연구동향 분석

순위기반 컨조인트분석과 선택기반 컨조인트분석의 예측력에 대한 실증적 비교

김부용 ( Bu Yong Kim ) 2014년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 순위기반 컨조인트분석과 선택기반 컨조인트분석의 예측력에 대한 실증적 비교' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • choice-basedconjoint
  • measurementset
  • predictability
  • ranking-basedconjoint
  • rtd-coffee
  • rtd커피
  • 선택기반컨조인트분석
  • 순위기반컨조인트분석
  • 예측력
  • 측정집합
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
128 2

0.0%

' 순위기반 컨조인트분석과 선택기반 컨조인트분석의 예측력에 대한 실증적 비교' 의 참고문헌

  • 패션점포 내 배경음악과 광고사진이 소비자의 정서 및접근행동에 미치는 영향
    기현명 이유리 Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구) 16 (3) : 39 ~ 60 [2006]
  • 컨조인트 분석을 통한 문화관광 축제 판매 음식 선택 속성에 관한 탐색적 연구
    이은용 한국조리학회지 16 (3) : 94 ~ 113 [2010]
  • 컨조인트 분석을 이용한 치과 의료서비스 시장 세분화와 전략 개발
    김진환 보건행정학회지 20 (3) : 1 ~ 20 [2010]
  • 컨조인트 분석을 이용한 레스토랑의 선택 속성에 관한 연구
    조미나 한국조리학회지 16 (1) : 254 ~ 268 [2010]
  • 컨조인트 분석법을 이용한 한국 음식의 HMR 상품 개발에 관한 연구
    최원식 한국조리학회지 18 (1) : 156 ~ 167 [2012]
  • 정보 보안 위험: 컨조인트분석 활용 사례 연구
    박노진 한국데이터정보과학회지 22 (2) : 207 ~ 215 [2011]
  • 외식 소비자의 레스토랑 선택속성 및 속성가치에 대한 선호도 조사 연구
    홍종숙 동아시아식생활학회지 22 (2) : 315 ~ 321 [2012]
  • 식물공장 농산물에 대한 소비자 선호속성 탐색
    김연중 한국산학기술학회논문지 13 (11) : 5052 ~ 5059 [2012]
  • 순위기반 컨조인트분석에서 선호도측정을 위한새로운 방법
    김부용 응용통계연구 27 (2) : 185 ~ 195 [2014]
  • 문화기술 관련 산학협력 연구과제의 속성들에 대한 컨조인트 분석
    정욱 경영과학 29 (3) : 13 ~ 21 [2012]
  • Willingness-to-pay estimation with choice-based conjoint analysis: Addressing extreme response behavior with individually adapted designs
    Gensler, S. European Journal of Operation Research 219 : 368 ~ 378 [2012]
  • Where have all the flowers gone? Forecasting green trends in the automobile industry with a choice-based conjoint adoption model
    Eggers, F. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 : 51 ~ 62 [2011]
  • Website attributes that increase consumer purchase intention: A conjoint analysis
    Chen, Y. H. Journal of Business Research 63 : 1007 ~ 1014 [2010]
  • The potential of converged mobile telecommunication services: A conjoint analysis
    Nikou, S. The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media 14 : 21 ~ 35 [2012]
  • The market potential for plugin hybrid and battery electric vehicles in Flanders: A choice-based conjoint analysis
    Lebeau, K. Transportation Research Part D 17 : 592 ~ 597 [2012]
  • The efficiencies of fractional factorial designs
    Voelkel, J. G. Technometrics 47 : 488 ~ 494 [2005]
  • The ability of rating and choice conjoint to predict market shares: A Monte Carlo simulation
    Chakraborty, G. Journal of Business Research 55 : 237 ~ 249 [2002]
  • Ranking versus scale rating in conjoint analysis: Evaluating landscapes in mountainous regions in southeastern Spain
    Sayadi, S. Ecological Economics 55 : 539 ~ 550 [2005]
  • Preference and subjective evaluation of washed fabric hand using conjoint analysis
    Ryu, H. S. Textile Research Journal 80 : 2167 ~ 2175 [2010]
  • New Design of Choice Sets for Choice-based Conjoint Analysis
    김부용 응용통계연구 25 (5) : 847 ~ 857 [2012]
  • Maximum likelihood and minimum Chi-square estimates of the logistic function
    Berkson, J. Journal of the American Statistical Association 50 : 130 ~ 162 [1955]
  • Marketing a consumer durable brand in Malaysia: A conjoint analysis and market simulation
    Ong, F. S. Journal of Consumer Marketing 27 : 507 ~ 515 [2010]
  • Large factorial designs for product engineering and marketing research applications
    Kuhfeld, W. F. Technometrics 47 : 132 ~ 141 [2005]
  • Issues in the use of ratings-based versus choice-based concomitant analysis in operations management research
    Karniouchina, E. V. European Journal of Operations Research 197 : 340 ~ 348 [2009]
  • Handling of individual differences in rating-based conjoint analysis
    Endrizzi, I. Food Quality and Preference 22 : 241 ~ 254 [2011]
  • Functional and organic eggs as an alternative to conventional production: A conjoint analysis of consumers’ preferences
    Mesias, F. J. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91 : 532 ~ 538 [2010]
  • Customer value of smart metering: Explosive evidence from a choice-based conjoint study in Switzerland
    Kaufman, S. Energy Policy 53 : 229 ~ 239 [2013]
  • Consumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: A comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methods
    Bridges, J. F. P. Trends in Ampli cation 16 : 40 ~ 48 [2012]
  • Consumer perception of irradiated fruit: A case study using choice-based conjoint analysis
    Deliza, R. Journal of Sensory Studies 25 : 184 ~ 200 [2010]
  • Consumer perception of functional food: A conjoint analysis with probiotics
    Annunziata, A. Food Quality and Preference 28 : 348 ~ 355 [2013]
  • Consumer attitudes and expectations of ginseng food products assessed by focus groups and conjoint analysis
    Chung, H. S. Journal of Sensory Studies 26 : 346 ~ 357 [2011]
  • Conjoint analysis of consumer preference for blue-fin tuna
    Ariji, M. Fisheries Science 76 : 1023 ~ 1028 [2010]
  • Comparison of Chinese and Indian consumers’ evaluative criteria when selecting denim jeans: A conjoint analysis
    Jin, B. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 14 : 180 ~ 194 [2010]
  • Applied Linear Statistical Models
    Kutner, M. H. McGraw Hill [2005]
  • Application of ethnography and conjoint analysis to determine key consumer attributes for latte-style coffee beverages
    Jervis, S. M. Journal of Sensory Studies 27 : 48 ~ 58 [2012]
  • Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Cosmetic Essence-for-Men via Choice-Based Conjoint with New Design of Choice Sets
    김부용 응용통계연구 25 (6) : 987 ~ 997 [2012]
  • An empirical comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint models
    Elrod, T. Journal of Marketing Research 29 : 368 ~ 377 [1992]
  • A cross-validity comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models
    Moore, W. L. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21 : 299 ~ 312 [2004]
  • A comparison of conjoint analysis response formats
    Boyle, K. J. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 : 441 ~ 454 [2001]
  • A Conjoint Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Traditional Cheeses in Turkey : A Case Study on Tulum Cheese
    Hakan Adanacioglu 한국축산식품학회지 32 (4) : 458 ~ 466 [2012]