'
대학 지원환경에 대한 인식, 학생참여, 학습성과 간의 구조적 관계와 학생 변화 분석' 의 주제별 논문영향력
| 주제 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 동일주제 총논문수 | 논문피인용 총횟수 | 주제별 논문영향력의 평균 |
| 790 | 0 |
0.0% |
주제별 논문영향력
' 대학 지원환경에 대한 인식, 학생참여, 학습성과 간의 구조적 관계와 학생 변화 분석' 의 참고문헌
-
한국의 고등교육 개혁 정책
-
한국교육개발원 취업통계연보2009 [2009]
-
한국교육개발원 교육통계연보2012 [2012]
-
한국교육개발원 OECD 교육지표
-
한국개발연구원 미래비전 2040 미래 사회경제구조 변화와 국가발전전략한 국개발연구원 [2010]
-
중장기 인력수급 전망 2013~2023(I)
-
왜 구성주의인가? -정보화시대와 학습자중심의 교육환경-
-
사회수요 맞춤형 인재양성 사업 공청회 설명자료
-
박사
-
동일방법편의(Common Method Bias)의 원인과 해결방안김미숙(Mee Sook Kim) 박원우(Won-Woo Park) 정상명(Sang Myung Jeong) 허규만(Kyu Mann Huh) 인사 조직연구, 15(1), 89-133 [2007]
-
대학교육의 효과성 개념과 측정: 모형탐색과 적용
-
다변량 데이터 분석의 이해
-
구조방정식모델링의 이해와 적용
-
구조방정식모델 개념과 이해
-
고등교육에서의 학습자중심 교육이론에 기반한 PBL 모형 개발
-
Zhang, Z., & Richarde, R. (1998, April). Assessing college students’ development: A repeated-measures analysis using a mixed model. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
-
Yung, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (1996). Bootstrapping techniques in analysis of mean and covariance structures. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumaker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: issues and techniques(pp. 195-226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
-
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977) Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
-
Whitmire, E., & Lawrence, J. (1996, November). Undergraduate students’ development of critical thinking skills: An institutional and disciplinary analysis and comparison with academic library use and other measures. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Memphis, TN.
-
Watson, L., & Kuh, G. (1996). The influence of dominant race environments on student involvement, perceptions, and educational gains: A look at historically Black and predominantly White liberal arts institutions. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 415-414.
-
Tsui, L. (1999). Courses and instruction affecting critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 40, 185-200.
-
Toutkoushian, R. & Smart, J. (2001). Do institutional characteristics affect student gains from college? The Review of Higher Education, 25(1), 39-61.
-
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition(2nd Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Terenzini, P. T., & Reason, R. D. (2005, November). Parsing the first year of college: Rethinking the effects of college on students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.
-
Strauss, L.C. & Volkwein, J. F. (2004), Predictors of Student Commitment at Two-Year and Four-Year Institutions, Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), 203-227.
-
Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F. (2001). Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive styles. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
-
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence: How Practical and Creative Intelligence Determine Success in Life, NY: Plume.
-
Spaulding, S., & Kleiner, K. (1992). The relationship of college and critical thinking: Are critical thinkers attracted of created by college disciplines? College Student Journal, 26, 162-166.
-
Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, Work Engagement, and Proactive Behavior: A New Look at The Interface Between Non Work and Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518-528.
-
Smart, J., & Feldman, K., & Ethington, C. (2000). Academic disciplines: Holland’s theory and the study of college students and faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
-
Smart, J. C., Ethington, C. A., Umbach, P. D., & Rocconi, L. M. (2009). Faculty emphases on alternative course-specific learning outcomes in Holland’s model environments: The role of environmental consistency. Research in Higher Education, 50, 483–501.
-
Smart, J. C., & Umbach, P. D. (2007). Faculty and academic environments: Using Holland’s theory to explore differences in how faculty structure undergraduate course. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 183–195.
-
Smart, J. C. (2010). Differential patterns of change and stability in student learning outcomes in Holland’s academic environments: The role of environmental consistency. Research in Higher Education, 51, 468–482.
-
Shrout, P., & Bolger, N. (2002). Medication in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445.
-
Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kosugi, S., Suzuki, A., Nashiwa, H., Kato, A., Sakamoto, M., Irimjiri, H. Amano, S., Hirohata, K., Goto, R. (2008). Work engagement in Japan: Validation of the Japanese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 510-523.
-
Sharp, L. M. & Weidman, J. C. (1989). Early careers of undergraduate humanities majors. Journal of Higher Education, 60(5), 543-564.
-
Sebrell, K., & Erwin, T. (1998). Assessment of critical thinking: One performance method analyzed. Unpublished paper, Center for Assessment and Research Studies, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA.
-
Sax, L., Bryant, A., & Harper, C. (2005) The differential effects of student-faculty interaction on college outcomes for women and men. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 642-659.
-
Rykiel, J. (1995). The community college experience: Is there an effect on critical thinking and moral reasoning? Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 3824A.
-
Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
-
Rocconi, L. M., Ribera, A. K., Nelson Laire, T. F. (2015). College Seniors’ Plans for Graduate School: Do Deep Approaches Learning and Holland Academic Environments Matter?, Research in Higher Education, 56, 178-201. Doi 10.1007/s11162-014-93568-3.
-
Ro, H. K., Terenzini, P. T., & Yin, A. C. (2013). Between-college effects on students reconsidered. Research in Higher Education, 54(3), 253-282.
-
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination Theory perspective on student engagement. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer Science.
-
Reeve, J. & Tseng, M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of student engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257-267.
-
Reason, R. D., Terenzini, P. T., & Domingo, R. J. (2006). First things first: Developing academic competence in the first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 47(2), 149-175. Doi: 10.1007/s11162-005-8884-4.
-
Pike, G.R., Kuh, G.D. & Gonyea, R.M. (2003). The Relationship between institutional mission and students' involvement and educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 241-261.
-
Pike, G.R. (2006). Students’ personality types, intended majors, and college expectations: futher evidence concerning psychological and sociological interpretations of holland’s theory, Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 801-822.
-
Pike, G.R. (1999). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 269-284.
-
Pike, G. R., Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (2012). The mediating effects of student engagement on the relationships between academic disciplines and learning outcomes: An extension of Holland’s theory. Research in Higher Education, 53, 550–575.
-
Pascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Blaich, C. F. (2008). Validation of the NSSE benchmarks and deep approaches to learning against liberal arts outcomes. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville, FL.
-
Pascarella, E. T., Martin, G. L., Hanson, J. M., Trolian, T. L., Gillig & Blaich, C. (2014). Effects of diversity experiences on critical thinking skills over 4 years of college, Journal of College Student Development, 55(1), 86-92.
-
Pascarella, E. T., Bohr, L., Nora, A., Zusman, B., Inman, P., & Desler, M. (1993). Cognitive impacts of living of living on campus versus communiting to college. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 216-220.
-
Pascarella, E. T. & Terenzini, P. (Ed.). (2005). How college affects students(Vol. 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
-
Pascarella, E. (1985). Students’ affective development within the college environment. Journal of Higher Education, 56(6), 640-663.
-
Parker, E. T., & Pascarella, E. T. (2013). Effects of diversity experiences on socially responsible leadership Over four years of college, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 6(4), 219-230.
-
Paris, C., & Combs, B. (2006). Lived meanings: What teacher mean when they say they are learner-centered. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(5), 571-592.
-
Nusche, D. (2008). Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Comparative Review of Selected Practices. Paris: OECD Publications.
-
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory(2nd Ed.). NJ: Erlbaum.
-
Nelson Laird, T. F., Seifert, T. A., Pacarella, E. T., Mayhew, M. J., & Blaich, C. F. (2014). Deeply affecting first-year students’ thinking: Deep approaches to learning and three dimensions of cognitive development. Journal of Higher Education, 85, 403-432.
-
Money, S. (1997). The relationship between critical thinking scores, achievement scores, and grade point average in three different disciplines. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 3401A.
-
McDonough, M. (1997). An assessment of critical thinking at the community college level. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 2561A.
-
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
-
McCormick, A.C., Pike, G.R., Kuh, G.D., Chen, P.-S.D. (2009). Comparing the utility of the 2000 and 2005 carnegie classification systems in research on students' college experiences and outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 50(2), 144-167.
-
Mayhew, M. J., Seifert, T. A., Nelson Laird, T. F., Pascarella, E. T., & Blaich, C. F. (2012). Going deep into mechanisms for moral reasoning growth: How deep learning approaches affect moral reasoning development for first-year students. Research in Higher Education, 53, 26-46.
-
Marton, F., & S lj , R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British journal of educational psychology, 46(1), 4-11.
-
Lundberg, C., & Schreiner, L. (2004). Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning: An analysis by student race/ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development, 45(5), 549-565.
-
Li, G., Long, S., & Simpson, M. (1999). Self-perceived gains in critical thinking and communication skills: Are there disciplinary differences? Research in Higher Education, 40, 43-60.
-
Li, G., Long, S., & Simpson, M. (1998). Self-perceives gains in communication and critical thinking skills: Are there disciplinary differences? Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Minneapolis, MN.
-
Lehman, D., & Nisbett, R. (1990). A longitudinal study of the effects of undergraduate training on reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 26, 952-960.
-
Le Deist, F. D & Winterton, J. (2005) What is competence?, Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27-46.
-
Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., Harper, B.J., & Yin, A.C. (2010). Academic Environments in Detail: Holland’s Theory at the Subdiscipline Level, Research in Higher Education, 51, 21–39.
-
Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., Whitt, E., & Associates. (2005). Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter(1st Ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
-
Kuh, G. D., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature, NPEC.
-
Kuh, G. D. (2005). Imagine asking the client: Using student and alumni surveys for accountability in higher education. In J.C. Burke(Ed.), Achieving Accountability in Higher Education: Balancing Public, Academic and Market Demand. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
-
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. change, 35(2), 24-32.
-
Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the national survey of student engagement. Change, 35(3), 10-17.
-
Kolb, D. A. (1976). The learning style inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer.
-
Ko, J. W., Park, Sumee., Yu, H. S., Kim, Seon-Joo., & Kim, D. M. (2015). The Structural Relationship Between Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Korea, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, DOI 10.1007/s40299-015-02 45-2.
-
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural Equation Modeling(2nd Ed). NY: The Guilford Press.
-
Kirchhoff, J. J. (1997). Public services production in context: Toward a multilevel, multistakeholder model. Public Productivity & Management Review 21, 70-85.
-
Kim, Y., & Sax, L. (2009). Student-faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 437-459.
-
KEDI Higher Education Policy Forum. (2013). Strategic Planning for the Advancement of Higher Education Quality in South Korea: Uncovering the Black-Box of Learning Process. Seoul, Republic of Korea: KEDI.
-
Johnstone, K., Ashbaugh, H., & Warfield, T. (2002). Effects of repeated practice and contextual-writing experience on college students’ writing skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 305-315.
-
In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms, ASCD. 추병완 최근순 역(2005). 구성주의 교수 학습론
-
Hu, S., & Kuh, G. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influence of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555-575.
-
Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
-
Holzer, M. (1995). The public productivity challenge. In A. Halachmi & G. Bouckaert(eds.), The enduring challenges in public management: Surviving and excelling in a changing world (pp. 413-448). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
-
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making Vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments(3rded.), Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
-
Hinchliffe, G. (2011). What is a Significant Educational Experience? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(3), 417-431.
-
Hahs-Vaughn, D., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2006). Estimating and using propensity score analysis with complex samples. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(1), 31-65.
-
Gunn, C. (1993). Assessing critical thinking: Development of a constructed response sheet. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 2267B.
-
Greene, T. G., Marti, C. N., & McClenney, K. (2008). The effort-outcome gap: Differences for African and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and academic achievement. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 513-539.
-
Grayson, J. (1996). Value added in generic skills between first and final year: A pilot project(Research report). Toronto: York University, Institute for Social Research.
-
Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53, 229–261.
-
Gadzella, B., & Masten, W. (1998). Critical thinking and learning processes for students in two major fields. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25, 256-261.
-
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
-
Franklin, M. (1995). The effects of differential college environments on academic learning and student perceptions of cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 36(2), 127-153.
-
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-132). New York, NY: Springer.
-
Feldman, K. A., Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (2008). Using Holland’s theory to study patterns of college student success: The impact of major fields on students. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 329–380). New York: Springer.
-
Doyle, S., Edison, M., & Pascarella, E. (1998, November). The “seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education” as process indicators of cognitive development in college: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami.
-
Davis, T., & Murrell, P. (1993). A structural model of perceived academic, personal, and vocational gains related to college student responsibility. Research in Higher Education, 34, 267-289.
-
Chickering, A. (1974). Commuting Versus Residential Students: Overcoming Educational Inequities of Living off Campus. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
-
Chickering, A. & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
-
Chen, R. (2011). Institutional characteristics and college student dropout risks: A multilevel event history analysis. Research in Higher Education. 1-19. Doi: 10.1007/s11162-011-9241-4.
-
Chang, M. J., Astin, A. W., & Kim, D. (2004). Cross-racial interaction among undergraduates: Some cause and consequences. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 527-551.
-
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
-
Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C. R. Reynolds(Eds.), Handbook of Creativity(pp. 3-32). New York: Plenum.
-
Braxton, J.M. & Milem, J.F & Sullivan, A.S. (2000), The Influence of Active Learning on the College Student Departure Process: Toward a Revision of Tinto’s Theory, The Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569-590.
-
Bowen, H. R.(Ed.). (1996). Investment in Learning. The individual and social value of American higher education. NJ: Transaction Publishers.
-
Boomsma,A.(2000).Reporting analysis of covariance structures.Structural Equation Modeling,7,461-483.
-
Bollen, K., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115-140.
-
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
-
Astin, A.W. (1999). Student Involvement: A Development Theory for Higher Education, Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529.
-
Astin, A. W. (1993b) What Matters in College? Four Critical Years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
-
Astin, A. W. (1993a). Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessement and Evaluation in Higher Education. American Council on Education. Oryx Press.
-
Astin, A. W. (1970b). The Methodology of Research on College Impact, Part Two, Sociology of Education, 43(4), 437-450.
-
Astin, A. W. (1970a). The Methodology of Research on College Impact, Part One, Sociology of Education, 43(3), 223-254.
-
Anaya, G. (1996). College experiences and student learning: The influence of active learning, college environments, and cocurricular activities. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 611-622.
-
Aghion, P. & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
-
Adam, S. (2004). Using Learning Outcomes. A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing learning outcomes at the local, national and international levels, Paper prepared for the United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, 1-2 July 2004, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh. Scotland.
-
APA. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Washinton, DC: American Psychological Association.
-
2014년 IMD 국가경쟁력 교육부문 평가결과 보고