연구동향 분석

“활용과 탐험의 이중주: 조직양면성에 대한 다차 원적 접근”

문상미 허문구 2013년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용

' “활용과 탐험의 이중주: 조직양면성에 대한 다차 원적 접근”' 의 참고문헌

  • 지식탐색이 혁신에 미치는 영향
    허문구 경영학연구 40 5 1247-1271 [2011]
  • “한국의 경영학 연구: 이대로는 안된다”
    김인수 경영학연구 29 3 293-314 [2000]
  • Understanding Dynamic Capabilities
    Winter, S. G. Strategic Management Journal 24 991-995 [2003]
  • Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity
    Gilbert, C. Academy of Management Journal 48 741-763 [2005]
  • Thriving in the new : Implication of Exploration on Organizational Longevity
    Piao, M. Journal of Management 36 6 1529-1554 [2010]
  • Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges
    Eisenhardt, K. Academy of Management Journal 50 1 25-32 [2007]
  • The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation
    Sidhu, J. S. Organization Science 18 20-38 [2007]
  • The interplay between exploration and exploitation
    Gupta, A. K. Academy of Management Journal 49 4 693-706 [2006]
  • The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation
    Voss, G.B. Academy of Management Journal 51 1 147-164 [2008]
  • The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice of strategic human resource management
    Colbert, B. A. Academy of Management Review 29 3 341-358 [2004]
  • The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation, In Management of organization. 1
    Duncan, R. 167-188 [1976]
  • The ambidexterous organization
    O'Reilly, C. A. Harvard Business Review 82 4 74-81 [2004]
  • The age of temporary advantage
    D'Aveni, R. A. Strategic Management Journal 31 13 1371-1385 [2010]
  • The Myopia of Learning
    Levinthal, D. A Strategic Management Journal 14 95-112 [1993]
  • The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity
    Gibson, C. B. Academy of Management Journal 47 2 209-226 [2004]
  • Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation
    Siggelknow, N. Organization Science 14 6 650-669 [2003]
  • Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms
    Jansen, J. P. Organization Science 20 4 797-811 [2009]
  • Someting Old, Something New: A Longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction
    Katila, R. Academy of Management Journal 45 6 1183-1194 [2002]
  • Rival interpretations of balancing exploration and exploitation: Simultaneous or sequential? in Handbook of technology and innovation management
    Chen, E. L. - [2008]
  • Perspectives on the productivity dilema
    Adler, P. Journal of Operations Management 27 99-113 [2009]
  • Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions
    Puranam, P. Academy of Management Journal 49 2 263-280 [2006]
  • Organizational technology, In Companion to organization
    Tushmsn, M.L. 386-414 [2002]
  • Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding
    Simsek, Z Journal of Management studies 46 4 597-624 [2009]
  • Organizational ambidexterity : Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance
    Raisch, S. Organization Science 20 4 685-695 [2009]
  • Organizational Ambidexterity : Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators
    Raisch, S. Journal of Management 34 375-409 [2008]
  • Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms
    Laursen, K. trategicManagement Journal 27 2 131-150 [2006]
  • Managing Strategic Contradictions : A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams
    Smith, W. K. Organization Science 16 5 522-536 [2005]
  • Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality in management
    Ghoshal, S.S Strategic Management Journal 15 91-112 [1994]
  • Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators
    Jansen, J.P. Management Science 52 11 1661-1674 [2006]
  • Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents
    Jansen, J. P. Schmalenbach Business Review 57 4 351-363 [2005]
  • Exploration vs. Exploitation : An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis
    He, Z. L. Organization Science 15 4 481-494 [2004]
  • Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations
    Lavie, D. Academy of Management Annals 4 1 109-155 [2010]
  • Exploration and exploitation in product innovation
    Greve, H. R. Industrial and Corporate Change 16 5 945-975 [2007]
  • Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development
    Rothaermel, F. T. Strategic Management Journal 25 3 287-306 [2004]
  • Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
    March, J. G. Organization Science 2 1 71-87 [1991]
  • Exploitationexploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science
    Andriopoulos, C. Special Issue on Ambidextrous Organizations 20 4 696-717 [2009]
  • Exploitation, Exploration, and ProcessManagement : The Productivity Dilemma Revisited
    Benner, M. J. Academy of Management Review 28 238 238-256 [2003]
  • Case study Research: Design and Methods
    Yin, R. K. - [2003]
  • Building Theories from Case Study Evidence
    Eisenhardt, K. Academy of Management Review 14 532-550 [1989]
  • Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation
    Lavie, D. Academy of Management Journal 49 4 797-818 [2006]
  • Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change
    Tushmsn, M.L. California Management Review 38 4 8-30 [1996]
  • Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma
    O'Reilly, C.A., Ⅲ Research in Organizational Behavior 28 185-206 [2008]
  • Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behaviral integration
    Lubatkin, M. H. Journal of Management 32 5 646-672 [2006]