부패와 사회복지정책에 관한 선행 실험연구를 통해 살펴본 실험연구 시 주의해야 할 다섯 가지 사항들

논문상세정보
' 부패와 사회복지정책에 관한 선행 실험연구를 통해 살펴본 실험연구 시 주의해야 할 다섯 가지 사항들' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • balance test
  • experiment
  • manipulation check
  • noncompliance
  • spillover effect
  • 균형검사
  • 비순응 문제
  • 실험 연구
  • 조작검사
  • 확산효과
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
221 0

0.0%

' 부패와 사회복지정책에 관한 선행 실험연구를 통해 살펴본 실험연구 시 주의해야 할 다섯 가지 사항들' 의 참고문헌

  • 정치학과 실험
    안도경 [2014]
  • Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences
  • Who is targeted in corruption? Disentangling the effects of wealth and power on exposure to bribery
  • When financial work incentives pay for themselves: evidence from a randomized social experiment for welfare recipients
  • Welfare benefits and the duration of welfare spells: evidence from a natural experiment in Canada
  • Turning a Blind Eye:Experimental Evidence of Partisan Bias in Attitudes toward Corruption
  • Treatment spillover effects across survey experiments
  • The local electoral impacts of conditional cash transfers: Evidence from a field experiment
  • The effects of externalities and framing on bribery in a petty corruption experiment
  • The Oxford handbook of political science
  • The Dangers of Extreme Counterfactuals
    King, Gary [2006]
  • Tax rates and tax evasion: Evidence from “Missing imports” in China
  • Social preferences in the lab: A comparison of students and a representative population
  • Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments
  • Propensities to engage in and punish corrupt behavior: Experimental evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore
  • Obtaining a driver’s license in India: an experimental approach to studying corruption
  • Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia
  • Medicaid increases emergency-department use: evidence from Oregon’s Health Insurance Experiment
  • Letting the briber go free: an experiment on mitigating harassment bribes
  • Labor markets and poverty in village economies
  • Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences
    Falk, Armin [2009]
  • Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences
  • Indirect effects of an aid program: how do cash transfers affect ineligibles’ consumption?
  • How conditioning on posttreatment variables can ruin your experiment and what to do about it
  • Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments
  • Experimental political science and the study of causality: From nature to the lab
  • Effects on school enrollment and performance of a conditional cash transfer program in Mexico
  • Does mass immigration destroy institutions? 1990s Israel as a natural experiment
  • Does corruption information inspire the fight or quash the hope? A field experiment in Mexico on voter turnout, choice, and party identification
  • Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? The case of self-selected student samples
    Falk, Armin [2013]
  • Detecting spillover effects: Design and analysis of multilevel experiments
  • Designing and analyzing randomized experiments: Application to a Japanese election survey experiment
  • Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science
  • Building state capacity: Evidence from biometric smartcards in India
  • An experimental bribery game
  • Active and passive waste in government spending: Evidence from a policy experiment
  • A note on dropping experimental subjects who fail a manipulation check
  • A controlled field experiment on corruption
  • "A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor : Evidence from six countries