  • Lee, S. U,. & Fraser, B. J. (2001b). Laboratory classroom environments in korean high schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Australia Association for Research in Education. Fremantle, Australia.
  • Language teaching : Classroom interaction
    Malamah-Thomas, A. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 안종훈, 정미화 (역). (2004). 효과 적인 수업을 위한 교실 상호작용. 서울: 범문사 [1987]
  • Lai, L. M. (1991). Selective attention in problem finding. Sandvika: Handelshoskolen BI.
  • Kuhn, D. Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effect of dyadic interaction on reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287-315.
  • Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science : Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50
  • Krajcik, K., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredrick, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project based science classrooms : Initial attempts by middle students. The Journal of the Learning Science, 7(3-4), 313-350.
  • Konfetta-Menicou, C., & Scaife, J. (2000). Teachers' questions-types and significance in science education. School Science Review, 81(296), 79-85.
  • Kissock, C., & Iyortuun, P. (1982). A guide to questioning. London: Macmillan Co.
  • Kinsvatter, R., Wilen, W., & Ishler, M. (1988). Dynamics of effective teaching. New York: Longman, Inc.
  • Kim, H. B., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1999). Assessment and investigation of constructivist science learning environments in Korea. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17(2), 239-249.
  • Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigation in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1965-1984.
  • Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. (2003). Communicative demands of learning science through technological design : Third grade students’ construction of solar energy devices. Linguistics and Education, 13, 483-532.
  • Jone, A. T., Simon, S. A., Black, P. J., Fairbrother, R. W., & Watson, J. R. (1992). Open work in science : Development of investigation in schools. Hatfield: Association for Science Education.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1991b). Hypertext as instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(1), 83-92.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1991a). Objectivism versus constructivism : Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.
  • Jay, E. S., & Perkins, D. N. (1997). Problem Finding: The search for mechanism. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The Creativity Research Handbook (VolumeⅠ), (pp.257-293). New Jersey: Hanpton Press.
  • Jay, E. S. (1996). The nature of problem finding in students' scientific inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard university graduate school of education.
  • Hyman, R. T. (1979). Strategic questioning. New Jesey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • Hoover, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1990). The scientific hypothesis formulation ability of gifted ninth-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 838-848.
  • Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. School Science Review, 79, 171-212.
  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. (1928). Deceit measures. New York: Macmillan.
  • Handbook of effective questioning techniques. Worthington Ohio: Education Association Inc., 송용의(역) (1987). 효율적인 교사의 발문기법
    Blosser, P. E. 서울: 배영사 [1973]
  • Grasser, A. C., & Person, N. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-107.
  • Gott, R,. & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buchingham: Open University Press.
  • Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1994). Looking in classrooms. NY: Hapercollins College Publishers.
  • Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. (2006). The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(1), 5-29.
  • Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision : A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: John Wiley.
  • Getzels, J. W. (1979). Problem finding : A theoretical note. Congnitive Science, 3, 167-172.
  • Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals : Promoting science inquiry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 475-499.
  • George, K. D., Nelson, M. A., & Dietz, M. A., & Abraham, E. C. (1974). Elementary school science, why and how. Lexington, Mass: D. C. Heath.
  • Gallagher, J. J., & Aschner, M. J. (1963). A preliminary report on analysis of classroom interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 9, 183-194.
  • Gallagher, J. J. (1965). Productive thinking in gifted children. Urbana: University of Illinois.
  • Gall, M. D. (1971). Higher cognitive questioning teachers handbook. NY: Mcmillian.
  • Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Perceived learning environment and students' emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 478-493.
  • Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research : Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine, Studies in educational learning environment (pp. 1-26). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1981). TORSA : Test of science related attitudes. Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorne, VIC.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science‐related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509-515.
  • Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analysing teaching behavior. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fisher, D. L., & Kim, H. B. (1999). Constructivist learning environment in science classes in Korea. Paper present at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED431661).
  • Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1983). A comparison of actual and preferred classroom environment as perceived by science teachers and students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 55-61.
  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common Knowledge : The development of understanding in the classroom. New York: Academic Press.
  • Duffy, T. H., & Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Constructivism : New implication for instructional technology?. Educational Technology, 31(5), 9-11.
  • Dudek S. Z., & C t , R. (1994). Problem finding revised. In M. A. Runco (Ed.). Problem finding, problem solving, & creativity, (pp. 130-150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, D., & Scott, J. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
  • Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(1), 197-210.
  • Dillon, J. T. (1985). Using questions to foil discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(1), 109-121.
  • Dillon, J. T. (1982b). Problem finding and solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(2), 97-111.
  • Dillon, J. T. (1982a). Effect of the question in education and other enterprise. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 14(2), 127-152.
  • Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1978). The systematic design of instruction Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Co.
  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic : The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
  • Davis, O. L., & Tinsley, D. C. (1967). Cognitive objectives revealed by classroom asked by social studies student teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 45(1), 21-26.
  • Dantonio, M. (1990). How can we create thinkers? : Questioning strategies that work for teachers. Bloomington: National Educational Service.
  • Czerniak, C., & Chiarelott, L. (1990). Teacher education for effective science instruction—A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 49-58.
  • Czarnik, J. C., & Hickey, D. T. (1997). Problem generation in the mission to Mars curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Cole, P. G., & Chan, L. K. (1987). Teaching principles and practice. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
  • Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42-44.
  • Clough, M. P., & Clark, R. (1994). Cookbooks and constructivism. The Science Teacher, 61(2), 34-37.
  • Clough, M. P. (1999). Modified SATIC coding sheet. IA: Iowa State University.
  • Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2002). Posing problems for open investigation : What questions do pupils ask?. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 269-287.
  • Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated question : A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549.
  • Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms : Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843.
  • Chin, C. & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109-138.
  • Chang, M. (1993). Role of explanations and student-centered interaction in science learning : An applied constructivist approach to instructional design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Syracuse University.
  • Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Reed Elsevier.
  • Cazden, C. B. (1970). Children's question : Their forms, functions and roles in education. Young Children, March, 210-212.
  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, HandbookⅠ: Cognitive domain. NY: Longman.
  • Basey, J. M., Mendelow, T. N., & Ramos, C. N. (2000). Current trends of community college lab curricula in biology : An analysis of inquiry, technology, and content. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 80-86.
  • Barid, J. R., & Mitchell, I. J. (1986). Improving the quality of teaching and learning : An Australian case-study – the peel project, Melbourne: Monash university.
  • Banchi, H. M. (2009). Learning from the best : Overcoming barriers to reforms based elementary science teaching (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest LLC.
  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys : the role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397-413.
  • Ash, D. (2003). Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 138-162.
  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching : What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
  • Anderson, G. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1974). Learning environments. In Walberg (Ed.), Evaluating educational performance : A sourcebook of methods, instruments, and examples. Macutchan, Berkeley, California.
  • Anderson, D., & Biddle, B. J. (1991). Knowledge for policy : Improving education through research. London: Falmer Pr.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Aldrige, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Taylor, P. C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 37-55.
  • Abraham, M. R., & Schlitt, D. M. (1973). Verbal interaction : A means for self-evaluation. School Science and Mathematics, 73(8), 678-686.
  • 2007 개정 과학과 교육과정의 주요 내용의 실 행에 관한 현직 과학 교사의 인식
    신명경 심재호 이선경 한국과학교육학회지, 30(1), 140-156 [2010]