CSCL에서 협력적 논증 스캐폴드가 지식공유와 개인의 지식 습득에 미치는 영향

논문상세정보

' CSCL에서 협력적 논증 스캐폴드가 지식공유와 개인의 지식 습득에 미치는 영향' 의 참고문헌

  • 체제적 교수 설계
    설양환 아카데미프레스 [2009]
  • 논증의 역사
    Breton, Philippe 커뮤니케이션북스 [2006]
  • Using argument representations to make thinking visible forindivisuals and groups
    Bell Proceeding of CSCL '97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning : 10 ~ 19 [1997]
  • Using Argumentation Vee Diagrams(AVDs) for Promoting Argument-Counterargument integration in Reflective Writing
    Nussbaum Journal of Educational Psychology 100 (3) : 549 ~ 565 [2008]
  • The uses of argument
    Toulmin, Stephen Edelston Cambridge University Press [1969]
  • The structure of discussion that promote reasoning
    Anderson Chinn Teacher College Record 100 : 315 ~ 368 [1998]
  • The skill of argument
    Kuhn, D. Cambridge University Press [1991]
  • The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts
    Dillenbourg Hong Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3 : 5 ~ 23 [2008]
  • The effects of constraint based argumentation scaffolding and epistemological beliefs on ill structured diagnosis-solution problem solvin
    Oh, S. University of Missouri [2004]
  • The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building
    Leitao Human Development 43 : 332 ~ 360 [2000]
  • Supporting interactive argumentation:Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem
    Munneke,L. Computers in Human Behavior 23 : 1072 ~ 1088 [2007]
  • Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction
  • Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective. in: Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Cognitive, Computational and Educational Perspectives
    King, A. Springer : 13 ~ 37 [2007]
  • Scripting Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Supported Learning Environments. in: Scripting Computer-Supported communication of knowledge-congnitive, computational and educational perspectives
    Weinberger, A. Springer : 191 ~ 211 [2007]
  • Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving
    Jonassen Oh, S. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 : 95 ~ 110 [2007]
  • Representationaltools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-basedlearning: How dyads work with constructed and inspectedargumentative diagrams
    Andriessen Kanselaar van Arnelsvoort Journal of the Learning Sciences 16 (4) : 485 ~ 521 [2007]
  • Promotng student's argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom. in: Internet environments for science education
    Bell,PBell, P. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates : 115 ~ 143 [2004]
  • Practices and orientations of CSCL, In What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education
    Lipponen, L. Kluwer Academic Publishers : 31 ~ 50 [2004]
  • Perspectives on Collaboration Scripts. in: Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Cognitive, Computational and Educational Perspectives
    Fischer, F. Springer : 1 ~ 10 [2007]
  • Over-scripting CSCL. in: Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL
    Dillenbourg, P. Open University of the Netherlands : 61 ~ 91 [2002]
  • On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one
    Sfard Educational Researcher 27 : 4 ~ 13 [1998]
  • Learning to teach argumentation:Research and development in the science classroom
    Simon,S. International Journal of Science Education 28 (2) : 235 ~ 260 [2006]
  • Learning to Argue. in: Collaborative learning, reasoning and technology
    Chinn, C. A. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates : 355 ~ 383 [2006]
  • Knowledge convergence incollaborative learning: Concepts and assessment
    Fischer Stegmann Weinberger Learning and Instruction 17 : 416 ~ 426 [2007]
  • Instructional support in CSCL. in: What We Know About CSCL and Implementing It In Higher Education
    Jarvela, S. Kluwer Academic Publishers : 115 ~ 139 [2004]
  • Instructional support in CSCL, In What we know about CSCL?
    Jarvela, S. Kluwer Academic Publishers : 115 ~ 139 [2004]
  • Fundamentals of argumentatio n theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemp orary developments
    van Eemeren, F. H. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates [1996]
  • Foundations of argumentative text processing. in: Developments in argumenttion theory
    van Eemeren, F. Amsterdam University Press : 43 ~ 57 [1999]
  • Flexibility in macro-scripts for computersupportedcollaborative learning
    Dillenbourg Tchounikine Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 : 1 ~ 13 [2007]
  • Facilitating argumentativeknowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts
    Fischer Stegmann Weinberger Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2 : 421 ~ 447 [2007]
  • Externalrepresentation of argumentation in CSCL and the management ofcognitive load
    Jochems Kirschner van Bruggen Learning and Instruction 12 : 121 ~ 138 [2002]
  • Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. in: Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundation for a CSCL community
    Paavola, S. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates : 24 ~ 32 [2002]
  • Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script. in: Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments
    Jermann, P. Kluwer Academic : 205 ~ 226 [2003]
  • Effect of dyadic interation onargumentative reasoning
    Felton Kuhn Shaw Cognition and Instruction 15 : 287 ~ 315 [1997]
  • Designing integrative scrips. in: Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Cognitive, Computational and Educational Perspectives
    Dillenbourg, P. Springer : 275 ~ 301 [2007]
  • Designing external representations to support solving wicked problems. in: Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments
    van Bruggen, J. Kluwer Academic : 177 ~ 204 [2003]
  • Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions. in: Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication
    Dillenbourg, P. Springer : 243 ~ 264 [2005]
  • Designing a computer-supportedcollaborative learning situation for broadening and deepening understanding of the space of debate
    Baker Lund Quignard the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2002) [2002]
  • Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: explanation and argumentation as vehicle for understanding scientific notions
    Baker Lund de Vries Journal of learning sciences 11 (1) : 63 ~ 103 [2002]
  • Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notion. in: Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments
    Baker, M. J. Kluwer Academic : 47 ~ 78 [2003]
  • Computer Support for knowledge construction in collaborativelearning environment
    Computer in Human Behavior 21 : 623 ~ 643 [2005]
  • CollaborativeArgumentation and Cognitive Processing - An Empirical Study ina Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment
    Proceeding of CSCL '07: Mice, minds, and society : 661 ~ 670 [2007]
  • Can People Learn Computer-Mediated Collaboration by Following A Script?. in: Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Cognitive, Computational and Educational Perspectives
    Rummel, N. Springer : 39 ~ 55 [2007]
  • CSCL, argumentation, and Deweyan inquiry: argumentation is learning. in: Arguing to Learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments
    Koschmann, T. Kluwer : 259 ~ 265 [2003]
  • Building collaborative knowing. in: Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge
    Stahl, G. MIT Press : 303 ~ 330 [2006]
  • Argumentation, Computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. in: Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments
    Andriessen, J. Kluwer Academic : 27 ~ 46 [2003]
  • Arguing to learn; Supporting interactive argumentation through Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
    Munneke,L. [2007]
  • Arguing to Learn. in: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Science
    Andriessen, J. cambridge university press : 443 ~ 459 [2006]
  • AnalyticFrameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments
    Educational PsychologyReview 19 (3) : 343 ~ 374 [2007]
  • A cognitive framwork for cooperative problem solving with argument visualization. in: Visualizing Argumentation
    van Bruggen, J. M. Springer : 25 ~ 47 [2003]