Status quo of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals in Korea: A study focused on protocol registration and GRADE use

논문상세정보
' Status quo of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals in Korea: A study focused on protocol registration and GRADE use' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • Editorial policies
  • GRADE approach
  • Systematic review
  • guidelines
  • journalarticle
  • researchreport
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
767 0

0.0%

' Status quo of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals in Korea: A study focused on protocol registration and GRADE use' 의 참고문헌

  • Use of GRADE in evidence syntheses published in high-impact-factor nutrition journals : A methodological survey
    Werner SS [2021]
  • The use of GRADE approach in Cochrane reviews of TCM was insufficient : a cross-sectional survey
    Wang Q [2022]
  • The PRISMA 2020 statement : an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
    Page MJ [2021]
  • Protocol registration issues of systematic review and metaanalysis studies : a survey of global researchers
    Tawfik GM [2020]
  • Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry
  • Prospective protocol registration should be required for systematic reviews in dermatology literature
    Osto M [2021]
  • Prevalence and methodological quality of systematic reviews in Korean medical journals (under review in Epidemiology and Health)
  • Physical Activity and Bone Health in Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols : a metaepidemiological study
    Tsujimoto Y [2017]
  • International Endodontic Journal policy on mandatory prospective(a priori)protocol registration for clinical trials and systematic reviews
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor with or without Radiotherapy in Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
    Guyatt G [2011]
  • From QUOROM to PRISMA : a survey of high-impact medical journals’ instructions to authors and a review of systematic reviews in anesthesia literature
    Tao KM [2011]
  • Folic Acid in Stroke Prevention in Countries without Mandatory Folic Acid Food Fortification: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chia-Yu Hsu [2018]
  • Factors Predicting the Response to Cyclosporin Treatment in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Systematic Review
  • Do surgery journals insist on reporting by CONSORT and PRISMA? A follow-up survey of ‘instructions to authors’
    Smith TA [2015]
  • Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Long-acting Injectable and Oral Second-generation Antipsychotics for the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
  • AMSTAR 2 : a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
    Shea BJ [2017]