연구동향 분석
박사

패션상품 구색의 다양성 지각이 구색 평가에 미치는 영향

이하경 2016년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 패션상품 구색의 다양성 지각이 구색 평가에 미치는 영향' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 바느질,의류,개인과 가족생활의 관리
  • 구색 구조
  • 구색 다양성 지각
  • 구색 매력성
  • 구색 배열
  • 구색 복잡성
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
769 0

0.0%

' 패션상품 구색의 다양성 지각이 구색 평가에 미치는 영향' 의 참고문헌

  • 현대 의상사회 심리학
    임숙자 수학사 [2009]
  • 피팅 모델의 신체적 매력성 효과: 심리적 거리감과 동일시의 이중구조를 중심으로
    안민아 이미아 추호정 소비자학연구, 22(3), 57-82 [2011]
  • 패션제품의 깊이가 매출액에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
    곽영식 이진화 대한가정학회지, 40(10), 113-121 [2002]
  • 패션비지니스 시스템론
    유지선 이호정 교학연구사 [2008]
  • 패션머천다이징
    이호정 교학연구사 [1999]
  • 패션마케팅
    이은영 교문사 [1999]
  • 패션 머천다이징 실제
    이호정 정송향 서울: 교학연구사 [2013]
  • 제품구색과 제품진열방식이 소비자의 점포 내 구매행동에 미치는 영향
    하환호 대한경영학회지, 22(3), 1427-1446 [2009]
  • 전형성 높은 브랜드가 상품구색 평가와 부정적 감정에 미치는 영향
    이영일 하환호 대한경영학회지, 23(3), 1687-1704 [2010]
  • 자아-브랜드 이미지 일치성과 기능적 일치성이 브랜드사랑과 브랜드태도 및 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향
  • 자기해석(Self-construal) 이 제품 구색에 대한 선호와 다양성 추구 행동에 미치는 효과 연구
    김수민 이병관 한국심리학회지: 소비자∙광고, 16(3), 499-518 [2015]
  • 자기 이미지와 브랜드 이미지 일치가 청바지 브랜드 태도에 미치는 영향
    신정란 황진숙 한국디자인포럼, 38, 175-188 [2013]
  • 선택대안의 수와 소비자의 제품에 대한 친숙도가 점포 내 구매결정에 미치는 영향
    하환호 현정석 유통연구, 11(2), 97- 122 [2006]
  • 상품구색의 크기와 브랜드 명성이 상품구색에 대한 평가와 구매결정에 미치는 영향
    이영일 하환호 상품학연구, 26(3), 39-48 [2008]
  • 라이프스타일과 브랜드 유형에 따른 패션점포속성 및 브랜드자산에 관한 연구
    나윤규 오완근 한국패션디자인학회지, 10(3), 97-114 [2010]
  • 기업 이미지와 기업-상품 적합성 및 소비자-기업 동일시가 브랜드 평가에 미치는 영향: 매개효과와 조절효과
    문준연 상품학연구, 26(4), 47-59 [2008]
  • 구색의 크기와 목표 진행상황이 소비자 선택에 미치는 영향
    김문용 박세훈 한희연 소비자학연구, 24(2), 329-351 [2013]
  • “브랜드 개성-자아 이미지 일치성이 구매의도에 미치는 영향 : 자기 감시성과 제품 유형의 조절효과”
    안광호 이재홍 장준수 광고학연구, 22(5), 7-23 [2011]
  • Yoo, C., Park, J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1998). Effects of store characteristics and in-store emotional experiences on store attitude. Journal of Business Research, 42(3), 253-263.
  • Xu, J., Jiang, Z., & Dhar, R. (2013). Mental representation and perceived similarity: How abstract mindset aids choice from large assortments. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 548-559.
  • Wu, J., Won Ju, H., Kim, J., Damminga, C., Kim, H. Y., & KP Johnson, K. (2013). Fashion product display: An experiment with Mockshop investigating colour, visual texture, and style coordination. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(10), 765-789.
  • Wansink, B., Kent, R. J., & Hoch, S. J. (1998). An anchoring and adjustment model of purchase quantity decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 71-81.
  • Van Herpen, H. W. I. (2001). Perceptions and evaluations of assortment variety. School of Economics and Management.
  • Van Herpen, E. & Pieters, R. (2002). The variety of an assortment: An extension to the attribute-based approach. Marketing Science, 21(3), 331-341.
  • Tully, S. M., & Winer, R. S. (2014). The role of the beneficiary in willingness to pay for socially responsible products: a metaanalysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 255-274.
  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological review, 110(3), 403-421.
  • Townsend, C., & Kahn, B. E. (2014). The “visual preference heuristic”: the influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 993-1015.
  • Steenkamp, J. B. E., Baumgartner, H., & Van der Wulp, E. (1996). The relationships among arousal potential, arousal and stimulus evaluation, and the moderating role of need for stimulation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(4), 319-329.
  • Sloot, L. M., Fok, D., & Verhoef, P. C. (2006). The short-and longterm impact of an assortment reduction on category sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 536-548.
  • Simonson, I., Nowlis, S., & Lemon, K. (1993). The effect of local consideration sets on global choice between lower price and higher quality. Marketing Science, 12(4), 357-377.
  • Simonson, I. (1999) the effect of product assortment on buyer preferences. Journal of Retailing, 75(3), 347-370.
  • Shugan, S. M. (1980). The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(2), 99-111.
  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (2015). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois press.
  • Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2009). What moderates the too-much-choice effect?. Psychology & Marketing, 26(3), 229-253.
  • Savitt, R. (1984). The “wheel of retailing” and retail product management. European Journal of Marketing, 18(6/7), 43-54.
  • Sarifuddin, M., & Missaoui, R. (2005, August). A new perceptually uniform color space with associated color similarity measure for content-based image and video retrieval. In Proc. of ACM SIGIR 2005 Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval (MMIR 2005), 1-8.
  • Russo, J. E., & Leclerc, F. (1994). An eye-fixation analysis of choice processes for consumer nondurables. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 274-290.
  • Rupe, D. & Kunz, G. I. (1998). Building a financially meaningful language of merchandise assortment. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 16(2), 88-97.
  • Rosenberg, J. M. (1995). Dictionary of retailing and merchandising. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382-439
  • Risch, E. H. (1991). Retail Merchandising. New York: Macmillan.
  • Reibstein, D. J., Youngblood, S. A., & Fromkin, H. L. (1975). Number of choices and perceived decision freedom as a determinant of satisfaction and consumer behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(4), 434.
  • Redden, J. P., & Hoch, S. J. (2009). The presence of variety reduces perceived quantity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 406-417.
  • Rajaram, K. (2001). Assortment planning in fashion retailing: methodology, application and analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 186-208.
  • Poynor, C., & Wood, S. (2010). Smart subcategories: how assortment formats influence consumer learning and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 159-175.
  • Plataniotis, K. N., & Venetsanopoulos, A. N. (2000). Color image processing and applications. Springer.
  • Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44(3), 547-555.
  • Phillips, H., & Bradshaw, R. (1993). How customers actually shop: Customer interaction with the point of sale. Journal of the Market Research Society, 35(1), 51-62.
  • Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.
  • Payne, J. W.(1976), “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making : An Information Search and Protocol Analysis,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 366-387.
  • Paschos, G. (2001). Perceptually uniform color spaces for color texture analysis: an empirical evaluation. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 10(6), 932-937.
  • Parboteeah, D. V., Valacich, J. S., & Wells, J. D. (2009). The influence of website characteristics on a consumer's urge to buy impulsively. Information Systems Research, 20(1), 60-78.
  • Palmer, S. E. (1982). Symmetry, Transformation, and the Structure of Perceptual Systems. Organization and Representation in Perception, 95-144.
  • Oppewal, H., & Koelemeijer, K. (2005). More choice is better: Effects of assortment size and composition on assortment evaluation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(1), 45-60.
  • Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867-872.
  • Moroney, N. (2003). A hypothesis regarding the poor blue constancy of CIELAB. Color Research & Application, 28(5), 371-378.
  • Morales, A., Kahn, B. E., McAlister, L., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2005). Perceptions of assortment variety: The effects of congruency between consumers’ internal and retailers’ external organization. Journal of Retailing, 81(2), 159-169.
  • Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T. & Iyengar, S. S. (2008). The mere categorization effect: How the presence of categories increases choosers’ perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 202-214.
  • Missaoui, R., Sarifuddin, M., & Vaillancourt, J. (2004). An effective approach towards content-based image retrieval. In Image and Video Retrieval (pp. 335-343). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • McAlister, L., & Pessemier, E. (1982). Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 311-322.
  • Mazzarotto, N. (2001). Competition policy towards retailers: size, seller market power and buyer power. University of East Anglia Centre for Competition & Policy, CCR Discussion Paper, (1-4).
  • Mantrala, M. K., Levy, M., Kahn, B. E., Fox, E. J., Gaidarev, P., Dankworth, B., & Shah, D. (2009). Why is assortment planning so difficult for retailers? A framework and research agenda. Journal of Retailing, 85(1), 71-83.
  • Lurie, N. H. (2004). Decision making in information-rich environments: The role of information structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 473-486.
  • Liu, Y., Li, H., & Hu, F. (2013). Website attributes in urging online impulse purchase: An empirical investigation on consumer perceptions. Decision Support Systems, 55(3), 829-837.
  • Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance, in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Levy, M. & Weitz, B. A. (2004). Retailing Management. (5th edn) New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Leon, K., Mery, D., Pedreschi, F., & Leon, J. (2006). Color measurement in L* a* b* units from RGB digital images. Food Research International, 39(10), 1084-1091.
  • Lee, S. E. & Kunz, G. I. (2001). Assortment diversity in relation to financial productivity: contributions towards merchandising theory. The Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 5(4), 303-312.
  • Lancaster, T. (1990). The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Lamberton, C. P., & Diehl, K. (2013). Retail choice architecture: The effects of benefit-and attribute-based assortment organization on consumer perceptions and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 393-411.
  • Kurt Salmon Associates. (1993). Efficient Consumer Response: Enhancing consumer value in the grocery industry. Research Department, Food Marketing Institute.
  • Krum, F. (1994). Quantum leap. Progressive Grocer, 73(1), 41-43.
  • Krueger, L. E. (1972). Perceived numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 11(1), 5-9.
  • Kreps, D. M. (1979). A representation theorem for" preference for flexibility". Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(3), 565-577.
  • Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (2003). Principles of marketing. (10th edn) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall International.
  • Koopmans, T. C. (1964). On flexibility of future preference. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University.
  • Koelemeijer, K., & Oppewal, H. (1999). Assessing the effects of assortment and ambience: a choice experimental approach. Journal of Retailing, 75(3), 319-345.
  • Kim, J. O., & Jin, B. (2001). Korean consumers' patronage of discount stores: domestic vs multinational discount store shoppers' profiles. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(3), 236-255.
  • Kemler-Nelson, D. G. (1984). The effect of intention on what concepts are acquired. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(6), 734-759.
  • Kalyanam, K., Borle, S., & Boatwright, P. (2007). Deconstructing each item's category contribution. Marketing Science, 26(3), 327-341.
  • Kahn, B. E., & Wansink, B. (2004). The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 519-533.
  • Kahn, B. E. (1995). Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services: An integrative review. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2(3), 139-148.
  • Kahn, B. E. & Lehmann, D. R. (1991). Modeling choice among assortments. Journal of Retailing, 67(3), 274-299.
  • Jacoby, J., Speller, D. E., & Kohn, C. A. (1974). Brand choice behavior as a function of information load. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(1), 63-69.
  • Jackson, T., & Shaw, D. (2000). Mastering fashion buying and merchandising management. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995.
  • Hutchinson, J. W. (1983). Expertise and the structure of free recall. Advances in Consumer Research, 10(1), 585-589.
  • Huffman, C., & Kahn, B. E. (1998). Variety for sale: mass customization or mass confusion?. Journal of Retailing, 74(4), 491-513.
  • Hollander, S. C. (1966). Notes on the retail accordion. Journal of Retailing, 42, 29-40.
  • Hoch, S. J., Bradlow, E. T. & Wansink, B. (1999). The variety of an assortment. Marketing Science, 18(4), 527-546.
  • Hoch, S. J., & Deighton, J. (1989). Managing what consumers learn from experience. The Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 1-20.
  • Hauser, J. R., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 393-408.
  • Hart, C., & Rafiq, M. (2006). The dimensions of assortment: A proposed hierarchy of assortment decision making. Int. Rev. of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 16(3), 333-351.
  • Handelsman, M., & Munson, J. M. (1985). On integrating consumer needs for variety with retailer assortment decisions. Advances in Consumer Research, 12(1), 108-112.
  • Gruen, T. W. & Shah, R. H. (2000). Determinants and outcomes of plan objectivity and implementation in category management relationships. Journal of Retailing, 76(4), 483-510.
  • Greifeneder, R., Scheibehenne, B., & Kleber, N. (2010). Less may be more when choosing is difficult: Choice complexity and too much choice. Acta Psychologica, 133(1), 45-50.
  • Greenleaf, E. A., & Lehmann, D. R. (1995). Reasons for substantial delay in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 186-199.
  • Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (2005). Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24(3), 382-395.
  • Goodman, J. K., & Malkoc, S. A. (2012). Choosing here and now versus there and later: The moderating role of psychological distance on assortment size preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 751-768.
  • Gist, R. R. (1968). Retailing: Concepts and decisions. New York: Wiley. Grice, H. P. (1970). Logic and conversation (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
  • Ginsburg, N. (1978). Perceived numerosity, item arrangement, and expectancy. The American Journal of Psychology, 91(2), 267- 273.
  • Ghosh, A. (1990). Retail management. (2nd edn) Orlando, FL: The Dryden Press, Harcourt Brace.
  • Frings, G. S. (1987). Fashion: from concept to consumer. Prentice- Hall.
  • Frick, R. W. (1987). The homogeneity effect in clothing. Perception and Psychophysics, 41(1), 8-16.
  • Forster, J., Liberman, N., & Kuschel, S. (2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 579.
  • Folkes, V., & Matta, S. (2004). The effect of package shape on consumers' judgments of product volume: attention as a mental contaminant. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 390-401.
  • Fasolo, B., Hertwig, R., Huber, M., & Ludwig, M. (2009). Size, entropy, and density: What is the difference that makes the difference between small and large real-world assortments?. Psychology & Marketing, 26(3), 254-279.
  • Estrella-Ramon, A. (2014). The Impact of Varying Size of Assortment on Consumer Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 18(1), 69.
  • Dreze, X., Hoch, S. J., & Purk, M. E. (1994). Shelf management and space elasticity. Journal of Retailing, 70(4), 301-326.
  • Domzal, T. J., Hunt, J. M., & Kernan, J. B. (1995). Achtung! The information processing of foreign words in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 14(2), 95-114.
  • Diehl, K., Van Herpen, E., & Lamberton, C. (2015). Organizing products with complements versus substitutes: Effects on store preferences as a function of effort and assortment perceptions. Journal of Retailing, 91(1), 1-18.
  • Dhar, S. K., Hoch, S. J., & Kumar, N. (2001). Effective category management depends on the role of the category. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 165-184.
  • Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 215-231.
  • Desmet, P., & Renaudin, V. (1998). Estimation of product category sales responsiveness to allocated shelf space. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(5), 443-457.
  • Deng, L., & Poole, M. S. (2012). Aesthetic design of e-commerce web pages–Webpage Complexity, Order and preference. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(4), 420-440.
  • Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1), 1-42.
  • De Vries-van Ketel, E. (2006). How assortment variety affects assortment attractiveness: A consumer perspective. Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM).
  • Craig, C. S., Ghosh, A., & McLafferty, S. (1984). Models of the retail location process-A Review. Journal of Retailing, 60(1), 5-36.
  • Coupey, E., Irwin, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Product category familiarity and preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 459-468.
  • Clark, H. H. (1985). Language use and language users. Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 179-232.
  • Chernev, A. (2008). The role of purchase quantity in assortment choice: The quantity-matching heuristic. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(2), 171-181.
  • Chernev, A. (2006). Decision focus and consumer choice among assortments. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 50-59.
  • Chernev, A. (2003). When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 170-183.
  • Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. Dual-process theories in social psychology, 73-96.
  • Chang, C. (2011). The effect of the number of product subcategories on perceived variety and shopping experience in an online store. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(3), 159-168.
  • Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65-81.
  • Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 39(5), 752-766.
  • Carpenter, G. S., & Nakamoto, K. (1989). Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 285-298.
  • Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62(3), 193-217.
  • Brooks, L. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. H. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Broniarczyk, S. M., Hoyer, W. D. & Mcalister, L. (1998). Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 166-176.
  • Boyd, D. E. & Bahn, K. D. (2009). When do large product assortments benefit consumers? An information-processing perspective. Journal of Retailing, 85(3), 288-297.
  • Borin, N., Farris, P. W., & Freeland, J. R. (1994). A model for determining retail product category assortment and shelf space allocation. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 359-384.
  • Boatwright, P. & Nunes, J. C. (2001). Reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 50-63.
  • Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of consumer research, 25(3), 187-217.
  • Betancourt, R., & Gautschi, D. (1990). Demand complementarities, household production, and retail assortments. Marketing Science, 9(2), 146-161.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company
  • Berger, J., Draganska, M., & Simonson, I. (2007). The influence of product variety on brand perception and choice. Marketing Science, 26(4), 460-472.
  • Bellenger, D. N., & Korgaonkar, P. K. (1980). Profiling the recreational shopper. Journal of Retailing, 56(3), 77-92.
  • Bell, J. A., & Ternus, K. (2006). Silent selling: Best practices and effective strategies in visual merchandising. Fairchild Publications, Incorporated.
  • Bayus, B. L., & Putsis Jr, W. P. (1999). Product proliferation: An empirical analysis of product line determinants and market outcomes. Marketing Science, 18(2), 137-153.
  • Baumol, W. J., & Ide, E. A. (1956). Variety in retailing. Management Science, 3(1), 93-101.
  • Baron, S., Davies, B. J., & Swindley, D. (1991). Macmillan dictionary of retailing. Macmillan.
  • Ballantine, P. W., Jack, R., & Parsons, A. G. (2010). Atmospheric cues and their effect on the hedonic retail experience. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 38(8), 641-653.
  • Balderston, F. E. (1956). Assortment choice in wholesale and retail marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 21(2), 175-183.
  • Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R. & Griffin, M.(1994), “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value”, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
  • Arnold, S. J., Oum, T. H., & Tigert, D. J. (1983). Determinant attributes in retail patronage: seasonal, temporal, regional, and international comparisons. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(2), 149-157.
  • Areni, C. S., Duhan, D. F., & Kiecker, P. (1999). Point-of-purchase displays, product organization, and brand purchase likelihoods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 428-441.
  • Alba, J. W., Hutchinson, J. W., & Lynch, J. G. (1991). Memory and decision making. Handbook of Consumer Behavior, 1-49.