연구동향 분석

미국 법원에서 심리학 도구(사이코패시 체크리스트, PCL-R)의 역할에 대한 연구(2005~2012)

최이문(Choi, Yimoon) 강태경(Gahng, Taegyung) 조은경(Cho, Eunkyung) 2014년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 미국 법원에서 심리학 도구(사이코패시 체크리스트, PCL-R)의 역할에 대한 연구(2005~2012)' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 형법
  • deathpenalty
  • evidence
  • experttestimony
  • forensicassessment
  • pcl-r
  • 사이코패시
  • 사형psychopathy
  • 전문가증언
  • 정신감정
  • 증거능력
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
526 0

0.0%

' 미국 법원에서 심리학 도구(사이코패시 체크리스트, PCL-R)의 역할에 대한 연구(2005~2012)' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국판 표준화. PCL-R 전문가 지침서
    조은경 학지사 심리검사 연구소 [2008]
  • 한국판 Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) 의 구성타당도 연구
    이수정 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격 23 (3) : 57 ~ 71 [2009]
  • Ward v. State, No. 74S00-0907-PD-320, 969 N.E.2d 46 lexis 470
    [2012]
  • Virginia v. Allen, 609 S.E.2d 4
    [2005]
  • United States v. Williams, 731 F. Supp. 2d 1012 (D. Haw., Aug. 16, 2010)
    [2010]
  • United States v. Wallace, 528 F.2d 863
    [1976]
  • United States v. Taylor, 320 F. Supp. 2d 790 (N.D. Ind. 2004)
    [2004]
  • United States v. Skinner, 303 Fed. Appx. 369
    [2008]
  • United States v. Mitchell , 706 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (D. Utah Oct. 20, 2010)
    [2010]
  • United States v. Fell, No. CR-00-1037, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24707
    [2006]
  • United States v. Commey, No. CR-00-1037, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92891
    [2010]
  • United States v. Barnette, 211 F. 3d 803
    [2000]
  • United States v. Aleksov, No. 11-23 (CKK), 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180115
    [2012]
  • The status of Daubert in state courts. Atlantic Legal Foundation
  • The sexual offender and his offenses (1954); Morris Ploscowe, Sex and the law
    Karpman, Benjamin Prentice-Hall [1951]
  • The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in court: A case law survey of U.S. courts (1991-2004)
    DeMatteo, David Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 12 (2) [2006]
  • The neural correlates of moral decision-making in psychopaths
    Glenn, Andrea L. Molecular Psychiatry 14 [2009]
  • The Impact of Mntal Health Evidence on Support for Capital Punishment: Are Defendants Labeled Psychopathic Considered More Deserving of Death?
    Edens, John F. Behavioral Science & Law 23 (5) [2005]
  • The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—rRevised (PCL-R)
    Hare, Robert D. Multi-Health Systems [1993]
  • The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R)
    Hare, Robert D. Multi-Health Systems [1991]
  • The Evidentiary Introduction of Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Assessed Psychopathy in U.S. Courts: Extent and Appropriateness
    Walsh, Tiffany Law and Human Bevaior 30 [2006]
  • Strack v. Bd. of Prison Hearings, No. CIV S-10-1311 GEB DAD P, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4587 (E.D. Cal., Jan. 14, 2011)
    [2011]
  • Stitt v. United States, 369 F. Supp. 2d 679 (E. D. Va., Apr. 1, 2005)
    [2005]
  • State v. Schweitzer, No. 2-05-03, 2005 Ohio App. LEXIS 5080 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
    [2005]
  • Sexual predator treatment squeezes budgets
  • Sex and the law
    Ploscowe, Morris Prentice-Hall [1951]
  • Psychopathy, Homicide, and the Courts: Working the System
    Häkäen-Nyholm, Helinä Criminal Justice and Behavior 36 (8) [2009]
  • Psychological evaluations for the courts
    Melton, Gary. B. Guilford [2007]
  • People v. Vasquez, 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 610
    [2001]
  • People v. Suarez, No. E042936, 2008 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 9144
    [2008]
  • People v. Soto, No. A126221, 2011 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 530
    [2011]
  • People v. Sandry, 857 N.E.2d 295 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006)
    [2006]
  • People v. Parker, No. F046235, 2006 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2243
    [2006]
  • People v. Jesperson, No. D046197, 2007 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7372
    [2007]
  • People v . Dacayana, No. B164662004, Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 6871
    [2004]
  • Only yesterday: The rise and fall of twentieth century sexual psychopath laws
    Lave, Tamara R. Louisiana Law Review 69 (3) [2009]
  • Model Penal Code § 4.01(2)
    American Law Institute Tent. Draft No. 4 [1955]
  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436
    [1966]
  • Luca Malatesti & John McMillan ed. Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry and Philosophy
    Morse, Stephen J. Oxford University Press [2010]
  • Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137
    [1999]
  • Kansasv . Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346
    [1997]
  • Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407
    [2002]
  • Jaet v. Jaet, No. 08-81232-CIV-COHN/SELTZER, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102747 (S.D.Fla. Dec. 10, 2008)
    [2008]
  • In re Williams, No. H033771, 2010 Cal. App. Unpub. Lexis 5781 (Jul. 22, 2010)
    [2010]
  • In re Thunder, 822 N.W.2d 737 (Wis. Ct. App. 2012)
    [2012]
  • In re Stringer, No. A05-2240, 2006 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 831 (Minn. App. Aug. 1, 2006)
    [2006]
  • In re Sandry, 367 Ill. App. 3d 949 (App. Ct. 2d Dist. 2006)
    [2006]
  • In re S.E.J., No. A-2463-08T2, 2009 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1606
    [2009]
  • In re O.S., 763 N.W.2d 723 (Neb., 2009)
    [2009]
  • In re Lenczycki, 938 N.E.2d 610 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010)
    [2010]
  • In re Hitt, No. 08-81232-CIV-COHN/SELTZER, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9377 (Tex. App., Dec. 1, 2011)
    [2011]
  • In re Commitment of Hitt, No. 09-10-00295-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9377 (Tex.App.-Beaumont, 2011)
    [2011]
  • In re Commitment of Hinkle, No. 09-09-00548-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 4504 (Tex. App.-Beaumont, 2011)
    [2011]
  • In re Commitment of Dodson, NO. 09-09-00053-CV, Tex. App. LEXIS 2931
    [2010]
  • In re Commitment of Dodson, 311 S.W.3d 194 (Tex.App.-Beaumont, 2010)
    [2010]
  • In re Cass, No. D056754, 2010 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 9671
    [2010]
  • Hernandez v. People, 176 P.3d 746
    [2008]
  • Hansen v. Martel, No. CIV S-09-2646 GEB DAD P, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137709 (E.D. Cal., Dec. 30, 2010)
    30 [2010]
  • Handbook of psychopathy
    Monahan, John Guilford Press [2009]
  • Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013
    [1923]
  • Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454
    [1981]
  • Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162
    [1975]
  • Do PCL-R scores from state or defense experts best predict future misconduct among civilly committed sex offenders?
    Boccaccini, Marcus T. Law and Human Behavior 36 (3) [2012]
  • Davis v. State, 313 S.W.3d 317 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010)
    [2010]
  • Daubert v . Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579
    [1993]
  • Cross v. Harris, 418 F.2d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
    [1969]
  • Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward
    National Research Council National Academies Press [2009]
  • Cobos v. Hartley, No. 1:10-cv-00709, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106614 (E.D. Cal., Oct. 6, 2010)
    [2010]
  • Centeno v. Superior Court, 117 Cal. App. 4th 30, 11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 533
    [2004]
  • Can A Test Really Tell Who's A Psychopath?
  • Buchanan v. Kentucky, 483 U.S. 402
    [1987]
  • Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148
    [1958]
  • Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238
    [1969]
  • Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?
    Murrie, Daniel C. Psychological Science 24 (10) [2013]
  • Alverson v. Workman, No. 09-5000, 595 F.3d 1142 LEXIS 2995
    [2010]
  • Ake v. Olkahoma, 470 U.S. 68
    [1985]
  • Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418
    [1979]