연구동향 분석
박사

공무원 취업 준비생들의 영어 학습동기와 학습전략 = A Study on English Learning Motivation and Strategies of Job-seekers for Officials

신효수 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 공무원 취업 준비생들의 영어 학습동기와 학습전략 = A Study on English Learning Motivation and Strategies of Job-seekers for Officials' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 공무원취업준비생
  • 영어학습동기
  • 영어학습전략
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
69 0

0.0%

' 공무원 취업 준비생들의 영어 학습동기와 학습전략 = A Study on English Learning Motivation and Strategies of Job-seekers for Officials' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국폴리텍대 대학생의 자기조절학습 전략 활용에 관한 연구
    강혜영 유현실 직업능력개발연구. 10(1), 77-98 [2007]
  • 한국초중등학생들의영어학습동기및제2언어자아분석정성적인터뷰접근법
    김태영 영어학, 12(1), 67-99 [2012]
  • 한국 초등학생의 영어 학습 동기와 영어 학업 성취도: 제2자아, 국제적인 자세, 가족의 지지도 효과
    안경자 이연실 현대영어교육, 12(1),127-152 [2013]
  • 한국 중·고등학생의 태도와 동기가 영어학습에 미치는 영향
    이효웅 영어교육, 51(2), 3-34 [1996]
  • 한국 대학생들이 EFL로 사용하는 학습전략
    오준일 한국 언어교육, 1,23-53 [1992]
  • 학습동기, 학습전략, 학업성취도의 관계: 한국 고등학교영어 학습자의 경우
    위혜정 조정순 영어학, 10(4), 807-838 [2010]
  • 학습동기 변인들과 인지전략 및 학업성취간의 관계
    한순미 교육심리연구, 18(1), 329-350 [2004]
  • 태도와 성별이 영어 학습 책략 사용에 미치는 영향
    오준일 영어교육,51(2), 35-54 [1996]
  • 중학생들의 영어 숙달도와 동기 및 사회적 거리와의 상관관계
    나은진 영어교육연구, 15(3). 223-251 [2003]
  • 정윤선. 완벽주의와 난관주의가 학습동기와 학습전략에 미치는영향
    양명희 한국교육학연구, 48(3), 45-72 [2010]
  • 자기효능감이 어휘학습책략 사용과 성취도에 미치는 영향
    오희정 현대교육, 14(1), 153-176 [2013]
  • 박사
    자기조절학습 프로그램이 과학탐구능력, 학업성취도, 과학적 태도 및 탐구동기에 미치는 영향
    정미선 부산대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문 [2007]
  • 외국어 학습전략에 관한 연구 : 중. 고. 대학생을 중심으로
    이효웅 영어교육, 48, 51-59 [1994]
  • 외국어 학습전략과 영어 숙달도와의 관계 연구
    임미란 인문학연구, 26,157-194 [2001]
  • 온라인 학습 환경에서 대학생의 학습양식과 성별이 자기조절 학습전략 및 학습결과에 미치는 영향
    서희전 ( Hee Jeon Suh ) 교육정보미디어연구, 16(3), 433-457. [2010]
  • 온-오프라인 결합 교양영어 수강 학생들의 학습동기 유형과 변화
    김은주 김태영 김혜영 현대영어교육, 12(1), 126-156 [2011]
  • 영어회화전문강사가 중학생의 제 2언어 자아 및 동기에 미치는영향 연구: 구조방적식 접근
    양진숙 현대영어교육, 14(2), 291-311 [2013]
  • 영어회화수업에서 불안심리와 학습동기가 의사소통능력에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
    박정숙 영어교육, 53(1), 73-102 [1998]
  • 영어회화 학습자가 사용하는 학습전략에 관한 연구
    송석요 영어영문학연구, 44(4), 115-139 [2002]
  • 영어학습전략과 자기효능감이 대학생 토익성적 변화에 미치는 종단적 효과
    정병삼 교육평가연구, 24(2), 377-399 [2011]
  • 영어학습전략과 신념이 수행능력이 미치는 상관관계 분석-영어전공 과 타전공대학생의 비교를 중심으로
    송고은 교양교육연구, 7(2), 491-519 [2013]
  • 영어학습을 통한 학습자 자율성과 정체성 고찰
    박윤주 통합인문학연구,3(1), 197-219 [2011]
  • 영어학습에 대한 신념체계와 영어성취도와의 구조모형
    김경자 영어교육,16(2), 25-47 [2011]
  • 영어학습목표 달성을 위한 학습 활동지 개발
    현태덕 현대영어교육,12(1). 244-268 [2011]
  • 영어교육론
    배두본 서울: 한신문화사 [1997]
  • 영어 학습자의 학습동기에 영향을 미치는 요인
    김광환 신명희 디지털정책연구, 10(9), 443-448 [2012]
  • 영어 학습동기, 학습전략 사용 및 학업성적간의 관계. 박사학위논문
    이옥주 계명대학교 [1999]
  • 영어 학습 태도, 동기 및 책략의 상관관계
    이효웅 영어교육연구, 14 (1),189-212 [2002]
  • 영어 집중 캠프에 참여한 대학생들의 영어 학습동기와 영어성취도의 상관관계 분석
    나경희 영어영문학연구, 53(1), 159-177 [2011]
  • 영어 듣기 숙달도와 듣기 전략 사용에 관한 연구
    정혜진 영어교육연구,18(3). 253-277 [2006]
  • 언어 학습자가 사용하는 책략들: 부산 수산대학교 학생들을 중심으로
    박기표 영어어문교육, 1, 23-53 [1998]
  • 성인학습자 집단 간의 자기조절학습전략 사용,동기의 차이와 학업성취와의 관계
    김언주 성현숙 교육심리학회, 17(1), 333-354 [2003]
  • 사이버대학생들의 학업스트레스와 성취도 관계에서 학업적 자기효능감, 과제가치의 조절
    이정원 조선유 주영주 평생학습사회, 8(1). 73-82 [2012]
  • 동기와언어불안감이영어말하기능력에미치는영향
    박혜숙 외국어교육,13(4), 219-241 [2006]
  • 동기와 전략으로 본 영어 학습자들의 성향 분석
    이일연 영어어문교육,8(2), 151-174 [2002]
  • 대학생과 고교생의 영어 학습 동기와 학습 전략 변화 비교
    김해동 응용언어학, 19(1), 189-212 [2003]
  • 대학 교양영어 수강자들의 영어 학습동기와 동기 변화에 관한 사례 연구
    황정희 한국영어교육, 12(1), 97-121 [2013]
  • 대학 교양영어 교육의 과목 개선을 위한 학습자 요구 분석
    임정완 현대영어 교육, 7(2), 130-149 [2006]
  • 국제이메일 교류가 학습동기에 미치는 영향
    정남숙 영어학, 4(4). 615-639 [2004]
  • 교양영어교육에 대한 대학생들의 의식에 관한 연구 : 학습동기, 요구, 기대를 중심으로
    김영숙 응용언어학, 11(1), 73-98 [1996]
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
  • Wheeler, V. A., & Ladd, G. W. (1982). Assessment of children’s self-efficacyfor social interaction with peers. Developmental Psychology, 18,795-805.
  • Wenden, A. L. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. New York:Prentice Hall.
  • Wenden, A. L. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In A. Wenden, andJ. Rubin, (Ed.), Learner strategies in language learning(pp.3-13). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Wenden, A. L. (1985). Learner strategies. TESOL Newsletter, 19(5), 1-7.
  • Weinstein, C. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching. (3rdEd.). New York: Macmillan.
  • Warr, P., & Downing, J. (2000). Learning strategies, learning anxiety andknowledge acquisition. British J ournal of Psychology, 91, 311-333.
  • Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and motivationalstyles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. J ournal ofPersonality, 60(3), 599-617.
  • Truitt, S. (1995). Beliefs about language learning: A study of Koreanuniversity students learning English. Texas Papers in ForeignLanguage Education, 2, 1-14.
  • Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair ininterlanguage, Language Learning, 30(2), 417-429.
  • Taguchi, T., Magid, M, & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self systemamong Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: Acomparative study. In Z. Do?rnyei & E. Ushioda (eds.), Motivation,language identity and the L2 self. Britsol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Sternberg & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual differences(pp.13-59). New York: Freeman.
  • Stern, H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner. TheCanadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304-318.
  • Snow, R, E., & Swanson, J. (1992). Instructional Psychology: Aptitude,adaption, and assessments. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1),583-626.
  • Snow, R, E. (2001). Content-based and immersion models for second andforeign language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (ed.), TeachingEnglish as a second or foreign language(3rd). Boston: Heinle &Heinle.
  • Snow, R, E. (1989). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework ofresearch in individual differences in learning. In P. L. Ackerman, R. J.
  • Seliger, H. W. (1983). The language learner as linguist: Of metaphos andrealities, Applied Linguistics, 4(3), 179-191.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and school learning. Psychology in theSchools, 22, 208-223.
  • Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning. The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle &Heinle.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classdefinitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology,25, 54-67.
  • Rubin, J., & Thompson, I. (1994). How to be a more successful languagelearner: Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, reach historyand typology. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (eds.), Learner strategiesin language learning (p.p. 15-30). Englishwood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.
  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can teach us. TESOLQuarterly, 9(1), 41-51.
  • Ramage, K. (1990). Motivational factors and persistence in foreign languagestudy. Language Learning, 30, 289-316.
  • Politzer, R. L., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learningbehaviors and their relation to gain in linguistic and communicativecompetences. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 103-124.
  • Politzer, R. L. (1983). An exploratory study of self-reported language learningbehaviors and their relation to achievement. Studies in SecondLanguage Acquistion, 6(1), 54-65.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory,research and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: MerrillPrentice-Hall.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivation and self-regulated learningcomponents of classroom academic performance. J ournal ofEducational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation andcognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. Maehr (eds.),Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol, 6, Motivationenhancing enviroments(pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (1988). A process-oriented view of student motivation andcognition. In J. S. Stark & L. Mets (eds.), Improving teaching andlearning through research(pp. 65-77). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Phillips. V. (1991). A Look at learner strategy use and ESL proficiency. CATESOL J ournal, 4(1), 57-67.
  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341.
  • Peacock, M. (2001). Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching stylesin EFL. International J ournal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 1-20.
  • Park, G. P. (1995). Language learning strategies and beliefs about languagelearning of university students learning English in Korea. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Taxas at Austin.
  • Paris, S. G., & Oka, E. R. (1986). Children’s reading strategies, metacognition,and motivation, Developmental Review, 6, 25-56.
  • O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in secondlanguage acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. L., Nyikos, M., & Ehrman, M. (1988). Vive la difference:Reflections on sex differences in use of language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 21, 321-329.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Shearin, J. (1996). Language learning motivation in a newkey. In Rebecca Oxford (Ed.), Language learning motivation:Pathways to the new century (pp. 71-80). Honolulu: University ofHawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1993). A factor analytic study of languagelearning strategy use: Interpretation from information-processingtheory and social psychology. Modern Language J ournal, 77, 11-22.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of languagestrategies by university students. Modern Language J ournal, 73(3),291-300
  • Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. E., (1993). Second language research onindividual difference. In W. Grabe (Ed.), Issues in second languageteaching and learning, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13,188-205.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1993b). Research on second language learning strategies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 175-187.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1993a). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update andESL suggestions. Tesol J ournal , 2, 18-22.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1992). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis ofstudies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 1-13.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teachershould know. New York: New Bury House.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis ofstudies with implications for strategy training. System, 17(2), 235-247.
  • Nyikos, M. (1990) Sex-related differences in adult language learning:Socialization and memory factors. Modern Language J ournal, 74(3),273-287.
  • Nolen, S. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and studystrategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269-287.
  • Noels, K. A., Pellertier, L. G., Cle?ment, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why areyou learning a second language? Motivational orientions andself-determination theory. Language learning, 50(1), 57-85.
  • Nicholls, J. G. (1975). Causal attribution and other achievement-relatedcognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value, and sex. J ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 379-389.
  • Newby, T. J. (1991). Classroom motivation: Strategies of first-year teachers. J ournal of Educational Psychology, 83, 195-200.
  • Naiman, N., Fronhlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco. A. (1978). The goodlanguage learner. Research in Education Series, 7. The OntarioInsitute for Studies in Education.
  • Naiman, N., Fronhlich, M., & Todesco. A. (1975). The good second languagelearner. TESL Talk, 6, 58-75.
  • Meece, J., Blumemfeld, P., & Hoyle, R. (1988). Students’ goal orientations andcognitive engagement in classroom actives. J ournal of EducationalPsychology, 80, 514-523.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. (2nd ed.). New York:Harper & Row.
  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41,954-969.
  • Margolish, D. P. (2000). A learning strategies approach to English acquisitionin Korea. Proceedings of YETA Autumn Conference (pp. 6-12). Busan, Korea.
  • Mansnerus, L. (1989). SAT separates girls from boys. New York Times, 4A,27-28.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Language anxiety: Its relationshipto other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language Learning, 41(4), 513-534.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1989). Anxiety and second languagelearning: Toward a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 39,252-275.
  • MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Toward a social psychological model of strategy use. Foreign Language Annals, 27(2), 185-195.
  • Lukmani, Y. (1972). Motivation to learn and language proficiency. LanguageLearning, 22, 261-273.
  • Lepper, M., Corpus, J., & lyengar, S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsicmotivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences andacademic correlates. J ournal of Educational Psychology, 97(2),184-196.
  • Lepper, M. R., & Cordova D. I. (1992). A desire to be taught: Instructionalconsequences of intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3),187-207.
  • Lens, W., & DeCruyenaere, M. (1991). Motivation and de-motivation insecondary education: Student characteristics. Learning and Instruction,1, 145-159.
  • Lee, K-R., & Oxford, R. L. (2008). Understanding EFL learners’ strategy useand strategy awareness. The Asian EFL J ournal, 10, 7-32.
  • Lambert, W. E. (1965). Foreign English as a second language. New York:McGraw-Hill co.
  • Kim, T.-H. (2012). The Role of Interest and Self-efficacy in Englishachievement among Korea Youth. J ournal of Future Oriented YouthSociety, 91(1), 47-68.
  • Kim, S. (2011). Exploring native speaker teacher’ beliefs about learning andteaching, English. English Teaching, 66(2),123-148.
  • Kim, K.-J. (2006b). Language learning beliefs in relation to Englishproficiency: A Korean sample. English Teaching, 61(4), 27-50.
  • Kim, K.-J. (2006a). The English about language learning of Korean collegestudents and their teachers of English. English Language &Literature Teaching, 12(3), 1-24.
  • Kim, K.-J. (2004). A structural model for English achievement based onmotivation, gender, and academic majors. Korean J ournal of AppliedLinguistics, 20(1), 59-80.
  • Kern, R. G. (1995). Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 71-92.
  • Kang, D.-H. (2010). A Study on process-oriented L2 Motivation in Koreancollege classrooms, Foreign language education 17(1), 79-107.
  • Kang, D.-H. (2001). Foreign language laerning (EFL) Motivation Revisited: ALongitudinal study, Foreign language education 8(2), 223-244.
  • Kang, D.-H. (2000). Motivation is Such a Complex Process, English Teaching55(3), 3-39.
  • Hwang, J, B. (2002). The role of anxiety and motivation in Korean EFlearners’ acquisition of content knowledge. Foreign LanguagesEducation, 9(3), 1-22.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign languagelearners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27, 557-576.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginninguniversity foreign language students. Modern Language J ournal , 72,283-294.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. InA. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in languagelearning (pp. 119-129). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivationalprinciple. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.
  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
  • Ham, S. (2002). The self-efficacy model of language learning strategy andEFL reading achievement. English Teaching, 57(1), 111-130.
  • Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.
  • Green, J. M. (1991). Language learning strategies of Puerto Rican universitystudents. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of Puerto RicoTESOL, San Juan, PR.
  • Grainger, P. R. (1997). Language-learning strategies for learner of Japanese:Investigating ethnicity. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 378-386.
  • Gillian, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory of women’sdevelopment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gardner, R. C., & Lambert. W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in secondlanguage learning, Rowley, MA; Newbury House.
  • Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivation variables in secondlanguage acquisition. Canadian J ournal of Psychology 13, 266-272.
  • Gardner, R. C. (1994). On motivation, research agenda, and theoreticalframeworks. Modern Language J ournal, 78, 359-368
  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second laanguage learning: Therole of attitudes and motivation. London, UK: Edward ArnoldPublisher.
  • Gardner, R, C,. & Gliksman, L. (1982). On Gardner on affect.: A discussion ofvalidity as it relates to the Attitude/Motivation Test Mattery. Language Learning, 32, 191-200.
  • Ferguson, E. D., & Wee, B. E. F. (2000). Motivation: A biosocial andcognitive intergration of motivation and emotion. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.
  • Ely, C. M. (1986). Language learning motivation: A descriptive analysis. Modern Language J ournal, 70(1), 28-35.
  • Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of languagelearning success: Modern language journal, 79, 67-89.
  • Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1991). Affective survey. Unpublishedmanuscript. Arlington, VA: Foreign Serve Institute.
  • Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, careerchoice, and psychological type on adults’ language learning strategies. Modern Language J ournal, 73(1), 1-13.
  • Eccles,J.S.,& Wigfield,A.(2002).Motivationalbeliefs,valuesandgoals. AnnualReview ofPsychology,53,109?132.
  • Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R., & Blumenfeld, P. (1995). Age andgender difference in children’s achievement self-percept elementaryschool years. Child Development, 64(5), 830-847.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the achiever: Thestructure of adolescents’ academic achievement related-beliefs andself-perceptions.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1985). Teacher expectation and studentmotivation. In J. Dusek(ed.), Teacher expectancies(pp. 185-226). Hilsdale, N. J: Erlbaum.
  • Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). SanFrancisco: Freeman.
  • EFL 교실에서 학습동기를 부여하기 위한 영어 학습동기저해요인 분석
    장신재 황병희 교육연구논총, 21, 163-191 [2004]
  • Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. (1996). Prediction of ESL proficiency amongAfrikaans speakers in South Africa. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Languagelearning strategies around the world: Crosscultural Perspectives (pp. 61-74). Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Do?rnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Do?rnyei & E. Ushioda (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Do?rnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individualdifferences in second language acquisition. Mahwah: LawrenceErlbaum.
  • Do?rnyei, Z. (1990a). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign-language learning. Language Learning, 40, 45-78.
  • Do?rnyei, E. L. (1975). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign-languagelearning. Language Learning, 40(1), 45-78.
  • Do??rnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies framework for foreign languageclassrooms. Cambridge University Press.
  • Do??rnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Toward a process-orientedconceptualization of student motivation. British J ournal of EducationalPsychology, 70, 519-538.
  • Do??rnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign languageclassroom. Modern Language J ournal, 78, 273-284.
  • Do??rnyei, Z. (1990b). Analysis of motivation components in foreign languagelearning. Paper presented at the 9th World Congress of AppliedLinguistics. Thessaloniki-Halkidiki, Greece. (ERIC DocumentReproduction Service No. Ed 323 810).
  • Diab, R. L. (2006). University students’ beliefs about learning English andFrench in Lebanon. System, 34, 80-96.
  • Deci,E.L.(1975).IntrinsicMotivation.New York:Plenum Press.
  • Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). Aninstrument to assess adults orientation toward control versusautonomy with children. J ournal of Educational Psychology, 73,642-650.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan. R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determinationin human behavior . New York: Plenum Press.
  • Dailey, A. (2009). Key motivational factors and how teachers can encouragemotivation in their students. Retried March 6, 2015, from the Worldwide Web: http:// www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-artslaw/cels/essays/secondlanguage/DailySLAKeyMotivationalFactorsandHowTeachers.pdf.
  • Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the researchagenda. Language Learning, 41(4), 469-512.
  • Cohen,A.D.(1998).Strategiesin learning and using asecondlanguage.New York:Longman.
  • Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreignlanguage instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22(1), 13-24.
  • Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980), Theoretical bases of communicativeapproaches to second language teaching and testing, AppliedLinguistics, 1, 1-47.
  • Bruner, J, S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: BelknapPress of Harvard University.
  • Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. (5th ed.). White Plains: Pearson Longman.
  • Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. (3rd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language learning. ModernLanguage J ournal, 28(1) 69-83.
  • Bardwick, J. (1971). Psychology of women: A study of bicultural conflicts. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Banya, K., & Cheng, M. H. (1997) Beliefs about foreign language learning: Astudy of beliefs of teachers’ and students’ cross cultural settings. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Teachers of English toSpeakers of Other Languages, Orlando: FL.
  • Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self efficacy,and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. J ournal ofpersonality and social psychology, 41(3), 586-598.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioralchange. Phychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological review, 64(6). 359-372.
  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goal in the classroom: Studentlearning strategies and motivation processes. J ournal of EducationalPsychology, 80, 260-267.
  • Ames, C.(1984). Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 478-487.
  • Abraham, R. G., & Vann, R. J. (1987). Strategies of two language learners: Acase study. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies inlanguage learning (pp. 85-102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.