The Benefit and Limitations of No-Fault Divorce in Korea

논문상세정보
' The Benefit and Limitations of No-Fault Divorce in Korea' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 법학
  • divorcebyagreement
  • family law
  • fault-baseddivorce
  • no-fault divorce
  • unilateral divorce
  • 가족법
  • 유책주의
  • 일방이혼
  • 파탄주의
  • 협의이혼
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
8,087 0

0.0%

' The Benefit and Limitations of No-Fault Divorce in Korea' 의 참고문헌

  • “Multicultural Families” in South Korea: A Socio-Legal Approach
    Hyunah Yang North Caroliva Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 37 [2011]
  • Women and Confucianism in Choson Korea
    Youngmin Kim State University of New York Press [2011]
  • Who Pays for Guilt?: Recent Fault-Based Divorce Reform Proposals, Cultural Stereotypes and Economic Consequences
    Jane Biondi Boston College Law Review 40 [1999]
  • Vision of Postcolonial Feminist Jurisprudence in Korea: Seen from the ‘Family-Head System’ in Family Law
    Hyunah Yang Journal of Korean Law 5 (2) [2006]
  • Tradition and the Constitution in the Context of the Korean Family Law
    Jinsu Yune Journal of Korean Law 5 (1) [2005]
  • Together With My Suffering Neighbour
    Sonia Strawn Int. Bar J 10 [1979]
  • The effect of Divorce Laws on Divorce Rates in Europe
    Libertad González European Economic Review 53 (2) [2009]
  • The Supreme Court’s Treatment of Same-Sex Marriage in United States v. Windsor and Holligsworth v. Perry: Analysis and Implications
    Sherif Girgis Case Western Reserve Law Review 64 [2014]
  • The Sage and the Second Sex, Confucianism, Ethics and Gender
    Chenyang Li Carus Publishing Company [2000]
  • The Role of Woman in Korea Divorce Law
    Jacqueline Putnam Epstein Journal of Korean Law 6 (2) [2007]
  • The Reform of the Consensual Divorce Process and the Child Support Enforcement System in Korea
    윤진수 Journal of Korean Law 11 (2) : 247 ~ 261 [2012]
  • The Place of Fault in Modern Divorce Law
    Ira Mark Ellman Arizona State Law Journal 28 [1989]
  • The Misguided Movement to Revive Fault Divorce, and Why Reformers Should Look Instead to the American Law Institute
    Ira Mark Ellman International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 11 [1977]
  • The Legacy of Institutionalized Gender Inequality in South Korea: The Family Law
    Rosa Kim Boston College Third World Law Journal 14 [1994]
  • The Honorable Sondra Miller, Justice Abandoned: Forty Year of Stalemate in Actions for Divorce on the Ground of Abandonment
    Delores Gebhardt Pace Law Review 27 [2006]
  • The Fragility of Estimated Effects of Unilateral Divorce Laws on Divorce Rates
  • The Economic Consequences of Divorce in Six OECD Countries
  • The Doctrine of Recrimination in Divorce Proceedings
    J.G. Beamer University of Kansas City Law Review 10 : 1941 ~ 1942 [1941]
  • The Cost of Fault-Based Divorce
    Deborah H. Bell Mississippi Law Journal 82 [2013]
  • The Constitutional Status of Morals Legislation
    John Lawrence Hill Kentucky Law Journal 98 [2010]
  • The Constitution and Covenant Marriage Legislation: Rumors of a Constitutional Right to Divorce Have Been Greatly Exaggerated
    David M Regent University Law Journal 12 [2000]
  • Socioeconomic Determinants of Marital Disruption: The Case of Divorce or Separation
    Yean-Ju Lee Research Paper Submitted to the 2005 Annual Conference of the Korean Labor Income Panel Study [2005]
  • Small Bang? The Impact of Divorce Legislation on Marital Breakdown in Ireland
    Tony Fahey Internationall Journal of Law Policy and the Family 26 (2) [2012]
  • Rules, Responsibility and Commitment to Children: The New Language of Morality in Family Law
    Jane C. Murphy University of Pittsburgh Law Review 60 [1999]
  • Report of the Mortimer Commission of the Church of England
    [1966]
  • Repairing Family Law
    Claire Huntington Duke Law Journal 57 (5) [2008]
  • Reforming Divorce Reform
    Allen M. Parkman Santa Clara Law Review 41 [2000]
  • Reflections on the Future of Grounds for Divorce
    Brigitte M. Bodenheimer Journal of Family Law 8 [1968]
  • Reconstructing Fault: The Case for Spousal Torts
    Pamela Laufer-Ukeles University of Cincinnati Law Review 79 [2010]
  • Reassessing Fault Factors in No-Fault Divorce
    Peter Nash Swisher Family Law Quarterly 31 (2) [1997]
  • Projection Bias in Divorce
  • Only in New York: The Geography of Family Law
    Barbara Stark Wisconsin Journal Law, Gender and Society 29 (1) [2014]
  • On Mutual Consent to Divorce: A Debate With Two Sides to the Story
    Lynne Marie Kohm Appalachian Journal of Law 8 [2008]
  • Note, Enhancing The Effectiveness of Mediation in Korean- American Family Disputes: Cultural Sensitivity Training for Mediators and Co-Mediation Teams
    Giyang An Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 11 [2010]
  • No-Fault Marital Dissolution: The Bitter Triumph of Naked Divorce
    Herbie DiFonzo San Diego Law Review 31 [1994]
  • No-Fault Divorce and the Divorce Conundrum
    Lynn D. Wardle Brigham Young University Law Review 1991 (1) [1991]
  • Marriage and Some Troubling Issues with No-Fault Divorce
    Peter Nash Swisher Regent University Law Review 17 [2005]
  • LL.D, Reform of Divorce Act, 1968 (Canada), in Studies on Divorce
    H.R. Halo Law Reform Commission of Canada [1975]
  • Korean Divorce Law: Can a Spouse Guilty of Marital Misconduct Get a Divorce Without the Consent of the Other Spouse?
    Dong-Jin Park The International Survey of Family Law 2010 [2010]
  • Korea: The 1990 Family Law Reform and the Improvement of the Status of Women
    Mi-Kyung Cho University of Louisville Journal of Family Law 33 [1995]
  • Grounds for Divorce: A Survey
    Matthew Butler Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 11 [2000]
  • Gender Equality and the Matrimonial Property System under the Family Law in Korea
    Eun-Hee Cho Journal of Korea Law 5 (2) [2006]
  • Facilitating Forgiveness and Reconciliation in “Good Enough” Marriages
    Solangel Maldonado Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 13 [2013]
  • Empirical Work in Family Law
    Margaret F. Brinig University Illinois Law Review 2002 [2002]
  • Earning Capacity and Imputing Income for Child Support Calculations: A Survey of Law and Outline of Practice Tips
    David W. Griffin Journal of the American Academy Matrimonial Lawyers 26 [2014]
  • Early Adolescents and Divorce in South Korea: Risk, Resilience and Pain
    Yeonok Chung Journal of Comparative Family Studies 41 (5) [2010]
  • Does Divorce Law Affect the Divorce Rate? A Review of Empirical Research, 1995-2006
    Douglas W. Allen iMAPP Research Brief 1 (1) [2007]
  • Do Divorce Law Reforms Matter for Divorce Rates? Evidence from Portugal
    Clarisse Coelho Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 3 [2006]
  • Divorce in South Korea: An Introduction to Demographic Trends, Culture, and Law
    Hyunjoo Shim Family Court Review 51 (4) [2013]
  • Divorce in Korea, Trends and Educational Differentials
    Huynjoon Park Journal of Marriage and Family 1 [2013]
  • Divorce and Remarriage as Human Rights: The Irish Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights at Odds in Johnston v. Ireland
    Kathleen M. Dillon Cornell International Law Journal 22 [1989]
  • Divorce Without Fault Without Perjury
    Walter Wadlington Virginia Law Review 52 [1966]
  • Divorce Reform at the Crossroads
  • Divorce Rates, Marriage Rates, and the Problematic Persistence of Traditional Marital Roles
    Ira Mark Ellman Family Law Quarterly 34 [2000]
  • Divorce Law, Feminism, and Psychoanalysis: In Dreams Begin Responsibilities
    Barbara Stark UCLA Law Review 28 : 38 ~ [1991]
  • Divorce Law Reforms and Divorce Rates in the U.S.: An Interactive Fixed Effects Approach
    Dukpa Kim Journal of Applied Economic 29 [2011]
  • Divorce American Style
    William A. Galston Pub. Interest [1996]
  • Did Unilateral Divorce Raise Divorce Rates? Evidence from Panel Data
    Friedberg, Leora The American Economic Review 88 (3) [1998]
  • Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results: Comment
  • Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results
    Justin Wolfers The American Economic Review 96 (5) [2006]
  • Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Woman
    A. Res. 104, U.N. GAOR, 48th Sess, U.N. Doc A/RES/48/104 [1993]
  • Cultivating Forgiveness: Reducing Hostility and Conflict After Divorce
    Solangel Maldonado Wake Forest Law Review 43 [2008]
  • Constitutional Court Abolishes ‘Scarlet Letter’ Law banning adultery
    National News: The Hankyoreh [2015]
  • Confucian Ethics, Judges and Women: Divorce Under the Revised Korean Family Law
    Kay C. Lee Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 4 [1995]
  • Comment, The “Holey” Bonds of Matrimony: A Constitutional Challenge to Burdensome Divorce Law
    Elizabeth Horowitz University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 8 [2006]
  • Comment, Fault: A Viable Means of Re-Injecting Responsibility in Marital Relations
    Adriaen M. Morse, Jr. University of Richmond Law Review 30 [1996]
  • Cead Mile Failte? Ireland Welcomes Divorce: The 1995 Irish Divorce Referendum and the Family Divorce Act of 1996
    Christine James Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 8 [1997]
  • An Ounce of Prevention: Marital Counseling Laws as an Anti-Divorce Measure
    Matthew J. Astle Fam. L.Q 38 (3) [2004]
  • Abortion and Divorce
    Mary Ann Glendon Western Law 95 [1987]
  • A Study on Divorce Reform
  • A Journey of Family Law Reform in Korea: Tradition, Equality and Social Change
    Hyunah Yang Journal of Korea Law 8 (1) [2008]