연구동향 분석
홈
알림
이용안내
오류접수
API
서비스소개
인기 연구 키워드 :
인기 활용 키워드 :
미국 산업재해보상보험법에 있어서 질병에 대한 업무상 판단
이달휴(Lee, Dahl Hugh)
2014년
활용도 Analysis
논문 Analysis
연구자 Analysis
활용도 Analysis
논문 Analysis
연구자 Analysis
활용도
공유도
영향력
논문상세정보
저자
이달휴(Lee, Dahl Hugh)
주제어
arisesoutoftheemployment
Common Law
disease
increasedrisk
Occupational disease
Work-related injury
Workers Compensation
산업재해보상보험법
업무기인성
업무수행성
증가된위험
직업병
질병
참고문헌( 54)
유사주제 논문( 8,516)
법학 8,018건
질병 187건
disease 152건
산업재해보상보험법 47건
common law 39건
직업병 23건
occupational disease 20건
workers compensation 14건
work-related injury 6건
업무수행성 6건
업무기인성 3건
increasedrisk 1건
인용/피인용
미국 산업재해보상보험법에 있어서 질병에 대한 업무 ...
' 미국 산업재해보상보험법에 있어서 질병에 대한 업무상 판단' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 요약
주제
법학
arisesoutoftheemployment
common law
disease
increasedrisk
occupational disease
work-related injury
workers compensation
산업재해보상보험법
업무기인성
업무수행성
증가된위험
직업병
질병
동일주제 총논문수
논문피인용 총횟수
주제별 논문영향력의 평균
8,504
0
0.0%
자세히
주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력
주제
주제별 논문수
주제별 피인용횟수
주제별 논문영향력
주제분류(KDC/DDC)
법학
8,019
0
0.0%
주제어
arisesoutoftheemployment
1
0
0.0%
common law
40
0
0.0%
disease
153
0
0.0%
increasedrisk
2
0
0.0%
occupational disease
21
0
0.0%
work-related injury
7
0
0.0%
workers compensation
15
0
0.0%
산업재해보상보험법
48
0
0.0%
업무기인성
4
0
0.0%
업무수행성
7
0
0.0%
증가된위험
1
0
0.0%
직업병
24
0
0.0%
질병
188
0
0.0%
계
8,530
0
0.0%
* 다른 주제어 보유 논문에서 피인용된 횟수
0
닫기
' 미국 산업재해보상보험법에 있어서 질병에 대한 업무상 판단'
의 참고문헌
영국의 업무상 사고 인정기준에 관한 연구
김성권
경북대학교 대학원
[2007]
업무상 질병 인정기준의 개선방안
노병호
법학논고 (45) : 481 ~ 512
[2014]
산재보험법상 개념으로서 “사고”의 의미
오상호
법학논고 35 (35) : 299 ~ 328
[2011]
산업재해보상보험법의 법적 문제와 개선방안에 관한 연구
이재삼
법학연구 (51) : 351 ~ 379
[2013]
職業病の認定
良永弥太郞
現代勞動法講座 12
[1980]
アメリカ聯邦勞災關係立法の硏究
石橋敏郞
嵯峨野書院 : 1 ~
[1999]
workers’ compensation law
Margaret C. Jasper
Oceana
[2008]
workers’ compensation
Gary R. Smith
WEST
[1999]
Workplace Safety and Health
James Robert Chelius
[1977]
Workers’ Compensation Research Institute
R. Field
Asbestos Clai:The Decision to Use Workers' Compensation and Tort 12
[1988]
Workers compensation and employee protection laws
Jack B. Hood
ST. PAUL
[1999]
Williams Industries, Inc. v. Wagoner, 24 Va.App. 81, 480 S.E.2d 788
[1997]
Ward v. Halliburton Company 415 P.2d 847
[1966]
Virginia Elextric and Power Co. v. Cogbill, 233 Va. 354, 288 S.E.2d 485
[1982]
The Federal Employees’ Compensation Act(FECA): Workers’ Compensation for Federal Employees
Scott Szymendera
[2013]
Storie v. Taylor Supply Co., 190 Tenn. 149, 228 S.W.2d 94
[1950]
Social Insurance and Economic Security
GEORGE E.REJDA
Prentice Hall
[1994]
Shifts in Compensating Work-Related Injuries and Diseases
Saskia Klosse
Springer Wine
[2007]
Service Adhesive Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, 226. Ill. App. 3d 356, 168 Ill Dist. 366, 589 N.E. 2d 766
[1992]
Ritter v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co., 178 Neb.792, 795, 135 N.W. 2d 470, 472
[1965]
Responses to Occupational Disease: The Role of Markets, Regulation, and Information
Elinor P. Schroeder
Geo.L.Rev 72 : 1231 ~ 1246
[1984]
Paider v. Park East Movers, 19 N.Y.2d 373, 280 N.Y.S. 2d 140, 227 N.E 2d 40
[1967]
Osmose Wood Preserving v. Jones, 40 Ark.App. 190, 843 S.W.2d 875
[1992]
OSHA’s Critics and Regulatory Reform
Thomas O.McGarity
Wake Forest L. Rev 31 : 587 ~
[1996]
New Perspective In workers’ compensation
John F. Buurton
KLR Press
[1988]
McCann Steel Co. v. Carney, 192 Tenn. 94, 237 S.W. 2d 942
[1951]
MANAGING WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
Keith R. Wertz
LEWIS
[2001]
Legislative and Judicial Responses to the Inadequacy of Compensation for Occupational Disease
Schroeder
Law & Contemp. Prob 49 (4) : 157 ~ 158
[1986]
Leadbetter, Inc.v. Penkalski, 21 Va.App. 427, 432, 464 S.E.2d 554, 556
[1995]
Jenkinds v. Ogletree Farm Supply, 291 So.2d 560
[1974]
Jameson v. SAIF, 63 Or. App. 553, 665 P. 2d 379
[1983]
Hughes v. Trustees of St. Patrick’s Cathedral, 245 N.Y. 201, 156 N.E. 665
[1927]
Haynes v. Feldspar Producing Co., 222 N.C.163, 22 S.E.2d 275
[1942]
Harris v. Board of Education, 375 Md. 21, 825 A.2d 365
[2003]
Harman v. Republic Aviation Corp., 298 N.Y. 285, 82 N.E.2d 785
[1948]
Hanson v. Reichelt(1990, Iowa) 452 NW2d 164, 20 ALR5th 952
[1990]
Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44, 52, 283 S.E.2d 101, 105-06
[1981]
Glodenis v. American Brass Co., 118Conn. 29, 40, 170A 146, 150
Gargiulo v. Gargiulo 24 N.J.Super. 129, 93 A.2d 598 N.J.Super.A.D. 1953. December 30, 1952
Gaffing at a thing called cause: medico-legal conflicts in the concept of causation
Small
Tex. L.Rev 31 : 630 ~
[1953]
EMPLOYMENT LAW
Mark A. Rothstein
WEST GROUP
[1999]
Dougherty’s Case, 238 Mass. 456, 131 N.E. 167, 16 A.L.R. 1036
[1921]
Crossett School District v. Gourley, 50 Ark. App. 1. 899 S.W.2d 482
[1995]
Conway v. Blackfeet Indian Developers, Inc., 205 Mont. 459, 669 P. 2d 225
[1983]
Chicago, Wilmington & Franklin Coal Co. v. Industrial Comm., 400 Ill. 60, 78 N.E.2d 104
[1948]
Champion Home Builders v. Industrial Commission, 703 P.2d 306
[1985]
CONNELLY v. HUNT FURNITURE CO., 240 N.Y. 83, 147 N.E. 366
[1925]
CASES AND MATERIALS ON WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
Joseph W. Little
THOON
[2004]
Builders & Managers, Inc. v. Cortilesso, 608 A.2d 725
[1992]
Bradford v. Workers' Compensation Commissioner, 185 W. Va 434, 408 S.E.2d 13
[1991]
Booker v.Duke Medical Center, 297 N.C. 472-75, 256 S.E. 2d 198-200
[1979]
An International Comparison of Workers’ Compensation
C. Arthur Williams
Kluwer Academic Publishers
[1991]
American Filtrona Co. v. Hanford, 16 Va.App. 159, 428 S.E.2d 511, 513
[1993]
A Prelude to the Welfare State
Price V. Fishback
The University of Chicago Press
[2000]
' 미국 산업재해보상보험법에 있어서 질병에 대한 업무상 판단'
의 유사주제(
) 논문