연구동향 분석

컴퓨터 소프트웨어 발명의 특허적격성에 관한 미국판례에 따른 판단기준

정차호(Chaho JUNG) 이해영(Haeyoung LEE) 2014년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 발명의 특허적격성에 관한 미국판례에 따른 판단기준' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 법학
  • aliceprecedent
  • alice판례
  • businessmethod
  • computersoftware
  • patent-eligibility
  • patentablesubject-matter
  • 영업방법
  • 컴퓨터소프트웨어
  • 특허대상
  • 특허적격성
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
8,050 0

0.0%

' 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 발명의 특허적격성에 관한 미국판례에 따른 판단기준' 의 참고문헌

  • eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388
    [2006]
  • Vanquishing Copyright Pirates and Patent Trolls: The Divergent Evolution of Copyright and Patent Laws
    Robert E. Thomas American Business Law Journal 43 (4) : 689 ~ 739 [2006]
  • Ultramercial, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, 657 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
    [2011]
  • Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC & WildTangent, Inc., 722 F.3d 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
    [2013]
  • The History of Software Patents: From Benson and Diehr to State Street and Bilski
  • State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group Inc., 149 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
    [1998]
  • Patenting Floppy Disks, or How the Federal Circuit's Acquiescence has Filled the Void Left by Legislative Inaction
    Shawn McDonald Va.J.L. & Tech 3 : 9 ~ [1998]
  • Patent Eligibility and Patentability of Computer Software Patents in the United States, Europe and Japan
    Masako Kikuchi CASRIP Newsletter 16 (3) [2009]
  • Patent Eligibility and Computer-Related Processes: A Critique of In re Bilski and the Machine-or-Transformation Test
    Andrew Patrick Virginia Journal of Law & Technology 14 (181) [2009]
  • Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S. 584
    [1978]
  • Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 132 S.Ct. 1289
    [2012]
  • Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Metabolite Lab. Inc., 548 U.S. 124
    [2006]
  • In re Walter, 618 F.2d 758, 205 U.S.P.Q. 397 (CCPA 1980)
    [1980]
  • In re Freeman, 573 F.2d 1237, 197 U.S.P.Q. 464 (CCPA 1978)
    [1978]
  • In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
    [2008]
  • In re Alappat, 33 F.3d 1526 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (en banc)
    [1994]
  • In re Abele, 684 F.2d 902 (CCPA 1982)
    [1982]
  • Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63
    [1972]
  • Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175
    [1981]
  • Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303
    [1980]
  • CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp., 717 F.3d 1269 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (en banc)
    [2013]
  • CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp., 685 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
    [2012]
  • Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S.Ct. 3218
    [2010]
  • Bancorp Services, LLC v. SunLife Assurance Co. of Canada, 687 F.3d 1266 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
    [2012]
  • Arrhythmia Research Technology Inc. v. Corazonix Corp., 958 F.2d 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
    [1992]
  • Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l et al., 573 U.S
    [2014]
  • Accenture Global Services, Gmbh And Accenture LLP v. Guidewire Software, Inc., No. 2011-1486 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
    [2013]