연구동향 분석

원자력 발전소 연장운행의 정치경제학: 원전주변지역주민들의 경제적, 정치적 차별지각을 중심으로

김근식 ( Geun Sik Kim ) 김서용 ( Seoyong Kim ) 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 원자력 발전소 연장운행의 정치경제학: 원전주변지역주민들의 경제적, 정치적 차별지각을 중심으로' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • extensionacceptanceofnuclearpower
  • localresidents
  • risk perception
  • 원자력 발전소 연장운행
  • 위험지각 패러다임
  • 지역적 맥락
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
202 0

0.0%

' 원자력 발전소 연장운행의 정치경제학: 원전주변지역주민들의 경제적, 정치적 차별지각을 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • 후쿠시마 원전사고에 대한 한국민의 위험판단 과정에 대한 분석: 휴리스틱-체계적 모형(HSM)에서 정보수신자의 관여와 능력의 역할을 중심으로
    김서용 정부학연구 20 (3) : 315 ~ 343 [2014]
  • 후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 원전사고와 원자력에 대한 위험판단 분석: 위험지각패러다임과 위험소통모형의 통합 적용을 통해
    김서용 한국행정연구 23 (4) : 113 ~ 143 [2014]
  • 후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 원자력 수용성 및 인식구조 변화에 대한 탐색적 분석
    왕재선 한국행정학보 47 (2) : 395 ~ 424 [2013]
  • 후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 세계인의 원자력 수용성 태도변화 분석
    김서용 한국정책학회보 23 (3) : 57 ~ 90 [2014]
  • 지역에너지 거버넌스 구축요인 분석
    서혁준 지방행정연구 28 (4) : 283 ~ 312 [2014]
  • 위험인식모형과 원자력위험: 심리측정패러다임 검증 및 적용
    차용진 한국정책학회보 21 (1) : 285 ~ 312 [2012]
  • 위험과 편익을 넘어서: 원자력발전소 수용성에 대한 경험적 감정의 휴리스틱 효과
    김서용 한국행정학보 41 (3) : 373 ~ 398 [2007]
  • 위험과 편익사이에서 : 방폐장 수용성의 결정요인에 대한 분석
    김서용 한국행정연구 15 (3) : 297 ~ 330 [2006]
  • 원전비리 사건의 부정적 효과와 신뢰기제 분석
    임채홍 한국행정연구 23 (3) : 131 ~ 159 [2014]
  • 원자력 발전소에 대한 신뢰, 인식된 위험과 혜택, 그리고 수용성
    심준섭 한국정책학회보 18 (4) : 93 ~ 132 [2009]
  • 신뢰와 원자력 수용성의 다차원성에 대한 탐색적 분석
    정주용 한국행정학보 48 (4) : 51 ~ 78 [2014]
  • 신뢰와 원자력 수용성
    왕재선 한국정책학회보 22 (3) : 235 ~ 266 [2013]
  • 방폐장 입지에 관한 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 변수
    이나경 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 17 (4) : 461 ~ 475 [2005]
  • 가치, 경험, 지각- 원자력 수용성에서 가치 및 경험 기반 중층모형(Multi-layer Model)의 적합성에 대한 탐색적 연구-
    유연재 Crisisonomy 11 (8) : 179 ~ 201 [2015]
  • “Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on The Risk Perception of Residents Near A Nuclear Power Plant in China
    Huang, L. Proceeding of Notational Academy Scicience. U S A 110 (49) : 19742 ~ 19747 [2013]
  • Wind Power Implementation : The Nature of Public Attitudes : Equity and Fairness Instead of ‘Backyard Motives’
    Wolsink, M. Renewable & Sustainable Eenrgy Review 11 : 1188 ~ 1207 [2007]
  • Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield
    Slovic, P. Risk Analysis 19 (4) : 689 ~ 701 [1999]
  • Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty and Scepticism in the Public Mind
    Earle, T. C. Earthscan [2007]
  • The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice
    Peters, E. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 : 1465 ~ 1475 [2000]
  • The future of nuclear power: value orientations and risk perception.
    Whitfield, S. C. Risk Analysis 29 (3) : 425 ~ 437 [2009]
  • The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology
    Siegrist, M. Risk Analysis 20 (2) : 195 ~ 203 [2000]
  • Reversing Nuclear Opposition: Evolving Public Acceptance of a Permanent Nuclear Waste Disposal Facility
    Jenkins-Smith Risk Analysis 31 (4) : 629 ~ 644 [2011]
  • Rethinking the siting of hazardous waste facilities
    Kasperson, R. E. Conference Institute for Applied Syste Analysis [1985]
  • Relationships between Value Orientations, Self-determined Motivational Types and Pro-environmental Behavioural Intentions
    De Groot, J. I. M. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (4) : 368 ~ 378 [2010]
  • Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate : Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste
    Bickerstaff, K. Public Understanding of Science 17 : 145 ~ 169 [2008]
  • Public Response to the Tokai Nuclear Accident
    Katsuya, T. Risk Analysis 21 (6) : 1039 ~ 1045 [2001]
  • Public Perceptions of Energy Choices: the Influence of Beliefs about Climate Change and the Environment
    Spence, A. Environment and Energy 21 (5) : 384 ~ 407 [2010]
  • Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Energy Futures before and after the Fukushima Accident: A Comparison between Britain and Japan
    Poortinga, W. Energy Policy 62 : 1204 ~ 1211 [2013]
  • Public Attitudes toward Siting a High-Level Nuclear
    Kunreuther, H. Waste Repository in Nevada 10 (4) : 469 ~ 484 [1990]
  • Perception of risk
    Slovic, P. Science 236 : 280 ~ 290 [1987]
  • Perceived risk, stigma and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in nevada
    Slovic, P. Risk Analysis 11 : 683 ~ 696 [1991]
  • On-site Storage Of High Level Nuclear Waste: Attitudes And Perceptions Of Local Residents
    Bassett, G. W. Risk Analysis 16 (3) : 309 ~ 319 [1996]
  • Nuclear Power, Climate Change and Energy Security: Exploring British Public Attitudes
    Corner, A. Energy Policy 39 : 4823 ~ 4833 [2011]
  • Nuclear Power in Australia: A Comparative Analysis of Public Opinion Regarding Climate Change and the Fukushima Disaster
    Bird, D. K. Energy Policy 64 : 644 ~ 653 [2014]
  • Local Acceptance of a High-Level Waste Repository
    Sjöberg, L. Risk Analysis 24 (3) : 737 ~ 749 [2004]
  • Living with Nuclear Power: A Q-Method Study of Local Community Perceptions
    Venables, D. Risk Analysis 29 (8) : 1089 ~ 1104 [2009]
  • Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust
    Sjӧberg, L. Risk Analysis 21 (1) : 189 ~ 198 [2001]
  • How safe is safe enough?: A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits
    Fischhoff, B. Policy Sciences 9 (2) : 127 ~ 152 [1978]
  • Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks
    Flynn, J. Risk Analysis 14 (6) : 1101 ~ 1108 [1994]
  • Gender, Race, and Perceived risk: The 'White Male' Effect
    Finucane, M. Health, Risk &Society 2 (2) : 159 ~ 172 [2000]
  • From the Familiar to the Extraordinary: Local Residents’ Perceptions of Risk When Living with Nuclear Power in the UK Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
    Parkhill, K. A. Risk Analysis 35 (1) : 39 ~ 58 [2010]
  • Fair Play in Energy Policy Decision: Procedural fairnss, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants
    Visschers, V. Energy Policy 46 : 292 ~ 300 [2012]
  • Exploring public perceptions of energy security risks in the UK
    Demski, C. Energy Policy 66 : 369 ~ 378 [2014]
  • Experience of Technological and Natural Disaster and their Impact on the Perceived Risk of Nuclear Accidents After the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan 2011: A Cross-country Analysis
    Yamamura, E. The Journal of Socio-Economics 41 : 360 ~ 363 [2012]
  • Energy security vs. climate change:Theorial framework development and experience in selected EU electricity markets
    Chalvatzis, K. J. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 : 2703 ~ 2709 [2009]
  • Determinants of trust perceptions among residents surrounding the Savannah River nuclear weapons site
    Williams, B. L. Environment and Behavior 31 (3) : 354 ~ 371 [1999]
  • Cultural Approach to the Perception of Risk: Analysing Concern about the Siting of a High-level Nuclear Waste Facility in Finland
    Litmanen, T. Waste Management Research 17 : 212 ~ 219 [1999]
  • Credibility, information preferences, and information interests
    Jungermann, H. Risk Analysis 16 : 251 ~ 261 [1996]
  • Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model
    Vivianne, H. M. V. Energy Policy 39 (6) : 3621 ~ 3629 [2011]
  • Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model
    Visschers, V. H. M. Energy Policy 39 : 3621 ~ 3629 [2011]
  • Climate Change or Nuclear Power—No Thanks! A Quantitative Study of Public Perceptions and Risk Framing in Britain
    Pidgeon, N. F. Global Environmental Change 18 : 69 ~ 85 [2008]
  • Changing Expectations: A Longtitudinal Study of Community Attitudes Toward a Nuclear Power Plant
    Hughey, J. B. American Journal of Community Psychology 11 (6) : 655 ~ 672 [1983]
  • Attitudes toward nuclear energy: familiarity and salience
    Van Der Plight, J. Environment Behavior 18 (1) : 75 ~ 93 [1986]
  • Attitude and Risk Perceptions of Stakeholders in a Nuclear Waste Siting Issue
    Sjöberg, L. Risk Analysis 23 (4) : 739 ~ 749 [2003]
  • Acceptance of Nuclear Power: The Fukushima Effect
    Siegrist, M. Energy Policy 59 : 112 ~ 119 [2012]
  • A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefits
    Alhakami, A. S. Risk Analysis 14 (6) : 1085 ~ 1096 [1994]