연구동향 분석

논의 기반 탐구 과학수업에서 동료평가 활동이 고등학생의 논의에 미치는 영향

이선우 ( Seon Woo Lee ) 박덕찬 ( Deok Chan Bak ) 남정희 ( Jeong Hee Nam ) 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 논의 기반 탐구 과학수업에서 동료평가 활동이 고등학생의 논의에 미치는 영향' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • argument-based inquiry
  • argumentation
  • peer assessment
  • 논의
  • 논의 기반 탐구 과학수업
  • 동료 평가
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
282 0

0.0%

' 논의 기반 탐구 과학수업에서 동료평가 활동이 고등학생의 논의에 미치는 영향' 의 참고문헌

  • 중학교 과학수업에 적용한 글쓰기를 활용한 논의-기반 모델링 전략의 효과
    조혜숙 한국과학교육학회지 34 (6) : 583 ~ 592 [2014]
  • 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기(Science Writing Heuristic)의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용
    남정희 한국과학교육학회지 28 (8) : 922 ~ 936 [2008]
  • 논의기반 탐구 과학 글쓰기 수업 적용에서 나타나는 초임 과학 교사들의 수업에 대한 인식 및 수업실행 변화
    권정인 한국과학교육학회지 33 (7) : 1329 ~ 1342 [2013]
  • 논의가 강조된 일반화학실험이 예비교사의 글쓰기 능력 및 화학개념 이해에 미치는 효과
    남정희 한국과학교육학회지 31 (8) : 1077 ~ 1091 [2011]
  • 논의가 강조된 일반화학실험이 대학생들의 글쓰기에서 나타난 다중 표상 및 다중 표상의 내재성에 미치는 영향
    남정희 한국과학교육학회지 31 (6) : 931 ~ 941 [2011]
  • Writing to Learn by Learning to Write During the School Science Laboratory : Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas
    Sampson, V. Science Education 97 (5) : 643 ~ 670 [2013]
  • Writing in science: How to scaffold instruction to support learning
    Fulwiler, B. Heinemann [2008]
  • Writing for learning in secondary science : Rethinking practices
    Prain, V. Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (3) : 179 ~ 201 [1996]
  • Web-based peer review : The learner as both adapter and reviewer
    Liu, E. IEEE Transactions on Education 44 (3) : 246 ~ 251 [2001]
  • Using the science writing heuristic in the general chemistry laboratory to improve students academic performance
    Poock, J. Journal of Chemical Education 84 : 1371 ~ 1378 [2007]
  • Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science
    Keys, C. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (10) : 1065 ~ 1084 [1999]
  • The uses of argument
    Toulmin, S. Cambridge University Press [1958]
  • The sound of music : Constructing science as a sociocultural practice through oral and written discourse
    Kelly, G. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (8) : 883 ~ 915 [1999]
  • The next generation science standards
    National Research Council National Academy Press [2013]
  • The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment
    Xiao, Y. The Internet and Higher Education 11 (3-4) : 186 ~ 193 [2008]
  • The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged
    Smyth, K. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (3) : 369 ~ 378 [2004]
  • The Effects of Argument-Based Inquiry Using the Science Writing Heuristic(SWH)Approach on Argument Structure in Students' Writing
    Jang, K. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 32 (7) : 1099 ~ 1108 [2012]
  • Teaching writing to high school students : A national survey
    Kiuhara, S. Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (1) : 136 ~ 160 [2009]
  • Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8
    National Research Council National Academy Press [2007]
  • Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8
    Duschl, R. National Academies Press [2007]
  • Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education
    Duschl, R. Studies in Science Education 38 : 39 ~ 72 [2002]
  • Structuring activities to foster argumentative discourse
    Kuhn, L. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association [2006]
  • Small-Group Discussion in Physics : Peer Interaction Modes in Pairs and Fours
    Alexopoulou, E. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33 (10) : 1099 ~ 1114 [1996]
  • Science without literacy:Aship without a sail?
    Osborne, J. Cambridge Journal of Education 32 : 203 ~ 215 [2002]
  • Science education in Europe
    Osborne, J. Nuffield Foundation [2008]
  • Rethinking assessment in higher education
    Boud, D. Kogan Page [2007]
  • Productive Discussion in Science : Gender Equity Through Electronic Discourse
    Hsi, S. Journal of Science Education and Technology 6 (1) : 23 ~ 36 [1997]
  • Peer assessment as collaborative learning : a cognitive perspective
    Kollar, I. Learning and Instruction 20 (4) : 344 ~ 348 [2012]
  • Learning about interface design through peer assessment
    Purchase, H. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (4) : 341 ~ 352 [2000]
  • Interpreting popular reports of science : What happens when the readers' world meets the world on paper?
    Phillips, L. International Journal of Science Education 21 (3) : 317 ~ 327 [1999]
  • Inquiry and the national science education standards
    National Research Council National Academy Press [2000]
  • In pursuit of consensus : Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation
    Berland, L. International Journal of Science Education 34 (12) : 1857 ~ 1882 [2012]
  • Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes
    Rust, C. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (2) : 147 ~ 164 [2003]
  • Improving students' evaluation of informal arguments
    Larson, A. Journal of Experimental Education 77 (4) : 339 ~ 366 [2009]
  • Explanation driven inquiry : Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry
    Sandoval, W. Science Education 88 (3) : 345 ~ 372 [2004]
  • Examining the literacy component of science literacy : 25 years of language arts and science research
    Yore, L. International Journal of Science Education 25 (6) : 689 ~ 725 [2003]
  • Examining the impact of student use of multiple-mode representations in constructing science arguments
    Hand, B. annual international conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching [2008]
  • Examining the effect of multiple writing tasks on Year 10 biology students’ understandings of cell and molecular biology concepts
    Hand, B. Instructional Science 35 : 343 ~ 373 [2007]
  • Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms
    Driver, R. Science Education 84 (3) : 287 ~ 313 [2000]
  • Epistemic levels in argument : an analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing
    Kelly, G. Science Education 86 (3) : 314 ~ 342 [2002]
  • Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
    Osborne, J. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (10) : 994 ~ 1020 [2004]
  • Doing the lessonor"doing science" : Argument in high school genetics
    Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. Science Education 84 (6) : 757 ~ 792 [2000]
  • Benchmarks for science literacy
  • Assessor or assessee : How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback
    Li, L. British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (3) : 525 ~ 536 [2010]
  • Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education : Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions
    Clark, D. Science Education 92 (3) : 447 ~ 472 [2008]
  • Assessment matters: Self assessment and peer assessment
    Spiller, D. University of Waikato [2009]
  • Articulation of conceptual knowledge and argumentation practices by high school students in evolution problems
    Tavares, M. Science & Education 19 (6-8) : 573 ~ 598 [2010]
  • Argumentation in science education : an overview
    Erduran, S. Argumentation in Science Education 35 : 3 ~ 27 [2007]
  • Argumentation and Participation Patterns in General Chemistry Peer-Led Sessions
    Kulatunga, U. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (10) : 1207 ~ 1231 [2013]
  • Analysis of lines of reasoning in written argumentation
    Kelly, G. Argumentation in science education 35 : 137 ~ 157 [2007]
  • A framework for K-12 science education:Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas
    National Research Council National Academies Press [2012]