연구동향 분석

일반논문 : 미국 민사소송제도에서 약식판결 (Summary Judgment)의 역할과 변화 -정의, 효율, 그리고 이데올로기-

변진석 ( Jin Suk Byun ) 2014년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 일반논문 : 미국 민사소송제도에서 약식판결 (Summary Judgment)의 역할과 변화 -정의, 효율, 그리고 이데올로기-' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • discovery
  • explosionoflitigation
  • freedomofcontract
  • locknerperiod
  • substantive due process
  • summary judgment
  • trilogyofsummaryjudgment
  • 계약자유의 원칙
  • 소송의폭발
  • 실체적적법절차
  • 약식판결
  • 약식판결3부작
  • 증거개시
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
165 0

0.0%

' 일반논문 : 미국 민사소송제도에서 약식판결 (Summary Judgment)의 역할과 변화 -정의, 효율, 그리고 이데올로기-' 의 참고문헌

  • 미국의 특허소송과 배심재판 -배심의 역할과 그 제한-
    변진석 외법논집 37 (1) : 37 ~ 55 [2013]
  • 미국 민사소송에서의 약식재판(Summary Judgement)
    오대성 민사소송 14 (2) : 748 ~ 788 [2010]
  • 미국 민사소송에서 증거개시의 역할과 한계, 한국에 도입가능성
    변진석 미국헌법연구 23 (3) : 129 ~ 162 [2012]
  • Wickard v. Filburn 317 U.S. 111
    [1942]
  • Why Summary Judgment is Unconstitutional
    Thomas, Suja A. Virginia Law Review : 139 ~ 180 [2007]
  • West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish 300 U.S. 379
    [1937]
  • Wallace v. SMC Pneumatics, Inc., 103 F.3d 1394
    [1997]
  • Vanishing Trials and Summary Judgment in Federal Civil Cases: Drifting toward Bethlehem or Gomorrah?
    Burbank, Stephen B. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies : 591 ~ 626 [2004]
  • US v. New York 488 U.S. 1041
    [1992]
  • US v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549
    [1995]
  • Trends in Summary Judgment Practice: A Preliminary Analysis
    Cecil, Joe S Federal Judicial Center [2001]
  • There is Litigation Explosion
    Marvell, Thomas B. National Law Journal : 13 ~ 42 [1986]
  • The Summary Judgment
    Clark, Charles E. Yale Law Journal : 423 ~ 471 [1929]
  • The Restrictive Ethos in Civil Procedure
    Spencer, A. Benjamin George Washington Law Review : 353 ~ 373 [2010]
  • The Pretrial Rush to Judgment: Are the “Litigation Explosion,” “Liability Crisis,” and Efficiency Cliches Eroding Our Day in Court and Jury Trial Commitments?
    Miller, Arthur R. New York University Law Review : 981 ~ 1134 [2003]
  • The Efficiency of Summary Judgment
    Brunet, Edward Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (Spring) : 689 ~ 703 [2012]
  • The Dangers of Summary Judgment: Gender and Federal Civil Litigation
    Schneider, Elizabeth M. Rutgers Law Review (Summer) : 705 ~ 777 [2007]
  • Summary Judgment in Federal Practice: Super Motion v. Classic Model of Epistemic Coherence
    Weakland, Brian L. Dickinson Law Review : 25 ~ 53 [1989]
  • Summary Judgment at Sixty
    Wald, Patricia Texas Law Review : 1897 ~ 1945 [1998]
  • Summary Judgment and Problems in Applying the Celotex Trilogy Standard
    Gordillo, Gregory A. Cleveland State Law Review : 263 ~ 299 [1994]
  • Six Summary Judgment Safeguard
    Brunet, Edward Akron Law Review, Symposium Article, Symposium: The Future of Summary Judgment : 1165 ~ 1188 [2010]
  • Second Thoughts About Summary Judgment
    Issacharoff, Samel Yale Law Journal : 73 ~ 119 [1990]
  • Private Enforcement
    Burbank, Stephen B. Lewis & Clark Law Review : 637 ~ 719 [2013]
  • President's Council on Competitiveness
    Agenda for Civil Justice Reform in America 1 [1991]
  • Poller v. CBS, Inc., 368 U.S. 464
    [1962]
  • Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. 475 U.S. 574
    [1986]
  • Managing toward the Goals of Rule 1
    Singer, Jordan M. Federal Courts Law Review : 1 ~ 16 [2010]
  • Manageral Judging and the Evolution of Procedure
    Elliott, E. Donald University of Chicago Law Review (Spring) : 306 ~ 336 [1986]
  • Lockner v. New York 198 U.S. 45
    [1905]
  • Let's Everybody Litigate?
    Rosenberg, Maurice Texas Law Review : 1349 ~ 1368 [1972]
  • Koszola v. Board of Education of City of Chicago, 385 F.3d 1104
    [2004]
  • Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294
    [1964]
  • III, Dispositions Unsettled: What Tax Court Procedure Can Teach Us about Federal Civil Procedure
    Snyder, John B. Ohio Northern University Law Review : 359 ~ 402 [2010]
  • Hutchinson v. Proximre, 443 U.S. 111
    [1979]
  • Hammer v. Dagenhart 247 U.S. 251
    [1918]
  • Gateways and Pathways in Civil Procedure
    Schwartz, Joanna C. UCLA Law Review : 1562 ~ 1707 [2013]
  • From the Bench: Trial or Tribulations (Rule 56 Style)?
    Shadur, Milton I. Litigation (Winter) : 5 ~ 7 [2003]
  • Fid. & Deposit Co. v. United States, 187 U.S. 315
    [1902]
  • Exploring Economic and Democratic Theories of Civil Litigation: Differences between Individual and Organizational Litigants in the Disposition of Federal Civil Cases
    Hadfield, Gillian K. Stanford Law Review : 1275 ~ 1327 [2005]
  • Estimates of Summary Judgment Activity in Fiscal Year 2006
    Joe Cecil Federal Judicial Center [2007]
  • Civil Justice Reform
    Quayle, Dan American University Law Review : 559 ~ 569 [1992]
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett 477 U.S. 317
    [1986]
  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topika, 347 U.S. 483
    [1954]
  • Arnstein v. Porter, 154 F.2d 464
    [1946]
  • Anthony v. BTR Automotive Sealing Systems, Inc., 339 F.3d 506
    [2003]
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. 477 U.S. 242
    [1986]
  • Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U.S. 578
    [1897]
  • Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U.S. 525
    [1923]
  • Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co.,398 U.S. 144
    [1970]
  • Adair v. United States, 208 U.S. 161
    [1908]
  • A Distorted Mirror: The Supreme Court's Shimmering View of Summary Judgment, Directed Verdict, and the Adjudication Process
    Stempel, Jeffrey W. Ohio State Law Journal : 95 ~ 193 [1988]