Bi-factor MIRT True-Score Equating for Testlet-Based Tests

논문상세정보
' Bi-factor MIRT True-Score Equating for Testlet-Based Tests' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 교육학
  • bi-factormodel
  • bi-factor모형
  • multidimensional irt
  • testlet-based test
  • true-score equating
  • 다차원 문항반응이론
  • 단위검사
  • 진점수 동등화
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
14,376 0

0.0%

' Bi-factor MIRT True-Score Equating for Testlet-Based Tests' 의 참고문헌

  • Vertical linking of test composed of testlets: A comparison between dichotomous models, polytomous models, and testlet response model
    Ngudgratoke, S. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education [2006]
  • The impact of scale dilation on the quality of the linking of multidimensional item response theory calibrations
    Min, K. Michigan State University [2003]
  • Testlet Response Model for IRT True Score Equating
    이규민 교육평가연구 22 (3) : 871 ~ 887 [2009]
  • Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices
    Kolen, M. J. Springer [2004]
  • Standard errors of Tucker equating
    Kolen, M. J. Applied Psychological Measurement 9 : 209 ~ 223 [1981]
  • On the reliability of testlet-based tests
    Sireci, S. G. Journal of Educational Measurement 28 : 237 ~ 247 [1991]
  • Observed score and true score equating procedures for multidimensional item response theory
    Brossman, B. G. Applied Psychological Measurement 37 : 460 ~ 481 [2013]
  • Multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) approaches to vertical scaling
    Yon, H. Michigan State University [2006]
  • Multidimensional item response theory
    Reckase, M. D. Springer [2009]
  • Multidimensional equating
    Hirsch, T. Journal of Educational Measurement 26 : 337 ~ 349 [1989]
  • Multidimensional IRT scale linking
    Thompson, T. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society [1997]
  • Mixed-format tests: Psychometric properties with a primary focus on equating (Volume 2)
    Lee, W. Center for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, The University of Iowa [2012]
  • Linking multidimensional item calibration
    Davey, T. Applied Psychological Measurement 20 : 405 ~ 416 [1996]
  • Incorporating the testlet concept in test score analyses
    Lee, G. Educational measurement : Issues and practices 19 (4) : 5 ~ 9 [2000]
  • IRTPRO: Flexible professional item response theory modeling for patient reported outcomes [Computer software]
    Cai, L. SSI International [2012]
  • IRT versus conventional equating methods : A comparative study of scale stability
    Petersen, N. S. Journal of Educational Statistics 8 : 137 ~ 156 [1983]
  • IRT equating: A flexible alternative to conventional methods for solving practica ltesting problems
    Cook, L. L. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association [1981]
  • How is reliability related to the quality of test scores? What is the effect of local dependence on reliability?
    Wainer, H. Educational Measurement : Issues and Practice 15 : 22 ~ 29 [1996]
  • Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory
    Samejima, F. Springer-Verlag : 85 ~ 100 [1996]
  • Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis
    Cai, L. Psychological Methods 16 : 221 ~ 248 [2011]
  • Full-information item bifactor analysis
    Gibbons, R. D. Psychometrika 57 : 423 ~ 436 [1992]
  • Formal relations and an empirical comparison among the bi-factor, the testlet, and a second-order multidimensional IRT model
    Rijmen, F. Journal of Educational Measurement 47 : 361 ~ 372 [2010]
  • Estimating reliability under a generalizability theory model for test scores composed of testlets
    Lee, G. Applied Measurement in Education 12 : 237 ~ 255 [1999]
  • Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories
    Bock, R. D. Psychometrika 37 : 29 ~ 51 [1972]
  • Comparison of dichotomous and polytomous item response models in equating scores from tests composed of testlets
    Lee, G. Applied Psychological Measurement 25 : 357 ~ 372 [2001]
  • Comparison of IRT true-score and equipercentile observed-score equatings
    Lord, F. M. Applied Psychological Measurement 8 : 452 ~ 461 [1984]
  • Comparing vertical scales derived from dichotomous and polytomous IRT models for a test composed of testlets
    Bishop, S. N. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education [2002]
  • Bi-factor MIRT observed-score equating for mixed-format tests
    Lee, G. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [2014]
  • Application of the bi-factor multidimensional item response theory model to testlet-based tests
    DeMars, C. E. Journal of Educational Measurement 43 : 145 ~ 168 [2006]
  • An extension of IRT-based equating to the dichotomous testlet model
    Wei, T. [2013]
  • An evaluation of the accuracy of multidimensional IRT linking
    Li, Y. H. Applied Psychological Measurement 24 : 115 ~ 138 [2000]
  • A test characteristic curve linking method for the testlet model
    Li, Y. Applied psychological measurement 29 (5) : 340 ~ 356 [2005]
  • A comparison among IRT true-and observed-score equating and traditional equipercentile equating
    Han, T. Applied Measurement in Education 10 : 105 ~ 121 [1997]
  • A Bayesian random effects model for testlets
    Bradlow, E. T. Psychometrika 64 (2) : 153 ~ 168 [1999]