박사

이슈리더십과 서번트 리더십이 성과에 미치는 인지적 과정과 감성적 과정 연구 : 경계조건으로서의 리더십 대체요인의 역할

최지선 2017년
논문상세정보
    • 저자 최지선
    • 기타서명 Tests of Cognitive and Emotional Mediations Between Issue Leadership/Servant Leadership and Performances : Substitutes for Leadership as Boundary Conditions
    • 형태사항 도표: ix, 167 p.: 26 cm
    • 일반주기 지도교수 : 백기복, 참고문헌 : p. 118-149
    • 학위논문사항 학위논문(박사)-, 2017. 8, 경영학과 인사조직전공, 국민대학교 일반대학원
    • DDC 658.3, 23
    • 발행지 서울
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2017
    • 발행사항 국민대학교 일반대학원
    유사주제 논문( 445)
' 이슈리더십과 서번트 리더십이 성과에 미치는 인지적 과정과 감성적 과정 연구 : 경계조건으로서의 리더십 대체요인의 역할' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 일반 경영
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
446 0

0.0%

' 이슈리더십과 서번트 리더십이 성과에 미치는 인지적 과정과 감성적 과정 연구 : 경계조건으로서의 리더십 대체요인의 역할' 의 참고문헌

  • 환경정보의 지각인지과정에 관한연구: 정보처리, 연결주의 이 론을 중심으로
    김주미 디자인학연구, 15: 33-36 [1996]
  • 한국에서 진정성 리더십 연구 방향
    김가진 윤정구 이지예 홍지혜 리더 십연구, 2: 3-26 [2011]
  • 중국기업 임파워링 리더십이 종업원의 혁신행동 과 직무성과에 미치는 영향: 핵심자기평가의 매개효과를 중심으 로
    김종관 이염남 인적 자원관리연구, 21(4): 113-130 [2014]
  • 조직구조, 권위주의적 태도, 직무만족도와 직무몰입도의 관계 에 대한 경로분석적 연구: 선형구조관계 (LISREL) 모형의 적용
    최창현 한 국행정학보, 25(2), 533-547 [1991]
  • 조직 환경과 조직구조가 조직효과성에 미치는 영향
    김영호 류병곤 류은영 한국인사행정학회보, 11: 185-215 [2012]
  • 임파워링 리더십이 구성원의 지식공유와 내재 적 동기부여에 미치는 영향: 상사신뢰 매개를 중심으로
    김기홍 김승용 이병철 지식경영연 구, 14(2): 89-116 [2014]
  • 인지시스템의 발전: 정보처리와 체화된 인지시스템의 전망
    김민규 이호현 정동녘 조광수 황중식 정보과학학회지, 특집원고: 60-70. [2008]
  • 이슈리더십이 부하의 창의적 행동과 발언 행동에 미치는 영향
    백기복 송종영 최우재 조직과 인사관리연구, 40(4): 171-195 [2016]
  • 이슈리더십과 임파워먼트간의 관계에서 조직후원인식의 매개 효과 검증
    김동산 리더십연구, 5(3): 121-140 [2014]
  • 이슈리더십 측정도구 개발 및 타당성 검증
    신명용 국민대학교 대학 원 석사학위논문 [2005]
  • 이슈 리더십과 조직 성과와의 관계: 임파워먼트 매개 효과와 직종의 조절 효과를 중심으로
    백유성 신영숙 동양대 논문집, 12(1): 117-145 [2007]
  • 이슈 리더십과 성과간의 관계에 관한 실증연구
    백기복 이재희 한국 인사조직학회 2006년 하계통합학술대회 발표논문집 [2006]
  • 신뢰경과 서번트 리더십
    이관웅 엘테크 [2001]
  • 서번트 리더십이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향: 신 뢰와 감성기능의 역할
    신숙희 이명신 장영철 대한경영학회지, 25(2): 907-929 [2012]
  • 서번트 리더십이 조직시민행동과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 상사-조직 적합도의 조절효과를 중심으로
    최동주 숭실대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문 [2009]
  • 서번트 리더십과 조직시민행동 간의 조직몰입과 조직 신뢰의 매개효과 검증
    이묘숙 최동주 산업혁신연구, 26(1): 133-166 [2010]
  • 상사의 서번트 리더십이 리더효과에 미치는 영향
    윤대균 관광연구, 20(1): 137-153 [2015]
  • 상사의 부하신뢰와 부하의 상사신뢰의 형성과정과 결과에 관 한 연구
    류승민 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2008]
  • 사회과학조사방법론
    이군희 경기: 법문사 [2008]
  • 복잡계 특성을 통한 이슈리더십 이론의 해석
    김익택 백기복 리더십 연구, 2: 79-107 [2010]
  • 변혁적 리더십의 동기부여적 효과:셀프에피커시이론을 중심으 로
    이상호 이원우 인사관리연구, 19: 53-72 [1995]
  • 리더십리뷰 (2판)
    백기복 창민사 [2016]
  • 리더십 대체이론에 대한 연구
    신구범 인적자원관리연구, 14(1): 97-108 [2007]
  • 「사회과학조사방법론」
    채서일 서울: 비엠엔북스 [2013]
  • “이슈리더십의 3P 증진방안”
    백기복 북악경영연구, 10: 353-366 [2006]
  • “이슈리더십 측정도구 개발과 타당성 분석”
    백기복 북악경영연구, 8: 335-351 [2004]
  • Zaccaro, S. J., Gilber, J. A., Thor, K. K., & Mumford, M. D. 1991. Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perceptiveness and behavioral flexibility to leader effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 2: 317-342.
  • Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. 1995. Collective efficacy. New York, NY, US: Plenum Press.
  • Zaccaro, S. J., & McCoby, M. C. 1988. The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18:837-851.
  • Yukl. G. A. 2012. Leadership in Organizations (8 edition). Person.
  • Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Chun, J. U., & Dansereau, F. 2005. Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review. Leadership Quarterly, 16(6): 879-919.
  • Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human relations, 43(10), 975-995.
  • Wood, R., Bandura, A., & Bailey, T. 1990. Mechanisms governing organizational performance in complex decision-making environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(2): 181-201
  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
  • Wong, P. T., Davey, D., & Church, F. B. 2007. Best practices in servant leadership. Servant Leadership Research Roundtable, School of Global Leadership and Entrepreneurship. Regent University.
  • Wong, P. T. 1997. The challenge of open leadership, position paper for the graduate program in counseling psychology. Trinity Western University.
  • Wolff, S. B., Pescosolido, A. T., & Druskat, V. U. 2002. Emotional intelligence as the basis of leadership emergence in self-managing teams. Leadership Quarterly, 13(5): 505-522.
  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17(3), 601-617.
  • Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of management review, 7(3), 418-428.
  • Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. 1998. Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 513-530.
  • Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Graf, I. K., & Ferris, G. R. 1997. The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel Psychology, 50(4): 979-1006.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 517-529.
  • Verweij, M., & Senior, T. J. 2015. Social theory and the cognitive-emotional brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38: 1-66.
  • Vealey, R. S. 1986. Conceptualization of sport-confidence and competitive orientation: Preliminary investigation and instrument development. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8(3): 221-246.
  • Van, D. D., & Nuijten, I. 2011. Ther servant leadership survey : Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3): 249-267.
  • Van D, D. 2011. Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4): 1228-1261.
  • Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. 2007. The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114: 104-132.
  • Turner, D. C., Clark, L., Pomarol-Clotet, E., McKenna, P., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. 2004. Modafinil improves cognition and attentional set shifting in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology, 29(7): 1363-1373.
  • Tolli, A. P., & Schmidt, A. M. 2008. The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3): 692-701.
  • Taylor, S. G., & Pattie, M. W. 2014. When does ethical leadership affect workplace incivility? The moderating role of follower personality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(4): 595-616.
  • Stevens, C. K., & Gist, M. E. 1997. Effects of self-efficacy and goalorientation training on negotiation skill maintenance: what are the mechanisms? Personnel Psychology, 50(4): 955-978.
  • Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative science quarterly, 22, 46-56.
  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. 2003. Behavioral management and task performance in organizations: conceptual background, metaanalysis, and test of alternative models. Personnel Psychology, 56(1): 155-194.
  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261.
  • Spears, L.C., Lawrence, M., & Blanchard, K. (Eds.). 2001. Focus on leadership: Servant leadership for the 21st century(3rd ed.). New York, Wiley.
  • Spears, L. C. 1998. Servant-Leadership: This concept offers both power and promise. Executive excellence.
  • Spears, L. C. 1995. Reflections on leadership: How Robert K. Greenleaf’s theory of servant leadership influenced today’s top management thinkers. New York: Wiley.
  • Sojka, J. Z., & Giese, J. L. 1997. Thinking and/or feeling: an examination of interaction between processing styles. ACR North American Advances.
  • Smith, R. W. 1995. Servent leadership: A pathway to the emerging territoru, in spears, L, C. 1995. Reflection on leadership: How Roboert K. Greenleaf`s theory of servant leadership influenced today`s top management thinkers. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Sivanathan, N., Arnold, K.A., Turner, N., & Barling, J. 2004. Leading well: Trans-formational leadership and well-being. In A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Senge, 1995. Robert Greenleaf's Legacy: A new foundation for twenty-first century institutions, Reflection on leadership. How Robert.K Greenleaf's theory of Servant-leadership influenced today' stop management thinkers. New York: John Wiley & Sons,Inc.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 173-208.
  • Schriesheim, J. F. 1980. The social context of leader-subordinate relations: An investi- gation of the effects of group cohesiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65: 183-194.
  • Schriesheim, C. A. 1997. Substitutes-for-leadership theory: Development and basic concepts. Leadership Quarterly, 8(2): 103-108.
  • Schmidt, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. 2010. The moderating effects of performance ambiguity on the relationship between self-efficacy and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3): 572-581.
  • Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Peng, A. C. 2011. Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4): 863-871.
  • Schaubroeck, J., Jones, J. R., & Xie, J. L. 2001. Individual differences in utilizing control to cope with job demands: Effects on susceptibility to infectious disease. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2): 265-278.
  • Salovey, P. & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.
  • Salancik, G. R. (1977). Commitment is too easy! Organizational Dynamics, 6(1), 62-80.
  • Saks, A. M. 1995. Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 211-225.
  • Sahlin-Andersson, K. 1996. Imitating by editing success. The construction of organizational fields and identities in Translating organizational change. Barbara Czarniawska and BernwardJoerges (eds), 69–92. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Russell, S. S., Spitzmuller, C., Lin, L. F., Stanton, J. M., Smith, P. C., & Ironson, G. H. 2004. Shorter can also be better: The abridged job in general scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64: 878-893.
  • Russell, R. F., & Gregory S, A. 2002. A review of servant leadership attributes: Developing a practical model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(3): 145-157.
  • Robbins, S. P(1983), Organization Theory: The Structure and Design of Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
  • Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S.I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150-163.
  • Riggs, M. L., & Knight, P. A. (1994). The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 755-766.
  • Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., & Drasgow, F. 1999. A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5): 754-775.
  • Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 120-151.
  • Rafaeli, A., Worline, M. 2001. Individual emotion in work organizations. Social Science Information, 40(1): 95-123.
  • Raelin. J. 2003. The myth of charismatic leader. Training+Development. 57: 46-54.
  • Prussia, G. E., Anderson, J. S., & Manz, C. C. 1998. Self-leadership and performance outcomes: The mediating influence of self-efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(5): 523-538.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. , & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. 1996. Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citize. Journal of Management, 22(2): 259-298.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of management, 22(2), 259-298.
  • Podsakoff, P. M & MacKenzie, S. B(1994). An examination of the psychometric properties and nomological validity of some revised and reduced substitutes for leadership scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 702.
  • Pessoa, L. 2008. On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(2): 148-158.
  • Pessoa, F. 2013. Mensagem. Leya.
  • Parker, S. K., & Axtell, C. M. (2001). Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1085-1100.
  • Pagliere, F., Casgelfranchi,. C., Da Costa Pereira, C., Falcone, R., & Tettamanzi, 2014. Trusting the messenger because of the messsage: Feedback dynamics from information quality to source evaluation. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 20(2): 176-194.
  • Osborne, D., & Plastrik, P. 1997. Banishing bureaucracy: The five strategies for reinventing government. Addison-wesley publishing company, Inc.
  • Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. 1981. Relationships between organizational structure and employee reactions: Comparing alternative frameworks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66-83.
  • Ogilvie, J. R. 1986. The role of human resource management practices in predicting organizational commitment. Group & Organization Studies, 11(4): 335-359.
  • O'Reilly III, C. A., & Caldwell, D. F. 1981. The commitment and job tenure of new employees: Some evidence of post decisional justification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4): 597-616.
  • Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. 2006. Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4): 270-295.
  • Mumford, M. D., Friefrich, T. L., Caughron, J. J., & Byrne, C. L. 2007. Leader cognition in real world settings: How do leaders think about crises? Leadership Quarterly, 18(6): 515-543.
  • Mumford, M. D., & Van Doorn, J. R. 2001. The leadership of pragmatism: Reconsidering franklin in the age of charisma. Leadership Quarterly, 12(3): 279-309.
  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. M., & Steers, R. M. 1982. Employee-organization linkages. New York: Academic Press.
  • Morris, J. H., & Steers, R. M. 1980. Structural influences on organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17(1): 50-57.
  • Morris, J. H., & Snyder, R. A. 1979. A second look at need for achievement and need for autonomy as moderators of role perception–outcome relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(2): 173-178.
  • Mitchell, T. R., Hopper, H., Daniels, D., George-Falvy, J., James, L. R. (1994). Predicting self-efficacy and performance during skill acquisition, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 506-517.
  • Milward, H. B., & Rainey, H. G. 1983. Don't Blame the Bureaucracy!. Journal of Public Policy, 3(2): 149-168
  • Millar, M. G., & Millar, K. U. 1990. Attitude change as a function of attitude type and argument type. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2): 217-228.
  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. J ournal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551.
  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. 1988. Links between work experiences and organizational commitment during the first year of employment: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 61(3): 195-209.
  • Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J.(1991), A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment, Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
  • Messeghem, K. (2003). Strategic entrepreneurship and managerial activities in SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 21(2), 197-212.
  • Merton, R. K. 1940. Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18: 560-568.
  • McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. 2002. Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. Leadership Quarterly, 13(5): 545-559.
  • Mayer, R, C., Davis, J. H., & Schooerman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 709-734.
  • Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. 1997. What is emotional intellience? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds,), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications for educators. NY: Basic.
  • Mayer, D. M, Bardes, M. & Piccolo, R. F.(2008). Do servant- leaders help satisfy follower needs: An organizational justice perspective. european. J ournal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 180-197.
  • Mathieu, J, E., & Zajac, D. M.(1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment, Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171-194.
  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1961. The theory of organizational equilibrium. Complex organizations: A Sociological Reader, 61-70.
  • Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (2001). The New Superleadership: Leading Others to Lead Themselves. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Malekzadeh, A. R. and Nahavandi, A. 1998. ‘Leadership and culture in transnational strategy alliances. In Gertsen, M. C., S derberg, A.-M. and Torp, J. E. (Eds), Cultural Dimensions of International Mergers and Acquisitions. Berlin: De Gruypter.
  • MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1993). The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance. The Journal of Marketing, 70-80.
  • Lyubovnikova, J., Legood, A., Turner, N., & Mamakouka, A. 2017. How authentic leadership influences team performance: The mediating role of team reflexivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1): 59-70.
  • Luthans, F., Baack, D., & Taylor, L. (1987). Organizational commitment: Analysis of antecedents. Human relations, 40(4), 219-235.
  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological science, 1(4), 240-246.
  • Locke, E. A. 1991. The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 288-299.
  • Livovich, M. P. 1999. An investigation of servant-leadership in public school superintendents in the state of Indiana. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana State University. United States. Dissertations Abstracts International.
  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H. & Henderson, D(2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. Leadership Quarterly, 19: 161-177.
  • Leventhal, H., & Scherer, K. 1987. The relationship of emotion to cognition: A functional approach to a semantic controversy. Cognition and Emotion, 1(1): 3-28.
  • Krueger Jr, N. F., & Dickson, P. R. 1993. Perceived self-efficacy and perceptions of opportunity and threat. Psychological Report, 72: 1235-1240.
  • Kozlowski, S. W., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. M., & Nason, E. R. 2001. Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(1): 1-31.
  • Koh, B. K., Ng, L. C., Kita, Y., Tang, C. S., Ang, L. W., Wong, K. Y., James, L., & Goh, K. T. 2008. The 2005 dengue epidemic in Singapore: epidemiology, prevention and control. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 37(7): 538-545.
  • Kidron, A. 1978. Work values and organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 21: 239-247.
  • Keyton, J., & Springston, J. 1990. Redefining cohesiveness in groups. Small Group Research, 21(2): 234-254.
  • Kerr, S., & Slocum, J. W. 1981. Controlling the performances of people in organizations. Handbook of organizational design.
  • Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. 1978. Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(3): 375-403.
  • Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. 2001. Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1): 99-130.
  • Katz, D. 1964. The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 9(2): 131-146.
  • Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., and Snoek, J. D. 1964. Organizational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York, Wiley,
  • Jex, S. M., Bliese, P. D., Buzzell, S., & Primeau, J. 2001. The impact of self-efficacy on stressor–strain relations: Coping style as an explanatory mechanism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 401-409.
  • Jaramillo, F. D. B. Grisaffe, L. B. Chonko., & Roberts. J. A. 2009. Examining the impact of servant leadership on sales force performance. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 29: 257-275.
  • Ilies, R., Johnson, M., & Judge, T. A. Interpersonal Interactions at Work: Their Influence on Employee Well-Being and Organizational Outcomes. Part of the symposium: Work-Related Social Interactions and Mood: Tests of Affective Events Theory, R. Ilies and M. Johnson (Chairs), presented at the 2005 Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology National Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Humphrey, R. H. 2002. The many faces of emotional leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13(5): 493-50.
  • Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. 2011. Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: an examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4): 851-862.
  • Howell, J. P., Dorfman, P. W., & Kerr, S. 1986. Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1): 88-102.
  • Hoffman, E. L., & Lord, R. G. 2013. A taxonomy of event-level dimensions: Implications for understanding leadership processes, behavior, and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 24(4): 558-571. House, R. J. 1971. A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 321-339.
  • Hill, T., Smith, N. D., & Mann, M. F. 1987. Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2): 307-313.
  • Hernandez, M., Eberly, M. B., Avolio, B. J., & Johnson, M. D. 2011. The loci and mechanisms of leadership: Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory. Leadership Quarterly, 22(6): 1165-1185.
  • Heifetz, R. A. 1994. Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press.
  • Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2007). Personal initiative, commitment and affect at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 601-622.
  • Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
  • Gregory Stone, A., Russell, R. F., & Patterson, K. 2004. Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4): 349-361.
  • Greenleaf, R. K. 1977. Servant leadership. New York Paulist Press.
  • Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2002). The new leaders: Transforming the art of leadership into the science of results. London: Little, Brown.
  • Glisson, C., & Durick, M. 1988. Predictors of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in human service organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly. 33(1). 61–81.
  • Glaso, L., Ekerholt, K., Barman, S., & Einarsen, S. 2006. The instrumentality of emotion in leader-subordinate relationships. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 1(3): 255-276.
  • Glaso, L., & Einarsen, S. 2008. Emotion regulation in leader–follower relationships. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(4): 482-500.
  • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
  • George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310-329.
  • George, J. M. 2000. Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53: 1027-1055.
  • George, J. M. 1991. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 107-116.
  • Gardner, D. G., & Pierce, J. L. (1998). Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy within the Organizational Context An Empirical Examination. Group & Organization Management, 23(1), 48-70.
  • Gao, P., Wong, A. F., Choy, D., & Wu, J. 2010. Developing leadership potential for technology integration: Perspectives of three beginning teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(5): 643-658.
  • Flavell, J. H. 1981. Cognitive monitoring. Children’s oral Communication Skills, 35-60.
  • Flavell, J. H. 1979. Meta cognition and cognitive monitoring a new area of cognitive development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34. 906-911.
  • Festinger, L., Back, K. W., & Schachter, S. 1950. Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing (Vol. 3). Stanford University Press.
  • Ferris, G. R., Witt, L. A., & Hochwater, W. A. 2001. Interaction of social skill and general mental ability on job performance and salary. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1075-1082.
  • Epitropaki, O., Kark, R., Mainemelis, C., & Lord, R. G. 2017. Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review. Leadership Quarterly, 28(1): 104-129.
  • Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. 2010. Leader –member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6): 1085-1103.
  • Eisenberg, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51-59.
  • Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit‐level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 61-94.
  • Edwards, K. 1990. The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2): 202-216.
  • Earnhardt, M. P. 2008. Testing a servant leadership theory among United States military members. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 1(2): 14-24.
  • Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., Worline, M. C., Lilius, J. M., & Kanov, J. 2002. Leading in times of trauma. Harvard Business Review, 54-61.
  • Dubin, R., Champoux, J. E., & Porter, L. W. 1975. Central life interests and organizational commitment of blue-collar and clerical workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 411-421.
  • Drury, S. 2004. Employee perceptions of servant leadership: Comparisons by level and with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Doctoral dissertation, Regent University.
  • Downs, A. 1967. The life cycle of bureaus. Inside Bureaucracy, 296-309.
  • Doci, E., Stouten, J., & Hofmans, J. 2015. The cognitive- behavioral system of leadership: cognitive antecedents of active and passive leadership behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 1-15.
  • Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. 2014. Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. Leadership Quarterly, 25: 36-62.
  • Decotiis, T. A., & Summers, T. P. (1987). A path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 40, 445-470.
  • De Cremer, D., van Knippenberg, D., Van Dijke, Marius & Bos, A.E.R. 2006. Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters. Group Dynamics: Theory. Research and Practice, 10: 233-245.
  • Dansereau, F., Seitz, S. R., Chiu, C. Y., Shaughnessy, B., & Yammarino, F. J. 2013. What makes leadership, leadership? Using self-expansion theory to integrate traditional and contemporary approaches. Leadership Quarterly, 24(6): 798-821.
  • Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment. Journal of occupational psychology, 53(1), 39-52.
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. 1988. Behavioral dimensions of charismatic leadership. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage Publications.
  • Cherulnik, P. D., Donley, K. A., Wiewel, T. S. R., & Miller, S. R. 2001. Charisma is contagious: The effect of leaders’ charisma on observers’ affect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(10): 2149-2159.
  • Chen, G., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self-and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549-556.
  • Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. 1968. Leadership and performance of group functions: Introduction. Group dynamics: Research and theory. N Y: Harper & Row.
  • Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. A. C.(1984), Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354-359.
  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E. 2001. Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2):195-210.
  • Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. 2000. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6): 215-222.
  • Buchanan, B.(1974) Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 533-546.
  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97: 117-34.
  • Brooke, P. P., Russell, D. W., & Price, J. L. 1988. Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2): 139-145.
  • Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. 1987. Assessing the cohesion of teams:Validity of the group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9:275-294.
  • Boyer, G. B. 1999. Turning Points in the Development of Male Servant-leaders: A Dissertation. UMI Dissertation Services.
  • Bettenhausen, K. L. 1991. Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2): 345-381.
  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. 1999. Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2): 181-217.
  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
  • Bartol, K. M., Durham, C. C., & Poon, J. M. 2001. Influence of performance evaluation rating segmentation on motivation and fairness perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6): 1106-1119.
  • Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644-675.
  • Barnett, R., & Brennan, R. 1997. Change in job conditions, change in psychological distress, and gender: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 253-274.
  • Bandura, A. 1988. Organisational applications of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2): 275-302.
  • Bandura, A. 1986. Socal foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. & Wood. R. 1989. Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41: 586-589.
  • Bandura, A. & Cervone, D.(1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 38(1), 92-113.
  • Bagozzi, R. P. 1981. Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4): 607-627.
  • Awamleh, R., & Gardner, W. L. 1999. Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. Leadership Quarterly, 10(3): 345-373.
  • Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. 2004. Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6): 801-823.
  • Atwater, L., & Carmeli, A. 2009. Leader–member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. Leadership Quarterly, 20(3): 264-275.
  • Ashkanasy, N. M., Harttel, C, E. J., & Daus, C. S. 2002. Diversity and emotion: The new frontiers in organizational behavior research. Journal of Management, 28(3): 307-338
  • Ashkanasy, N. M., & Tse, B. 2000). Transformational leadership as management of emotion: A conceptual review. In N. M.
  • Ashkanasy, C. Hartel, & W. Zerbe. 2000. Emotions in the workplace: Development in the study of the managed heart. Wesport, CT: Quorun Books.
  • Ashkanasy, C. E. J. Hartel, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Theory, research and practice (pp. 221–235). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
  • Allen, N. J., & Mayer, J. P. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment of affective, continuance and normatiove commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1-18.
  • ADHD 아동의 WCST 수 행 저하와 실행기능 및 인성 특성과의 관계: WCST 수행 정상 ADHD 및 우울 집단과의 비교 정서
    배대석 서완석 서형모 이하영 장문선 정진영 행동장애연구, 26(2): 169-195 [2010]