'
개념 관계망 분석을 통한 2009 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 교과서 생명 영역의 핵심 주제 및 연계성 분석' 의 주제별 논문영향력
| 주제 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 동일주제 총논문수 | 논문피인용 총횟수 | 주제별 논문영향력의 평균 |
| 1,302 | 0 |
0.0% |
주제별 논문영향력
' 개념 관계망 분석을 통한 2009 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 교과서 생명 영역의 핵심 주제 및 연계성 분석' 의 참고문헌
-
형태소 분석기 KLT2000(한국어 형태소 분석기) [Computer software]
-
한국 대중가요의 의미 연결망
-
학과 교육과정 교과서의 변천과 발전 방향
-
제7차 초등학교 과학과 교육과정 내용의 적정성분석 및 평가박재근 ( Jae Keun Park ) 이봉우 ( Bong Woo Lee ) 이양락 ( Yang Rak Lee ) 한인옥 ( In Ok Han ) 초등과학교육, 24(3), 214-225 [2005]
-
제 7차 교육과정의 초·중등 생물 수업 목표의 연계성 지도 분석김영신 ( Youngshin Kim ) 김후자 ( Hu Ja Kim ) 손종경 ( Jong Kyung Sonn ) 정재훈 ( Jae Hoon Jeng ) 한국과학교육학회지, 29(6), 693-711 [2009]
-
박사
-
언어네트워크 분석을 통한 세포분열의 개념 간 오류 해결 교수학습 전략 개발 및 적용
-
네트워크 텍스트 분석을 활용한 대학부설 과학영재교육원의 중등수학 강의교재 분석김성연 ( Sungyeun Kim ) 신종호 ( Jongho Shin ) 이선영 ( Seonyoung Lee ) 최원 ( Won Choi ) E-수학교육 논문 집, 29(3), 465-489 [2015]
-
국가 교육과정 개정 담론의 비교 분석 (1): 제 4 차에서 제 7 차에 걸친
-
교육과학기술부 과학과 교육과정교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-361호 [별책 9] [2011]
-
교육과정 총론 개정의 기본 성격과 방향 및 주요 내용. 국 가수준 교육과정, 무엇을 어떻게 개정할 것인가?
-
박사
-
diSessa, A. A. (2013). A bird’s-eye view of the “pieces” vs“coherence” controversy (from the “pieces” side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change (pp. 31-48). NY: Routledge.
-
Wilkins, A. J. (1971). Conjoint frequency, category size, and categorization time. J ournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(4), 382-385.
-
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and Literacy in Science Education. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
-
Wasserman, S., & Galaskiewicz, J. (Eds.). (1994). Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage.
-
Van Atteveldt, W. (2008). Semantic Network Analysis: Techniques for Extracting, Representing, and Querying Media Content. Charleston, SC: BookSurge.
-
Valente, T. W., Coronges, K., Lakon, C., & Costenbader, E. (2008). How correlated are network centrality measures?. Connections (Toronto, Ont.), 28(1), 16.
-
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. IL: University of Chicago Press.
-
Tseng, Y. H., Chang, C. Y., Rundgren, S. N. C., & Rundgren, C. J. (2010). Mining concept maps from news stories for measuring civic scientific literacy in media. Computers & Education, 55(1), 165-177.
-
Trigg, R., & Weiser, M. (1986). TEXTNET: A network-based approach to text handling. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 4, 1-23.
-
Tanaka, K., Takahashi, M., & Tsuda, K. (2013). Comparison of centrality indexes in network japanese text analysis. International J ournal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3(1), 37.
-
Soyibo, K. (1995). Using concept maps to analyze textbook presentations of respiration. The American Biology Teacher, 57(6), 344-351.
-
Schwab, J. J. (1963). Biology Teachers’ Handbook. American Institute of Biological Sciences. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.
-
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The concept of the structure of a discipline. Educational Record, 43(3), 197-205.
-
Rundgren, C. J., Rundgren, S. N. C., Tseng, Y. H., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2012). Are you SLiM? Developing an instrument for civic scientific literacy measurement (SLiM) based on media coverage. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 759-773.
-
Popping, R. (2003). Knowledge graphs and network text analysis. Social Science Information, 42(1), 91-106.
-
Popping, R. (2000). Computer-assisted text analysis. Sage.
-
Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. J ournal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377-1387.
-
Paranyushkin, D. (2011). Identifying the pathways for meaning circulation using text network analysis. Berlin: Nodus Labs. Retrived at: http://noduslabs.com/research/pathways-meaningcirculation- text-network-analysis.
-
Paranyushkin, D. (2010). Text network analysis. In Conf rence du Performing Arts Forum, Retrived at: https://issuu.com/ deemeetree/docs/text-network-analysis.
-
Novak, J., & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning How to Learn. NY: Cambridge University Press.
-
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. J ournal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949.
-
Newman, M. E. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577-8582.
-
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2009). The Biology Teacher's Handbook. NSTA.
-
National Research Council [NRC] (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
-
Myers, J., & O'Brien, E. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26(2-3), 131-157.
-
Moody, D. E. (1996). Evolution and the textbook structure of biology. Science Education, 80(4), 395-418.
-
McInerney, J. D. (1987). Curriculum development at the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. Educational Leadership, 44(4), 24-28.
-
Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Harvard University Press.
-
Masucci, A. P., & Rodgers, G. J. (2006). Network properties of written human language. Physical Review E, 74(2), 026102.
-
Mani, I., & Maybury, M. T. (1999). Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. MIT Press.
-
Leydesdorff, L., & Welbers, K. (2011). The semantic mapping of words and co-words in contexts. J ournal of Infometrics, 5, 469-475.
-
Leydesdorff, L. (2007). FullText.exe for Full Text Analysis. URL http://users.fmg.uva.nl/lleydesdorff/software/fulltext/index.htm.
-
Kuhn, T., & Corman, S. (2003). The emergence of homogeneity and heterogeneity in knowledge structures during a planned organizational change. Communication Monographs, 70, 198-229.
-
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. CA: Sage.
-
Kinchin, I. M. (2011). Visualising knowledge structures in biology: Discipline, curriculum and student understanding. J ournal of Biological Education, 45(4), 183-189.
-
Jang, H. Y., & Barnett, G. A. (1994). Cultural differences in organizational communication: A semantic network analysis 1. Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 44(1), 31-59.
-
Hunter, S. (2014). A novel method of network text analysis. Open J ournal of Modern Linguistics, 4(02), 350.
-
Helbig, H. (2006). Knowledge representation and the semantics of natural language. NY: Springer.
-
Gagne, R. M. (1970). The Conditions of Learning. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
-
Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35-41.
-
Drieger, P. (2013). Semantic Network Analysis as a Method for Visual Text Analytics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79, 4-17
-
Doerfel, M. L. & Barnett, G. A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 25(4), 589-603.
-
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes any sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 35, 125-29.
-
Diesner, J., & Carley, K. M. (2005). Revealing social structure from texts: Meta-matrix text analysis as a novel method for network text analysis. In V. K. Narayanan, & D. J. Armstrong (Eds.), Causal Mapping for Research in Information Technology (pp. 81-108). Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
-
Diesner, J. (2012). Uncovering and Managing the Impact of Methodological Choices for the Computational Construction of Socio-technical Networks from Texts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
-
DeLeuil, L. (1998). Transitivity, metaphor and modality: Investigating the link between style and constructivism in science text. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, California, April.
-
Danowski, J. A. (1993). Network analysis of message content. Progress in Communication Sciences, 12, 198-221.
-
Corman, S. R., Kuhn, T., McPhee, R. D., & Dooley, K. J. (2002). Studying complex discursive systems: Centering resonance analysis of communication. Human Communication Research, 28, 157-206.
-
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407.
-
Clifton, C., Cooley, R., & Rennie, J. (2004). TopCat: Data mining for topic identification in a text corpus. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(8), 949-964.
-
Carley, K., M., & Palmquist, M. (1992). Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Social Forces, 70(3), 601-636.
-
Carley, K. M., & Kaufer, D. S. (1993). Semantic connectivity: An approach for analyzing symbols in semantic networks. Communication Theory, 3(3), 183-213.
-
Carley, K. M. (1997). Network text analysis: The Network Position of Concepts. In C. W. Roberts (Ed.), Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts (pp. 79-100). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
-
Carley, K. M. (1994). Extracting culture through textual analysis. Poetics, 22(4), 291-312.
-
Carley, K. M. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 75-126.
-
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The next generation science standards and the life sciences. Science & Children, 50(6), 7-14.
-
Bruner, J. S. (1977). The Process of Education. 1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
-
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J ournal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008.
-
Biological Science Curriculum Study (BSCS). (1993). Developing Biological Literacy: A Guide to Developing Secondary and Post-secondary Biology Curricula. Kendall Hunt Pub Co.
-
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. A new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Scientific American, 284(5), 1-5.
-
Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
-
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM, 8, 361-362.
-
Barab si, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512.
-
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. J ournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261-295.
-
Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. J ournal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978.
-
Alvarez-Hamelin, J. I., Dall'Asta, L., Barrat, A., & Vespignani, A. (2008). k-core decomposition of Internet graphs: hierarchies, self-similarity and measurement biases. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 3(2), 371-393.
-
2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 과학과 교육과정 연구