프로젝트 팀 내 공유리더십(Shared Leadership)이 팀 효능감과 팀 몰입에 미치는 영향 -과업조정 및 업무분담의 매개효과 검증 -

논문상세정보

' 프로젝트 팀 내 공유리더십(Shared Leadership)이 팀 효능감과 팀 몰입에 미치는 영향 -과업조정 및 업무분담의 매개효과 검증 -' 의 참고문헌

  • 팀장의 리더십이 구성원의 경력몰입과 이직의도에 미치는 영향 -감성지능의 조절효과-
    임서영 기업경영연구 17 3 1-22 [2010]
  • 팀 과정특성과 구성원 태도의 관련성에 관한 실증적 연구
    박동수 경영연구 13 4 1-30 [1998]
  • 공유리더십의 효과에 대한 연구: 과업상호의존성과 리더십의존성의 조절효과를 중심으로
    방호진 195-212 [2008]
  • Work groups and teams in organizations, In Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology
    Kozlowski, S. W. J. 333-375 [2003]
  • Who’s in charge here? : sources of leadership for change in eight schools
    Heller, M. F Elementary School Journal 96 65-86 [1995]
  • When two(or more)heads are betterthan one : The promise and pitfalls ofshared leadership
    O’Toole, J California ManagementReview 44 4 65-83 [2002]
  • When twelve heads are betterthan one: Implementing a shared eadershipconcept in a police agency
  • What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite
    Cohen, S. G. Journal of Management 23 239-290 [1997]
  • Understanding groups in organizations, In Research in Organizational Behavior
    Goodman, P. S - [1987]
  • Top management team process, shared leadership, an new venture performance : A theoretical model and researchagenda
    Ensley, M. E Human Resource ManagementReview 13 329-346 [2003]
  • Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?
    Bantel, K. A. Strategic Management Journal 10 107-125 [1989]
  • The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.)
    Katz, D. - [1978]
  • The relative influence of vertical vs. shared leadership on the longitudinal effectiveness of change management teams
    Pearce, C. L Group Dynamics : Theory, Research, and Practice 6 172-197 [2002]
  • The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
    Baron, R. M. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1173-1182 [1986]
  • The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness
    Hackman, J. R. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 350-365 [1976]
  • The importance of verticaland shared leadership within new venturetop management teams : Implicationsfor the performance of startups
    Ensley, M. D LeadershipQuarterly 17 217-231 [2006]
  • The importance of self-and shared leadership in knowledge work
    Pearce, C. L Organizational Dynamics 34 130-140 [2005]
  • The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes : A causal model
    Riggs, M Journal of Applied Psychology 79 755-766 [1994]
  • The future of leadership : Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work
    Pearce, C. L Academy of Management Executive 18 47-57 [2004]
  • Teamwork: what must go right, what can go wrong
    Larson, C. E - [1989]
  • Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence
    Hoegl, M. Organization Science 12 435-449 [2001]
  • Teams in organizations : recent research on performance and effectiveness
    Guzzo, R. A. Annual Review of Psychology 47 307-338 [1996]
  • Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams, In Advances in Interdisciplinary Study of Work Teams: Team Leadership
    Kozlowski, S. W. J 253-292 [1996]
  • Social network analysis : a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences
    Otte, E. Journal of Information Science 6 441-453 [2002]
  • Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups
    Sparrowe, R. T. Academy of Management Journal 44 316-325 [2001]
  • Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
    Wasserman, S. - [1994]
  • Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
    Nahapiet, J. Academy of Management Review 23 242-266 [1998]
  • Shared leadership in work teams: A socialnetwork approach, In Shared leadership:Reframing the hows and whys of leadership
    Mayo, M 193-214 [2003]
  • Shared leadership in teams : Aninvestigation of antecedent conditions andperformance
    Carson, J. B Academy of ManagementJournal 50 1217-1234 [2007]
  • Self-monitoring as a predictor of leader emergence
    Kent, R. L Psychological Reports 66 875-881 [1990]
  • Self-construals, communication processes, and group outcomes in homogeneous and hetrogeneous groups
    Oetzel, J. G Small Group Research 32 19-54 [2001]
  • Self efficacy: The exercise of control
    Bandura, A. A - [1997]
  • Role sharing at the top: a neglected aspect of studies of managerial behavior, In Executive behavior
    Stewart, R 120-136 [1991]
  • Relationships between work group characteristics and effectiveness : implications for designing effective work groups
    Campion, M. A Personnel Psychology 46 823-850 [1993]
  • Reflections on the study and relevance of organizational commitment
    Mowday, R. Human Resource Management Review 8 387-401 [1999]
  • Perceived facilitators and inhibitors of effectiveness in organizational work teams
    Hirokawa, R Management Communication Quarterly 8 4 424-446 [1995]
  • Participation in decision-making: One more look, In Research in organizational behavior
    Locke, E. A 265-339 [1979]
  • Outward bound : Strategies for team survival in an organization
    Ancona, D. G. Academy of Management Journal 33 334-365 [1990]
  • Network data and measurement, In Annual review of sociology
    Marsden, P. V Annual Reviews 16 435-463 [1990]
  • Motivation and opportunity: The role of remote work, demographic dissimilarity, and social network centrality in impression management
    Barsness, Z. I. Academy of Management Journal 48 401-419 [2005]
  • Members’ perceptions of co-leaders influence and effectiveness in group psychotherapy
    Alfred, A. R Journal for Specialists in Group Work 17 42-53 [1992]
  • Measuring and Assessing Organizations
  • Measures of inequality
    Allison, P. D. American Sociological Review 43 865-880 [1978]
  • Managing I/S design teams : a control theories perspective
    Henderson, J. C Management Science 38 757-777 [1992]
  • Let’s bring structure back : A commentary
    Kolb, J. A. Management Communication Quarterly 9 4 452-465 [1996]
  • Leading groups in organization, In Designing effective work groups
    Hackman, J. R 72-119 [1986]
  • Leadership, social work and virtual teams: The relative influence of vertical vs. shared leadership in the nonprofit sector, In Improving leadership in nonprofit organizations
    Pearce, C. L. 180-203 [2004]
  • Leadership, In Handbook of social psychology
    Gibb, C. A 877-917 [1954]
  • Leadership in Organizations,(4nd)
    Yukl, C. A - [1998]
  • Leadership for self-managing work teams : A typology and integrative model
    Stewart, G. L Human Relations 48 747-770 [1995]
  • Leadership capacity in teams
    Day, D. V Leadership Quarterly 15 857-880 [2004]
  • Leadership and decision making
    Vroom, V. H. - [1973]
  • Inequality and heterogeneity
    Blau, P. M. - [1977]
  • Increasing profits through teamwork
    Gallucci, S. L. Training and Development Journal 39 56-67 [1985]
  • High-Performing Self-Managed Work Teams: A Comparison of Theory
    Yeatts, D. E - [1998]
  • Five years of groups research : What we have learned and what needs to be addressed
    Bettenhausen, K. L. Journal of Management 17 345-381 [1991]
  • Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability with and Without Response Bias
    James, L. R. Journal of Applied Psychology 69 85-98 [1984]
  • Entrainment in individual and group performance, In The social psychology of time: New perspectives
    Kelly, J. R - [1988]
  • Enabling software developmentteam performance during requirementsdefinition : a behavioral versus technicalapproach
    Guinan, P. J Information Systems Research 9 2 101-125 [1998]
  • Empowered selling teams : Howshared leadership can contribute to sellingteam outcomes
    Perry, M. L The Journal of PersonalSellian and Sales Management 19 35-51 [1999]
  • Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity : a field experiment
    Buller, P. T Academic Management Journal 29 305-328 [1986]
  • Do they do what they believe they can? Group-efficacy and group performance across tasks and cultures
    Gibson, C. B. Academy of Management Journal 42 138-152 [1999]
  • Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance
    Mehra, A. LeadershipQuarterly 17 232-245 [2006]
  • Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis
    Gronn, P. Leadership Quarterly 13 423-451 [2002]
  • Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance
    Ancona, D. G. Organization Science 3 321-341 [1992]
  • Centrality and power in organization, In Networks in organizations: Structure, Form, and Action
    Brass, D. 191-215 [1992]
  • Business without bosses: How Self-managing teams are building high-performance companies
    Manz, C. C. - [1993]
  • Building highly developed teams: Focusing on shared leadership processes, efficacy, trust, and performance, In Advances in Interdisciplinary Study of Work Teams: Team Leadership
    Avolio, B. J 173-209 [1996]
  • Bass and Stodgill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research and Managerial Applications(3rd ed.)
    Bass, B. M - [1990]
  • Attitudes toward work in project groups as predictors of academic performance
    Freeman, K. A Small Group Research 27 2 265-282 [1996]
  • Affective responses to intragroup interdependence and job complexity
    Van der Vegt, G. S Journal of Management 26 633-655 [2000]
  • Academic amnesia and vestigial assumptions of our forefathers
    Bedian, A. G Leadership Quarterly 17 190-205 [2006]
  • A temporally based frameworkand taxonomy of team processes
    Marks, M. A Academyof Management Review 26 356-376 [2001]
  • A social network perspective on human resources management
    Brass, D. J. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 13 39-79 [1995]
  • A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance
    Sivasubraminiam, N Group and Organization Management 27 66-96 [2002]