과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 맥락에서의 소집단 논증활동 분석틀 개발: 담화클러스터와 담화요소의 분석

논문상세정보
' 과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 맥락에서의 소집단 논증활동 분석틀 개발: 담화클러스터와 담화요소의 분석' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • analytical framework
  • dialogicargumentation
  • discoursecluster
  • discoursescheme
  • socioscientific issues
  • ssi discourse
  • 과학관련 사회쟁점
  • 담화
  • 담화요소
  • 담화클러스터
  • 대화적 논증활동
  • 분석틀
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
247 2

0.0%

' 과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 맥락에서의 소집단 논증활동 분석틀 개발: 담화클러스터와 담화요소의 분석' 의 참고문헌

  • 집단지성을 강조한 과학기술 관련 사회쟁점 수업이 중학교 영재학급 학생들의역량 함양에 미치는 효과
    이현주 한국과학교육학회지 35 (3) : 431 ~ 442 [2015]
  • 집단지성 원리를 적용한 과학관련 사회·윤리적 쟁점 수업 모형의 개발
    이현주 한국과학교육학회지 34 (6) : 523 ~ 534 [2014]
  • 사회 속 과학 쟁점에 대한 소집단 논변 상호작용 분석을 위한 방법론 고찰
    박지영 한국과학교육학회지 32 (4) : 604 ~ 624 [2012]
  • 논증 담화 분석 연구의 방법론적 고찰: 논증활동의 협력적 구성과 인식적 실행의 분석을 중심으로
    맹승호 한국과학교육학회지 33 (4) : 840 ~ 862 [2013]
  • What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?
    Sadler, T. D. Research in Science Education 37 (4) : 371 ~ 391 [2007]
  • Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues
    Bell, R. L. Science Education 87 (3) : 352 ~ 377 [2003]
  • The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues : Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues
    Sadler, T. D. Science Education 89 (1) : 71 ~ 93 [2005]
  • The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education
    Zeidler, D. L. Springer : 7 ~ 38 [2003]
  • The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanation
    Sandoval, W. A. Cognition and Instruction 23 (1) : 23 ~ 55 [2005]
  • The morality of socioscientific issues : Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas
    Sadler, T. D. Science Education 88 (1) : 4 ~ 27 [2004]
  • The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science
    Dawson, V. M. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (8) : 952 ~ 977 [2010]
  • The development of argumentive discourse skills
    Felton, M. Discourse Processes 32 (2&3) : 135 ~ 153 [2001]
  • The Uses of Argument
    Toulmin, S. E. University Press [1958]
  • Tapping into argumentation : Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse
    Erduran, S. Science Education 88 (6) : 915 ~ 933 [2004]
  • Tangled up in views : Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas
    Zeidler, D. L. Science Education 86 (3) : 343 ~ 367 [2002]
  • Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain-specific and domain-general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena
    McNeill, K. L. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 18 (3) : 416 ~ 460 [2009]
  • Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens
    Lee,H. International Journal of Science Education 35 (12) : 2079 ~ 2113 [2013]
  • Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and research
    Evagorou, M. Springer : 133 ~ 159 [2011]
  • Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and research
    Simon, S. Springer : 167 ~ 192 [2011]
  • Scientific arguments as learning artifacts : Designing for learning from the web with KIE
    Bell, P. International Journal of Science Education 22 (8) : 797 ~ 817 [2000]
  • Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning about socioscientific issues : The influence of issue context
    Topcu, M. S. International Journal of Science Education 32 (18) : 2475 ~ 2495 [2010]
  • Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach
    Rest, J. R. Erlbaum [1999]
  • Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation
    Nussbaum, E. M. Springer : 17 ~ 37 [2012]
  • Perceptions of the nature and ‘goodness’ of argument among college students, science teachers, and scientists
    Abi‐El‐Mona, I. International Journal of Science Education 33 (4) : 573 ~ 605 [2011]
  • Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students
    Fowler, S. R. International Journal of Science Education 31 (2) : 279 ~ 296 [2009]
  • Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues
    Sadler, T. D. Journal of Moral Education 33 (3) : 339 ~ 358 [2004]
  • Grade 5 students’ online argumentation about their in-class inquiry investigations
    Choi, A. Research in Science Education 44 (2) : 267 ~ 287 [2014]
  • Fundamentals of argumentation theory
    van Eemeren, F. H. Erlbaum [1996]
  • Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics
    Zohar, A. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (1) : 35 ~ 62 [2002]
  • Examination dialogue : An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion
    Walton, D. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (5) : 745 ~ 777 [2006]
  • Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms
    Driver, R. Science Education 84 (3) : 287 ~ 312 [2000]
  • Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
    Osborne, J. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (10) : 994 ~ 1020 [2004]
  • Developing character and values for global citizens : Analysis of preservice science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues
    Lee,H. International Journal of Science Education 34 (6) : 925 ~ 953 [2012]
  • Decision making through dialogue : A case study of analyzing preservice teachers’ argumentation on socioscientific issues
    Kim, M. Research in Science Education 44 (6) : 903 ~ 926 [2014]
  • Critical questions and argument stratagems : A framework for enhancing and analyzing students'reasoning practices
    Nussbaum, E. M. Journal of the Learning Sciences 20 (3) : 443 ~ 488 [2011]
  • College Students’ Decision-Making Tendencies in the Context of Socioscientific Issues (SSI)
    장현숙 한국과학교육학회지 30 (7) : 887 ~ 900 [2010]
  • Beyond STS : A research based framework for socioscientific issues education
    Zeidler, D. L. Science Education 89 (3) : 357 ~ 377 [2005]
  • Assessment of evidence in university students' scientific writing
    Takao, A. Y. Science & Education 12 (4) : 341 ~ 363 [2003]
  • Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds and conceptual quality
    Clark, D. B. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (3) : 293 ~ 321 [2008]
  • Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling : Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education
    Nussbuam, E. Educational Psychologist 46 (2) : 84 ~ 106 [2011]
  • Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning
    Walton, D. Erlbaum [1996]
  • Argumentation in science education:Perspectives from classroom-based research
    Duschl, R. Springer : 159 ~ 175 [2007]
  • Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroombased research
    Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. Springer : 3 ~ 27 [2007]
  • A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation
    Sadler, T. D. Science Education 90 (6) : 986 ~ 1004 [2006]