Zollman, A. (2010). Commentary 2 on problem solving for the 21st century, In B. Sriraman, & L. English (Eds). Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers (pp. 297-301). New York: Springer.
Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Philosophical Investigations, (G. E. M. Anscombe & R. Rhees Eds., translated by G. E. M. Anscombe). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1961). TLP Logico-Philosophicus. (translated by D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness). New York: The Humanities Press.
Williamson, T. (2013b). Modal logic as metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, T. (2013a). Gettier cases in epistemic logic, Inquiry: An interdisciplinary journal of philosophy, 56(1), 1-14.
Williamson, T. (2009b). The philosophy of philosophy, Analysis, 69(1), 99-100.
Williamson, T. (2009a). Replies to Kornblith, Jackson and Moore, Analysis, 69(1), 125-135.
Williamson, T. (2007). The philosophy of philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell.
Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness, London: Routledge.
Wallace, W. A. (1996). The modeling of nature: philosophy of science and philosophy of nature in synthesis. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.
Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., & Ikospentaki (2004). Modes of knowing and ways of reasoning in elementary astronomy, Cognitive development, 19, 203-222.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational studies in mathematics, 54, 9-35.
Suarez, M. (1999). The role of models in the application of scientific theories: epistemological implications. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds), Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science(pp. 168-195), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating, human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint, The journal of the learning sciences, 16(4), 567-615.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one, Educational researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin, Educational studies in mathematics, 22, 1-36.
Scribner, S. (1997). Mind in action: A functional approach to thinking. In M. Cole, Y. Engstrom, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 354-368). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press
Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse Research in Mathematics Education: A Critical Evaluation of 108 Journal Articles, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 167-199.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Radu, M. (2008). Symbolic language versus understanding in mathematics education, In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 249-262). Rotterdam: Sense.
Presmeg, N. (2005). Metaphor and metonymy in processes of semiosis in mathematics education. In M. H. G. Hoffinann, J. Lenhard & F. Seeger (Eds.) Activity and Sign - Grounding Mathematics Education (pp. 105-116). New York: Springer.
Prawat, R. S. (1999). Dewey, Peirce, and the learning paradox, American educational research journal, 36(1), 47-76.
Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pollak, H. (1968). On some of the problems of teaching applications of mathematics, Educational studies in mathematics, 1, 24-30.
Peirce, C. S. (NEM) (1976). The new elements of mathematics by Charles S. Peirce (Vol. I - IV). Hague: Mouton.
Peirce, C. S. (C.P.) (1931–1935, 1958) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA:Harvard UP.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce. Volume 2, edited by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Pegg, J. & Tall, D. (2010) The fundamental cycle of concept construction underlying various theoretical frameworks. In B. Sriraman & L. D. English (Eds.). Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers (pp. 173-192). New York: Springer.
Park, J., Park, M., Park, M.-S., Cho, J. & Lee, K.-H. (2013). Mathematical modelling as a facilitator to conceptualization of the derivative and the integral in a spreadsheet environment, Teaching mathematics and its applications, 32, 123-139.
Park, J. & Lee, K.-H. (2014). Literature review of research on models in mathematics education, Journal of educational research in mathematics, 24(3), 285-310.
Overgaard, S., Gilbert, P., & Burwood, S. (2013). An Introduction to Metaphilosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Otte, M. (2008). Metaphor and contingency, In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 63-82). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Nagel, E. (1961), The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt.
Nachlieli, T., & Tabach, M. (2012). Growing mathematical objects in the classroom - The case of function, International journal of educational research, 51-52, 10-27.
Movshovitz-Hadar, & Kleiner (2009). Intellectual Courage and Mathematical Creativity. In R. Leikin, A. Berman & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students (pp.31-50). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. S. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science (pp. 10–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morrison, M. (1998). Modelling Nature Between Physics and the Physical World, Philosophia Naturalis, 38(1), 65–85.
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McClain, K. & Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting students’ ability to reason about data, Educational studies in mathematics, 45, 103-129.
Mathematical modelling as a tool for the connection of school mathematics. ZDM ,38(3), 226-246.
Lesh, R., Middleton, J. A., Caylor, E., & Gupta, S. (2008). A science need: Designing tasks to engage students in modeling complex data, Educational studies in mathematics, 68, 113-130.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2003). In what ways does a models and modeling perspective move beyond constructivism? In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 519-556). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lesh, R. & Lehrer, R. (2003). Models and modeling perspectives on the development of students and teachers, Mathematical thinking and learning, 5(2-3), 109-129.
Lesh, R. & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, Modeling, and Local conceptual development, Mathematical thinking and learning, 5(2-3), 157-189.
Lesh, R. & Fennewald, T. (2010). Introduction to Part Ⅰ Modeling: What is it? Why do it? In R. Lesh et al. (Eds.). Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 5-10). New York: Springer.
Lenhard, J. (2005). Deduction, perception and modeling: The two Peirces on the essence of mathematics, In M. H. G. Hoffinann, J. Lenhard & F. Seeger (Eds.) Activity and Sign - Grounding Mathematics Education (pp. 313-324). New York: Springer.
Lee, K.-H. (2010). Modelling of and conjecturing on a soccer ball in a Korean eighth grade mathematics classroom, International journal of science and mathematics education, 9, 751-769.
Kornblith, H. (2009). Timothy Williamson's The Philosophy of Philosophy, Analysis, 69(1), 109-116.
Keyt, D. (1964). Wittgenstein's picture theory of language, The philosophical review, 73(4), 493-511.
Kaiser, G. & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education, ZDM, 38(3), 302-310.
Hutten, E. H. (1954). The role of models in physics, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4, 284-301.
Hesse, M. (1953). Models in physics, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4, 198-214.
Hartmann, S. (2008). Modeling in philosophy of science. In M. Frauchiger & W. K. Essler (Eds.), Representation, evidence, and justification: Themes from Suppes (pp. 95-121). Frankfurt: Ontos.
Grootenboer, P. (2010). Commentary 1 on problem solving for the 21st century, In B. Sriraman, & L. English (Eds). Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers (pp. 291-295). New York: Springer.
Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics, Mathematical thinking and learning, 1(2), 155-177.
Gravemeijer, K. & Stephan, M. (2002). Emergent models as an instructional design heuristic. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. V. Oers & L. Verschaffel (Eds.) Symbolizing, Modelling and Tool use in Mathematics Education (pp. 145-169). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23, 121-123.
Gee, J. P. (2007). Social linguistics and literacies (3rd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
Garcia, F. J., Gascon, J., Higueras, L. R., & Bosch, M. (2006).
Galbraith, P. & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process, ZDM, 38(2), 143-162.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education china lectures, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fischbein, E.(1987). Intuition in Science and Mathematics: An Educational Approach, Dordecht: Reidel.
Fischbein, E. (2001). Tacit models and infinity, Educational studies in mathematics, 48, 309-329.
Fischbein, E. & Baltsan, M, (1998). The mathematical concept of set and the 'collection' model, Educational studies in mathematics, 37, 1-22.
Ernest, P.(1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. London: The Falmer Press.
English, L. D. & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem solving for the 21st century, In B. Sriraman, & L. English (Eds). Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers (pp. 263-290). New York: Springer.
Duhem, P. (1954) [translated from the French 2nd edition, 1914], The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Dubinsky, E. & McDonald, M. (2001) APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergrad mathematics education research. In D. Holton et. al. (Eds), The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level: An ICMI study (pp. 273-280). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Gravemeijer, K., Boon, P. & Reed, H. (2012). Tool use and the development of the function concept: From repeated calculations to functional thinking, International journal of science and mathematics education, 10, 1243-1267.
Cobb, P. (2009). Learning as the evolution of discourse: Accounting for cultural, group and individual development. Human Development 52. 205-210.
Cobb, P. (2002). Reasoning with tools and inscriptions, The journal of learning sciences, 11(2-3), 187-215.
Cobb, P. & Hodge, L. L. (2011). Culture, identity, and equity in the mathematics classroom, In E. Yackel et al. (eds.), A Journey in Mathematics Education Research, New York: Springer.
Clement, J. J. (2009). Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students: The Role of Imagery, Analogy, and Mental Simulation, New York: Springer.
Casti, J. (1989) Newton, Aristotle, and the Modeling of Living Systems. In Casti, J. & Anders, K. (Eds) Newton and Aristotle Towards a Theory of Models for Living System (pp. 47–98). Boston: Birkhuiser.
Caspi, S., & Sfard, A. (2012). Spontaneous meta-arithmetic as a first step toward school algebra, International journal of educational research, 51-52, 46-65.
Carnap, R. (1939). Foundations of logic and mathematics, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Blum, W., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical Modelling: Can It Be Taught And Learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45-58.
Blum, W. et al. (2002). ICMI study 14: Applications and modelilng in mathematics education - Discussion document. Educational studies in mathematics, 51, 149-171.
Blomh j, M. & Kjeldsen, T. H. (2006). Teaching mathematical modelling through project work – Experiences from an in-service course for upper secondary teachers, ZDM, 38(2), 163-177.
Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19-45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bailer-Jones, D. M. (1999), Tracing the Development of Models in the Philosophy of Science. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 23–40). New York: Springer.
Arzarello, F. & Sabena, C. (2008) Semiotic and theoretic control in argumentation and proof activities. Educational studies in mathematics, 70, 97-109.
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational researcher, 25, 5-11.
