학업성취도평가를 통한 교육책무성시스템: 텍사스 주 사례를 중심으로

양성관 2010년
논문상세정보
    • 저자 양성관
    • 제어번호 104851065
    • 학술지명 아시아교육연구
    • 권호사항 Vol. 11 No. 3 [ 2010 ]
    • 발행처 서울대학교 교육연구소
    • 자료유형 학술저널
    • 수록면 235-258
    • 언어 Korean
    • 출판년도 2010
    • 등재정보 KCI등재
    • 소장기관 서울대학교 중앙도서관
    • 판매처
    유사주제 논문( 0)

' 학업성취도평가를 통한 교육책무성시스템: 텍사스 주 사례를 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • 학업성취정보 이용에 관한 교사의 인식: 정보시스템 수용 모형
    양성관 교육행정학연구 22 4 105-130 [2004]
  • 학교경영의 자율성과 책무성
    김명수 학교경영 16 8 48-54 [2003]
  • 중앙교육행정기관의 책무성. 한국교육의 책무성에 대한 반성과 과제
    신현석 27-59 [2004]
  • 사립학교의 책무성. 한국교육의 책무성에 대한 반성과 과제
    조석훈 167-189 [2004]
  • 대학의 책무성, 한국교육의 책무성에 대한 반성과 과제
    신재철 107-130 [2004]
  • 기조강연: 한국교육의 책무성에 대한 반성과 과제. 한국교육의 책무성에 대한 반성과 과제
    윤정일 3-23 [2004]
  • What do test scores in Texas tell us?
    Klein, S. P. - [2000]
  • Using performance indicators to hold schools accountable: Implicit assumption and inherent tensions
    Ogawa, R. Peabody Journal of Education 75 4 200-215 [2000]
  • The role of testing in elementary schools
    Smith M. - [1989]
  • The right to learn
  • The political influence of state-mandated testing reform through the eyes of principals and teachers
    Brown, D. - [1993]
  • The ninth Bracey report on the condition of public education
    Bracey, G. W. 147-168 [1999]
  • The new meaning of educational change
    Fullan, M. - [2001]
  • The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance. in: Holding school accountable: Performance-based reform in education
    Elmore, R. - [1996]
  • The myth of the Texas miracle in education
    Haney, W. Education Policy Analysis Archives 8 41 - [2000]
  • The influence of mandated testing on mathematics instruction: Grade 8 teachers' perception (Monograph)
    Romberg, T.A. - [1989]
  • The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric
    McNeil, L. - [2000]
  • The development and impact of high stakes testing
    Natriello, G. - [1998]
  • The American school 1642-2000
    Spring, J. - [2000]
  • Teaching the new basic skills
    Murnane, R. - [1996]
  • Teachers-transforming their world and their work
    Lieberman, A. - [1999]
  • Target teach
  • Strengthening Title I: Designing a policy based on evidence. in: Hard work for good schools: Facts not fads in Title I reform
    Orfield, R. 1-20 [1999]
  • Standard-based accountability: Horse trade or horse whip?. in: From the capital to the classroom
    Goertz, M. 39-59 [2001]
  • Standard setting for upgrading high school mathematics and science. in: The governance of curriculum (ASCD Yearbook)
    Porter, A. 138-166 [1994]
  • School choice and SES stratification of schools: New findings from England and Wales
    Fitz, J. - [2000]
  • Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools
    Kozol, J. - [1991]
  • Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers
    Smith, M. Educational Researcher 20 5 8-11 [1991]
  • Priorities of educational testing and evaluation: The testimony of the CRESST national faculty
    Herman, J. - [1989]
  • Organizational Culture and Leadership
    Schein, E. - [1992]
  • New demands and concepts for educational accountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence, In Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd Ed)
    Adams, J. 463-489 [1999]
  • Nationally normed elementary achievement testing in America’s public school: How all 50 states are above the national average
    Cannell, J.J. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 7 4 12-15 [1987]
  • National standards and school improvement in the 1990s: Issues and promise
    Porter, A. American Journal of Education 102 430- [1994]
  • Making better decisions about school problems: How administrators use evaluation to find solutions
    Glasman, N. - [1994]
  • Is educational reform through mandated accountability an oxymoron?
    Hansen, J. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 26 1 11-21 [1993]
  • Introduction: Toward a new consensus on high academic achievement for all children
    Skrla, L. Education and Urban Society 33 3 227-234 [2001]
  • Inquiry-minded schools: Opening doors for accountability
    Rallis, S. Phi Delta Kappan 81 10 766-773 [2000]
  • Inflated test score gains: Is it old norms or teaching the test?
    Shepard, L. A. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices 9 3 15-22 [1990]
  • Improving education through standards-based reform
    McLaughlin, M. - [1995]
  • How indicators have been used in the USA. in: Measuring quality: Education indicators-United Kingdom and international perspectives
    Selden, R. 41-48 [1994]
  • High stakes testing: Worth the price?
    Gordon, S. Journal of School Leadership 7 345-368 [1997]
  • High stakes testing in reading and its effects on teachers, teaching, and students: Today in texas, tomorrow?
    Hoffman, J. - [1999]
  • Hedging bets: Standards-based reform in classroom. in: Measuring quality: Education indicators-United Kingdom and international perspectives
    Wilson, S. 193-216 [2001]
  • Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments
    McDonnell, L. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9 2 133-152 [1987]
  • Exploring rapid achievement gains in North Carolina and Texas
    Grissmer, D. - [1998]
  • Expert problem solving: Evidence from schools and district leaders
    Leithwood, K. - [1995]
  • Every kid a winner: Accountability in education. Palo Alto
    Lessinger, L. - [1970]
  • Evaluating of performance in the United States: Changes in accountability
    Fuhrman, S. - [1994]
  • 박사
  • Educative accountability policy research : Methodology and epistemology
    Macpherson, R. Educational Administration Quarterly 32 1 80-106 [1996]
  • Educational accountability: Current practices and theories in use
    O’Reilly, F. - [1996]
  • Developing a quality curriculum
    Glatthorn, A. - [1994]
  • Comparing state and district results to national norms: The validity of the claims that "everyone is above average."
    Linn, R. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 9 3 5-14 [1990]
  • Can we fairly measure the quality of education?
    Baker, E. - [1989]
  • Big change questions "Should large-scale assessment be used for accountability?" Answer: Depends on the assessment, silly!
    Popham, W. Journal of Educational Change 1 283-289 [2000]
  • Accountability: Implications for state and local policymakers
    Kirst, M. - [1990]
  • Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
    Linn, R. Educational Researcher 31 6 3-16 [2002]
  • "초․중등학교의 책무성", 한국교육의 책무성에 대한 반성과 과제
    김영철 137-158 [2004]