연구동향 분석

대학수준 팀 기반 학습에서 공유정신모형의 선행변인과 팀 성과

정한호 2011년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용

' 대학수준 팀 기반 학습에서 공유정신모형의 선행변인과 팀 성과' 의 참고문헌

  • 프로젝트 팀 내 다양성 공유리더십(Shared Leadership),성과 간의 관계에 대한 연구
    심덕섭 양동민 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 발표논문집 : 783 ~ 800 [2009]
  • 프로젝트 수업이 대학생의 창의적 사고, 창의적 성향 및 문 제해결능력 향상에 미치는 효과
    신경숙 정명화 교육심리연구 18 (3) : 287 ~ 301 [2004]
  • 프로젝트 기반 수업을 통한 대학원 학생들의 학습경험에 관한 연구
    박민정 교육과정연구 25 (3) : 265 ~ 288 [2007]
  • 팀 다양성과 팀 공유멘탈모형의 상호작용이 팀 효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
    김문주 윤정구 한국경영학회통합학술대회 : 1 ~ 28 [2009]
  • 지식근로자의 공유인지와 팀 효과성의 관계
    강혜련 ( Hye Ryeon Kang ) 임희정 ( Hui Jeong Lim ) 지식경영연구 6 (2) : 67 ~ 89 [2005]
  • 웹기반 팀 학습 환경에서 공유정신모형이 과제수행에 미치는영향
    이영민 교육공학연구 21 (3) : 79 ~ 96 [2005]
  • 벤처기업내 지식공유의 결정요인에 관한 실증연구: 공유정신모형, 신뢰구축행위, 애착행위 및 집단응집성을 중심으로
    권업 기업가정신과 벤처연구 7 (1) : 237 ~ 263 [2004]
  • 대학 프로젝트 수업 환경에서 분업화, 상호작용, 공유정신모형이 팀 수행성과와 개인 학습에 미치는 영향
    조일현 교육공학연구 26 (3) : 1 ~ 20 [2010]
  • 공유멘탈모델의 선행요인 및 팀효과성에 미치는 영향
    강혜련 양희동 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직 16 (2) : 93 ~ 120 [2003]
  • Working knowledge : how organizations manage what they know
    Davenport, Thomas H Harvard Business School Press [1998]
  • Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization
    Cummings Management Science 50 (3) : 352 ~ 364 [2004]
  • Towards an understanding of team performance and training, In Teams: Their Training and Performance
    Salas, E. Ablex : 3 ~ 29 [1992]
  • Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus
    Strategic Management Journal 20 (5) : 445 ~ 465 [1999]
  • Top Management andInnovation in Banking:Does the Composition of the Top TeamMakeaDifference?
    Bantel S.E.Jackson Strategic Management Journal 10 (1) : 107 ~ 124 [1989]
  • The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems
    Cannon-Bowers Rouse Salas IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 22 (6) : 1296 ~ 1308 [1992]
  • The relationship between sharedmental models and task performance in an online team basedlearning environment
    Johnson Lee Performance Improvement Quartely 21 (3) : 97 ~ 112 [2008]
  • The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance
    Cannon-Bowers Mathieu Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2) : 273 ~ 283 [2000]
  • The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups
    Ensley Hmieleski Pearce Leadership Quarterly 17 (3) : 217 ~ 231 [2006]
  • The importance of team architecture in understanding team processes
    Urban, J. M. JAI Press [1995]
  • The impactof cross-training on team effectiveness
    Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (1) : 3 ~ 13 [2002]
  • The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors
    Hinsz Tindale Vollrath Psychological Bulletin 121 (1) : 43 ~ 64 [1997]
  • The Measurement of Cohesion in Sport Teams : The Group Environment Questionnaire
    Widmeyer, W. Neil Sports Dynamics [1985]
  • Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence
    Gemuenden Hogel Organization Science 12 (4) : 435 ~ 449 [2001]
  • Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries
    Dumville Mohammed Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 (2) : 89 ~ 106 [2001]
  • Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?
    Klimoski S.Mohammed Journal of Management 20 (2) : 403 ~ 437 [1994]
  • Team leadership
    Margerison, Charles J The Leadership Quarterly 12 : 451 ~ 483 [2002]
  • Strategic Information Systems Planning Success: An Investigation of the Construct and its Measurement
    Grover Segars MIS Quarterly 22 (2) : 139 ~ 163 [1998]
  • Shared mental models in expert team decision making. in: Individual and Group Decision Making: Current issues
    Cannon-Bowers, J. A. Lawrence Erlbaum [2005]
  • Shared mental models and team performance: Are you thinking what we’re thinking?
    Fleming Griepentrog Paper to be presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology [2003]
  • Shared mental models and crew decision making
    Orasunu, J. [1990]
  • Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance
    Carson Marrone Tesluk Academy of Management Journal 50 (5) : 1217 ~ 1234 [2007]
  • Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance
    Ensley Pearce Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 (2) : 145 ~ 160 [2001]
  • Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups
    Campion.M.A Higgs.A Medsker.J.G Personnel Psychology 46 : 823 ~ 850 [1993]
  • Reflections on Shared Cognition
    Cannon-Bowers Salas Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 (2) : 195 ~ 210 [2001]
  • Power analysis and determination of samplesize for covariance structure modeling
    McCallum Sugawara Psychological Methods 1 (2) : 130 ~ 149 [1996]
  • Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established
    Human Factors 41 : 61 ~ 71 [1999]
  • On looking into the black box:prospects and limits in the search for mental models
    Morris Rouse Psychological Bulletin 100 (3) : 349 ~ 363 [1986]
  • Mental models, teammental models, and performance: Process, development, andfuture directions
    Anglim Lagan Fox Langan-Fox, J Willson Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 14 (4) : 331 ~ 352 [2004]
  • Members of great teams think alike: A model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members, In Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, Series of Self-Managed Work Teams
    Rentsch, J. R. JAL Press : 223 ~ 261 [1994]
  • Measuring sharedness ofteam-related knowledge:Design and validation ofa shared mentalmodelinstrument
    Johnson Human Resource Development International 10 (4) : 437 ~ 454 [2007]
  • Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments, In Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations
    McIntyre, R. M. Jossey-Bass : 9 ~ 45 [1995]
  • Managing I/S DesignTeams : A Control Theories Perspective
    Henderson Lee Soonchul Management Science 38 (6) : 757 ~ 777 [1992]
  • Learning versus performance in short termproject teams
    Druskat Kayes Small Group Research 31 (3) : 328 ~ 353 [2000]
  • LISREL 8: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLISTM command language
    J?reskog, K. G. Scientific Software International [1993]
  • If only we knew what we know :Identification and transfer of internal best practice
    Grayson O'Dell California management Review 40 (3) : 154 ~ 174 [1998]
  • Groupware in Practice: An Interpretation of work Experiences, In Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Assisting Human-Human Collaboration
    Bullen, C. Morgan Kaufman Publisher : 69 ~ 84 [1993]
  • Group interacting with technologies: Ideas, evidence, issues, and agenda
    McGrath, J. E. Sage [1994]
  • Group dynamics in sport (2nd Ed)
    Carron, A. V. Fitness [1998]
  • From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: Cycles of collective cognition in work groups
    Gibson Gibson, C. B. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 (2) : 121 ~ 134 [2001]
  • Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error
    Fornell Larker Journalof Marketing Research 18 : 39 ~ 50 [1981]
  • EQS structural equations program manual
    BMDP [1989]
  • Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit, In Cognition and communication at work
    Hutchins, E. Cambridge : 15 ~ 34 [1996]
  • Corporate ethical values and organizationalcommitment in marketing
    Hunt Journal of Marketing 53 (1) : 79 ~ 90 [1989]
  • Connections : new ways of working in the networked organization
    Sproull, Lee The MIT Press [1991]
  • Confronting failure: antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups
    Cannon Edmondson A Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 (2) : 161 ~ 177 [2001]
  • Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness, In Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications
    Kraiger, K. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc : 63 ~ 84 [1997]
  • Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory
    DeSantis Poole Organization Science 5 (2) : 121 ~ 147 [1994]
  • Can We Trust Trust?: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations
    Gambetta, Diego Cambridge: Basic Blackwell : 213 ~ 237 [1998]
  • An Exploratory Study of Organizational Values with a Focus on People Orientation
    Beatty Journal of Retailing 64 (4) : 405 ~ 426 [1988]
  • A Confirmatory FactorAnalysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument
    Doll Torkzadeh Xia MIS Quarterly 18 : 453 ~ 461 [1994]