연구동향 분석

자가 산부식 접착제로 접착된 광중합과 이원중합 복합레진의 법랑질 결합강도 비교

조영곤 유상훈 2007년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 자가 산부식 접착제로 접착된 광중합과 이원중합 복합레진의 법랑질 결합강도 비교' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 치과의학, 이비인후과학, 안과학
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
906 0

0.0%

' 자가 산부식 접착제로 접착된 광중합과 이원중합 복합레진의 법랑질 결합강도 비교' 의 참고문헌

  • Two-body in vitrowear study of some current dental coposites and amal-gam 82
    214 ~ 220 [1999]
  • Tensile bond strengthto and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamelsurfaces 27
    523 ~ 530 [1999]
  • Study of dental adhesive containingphophoric acid methacrylate monomer 5
    144 ~ 154 [1986]
  • Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems toenamel 2
    181 ~ 184 [1999]
  • Self-etching primervs phosphoric acid:an alternative concept for compos-ite-to-enamel bonding 24
    172 ~ 180 [1999]
  • Relationship between sur-face area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evalu-ation of a microtensile bond test 10
    236 ~ 240 [1994]
  • Regionalstrengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic dentin 75
    1404 ~ 1413 [1996]
  • Posterior composite technique utilizingdirected polymerization shrinkage and a novel matrix 3
    53 ~ 58 [1991]
  • Osmotic blistering inenamel bonded with One-Step self-etch adhesives 83
    290 ~ 295 [2004]
  • No-bottle' vs 'multi-bottle' dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study 17
    373 ~ 380 [2001]
  • Newtrends in dentin
    enamel adhesion 13 250 ~ 300 [2000]
  • Microtensilebond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives toenamel 16
    329 ~ 334 [2003]
  • Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin 16
    414 ~ 420 [2003]
  • Long-termeffect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength andmarginal adaptation 25
    11 ~ 19 [2000]
  • Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel anddentin 14
    205 ~ 210 [2001]
  • Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives withchemical
    dual-cured compositestwo-step vs one-stepsystems 28 747 ~ 755 [2003]
  • Factors contributing to the incompatibility betweensimplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-curedcomposites Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive 5
    91 ~ 105 [2003]
  • Factors contributing to the incompatibility betweensimplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured ordual-cured composites. Part I. Single-bottle self-etch-ing adhesive. 5
    27 ~ 40 [2003]
  • Enameland dentin bond strength of single application bondingsystems 14
    361 ~ 366 [2001]
  • Efficacy of self-etch-ing primer on sealing margins of class Ⅱ restorations 16
    37 ~ 41 [2003]
  • Effect ofself-etching primer application method on enamel bondstrength 15
    412 ~ 416 [2002]
  • Effect of phosphoric acid etching to self-etching primerapplication on adhesion of resin composite to enameland dentin 15
    305 ~ 308 [2002]
  • Effect of 4-acry-loxyethyltrimellitic acid in a self-etching primer onbonding to ground dentine 15
    132 ~ 143 [1996]
  • Compatibility of dentaladhesives and dual-cured cements 32 (1)
    [2003]
  • Aggressiveness of self-etchadhesives on unground enamel 29
    309 ~ 316 [2004]
  • Aggressiveness of contemporaryself-etching adhesives. Part Ⅱ: etching effects onunground enamel. 17
    430 ~ 444 [2001]
  • Adverse surface interaction between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites 17
    542 ~ 556 [2001]
  • Adhesive permeabili-ty affects composite coupling to dentin treated with aself-etch adhesive 28
    610 ~ 621 [2003]
  • Adhesion to dentin with resinusing sulfinic acid initiator system J15
    175 ~ 182 [1996]
  • Adhesion of singleapplication bonding systems to bovine enamel anddentin 27
    88 ~ 94 [2002]