미국에서의 증오표현행위의 규제에 관한 판례경향

논문상세정보
' 미국에서의 증오표현행위의 규제에 관한 판례경향' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 법학
  • campusspeechcode
  • fightingwords
  • hate speech
  • primafacieevidenceprovision
  • unprotectedspeech
  • virginiascross-burningstatute
  • 도발적언사
  • 명백한증거규정
  • 보호받지못하는표현
  • 십자가소각행위금지규정
  • 증오표현행위
  • 캠퍼스표현규제
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
8,105 7

0.0%

' 미국에서의 증오표현행위의 규제에 관한 판례경향' 의 참고문헌

  • 「表現の自由」を求めて―アメリカにおける権利獲得の軌跡
    奥平康弘 岩波書店 [1999]
  • 혐오언론현상에 대한 법제론적 고찰
    이재진 언론학보 19 [1999]
  • 헌법학원론 (제3판)
    김학성 피앤씨미디어 [2014]
  • 표현의 자유에 관한 1990년대 미국 연방대법원 판례의 동향
    양건 미국헌법연구 (11) [2000]
  • 표현의 자유
    박용상 현암사 [2002]
  • 증오언론과 십자가 소각에 관한 판례경향
    심경수 미국헌법연구 18 (1) : 39 ~ 80 [2007]
  • 적의적 표현행위(Hate Speech)의 헌법적 좌표-민주주의의 다양성의 의미(민주주의의 위기)-
    曺小永 공법연구 30 (4) : 6 ~ 6 [2002]
  • 상징적 표현행위-도발적 언사를 중심으로-
    고문현 헌법학연구 10 (2) : 263 ~ 299 [2004]
  • 규제의 필요성과 규제방법론에 대한 헌법적 평가―대학내에서의 적의적 표현행위에 대한 규제학칙을 중심으로―
    조소영 헌법판례연구 6 [2004]
  • 憲法 <第五版 >
    芦部信喜 岩波書店 [2011]
  • When to Regulate Hate Speech
    John C. Knechtle RENN ST. L. REV 110 : 539 ~ [2006]
  • Unprotected Speech로서의 Fighting Words에 관한 判例傾向
    徐柱實 미국헌법연구 13 : 37 ~ 86 [2002]
  • Unholy Fire: Cross Burning, Symbolic Speech, and the First Amendment Virginia v. Black
    Swanson, James L. CATO SUPREME COURT REVIEW : 81 ~ [2002]
  • Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment
    Thomas I.Emerson YALE L. J 72 : 877 ~ [1963]
  • The meaning of the term 'prima facie'
    Herlitz LA. L. REV 55 : 39 ~ [1994]
  • The Skokie Legace : Reflectionson an 'Ease Case' and Free Speech Theory
    Lee C. Bollinger MICH. L. REV 80 : 617 ~ [1982]
  • The Shortcomings of the Supreme Court's Viewpoint Discrimination Analysis in Virginia v. Black
    Maribeth G. Berlin DENV. U. L. REV 81 : 143 ~ [2003]
  • The New York Times Case: A Note on 'The Central Meaning of the First Amendment'
    Harry Kalven, Jr SUP. CT. REV : 218 ~ [1964]
  • The Life of the Mind and a Life of Meaning: Reflections on Fahrenheit 451
    Rodney A.Smolla MICH.L.REV 107 : 895 ~ [2009]
  • Terrorism and the Bill of Rights
    Rodney A.Smolla WM. & MARY BILL OF RTS. J 10 : 551 ~ [2002]
  • Symposium Essay: Regulating Intimidation Speech
    Alexander Tsesis HARV. J. ON LEGIS 41 : 389 ~ [2004]
  • Skokie : The First Amendmen tUnder Attack by Its Friends
    David Goldberger MERCER L. REV 29 : 761 ~ [1978]
  • SPEAK NO EVIL―THE TRIUMPH OF HATE SPEECH REGULATION 18
    Jon B. Gould The University of Chicago Press [2005]
  • Recent Decision: Constitutional Law―Hate Speech―First Amendment Permits on Cross Burning When Done with the Intent ti Intimidate
    Chris L. Brannon MISS. L. J 73 : 323 ~ [2003]
  • On Freedom of Expression
    Harry H. Wellington YALE L J 88 : 1105 ~ [1979]
  • Oh Say, Can You See: Free Expression by the Light of Fiery Crosses
    Bell, Jeannie Harvard Civil Right-Civil Liberties Law Review 39 : 335 ~ [2004]
  • ONLY WORDS
    Catharine A. MacKinnon HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS [1993]
  • Note: Burned Out: The Supreme Court Strikes Down Virginia's Cross Burning Statute in Virginia v. Black
    Amanda J. Congdon LOY. U. CHI. L. J 35 : 1049 ~ [2004]
  • Modern Power and the First Amendment: Reassessing Hate Speech
    Chris Demaske COMM. L. & POL'Y 9 : 273 ~ [2004]
  • Intentions, Conventions, and the First Amendment: The Case of Cross-Burning
    Frederick Schauer SUP. CT. REV : 197 ~ [2003]
  • HATE SPEECH―THE HISTORY OF AN AMERICAN CONTROVERSY 8
    Samuel Walker University of Nebraska Press [1994]
  • HATE SPEECH, AND TENURE 41
    Benjamain Baez Routledge Falmer [2002]
  • Group Libel and Free Speech
    Loren P. Beth MINN. L. REV 39 : 167 ~ [1955]
  • First Amendment Doctrine and the Burger Court
    Thomas I.Emerson CAL L. REV 68 : 422 ~ [1980]
  • FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE UNITED STATES
    Thomas L. Tedford Strata Pub Co [2001]
  • EXCITABLE SPEECH: A POLITICS OF THE PERFORMATIVE
    Butler, Judith Routledge [1997]
  • DEMOCRACY AND THE PROBLEM OF FREE SPEECH 193
    Cass R. Sunstein THE FREE PRESS [1993]
  • DELIBERATE INTENT: A LAWYER TELLS THE TRUE STORY OF MURDER
    Rodney A.Smolla BY THE BOOK [1999]
  • Crοss Burning Revisited: What the Supreme Court Should Have Done in Virginia v. Black and Why It Did'nt
    W. Wat Hopkins HASTINOS COMM. & ENT. L. J 26 : 269 ~ [2004]
  • Conference: Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis
    Michael Rosenfeld CARDOZO L. REV 24 : 1523 ~ [2003]
  • Comment, The Case of the Missing Amendments: R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
    Akhil R. Amar HARV. L. REV 106 : 124 ~ [1992]
  • Casenote: Constitutional Law―Freedom of Speech― State Statutes May Prohibit Cross Burning Performed with the Intent to Intimidate without Violating the First Amendment
    Malanie Bradford CUMB. L. REV 34 : 607 ~ [2003]
  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: PRINCIPLE AND POLICIES
    Erwin Chemerinsky Aspen Publishers [2006]
  • Agreeing To Agree: A Proponent and Opponent of Hate Crime Laws Reach for Common Ground
    Susan B. Gellman HARV. J. ON LEGUS 41 : 421 ~ [2004]