연구동향 분석
박사

시간 제약 상황에서 프레이밍이 과제 유형에 따라 학습자의 수행에 미치는 영향 = Framing Effects on Task Performance according to the Task Type under Time Constraints

진성조 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 시간 제약 상황에서 프레이밍이 과제 유형에 따라 학습자의 수행에 미치는 영향 = Framing Effects on Task Performance according to the Task Type under Time Constraints' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 과제수행
  • 과제유형
  • 동기
  • 시간 제약
  • 프레이밍
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
663 0

0.0%

' 시간 제약 상황에서 프레이밍이 과제 유형에 따라 학습자의 수행에 미치는 영향 = Framing Effects on Task Performance according to the Task Type under Time Constraints' 의 참고문헌

  • 박사
    학업성취 수준에 따른 시험효과(Testing Effect) 연구 : 기억, 유능감, 동기, 정서를 중심으로
    최효식 서울대학교 박사학위 논문 [2013]
  • 학습과학: 뇌, 마음, 경험 그리고 교육
    Bransford, John D 서울:학지사 [2007]
  • 프레이밍이 동기 수준에 미치는 영향
    김명언 진성조 한국 심리학회 연차학술대회 [2008]
  • 초중학생의 지적, 정의적 발달 수준 분석 연구Ⅰ
    김양분 류덕엽 이재분 현주 서울: 한국교육개발원 [2000]
  • 지각된 유능감과 교실목표구조에 의한 동기변인 예측에 있어서 사회적지지의 매개효과
  • 수행에 대한 피드백 제공방식과 지각된 유능감 및 수행목표성향이 과제흥미도와 수행만족도에 미치는 효과
  • 성적이 떨어지는 아이들
    김창대 김택호 이영선 이정윤 임은미 청소년상담문제연구보고서, 9, 1-103 [1994]
  • 목표 중요성, 수행 피드백, 성취목표지향성 간의 상호작용이 자기조절에 미치는 영향: 대학생의 학습시간 투자를 중심으로
    이현주 교육심리연구.27(4). 829-852 [2013]
  • 다변량 통계방법의 이해
    박현정 서울: 학연사 [2005]
  • 교실토론상황에서 학생의 감정, 인지, 행동의 상호작용: 근거이론 분석법을 통한 모델을 중심으로
    도승이 교육심리연구. 19(1). 17-39 [2005]
  • Wills, T. A., Windle, M., & Cleary, S. D. (1998). Temperament and noveltyseeking in adolescent substance use: Convergence of dimensions oftemperament with constructs from Cloninger's theory. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 74, 387?406.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values:A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265?310.
  • Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-Value Theory of achievementmotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
  • Wickelgren, W.A.(1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processingdynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67-85.
  • Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economicbehavior, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Van-Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is itmoderated by regulatory focus? Applied Psychology: An InternationalReview, 53(1), 113-135.
  • Van Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Task type as a moderator of positive/negativefeedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1084-1105.
  • Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1984). On the causal effects of perceivedcompetence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluationtheory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 94?102.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and thepsychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
  • Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distressregulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, doit! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 53-67.
  • Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Expectation of afinal cumulative test enhances long-term retention. Memory &Cognition, 35, 1007-1013.
  • Sundre. D. L. (1999). Does Examinee motivation moderate the relationshipbetween test consequences and test performance? Paper presented atthe annual meeting of American Educational Research Association.
  • Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic Happiness: Using the New PositivePsychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. NewYork, NY: Free Press.
  • Seligman, M. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco, Freeman.
  • Schnipke, D. L., & Scrams, D. J. (1997). Modeling item response times with atwo-state mixture model: A new method of measuring speededness.Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 213-232.
  • Schneider, S. L. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, thestatus quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 18, 1040-1057.
  • Sansone, C. (1986). A question of competence: The effects of competence andtask feedback on intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 51, 918-931.
  • Sanchez, R. J., Truxillo, D. M., & Bauer, T. N. (2000). Development andexamination of an expectancy-based measure of test-takingmotivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 739-750.
  • SMILES(Student Motivation in the Learning Environment Scales): 학습환경에서의 학생동기척도
    김성일 김진호 김혜진 노아름 노언경 백선희 봉미미 송주연 신지연 안현선 우연경 원성준 이계형 이민혜 이선경 이선영 이우걸 이지수 임효진 정윤경 황아름 고려대학교 두뇌동기연구소 홈페이지http://bmri.korea.ac.kr/korean/research/assessment_scales/list.html?id=assessment [2012]
  • Roskam, E.E.(1997). Models for speed and time-limit test. In W.J. van derLinden and R.K. Hambleton(Eds.) Handbook of modern item responsetheory(pp. 187-208). New York: Springer.
  • Roney, C. J., Higgins, E. T., & Shah, J. (1995). Goals and framing: Howoutcome focus influences motivation and emotion. Personality andSocial Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1151-1160.
  • Reese, J., Schneider, S., Hnath, T., & Abrams, H. (1997). The influence ofmessage framing and treatment approach on hearing aid uptake inelderly hearing-impaired veterans. Poster presented at the annualmeeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, November,Philadelphia, PA.
  • Puto, C. P. (1987). The framing of buying decisions. Journal of ConsumerResearch, 14, 301-315.
  • Pruitt, D. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York : Academic Press.
  • Pintrich, P.R. & De Groot E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learningcomponents of classroom academic performance. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 82(1), pp. 33-50.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). Amanual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for LearningQuestionnaire (MSLQ) . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan,National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching andLearning.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory,research and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: MerrillPrentice-Hall.
  • Penney, R. K.(1967). Effect of reward and punishment on children's orientationand discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75,140-142.
  • Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decisionmaker. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Osteen, J. (2004). Your Best Life Now: 7 steps to living at your full potential.New York: FaithWords.
  • Ordonez L. D., Benson L. (1997). Decisions under time pressure: how timeconstraint affects risky decision making. Organizational Behavior andHuman Decision Process. 71, 121?140.
  • Neale, M. A., &Bazerman, M. H. (1985).The effects of framing and negotiatoroverconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Academy ofManagement Journal, 28, 34-49.
  • Moran, J.D. III, McCullers, J.C., & Fabes, R.A. (1984). Developmental analysisof the effects of reward on selected Wechsler subscales. AmericanJournal of Psychology, 90, 103-119.
  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hicks, L., Roeser, R., Urdan, T., Anderman, E., et al.(1996). Patterns of adaptive learning survey (PALS). Ann Arbor:University of Michigan.
  • Metcalfe, J. & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problemsolving. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 238-246.
  • Meijer, R. R.(2003). Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using itemresponse theory-based person-fit statistics. Psychological Methods,8(1), 72-87.
  • Mardia, K. V. (1971). The effect of nonnormality on some multivariate testsand robustness to nonnormality in the linear model. Biometrika, 58,105-121.
  • Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framingand issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361-367.
  • Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S.(1991). Promoting systematic processing inlow-motivation setting: Effect of incongruent information onprocessing and judgment. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 61, 13-25.
  • Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion andprevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 77(6), 1135-1145.
  • Lee, Y. & Chen, H.(2011) A review of recent response time analyses ineducational testing. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling,53(3). 359-379.
  • Lee, H, (2009). Effects of goal relations on self-regulated learning in Multiplegoal setting: Self-regulated performance, process, and task enjoyment.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  • Kuvaas, M. & Selart B. (2004) Effects of attribute framing on cognitiveprocessing and evaluation. Organizational Behavior and HumanDecision Processes, 95, 198?207.
  • Krueger, G. P.(1989). Sustained work, fatigue, sleep loss and performance: areview of the issues. Work Stress, 3, 129?141.
  • Koo, M., & Fishbach, A. (2010). “Climbing the Goal Ladder: How UpcomingActions Increase Level of Aspiration.”Journal of Personality & SocialPsychology, 99, 1-13.
  • Koo, M., & Fishbach, A. (2008). Dynamics of self-regulation: How(un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 94, 183?195.
  • Kong, X. J., Wise, S. L., & Bhola, D. S. (2007). Setting the response timethreshold parameter to differentiate solution behavior fromrapidguessingbehavior. Educational and Psychological Measurement,67(4), 606-619.
  • Kluger, A. N., &DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback intervention onperformance: A historical review, a meta analysis, and a preliminaryfeedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
  • Klein, H.J.(1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation.Academy of Management Review, 14, 150-172.
  • Kernan, M. C., & Lord, R. G. (1989). The effects of explicit goals and specificfeedback on escalation processes. Journal of Applied SocialPsychology, 19, 1125-1143.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisionsunder risk. Econometrica, 47, 313?327.
  • Johnson, C.R. & Field, C. A.(1993). Using fixed-effects model multivariateanalysis of variance in marine biology and ecology. Oceanography andMarine Biology An Annual Review, 31, 177-121.
  • Hiroto, D. S. (1974). Locus of control and learned helplessness. Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 102, 187-193.
  • Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goalattainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525.
  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
  • Higgins E.T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain, American Psychologist, 52,1280-1300.
  • Harter, S. (1982). The Perceived Competence Scale for children. ChildDevelopment, 53, 87-97.
  • Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Tauer, J.M., & Elliot, A.J. (2002).Predictingsuccess in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals andability measures as predictors of interest and performance fromfreshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology,94, 562-575.
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsicmotivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 904-915.
  • Hamilton, M. L.(1969). Reward and punishment in child discrimination learning.Developmental Psychology, 1, 735-738.
  • Halkitis, P. N., & Jones, J. P. (1996). Estimating testing time: The effects ofitem characteristics on response latency. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New York, NY.
  • Goleman, D. (1998). (Ed). Working with emotional intelligence. New York:Bantam Books.
  • Gasiorowska, M. (2014). The effects of learned helplessness and messageframing on the processing of verbal and visual information inadvertisement. In Marek. T, Karwowski. W, Frankowicz. M, Kantola. J& Zgaga. P(Eds.), Human factors of a global society(pp.379-396). NewYork: Taylor & Francis.
  • Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.
  • Friedman, R.S., & Forster, J. (2001).The effects of promotion and preventioncues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81,1001-1013.
  • Forster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Bianco, A. T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions intask performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 148-164.
  • Forster, J., Grant, H., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Success/failurefeedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation: Howregulatory focus moderates classic relations. Journal of ExperimentalSocial Psychology, 37, 253-260.
  • Fishbach, A., & Labroo, A. (2007). Be better or be merry: How mood affectsself-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 158?173.
  • Fishbach, A., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2011). How feedback influences persistence,disengagement, and change in goal pursuit, In H. Aarts& A. Elliot(Eds.). Goal-directed behavior. Psychology Press.
  • Entman, R.(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
  • Elliot, A., Faler, J., McGregor, H., Campbell, W., Sedekides, C., & Harackiewicz,J. (2000). Competence valuation as a strategic intrinsic motivationprocess. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 780?794.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament asbasic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78(3), 865 ?906.
  • Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality orMyth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153-1166.
  • Efklides, A., Petkakim C., (2005). Effects of Mood on students’ metacognitiveexperiences, Learning and Instruction, 15, 415-431.
  • Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J.,and Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors.In Spence, J. T. (ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motives, W. H.Freeman, San Francisco.
  • Dweck, C. (1999). Caution: Praise can be dangerous. American Educator, 23(1),4-9.
  • Dunegan, K. J. (1993). Framing, Cognitive Modes, and Image Theory: Towardand Understanding of a Glass Half Full. Journal of AppliedPsychology. 78, 491-503.
  • Deci, E., & Cascio W. (1972). Changes in intrinsic motivation as a function ofnegative feedback and threats. Presented at the meeting of the EasternPsychological Association, Boston.
  • Deci, E. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
  • DeMars, C. E. (2007). Changes in rapidguessingbehavior over a series ofassessments. Educational Assessment, 12, 2345.
  • De Dreu, C. K., Emans, B. J., & Van de Vliert, E.(1992). Frames of referenceand cooperative social decision-making. European Journal of SocialPsychology, 22, 297-302.
  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart. L .R., Kwon. S. (2000). Influence of SocialMotives on Integrative Negotiation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Testof Two Theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78,889-905.
  • Davis, M. A., & Bobko, P. (1986).Contextual effects on escalation processes inpublic sector decision making. Organizational Behavior and HumanDecision Processes, 37, 121-138.
  • Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations:Promotion and prevention in decision making. Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
  • Condry, J. (1977). Enemies of exploration: Self-initiated versus other initiatedlearning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 459-477.
  • Cochran, W. &Tesser, A. (1996). The “What the Hell” effect: Some effects ofgoal proximity and goal framing on performance. LL. Martin & A.Tesser (Eds.). Striving and Feeling: Interactions among Goals, Affect,and Self-Regulation (pp. 99-120). New Jersey: Erlbaum, 99-120.
  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioralactivation, and affective responses to impending reward andpunishment: The BlS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 67, 319-333.
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structure of behavioralself-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner,Handbook of Self-Regulation. (pp 42-80). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the Self-regulation of Behavior.New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptualframework for personality?social, clinical, and health psychology.Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111-135.
  • Campion, M. A., & Lord, R.G. (1982).A control systems conceptualization of thegoal-setting and changing processes. Organizational Behavior andHuman Performance, 30, 265-287.
  • Buss, A. H., & Buss, E. H.(1956). The effect of verbal reinforcementcombinations on conceptual learning. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 52, 283-287.
  • Brand, C. R. & Dreary, I. J. (1982). Intelligence and ‘inspection time’. In H. J.Eysenck (Ed.), A model for intelligence (pp. 133-148). Berlin and NewYork: Springer- Verlag.
  • Bottom, W. P. & Studt, A. (1993). Framing Effects and the Distributive Aspectof Integrative Bargaining. Organizational Behavior and HumanDecision Processes, 56, 459-474.
  • Blanchard, K.(2002). Whale Dones- The power of positive relationships. NewYork. Free press.
  • Bergstrom, B., Gershon, R. & Lunz, M. E. (1994). Computerized adaptivetesting: Exploring examinee response time using hierarchical linearmodelling. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the NationalCouncil on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
  • Beach, L. R. & Mitchell, T. R. (1990). Image theory: A behavioral theory ofdecisions in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.),Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Beach, L. R. & Mitchell, T. R. (1987). Image theory: Principles goals, and plansin decision making. Acta Psychologica, 66, 201-220.
  • Bazerman, M. H., Magliozzi, T., & Neale, M.A. (1985). Integrative bargaining ina competitive market, Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 35 , 294-313.
  • Barringer, C., & Gholson, B. (1979). Effects and types of combinations offeedback upon conceptual learning by children: implications forresearch in academic learning. Review of Educational Research, 49,456-478.
  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C, Gian V. C., & Concetta, P. (2001). Self-EfficacyBeliefs as Shapers of Children's Aspirations and Career Trajectories,Child Development, 72, 187?206.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: FreemanBandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives onPsychological Science, 1, 164-180.
  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W.M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior anddevelopment (Vol. 1, pp. 45-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior.Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.
  • Amabile, T. (1987). The motivation to be creative. In S. Isaksen (Ed.),Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the basics, 223-254. Buffalo,NY: Bearly Limited.