연구동향 분석
박사

팔로워십 척도 개발 및 타당화 : 영리기업 구성원의 역량을 중심으로 = Development and Validation of the Followership Scale : Focused on Competencies of Employees in Commercial Enterprises

최준원 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 팔로워십 척도 개발 및 타당화 : 영리기업 구성원의 역량을 중심으로 = Development and Validation of the Followership Scale : Focused on Competencies of Employees in Commercial Enterprises' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 구성 타당도
  • 리더십
  • 척도 개발
  • 척도 타당화
  • 측정동일성
  • 팔로워십
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,955 0

0.0%

' 팔로워십 척도 개발 및 타당화 : 영리기업 구성원의 역량을 중심으로 = Development and Validation of the Followership Scale : Focused on Competencies of Employees in Commercial Enterprises' 의 참고문헌

  • 호텔베이커리 종사원의 팔로워십 유형이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향
    이갑용 청운대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2013]
  • 호텔 구성원의 팔로워십 유형이 직무태도에 미치는 영향
    양희종 경기대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2013]
  • 행정조직에서 조직문화 및 하위문화의 비교
    황창연 한국행정학보, 37(1),37-58 [2003]
  • 핵심역량모델의 개발과 활용 (민병모,박동건, 박종구, 정재창 역)
    Spencer, L. M. Spencer, S. M. 서울: PSI컨설팅(원전은 1993에 출판) [1998]
  • 한국언론연구원 매스컴대사전
    한국언론연구원 [1993]
  • 한국 남녀 중학생 집단에서 자기결정성이 학업성취도에 주는 영향
  • 박사
    학교장의 변혁적 리더십, 교사 임파워먼트, 팔로워십 및 학교장신뢰가 학교조직효과성에 미치는 영향
    강경수 인하대학교 대학원박사학위논문 [2007]
  • 팔로워십이 서비스품질에 미치는 영향
    강지은 부산대학교 대학원석사학위논문 [2011]
  • 팔로워십의 선행요인에 관한 연구
    홍은결 성균관대학교 대학원석사학위논문 [2012]
  • 팔로워십을 고려한 리더십 개발의 필요성에 관한실증 연구 -리더신뢰의 매개효과를 중심으로
    김경섭 이규헌 임유신 HRD연구, 12(2), 113-144 [2010]
  • 팔로워십[Followership](이동욱, 김충선, 이상호 역)
    Kellerman, B. 더난출판(원전은 2008에 출판) [2011]
  • 박사
    팔로워십 유형이 하위자의 직무만족에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
    원현숙 서강대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [1998]
  • 팔로워십 유형과 변혁적 거래적 리더십간의 관계에 관한 실증적연구
    오대현 국방대학원 석사학위논문 [1997]
  • 팔로워십 역량의 중요도 및 역량개발 요구도 분석 : 대기업 구성원의 직책별 인식을 중심으로
    김희봉 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2013]
  • 팔로어십의 유형화에 관한 실증연구
    박민생 장영철 인적자원관리연구,18617(1), 57-72 [2010]
  • 팔로어십-리더십 유형간의 짝이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 관한190연구
    최광신 전남대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2001]
  • 팔로어십 특성과 리더십유효성과의 관련성
    최창옥 영남대학교 대학원석사학위 논문 [1999]
  • 파이낸셜뉴스 우수 중기 지원하려면 '성실성'을 뽐내라
    12면 [2013]
  • 파이낸셜뉴스 업종 따라 원하는 인재상 차이 100대기업 88%도전정신 꼽아
    18면 [2013]
  • 팀제조직의 성과평가 모델에 관한 연구-BSC 모델을 중심으로
    安吉贊 생산성논집 (구 생산성연구), 16(1), 177-199 [2002]
  • 팀 리더의 퍼실리테이션 역량이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향
    김경석 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2012]
  • 박사
    태권도지도자의 변혁적 리더십이 선수들의 재미요인과 팔로워십에미치는 영향
    이병석 전남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2012]
  • 커뮤니케이션 리더십 (정성묵 역)
    Pearce, T. 서울: 도서출판 예문 (원전은2003에 출판) [2006]
  • 진정성 리더십이 심리적 계약에 미치는 영향: 절차공정성과 상사신뢰의 매개효과
    이병주 최준원 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 27(1), 21-54 [2014]
  • 직장인 45%, 착한 직장인은 ‘협조맨’... ‘나쁜 직장인’ 유형1위는?. http://www.edaily.co.kr/news/NewsRead.edy?SCD=JG11&newsid=01364486602844672&DCD=A00701&OutLnkChk=Y.에서 2014. 3
    이데일리 20자료 얻음 [2013]
  • 지방자치단체 중간관리자 리더십유형이 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
    정재근 대전대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2013]
  • 중소기업의 노사파트너십이 기업경쟁력에 미치는 영 향
    박재석 이덕로 중소기업연구, 32(3), 129-154 [2010]
  • 중소기업 인재육성을 위한 리더십 및 직무 공통 역량 모델개발: 상암 DMC 입주업체 중심으로
    김정근 이규하 기업교육연구, 15(1), 103-130 [2013]
  • 중간관리자의 리더십 유형이 조직효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 팔로워십의 매개효과를 중심으로
    김종철 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2012]
  • 중간관리자가 지각하는 의사소통, 팔로어십, 리더십의 관계연구:관계/과업을 중심으로
    변계영 고려대학교 노동대학원 석사학위논문 [2011]
  • 주도성과 핵심자기평가가 경력성공에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 경력계획을 매개변인으로
    이동하 탁진국 한국심리학회지 산업 및 조직, 21(1), 83-103 [2008]
  • 조직유형별 팔로워십 주요역량에 관한 구성원의 인식차이 : 규범적 조직과 실리적 조직을 중심으로
    김희봉 송영수 평생교육ㆍHRD연구, 7(3), 1-22 [2011]
  • 조직구성원의 팔로워십 類型이 리더십의 效果에 미치는 影響에 관한硏究
    양종호 부산대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2003]
  • 조직 커뮤니케이션 원론
    오두범 서울대학교출판부 [1994]
  • 정서지능, 리더십, 팔로워십, 조직성과 간의 관계분석:육군 소대장과 소대원을 중심으로
    강용관 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2008]
  • 임상간호사의 팔로워십(followership)과 직무만족 , 조직몰입과의 관계
    구옥희 최옥순 대한간호학회지(JKAN), 30(5), 1254-1264 [2000]
  • 일반논문/지방정부 조직의 혁신을 위한 벤치마킹 (Benchmarking)-팀 (team) 조직의 구축방안을 중심으로
    김순양 한국행정학보, 34(1), 265-289 [2000]
  • 일반 논문: 기업의 인적자원 개발을 위한 역량 중심의 교육과정개발
    김진모 직업교육연구, 20(2), 109-128 [2001]
  • 외식기업 직원의 심리적 주인의식과 조직유효성의영향관계에 관한 연구
    정유경 추대엽 대한경영학회지, 23(2), 1119-1137 [2010]
  • 박사
    외국계 기업 조직구성원의 팔로우십 유형에 따른 조직몰입의 차이 분석
    김은아 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2010]
  • 오센틱 리더십 척도의 한국기업 현장에의 타당화 연구
    이지숙 최항석 평생교육ㆍHRD연구, 6(3), 89-114 [2010]
  • 역량중심 인적자원개발의 비판과 쟁점 분석. 경영교육연구
    오헌석 47(經營敎育論叢 第47輯), 191-213 [2007]
  • 심리적 임파워먼트가 직무만족에 미치는 영향력에 대한 직무몰입 의 조절역할
    정진철 황윤용 산업경제연구, 18(4), 1541-1564 [2005]
  • 신세대 대상 광고의 표현방향설정 연구
    이경근 광고연구, 2(7), 215-243 [1995]
  • 스포츠센터조직의 리더십유형과 조직유효성관계에서 팔로워십특성의 조절효과분석
    남상백 조광민 조운용 한국사회체육학회지, 39(1), 115-126 [2010]
  • 슈퍼리더십 (김남현 역)
    Manz, C. C. Sims, H. P. 서울: 경문사 (원전은2001에 출판) [2002]
  • 셀프리더십 척도(Revised self-leadership questionnaire) 타당화 연구: 우리나라 대학생을 중심으로
    김명소 신용국 한영석 한국심리학회지 :학교, 6(3), 313-340 [2009]
  • 성격의 5요인과 조직에서의 맥락수행간의 관계
    김도영 유태용 한국심리학회지 : 산업 및 조직, 15(2), 1-24 [2002]
  • 성격10요인 척도의 타당성과 유용성 검증. 서울대학교 대학원석사학위논문
    이정윤 서울 [2012]
  • 서비스기업의 팔로워십 특성이 직원의 관계교환(LMX)의 질, 임파워먼트, 직무태도간에 미치는 영향
  • 상사의 리더십 유형에 대한 인식이 팔로워의 직무몰입에 미치는영향에 대한 실증 연구
    정상무 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2009]
  • 박사
    상사의 권한위임과 직무태도와의 관계에 관한 연구
    임미하 서울대학교대학원 석사학위 논문 [2006]
  • 박사
    사립 중 고등학교 학교장 임용 방식에 따른 교장 리더십과 교사팔로워십 관계 분석
    한인수 인천대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2011]
  • 부하가 인식하는 상사의 리더십이 직무만족에 미치는 영향연구: 상사신뢰의 매개역할을 중심으로
    김호균 행정논총, 45(4), 167-193 [2007]
  • 병원에 있어 환자중심진료를 위한 팀조직의 정책과제와 추진방향
    유병남 산업경제연구, 18(6), 2991-3013 [2005]
  • 병원간호조직문화와 팔로워십(Followership)유형이 임상간호사의조직몰입에 미치는 영향
    신은숙 원광대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2004]
  • 병원 간호사들이 지각하는 직속상관의 리더십 자신의 팔로워십, 소진과의 관계
    고은미 경희대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2010]
  • 변혁적·거래적 리더십과 팔로워십의 적합성이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
    김경섭 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문 [2005]
  • 변혁적 리더십과 팔로워십이 조직 구성원들의 직무만족에 미치는 영향
    김용모 한양대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2011]
  • 변혁적 리더십과 팔로어십의 관계가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향
    이금숙 계명대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2009]
  • 메트로 30대 그룹 인재상 5년 동안 어떻게 변했나. http://www.emetro.co. kr/news/newsview?newscd=2014022500117.에서 2014. 3
    6 자료 얻음 [2014]
  • 매일경제 경제용어. http://dic.mk.co.kr/menuNew2006/dicText.php.에서2014. 3
    20 자료 얻음 [2014]
  • 매슬로 욕구단계이론을 통한 병입 생수 브랜드의디자인 분석
    김재범 백명진 정희숙 디자인학연구, 24(1), 175-186 [2011]
  • 리더와 팔로어의 상호작용에 관한 연구
    김연욱 전남대학교 대학원박사학위논문 [2009]
  • 리더십類型이 임파워먼트에 미치는 影響에 관한 硏究
    유철종 대구가톨릭대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2001]
  • 리더십이 자기효능감을 통해 조직몰입과 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향
    김용재(Kim Yong Jae) 김종완(Kim Jong Wan) 인적자원개발연구, 11(2), 1-23 [2008]
  • 리더십연구 속에서 팔로어의 개념과 관점에 관한 연구
    최광신 한국정보전략학회지, 3(1), 136-161 [2000]
  • 리더십과 팔로워십이 조직효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
    고성희 성균관대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2012]
  • 박사
    리더십과 조직몰입과의 관계에 있어서 팔로워십의 조절효과에 관한연구
    이홍희 경남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2002]
  • 리더십과 Followership간의 적합성이 조직 유효성에 미치는 효과: 변혁적 리더십과 거래적 리더십 비교
    박경아 박종훈 조직과 인사관리연구, 24(2),87-115 [2001]
  • 리더십 이론과 실제 (김남현 역). 서울: 경문사
    Northouse, P. G. (원전은2012에 출판) [2013]
  • 리더십 유형과 followership유형이 직무만족에 미치는 영향에 관한연구
    박선숙 동국대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [1996]
  • 동일방법 편의(CommonMethodBias)의원인과 해결방안.인사?
    김미숙 박원우 정상명 허규만 조직연구, 15(1), 89-188 [2007]
  • 대기업 HRD 직무역량모델 개발 사례 연구 - A기업 사례중심으로
    양대현 이찬 산업교육연구, 26, 27-49 [2013]
  • 다면평가시스템 운영 개선 방안
    서도원 산업과경영, 21(1), 1-28 [2008]
  • 기업의 중간관리자 의사소통능력이 조직의 직무만족 및 조직몰입에 미치는 영향
    정경미 대구대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2013]
  • 박사
    군병원 조직구성원의 조직몰입 영향요인 분석 연구: 조직문화 유형과 팔로워십 유형 요인을 중심으로
    배미애 경희대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2003]
  • 교사 팔로워십, 학교장 지도성과정 및 학교조직 효과성 간의 관계 연구
    이유경 충북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2011]
  • 공정성지각이 직무만족, 조직몰입 및 조직시민행동에 미치는영향에 대한 신뢰의 매개효과. 경영연구
    서인덕 정시영 22(經營硏究 第22卷 第1號), 393-424 [2007]
  • 경영참여와 노사관계: 사업체패널조사를 통한 실태분석
    이주희 사회과학연구논총, 14(0), 93-109 [2005]
  • 경력계획이 주관적 경력성공에 미치는 영향: 긍정심리자본의 매개효과와 미래시간전망과 코칭리더십의 조절효과
    오은혜 탁진국 한국심리학회지 : 산업및 조직, 25(4), 727-748 [2012]
  • 게시발표: 국내기업 인재상의 내용분석
    김사라 김솔이 김영주 김정수 김현욱 박혜진 심윤희 안여명 유태용 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표논문집,188(단일호), 264-265. [2008]
  • 개인의 역량 측정을 위한 다중지능 하 위요소의 재분석
    문용린 엄채윤 유경재 ( Kyung Jae Yoo ) 전종희 교육심리연구, 21(2), 283-309 [2007]
  • 간호사의 이직의도와 직무몰입에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구
    김윤찬(Kim Yun-Chan) 서연숙(Seo Yeon-Sook) 경영교육저널, 12, 151-172 [2007]
  • “리더의 유머사용과 구성원의 성과 및 행복 : 리더신뢰의 조절효과와 긍정심리자본의 매개효과”
    이동섭 정흥준 최용득 경영학연구, 41(3), 575-605 [2012]
  • [상보] 삼성, 채용제도 전면 개편…직무적합성평가?창의성면접도입. http://www.etoday.co.kr/news/section/newsview.php?idxno=1013202.에서 2014. 11
    이투데이 5 자료 얻음 [2014]
  • Zaccaro, S. J., Kemp, C., & Bader, P. (2004). Leader traits and attributes. Thenature of leadership , 101-124.
  • Wortman, M. S. (1982). Strategic management and changing leader-followerroles. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(3) , 371-383.
  • Woolley, L., Caza, A., & Levy, L. (2011). Authentic Leadership and FollowerDevelopment Psychological Capital, Positive Work Climate, and Gender.Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(4) , 438-448.
  • Wikipedia Delphi method. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method.에서 2014. 5
    15 자료 얻음 [2014]
  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurementinvariance of psychologicalinstruments:Applications in the substanceuse domain.In K.J.Bryant,M.Windle,& S.G.West(Eds.),Thescience of prevention (pp. 281?324). Washington, DC: AmericanPsychologicalAssociation.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
  • Wallace, J. E. (1995). Organizational and professional commitment inprofessional and nonprofessional organizations. Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 228-255.
  • Waddington, P. (1997). Dying for information? A report on the effects ofinformation overload in the UK and worldwide. British library research211and innovation report , 49-52.
  • Van Scotter, J. R. & Motowidlo, S. J.(1996), 'Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5) : 525-531.
  • Thompson, J. D., & Demerath, N. J. (1952). Some Experiences With the GroupInterview. Social Forces, 31, 148-154.
  • Thomas, R. C., & Hasher, L. (2006). The influence of emotional valence on agedifferences in early processing and memory. Psychology and aging,21(4) , 821-825.
  • Thody, A. (2000). Followership or followersheep? An exploration of the valuesof non-leaders. Management in Education, 14(2) , 15-18.
  • The Economist Data, data everywhere. http://www.economist.com/node/15557443 에서 2014. 3. 15
    자료 얻음 [2010]
  • Thayer, L. O. (1961). Administrative communication. RD Irwin.
  • Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthymind. Basic Books.
  • Taylor, R. L., & Rosenbach, W. E. (2005). Military Leadership: In Pursuit ofExcellence. Cambridge, MA: Westview press.
  • Stumpf, S. A., & Tymon, W. G. (2012). The effects of objective career successon subsequent subjective career success. Journal of VocationalBehavior, 81(3), 345-353.
  • Stumpf, S. A. (2010). Stakeholder competency assessments as predictors ofcareer success. Career Development International, 15(5) , 459-478.
  • Stumpf, S. A. (2007). Stakeholder assessments as a predictor of high potentialand promotion to partner in professional service firms. CareerDevelopment International, 12(5), 481-497.
  • Strube, M. J., & Garcia, J. E. (1981). A meta-analytic investigation of Fiedler'scontingency model of leadership effectiveness. Psychological bulletin,90(2) , 307-321.
  • Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research.New York: Free Press.
  • Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey ofthe literature. Journal of Psychology, 25, 35-71.
  • Steger, J., Manners, G., & Zimmerer, T. (1982). Following the Leader: How toLink Management Style to Subordinate Personalities. ManagementReview, 71(10), 22.
  • Stebbins, R. A. (1970). Career: The Subjective Approach. The SociologicalQuarterly, 11(1) , 32-49.
  • Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work Models forSuperior Performance. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, andconsequences (Vol. 3): Sage.
  • Smith, C., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenshipbehavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology,68(4) , 653-663.
  • Sims, H. P., & Manz, C. C. (1996). Company of heroes: Unleashing the power ofself-leadership. Wiley New York.
  • Simon, H. A. (1945). Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
  • Sheldon, K., Davidson, L., & Pollard, E. (2004). Integrity (authenticity, honesty).In C. Peterson & M. Selgman (Eds), Character strengths and virtues: Ahandbook and classfication (pp. 249-271). Oxford, UK: OxfordUniversity Press.
  • Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-concept Based Theory. Organization Science, 4(4): 577-594.
  • Schwind, K. (2009). On Followership. Master’s dissertation. St. John FisherCollege.
  • Schwartz, S. (2001). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory ofintegrated value systems. The Psychology of Values. The OntarioSymposium Volume 8.
  • Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., Zhou, X., & Yammarino, F. J. (2001). The follyof theorizing "A" but testing "B" : A selective level-of-analysis reviewof the field and a detailed leader-member exchange ilustration.Leadership Quarterly, 12, 515-551.
  • Rost, J. C. (1993). Leadership for the twenty-first century. GreenwoodPublishing Group.
  • Rogelberg, S. G., Luong, A., Sederburg, M. E., & Cristol, D. S. (2000). Employeeattitudes surveys: examining the attitudes of noncompliant employees.Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 284?293.
  • Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and thedynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agentsin the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4),547-568.
  • Rego, A., Sousa, F., & Marques, C. (2012). Authentic leadership promotingemployees' psychological capital and creativity. Journal of BusinessResearch, 65(3) , 429-437.
  • Rahim, M. A., Antonioni, D., & Psenicka, C. (2001). A Structrural EquationsModel of Leader Power, Subordinates' Styles of Handling Conflict, andJob Performance. International journal of conflict management, 12(3),208191-211.
  • 박사
    R&D 연구원 임파워먼트의 선행요인과 효과에 관한 연구 : 팔로워십 유형의 조절 효과를 중심으로
    박주성 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2009]
  • Potter, E. H., III , Rosenbach, W. E., & Pittman, T. S. (2001). Followers for thetimes: engaging employees in a winning partnership. In Contemporaryissues in leadership (pp. 163-181). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Potter, E. H., III , Rosenbach, W. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1996). Leading the newprofessional. In R. L. Taylor & W. E. Rosenbach (Eds.), Militaryleadership: In pursuit of excellence (3rd ed.) (pp. 145-152). Boulder,CO: Westview.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
  • Planty, E., & Machaver, W. (1952). Upward communications: A project inexecutive development. Personnel, 28, 304-318.
  • Pittman, T. S., Rosenbach, W. E., & Potter, E. H., III. (1998). Followers aspartners: Taking the initiative for action. In W. E. Rosenbach & R. L.Taylor (Eds.). Contemporary issues in leadership (pp. 107-120).Boulder, CO:Westview.
  • Pines, A. M., Aronson, E., & Kafry, D. (1981). Burnout: From tedium topersonal growth. NY: Free Press.
  • Petrick, J. A., & Scherer, R. F. (2003). The Enron scandal and the neglect ofmanagement integrity capacity. American Journal of Business, 18(1),37-50.
  • Peters, L. H., Hartke, D. D., & Pohlmann, J. T. (1985). Fiedler's Contingency207Theory of Leadership: An application of the meta-analysis proceduresof Schmidt and Hunter. Psychological bulletin, 97(2), 274-285.
  • Perlow, L., & Williams, S. (2003). Is silence killing your company? IeeeEngineering Management Review, 31(4), 18-23.
  • Pelled, L. H., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Down and out: an investigation of therelationship between mood and employee withdrawal behavior. Journalof Management, 25 , 875-895.
  • Parry, S. B. (1996). The quest for competencies. Training, 33(7) 48-56.
  • Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M.(1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 157.
  • Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005).PREDICTORS OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE CAREER SUCCESS:A META-ANALYSIS. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
  • Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (2007). Mastering self-leadership: Empoweringyourself for personal excellence. Prentice Hall.
  • Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theoryand research. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 270-295.
  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of vocationalbehavior,14(2),224-247.
  • Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An Exploratory Study of206Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don’t Communicate Upwardand Why. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1453-1476.
  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of vocational behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory,research, and application . Sage.
  • Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1956). The Focused Interview.Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
  • Merriam-Webster Follower. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/follower 에서2014. 3
    18 자료 얻음 [2014]
  • Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance ofleadership. Administrative Science Quarterly , 78-102.
  • Meindl, J. R., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1987). The Romance of Leadership and theEvaluation of Organizational Performance. The Academy of ManagementJournal, 30(1) , 91-109.
  • Meilinger, P. S. (2001). The ten rules of good followership In R.I. Lester andA.G. Morton (Eds), Concepts for Air Force Leadership, Vol. AU-24 (pp99-101). AL: Air University Press, Maxwell AFB.
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, D. (1995). An integrative model oforganizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
  • Maroosis, J. (2008). Leadership: A Partnership in Reciprocal Following. In R. E.Riggio, I. Chaleff & J. Lipman-Blumen (Eds.), The Art of Followership(pp. 17-24). CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Marion, R., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadership in complex organizations.Leadership Quarterly, 12, 389-418.
  • Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (1999). Mastering Self-leadership: EmpoweringYourself for Personal Excellence (2nd ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Manz, C. C(1986). Self-leadership: toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3): 585-600.
  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological Capital:Developing the Human Competitive Edge. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.
  • Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Peterson, S. J. (2010). Thedevelopment and resulting performance impact of positive psychologicalcapital. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1) , 41-67.
  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385-425.
  • Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing:Linking perceptions and performance. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
  • Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (2004). The effect of organisational culture andleadership style on job satisfaction and organisational commitment: Across-national comparison. Journal of Management Development, 23(4) ,321-338.
  • Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.1297-1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Litzinger, W., & Schaefer, T. (1982). Leadership through followership. Business204Horizons, 25(5), 78-81.
  • Lee, K., Allen, N. J., Meyer, J. P., & Rhee, K. Y. (2001). The Three ComponentModel of Organisational Commitment: An Application to South Korea.Applied psychology, 50(4), 596-614.
  • Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
  • Laschinger, H., & Finegan, J. (2005). Using empowerment to build trust andrespect in the workplace: A strategy for addressing the nursingshortage. Nursing Economics, 23(1), 221-234.
  • Lapidot, Y., Kark, R., & Shamir, B. (2007). The impact of situationalvulnerability on the development and erosion of followers' trust in theirleader. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 16-34
  • Kwan, V. S., John, O. P., Kenny, D. A., Bond, M. H., & Robins, R. W. (2004).Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: aninterpersonal approach. Psychological review, 111(1), 94-110.
  • Ko, J.-W., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1997). Assessment of Meyer andAllen's three-component model of organizational commitment in SouthKorea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 961-973.
  • Kirsh, D. (2000). A Few Thoughts on Cognitive Overload. Intellectica, 1(30),19-51.
  • Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups andwork teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,86(1) , 99-130.
  • Kelley, R. E. (1992). The power of followership: How to create leaders peoplewant to follow, and followers who lead themselves. New York:Doubleday/Currency
  • Kelley, R. E. (1991). Combining followership and leadership into partnership. InR. H. Kilmann, I. Kilmann, & Associates (Eds.), Making organizationscompetitive: Enhancing networks and relationships across traditional203boundaries (pp. 195-220). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kelley, R. E. (1988). "In praise of followers." Harvard Business Review, 66(6), 142-148.
  • Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams.The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11 (3), 187-213.
  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
  • Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The jobsatisfaction　job performance relationship: A qualitative andquantitative review. Psychological bulletin, 127(3) , 376.
  • Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The bigfive personality traits, general mental ability, and career success acrossthe life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621-652.
  • Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W., & Bretz, R. D. (1995). An empiricalinvestigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnelpsychology, 48(3), 485-519.
  • Jones, G. R. George, J. M.(1998). “The Experience and Evolution ofTrust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork.” Academyof Management Review, 23(3), 531-546.
  • Johnson, C. D. (2001). In search of traditional and contemporary career success.Doctoral Dissertation.The University of Georgia, Georgia. USA.
  • Jaskolka, G., Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1985). Measuring and predicting managerial success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26(2), 189-205.
  • Iris, B., & Barrett, G. V. (1972). Some relations between job and life satisfactionand job importance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(4) , 301.
  • Igbaria, M. (1991). Job performance of MIS professionals: an examination of theantecedents and consequences. Journal of Engineering and TechnologyManagement, 8(2) , 141-171.
  • Hutcheson, G. D., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist:Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. London: Sage.
  • Hurwitz, M., & Hurwitz, S. (2009). The romance of the follower: part 2.Industrial and Commercial Training, 41(4), 199-206.
  • Hughes, L. W. (2005). Transparency, translucence or opacity? An experimentalstudy of the impact of a leader’s relational transparency and style ofhumor delivery on follower creative performance. Unpublished doctoraldissertation. University of Nebraska.
  • Hughes, E. C. (1958). Men and their work. IL: Free Press Glencoe.
  • Hughes, E. C. (1937). Institutional office and the person. American journal ofsociology, 404-413.
  • Howell, J. M. & Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 96-112.
  • House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma inthe US presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness.Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 374-396.
  • House, R. J., & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the integration of charismatic,visionary and transformational leadership theories. In M. M. Chemers &R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives anddirections. (pp. 81-107). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • House, R. J., & Dessler, G. (1974). The path-goal theory of leadership: Somepost hoc and a priori tests. In J. Hunt & L. Larson(Eds.), Contingencyapproaches in leadership. (pp. 29-55). Carbondale: Southern Illinois201University Press.
  • House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 321-339.
  • Hollander, E., & Offermann, L. (1990). Relational features of organizationalleadership and followership. Measures of leadership , 83-98.
  • Hollander, E. P., & Webb, W. B. (1955). Leadership, followership, and friendship:an analysis of peer nominations. The Journal of Abnormal and SocialPsychology, 50(2), 163-167.
  • Hollander, E. P., & Offermann, L. R. (1990). Relational features of organizationalleadership and followership. In K. E. Clark & M. B. Clark (Eds.),Measures of leadership (pp. 83-97) West Orange, NJ: LeadershipLibrary of America.
  • Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis ofleadership processes. Psychological bulletin, 71(5) , 387-397.
  • Hollander, E. P. (1974). Processes of leadership emergence Journal ofContemporary Business, 3, 19-33.
  • Hollander, E. (1997). How and why active followers matter in leadership. In B.Adams & S. Webster (Eds.), Kellogg leadership studies project workingpapers: The balance of leadership and followership (pp. 11-30).College Park, MD: Academy of Leadership press.
  • Heslin, P. A. (2005). Conceptualizing and evaluating career success, Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 26, 113-136.
  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1993). Management of organizational behavior:Utilizing human resources. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Life-cycle theory of leadership.Training and Development Journal, 23, 26-34.
  • Heller, T., & Van Til, J. (1982). Leadership and Followership: some Summarypropositions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(3) , 405-414.
  • Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there auniversal need for positive self-regard? Psychological review, 106(4) ,766.
  • Hansen Jr, T. (1987). Management’s impact on first-line SupervisorEffectiveness. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 52(1) , 41-45.
  • Hall, D. T. (2002). Careers in and out of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  • Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006).Multivariate data Analysis(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearsonprentice Hall.
  • HR 담당자의 팔로워십 인식에 관한 질적연구
    이혜원 홍아정 평생교육ㆍHRD연구, 5(4), 29-50 [2009]
  • Grimm, P. (2010). Social desirability bias. Wiley International Encyclopedia ofMarketing.
  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature oflegitimate power and greatness. NY: Paulist Press.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
  • Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role-making model of leadership informal organizations: A developmental approach. Leadership frontiers.
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach toleadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory ofleadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domainperspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2) , 219-247.
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1991). The transformation of professionals intoself-managing and partially self-designing contributions: Toward atheory of leader-making. Journal of Management Systems, 3(3), 33-48.
  • Grabowski, M., & Roberts, K. H. (1999). Risk Mitigation in Virtual Organization.Organization Science, 10 , 704-721.
  • Gordon, T. J. (1994). The delphi method. Futures research methodology, 2.
  • Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person　Organization Fit andContextual Performance: Do Shared Values Matter. Journal ofVocational Behavior, 55(2) , 254-275.
  • Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. (2006). Individualism　collectivism and groupcreativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,100(1), 96-109.
  • Gilbert, G. R., & Hyde, A. C. (1988). Followership and the federal worker.Public Administration Review, 962-968.
  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader　memberexchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 82(6), 827-844.
  • George, J. M. (1989). Mood and absence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74,317-324.
  • George, B., Sims, P., McLean, A. N., & Mayer, D. (2007). Discovering yourauthentic leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 129-138.
  • George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creatinglasting value. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gattiker, U. E. & Larwood, L. (1988), Predictors for managers’ career mobility, successand satisfaction. Human Relations, 41(8), 569-591.
  • Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005).“Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leaderand follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343-372.
  • Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2005). Authentic LeadershipTheory and Practice: Origins, Effects and Development. UK: ElsevierLtd.
  • Gaertner, K. N., & Nollen, S. D. (1989). Career experiences, perceptions ofemployment practices, and psychological commitment to theorganization. Human Relations, 42(11), 975-991.
  • Gabarro, J. J., & Kotter, J. P. (1993). Managing your boss. Harvard BusinessReview, 71, 150-157.
  • Frey, J. H., & Fontana, A. (1991). The group interview in social research. SocialScience Journal, 28(2), 175.
  • Frey, J. H., & Carns, D. E. (1988). Job satisfaction of casino card dealers.Sociology & Social Research, 72, 159-164.
  • Frew, D. R. (1977). Leadership and followership. Personnel Journal, 56, 90-97.
  • Follett, M. P. (1949). The Essentials of Leadership. In L. Urwick (Ed.),Freedom and Coordination (pp. 47-60). London: Managementpublications Trust, Ltd.
  • Flaherty, K. E., & Pappas, J. M. (2002). The influence of career stage on jobattitudes: Toward a contingency perspective. Journal of Personal Selling& Sales Management, 22(3), 135-143.
  • Finegold, D., & Mohrman, S. (2001). What do employees really want. Paperpresented at the The perception vs. the reality. In proceedings of theannual meeting of the World Economic Forum, Davos, Switzerland.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage publications.
  • Fiedler, F. E.(1967), A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L.Berkowitz (Eds.), Advances in experimentl social psychology Vol. 1.(pp. 149-190). New York: Academic Press, 1(1), 64.
  • Evans, M. G., Gunz, H. P., & Jalland, R. M. (1997). Implications of organizationaldownsizing for managerial careers. Canadian Journal of AdministrativeSciences, 14, 359-371.
  • Evans, M. G. (1970). The effects of supervisory behavior on the path-goalrelationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5(3) ,277-298.
  • Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2004). Work Value Congruence andIntrinsic Career Success: The Compensatory Roles of Leader-MemberExchange and Perceived Organizational Support. Personnel Psychology,57(2) , 305-332.
  • Ehrhart, M. G., & Klein, K. J. (2001). Predicting followers' preferences forcharismatic leadership: the influence of follower values and personality.Leadership Quarterly, 12(2), 153.
  • Dunham, R. B., Grube, J. A., & Castaneda, M. B. (1994). Organizationalcommitment: The utility of an integrative definition. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 79(3), 370.
  • Dollinger, S. J., & Leong, F. T. (1993). Volunteer bias and the five-factor model.The Journal of psychology, 127(1), 29-36.
  • Dixon, G., & Westbrook, J. (2003). Followers Revealed. EngineeringManagement Journal, 15(1), 19-25.
  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in Leadership: Meta-AnalyticFindings and Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 87, 611-628.
  • Diamantopoulos, A., Siguaw, J. A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL:A guide for the uninitiated. Sage.
  • Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkageapproach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinalinvestigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and196Human Performance, 13(1) , 46-78.
  • Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2009). Organization Development & Change,9th Ed. OH : South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning.
  • Crossley, M., & Hiscock, M. (1992). Age-related differences in concurrenttaskperformance of normal adults: evidence for a decline in processingresources. Psychology and aging, 7(4), 499-506.
  • Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). “Construct validity in psychological tests”, Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281-302.
  • Crawford, C. B. (1994). Theory and implications regarding the utilization ofstrategic humor by leaders. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(4) ,53-68.
  • Collinson, D. (2006). Rethinking followership: A post-structuralist analysis offollower identities. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 179-189.
  • Collins, M. (1983). A critical analysis of competency-based systems in adulteducation. Adult Education Quarterly, 33(3), 174-183.
  • Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structureof the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource ManagementReview, 10(1), 25-44.
  • Cohen, D., & Prusak, I. (2001). In Good Company: How social Capital MakesOrganizations Work. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  • Clarke, R., Gerrity, T., Laverdiere, R., & Johns, B. (1985). Age as a factor inteacher job satisfaction. Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of HumanBehavior, 22(2) , 19-23.
  • Chapman, B. P., & Hayslip Jr, B. (2006). Emotional intelligence in young and195middle adulthood: Cross-sectional analysis of latent structure andmeans. Psychology and aging, 21(2) , 411-418.
  • Chang, C.-H. D., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Tan, J. A. (2012).Core Self-Evaluations A Review and Evaluation of the Literature.Journal of Management, 38(1) , 81-128.
  • Chaleff, I. (1995). The Courageous Follower: Standing up to and for our leaders.San Francisco : Berrett-Koehler.
  • Caza, A., Bagozzi, R. P., Woolley, L., Levy, L., & Caza, B. B. (2010).Psychological capital and authentic leadership: Measurement, gender,and cultural extension. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration,2(1) , 53-70.
  • Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & McGregor, R. (2010).Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. TheLeadership Quarterly, 21(3), 543-562.
  • Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem inindustrial and organizational psychology, In M.D. Dunnette & L.M.Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology(2nd ed), Vol.1 (pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting PsychologistsPress.
  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Free Press.
  • Bryman, A.(1992), Charisma and leadership in organizations, London,Sage.
  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: Asocial learning perspective for construct development and testing.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2) , 117-134.
  • Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases insocial judgments. Social Cognition, 4(4), 353-376.
  • Brown, A. D., & Thornborrow, W. (1996). Do organizations get the followersthey deserve? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 17(1),5-11.
  • Brooke, P. P., Russell, D. W., & Price, J. L. (1988). Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Journal of applied psychology, 73(2), 139-145.
  • Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 35(5), 307.
  • Bossidy, L. (2007). What your leader expects of you. Harvard Business Review,85(4) , 58-65.
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task Performance and ContextualPerformance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research. HumanPerformance, 10(2) , 99-109.
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain toinclude elements of conxtextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C.Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). SanFrancisco : Jossey-Bass.
  • Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis ofstudies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychologicalbulletin, 119(1) , 111.
  • Bogardus, E. S. (1926). The Group Interview. Journal of Applied Sociology, 10,372-382.
  • Blanchard, K. H., Zigarmi, P., & Zigarmi, D. (1985). Leadership and the oneminute manager: Increasing effectiveness through situational leadership.New York: William Morrow.
  • Blanchard, K. H. (1985). SLII: A situational approach to managing people.Escondido, CA: Blanchard Training and Development.
  • Bjugstad, K., Thach, E. C., Thompson, K. J., & Morris, A. (2006). A Fresh Lookat Followership: A Model for Matching Followership and LeadershipStyles. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7(3) , 304-319.
  • Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge.New York: Harper & Row.
  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange:A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567.
  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1992). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire　Shortform 6S . Binghamton, NY: Center for Leadership Studies.
  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.
  • Barley, S. R. (1989). Careers, identities, and institutions: the legacy of theChicago School of Sociology. Handbook of career theory, CambridgeUniversity Press, 41-65.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
  • Baker, S. D. (2007). Followership The Theoretical Foundation of aContemporary Construct. Journal of Leadership & OrganizationalStudies, 14(1), 50-60.
  • Babin, B. J., & Boles, J. S.(1996). The effects of perceived co worker involvementand supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance andjob satisfaction, Journal of Retailing, 72(1), 57 75.
  • Avolio, B. J., Howell, J. M., & Sosik, J. J. (1999). A funny thing happened on theway to the bottom line: Humor as a moderator of leadership styleeffects. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 219-227.
  • Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: a look at the process bywhich authentic leaders impact follower attitudes andbehaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823.
  • Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2007). Authentic leadershipquestionnaire. Retrieved February, 2, 2009.
  • Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2006). The high impact leader. New York:McGraw-Hill.
  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadershipdevelopment: Getting to the root of positive forms ofleadership. The leadership quarterly, 16(3), 315-338.
  • Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). Introduction: the boundaryless careeras a newemployment principle. In M. B. Arthur, & D. M. Rousseau(Eds.), The boundaryless career (pp. 3-20). New York: OxfordUniversityPress.
  • Allen,N.J.,& Meyer,J.P.1990.Themeasurementandantecedentsof affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization.Journalofoccupationalpsychology,63(1),1-18.
  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpretinginteractions: Sage.
  • Agho, A. O., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1992). Discriminant validity ofmeasures of job satisfaction, positive affectivity and negative affectivity.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(3) , 185-195.
  • Agho, A. O. (2009). Perspectives of Senior-Level Executives on EffectiveFollowership and Leadership. Journal of Leadership & OrganizationalStudies, 16(2), 159-166.
  • Adair, R. (2008). Developing Great Leaders, One Follower at a Time. In R. E.Riggio, I Chaleff & J. Lipman-Bluemen (Eds.), The Art of Followership.(pp. 137-153). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • 5요인 성격검사의 개발 및 타당화 연구
    김명언 유태용 이도형 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 10(1), 85-102 [1997]
  • 1인자를 만든 2인자들
    이철희 페이퍼로드 [2009]