Updated Editorial Guidance for Quality and Reliability of Research Output
활용도 Analysis
논문 Analysis
연구자 Analysis
'
Updated Editorial Guidance for Quality and Reliability of Research Output' 의 참고문헌
World University Rankings blog: dealing with freak research papers
Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals
Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science
Towards an open science publishing platform
The extent of South African authored articles in: predatory journals
The ethical issues in instructions for authors of Chinese biomedical journals
The Journal of Korean Medical Science as a member of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
Study of predatory open access nursing journals
Science in East Asia - by the numbers
Sarajevo declaration on integrity and visibility of scholarly publications
San Francisco declaration on research assessment
Russian bioscience publications and journals in international bibliometric databases
Robust research: institutions must do their part for reproducibility
Rewarding peer-review work: the Publons initiative
Retractions in orthopaedic research: a systematic review
Research submission: some technicalities and vital links
Read the Budapest open access initiative
Quality of author guidelines in nursing journals
Publication ethics from the ground up
Professional writers can help to improve clarity of medical writing
Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing
Open access: changing global science publishing
OASPA Endorses the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)
Mythbusting medical writing: goodbye, ghosts! Hello, help!
Legal and ethical issues in research
Journals stating that they follow the ICMJE recommendations
Is predatory publishing a real threat? Evidence from a large database study
Is mass authorship destroying the credibility of papers?
Is a title indexed in Scopus? A reminder to check before you publish
In unusual move, gov't database delists 14 journals from one publisher
Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct
Impact of data transparency: scientific publications
Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals
Good publication practice for communicating company-sponsored medical research: GPP3
Five years post-DORA: promoting best practices for research assessment
Familiarizing with science editors' associations
Due diligence in the open-access explosion era: choosing a reputable journal for publication
Does citation matter? Research citation in policy documents as an indicator of research impact - an Australian obesity policy case-study
Discriminating between legitimate and predatory open access journals: report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee
Deconstructing the notion of "global health research partnerships" across Northern and African contexts
DOIs and other persistent identifiers have much more to offer science
Current state of science editing and publishing in Russia
COPE ethical guidelines for peer reviewers
Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities
Barriers to publishing in biomedical journals perceived by a sample of French researchers: results of the DIAzePAM study
Authorship in reports of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic cross-sectional analysis
Authorship in paediatric research conducted in low- and middle-income countries: parity or parasitism?
Author attitudes to professional medical writing support
Announcement: Nature journals support the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment
[2017]
An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors' perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals
All countries, great and small
[2016]
Active policy as a key to success for an international economic periodical
AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP joint position statement on the role of professional medical writers
A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals
A learned society's perspective on publishing
'
Updated Editorial Guidance for Quality and Reliability of Research Output'
의 유사주제(
