연구동향 분석

혼합라쉬모형을 적용한 TIMSS 2011 수학흥미 척도의 응답양식 탐색

신학경 손원숙 2014년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 혼합라쉬모형을 적용한 TIMSS 2011 수학흥미 척도의 응답양식 탐색' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 교육학
  • extremeresponsestyle(ers)
  • middleresponsestyle(mrs)
  • mixedraschmodels
  • response style
  • timss2011
  • 극단반응양식
  • 응답양식
  • 중간반응양식
  • 혼합라쉬모형
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
14,383 7

9.4%

' 혼합라쉬모형을 적용한 TIMSS 2011 수학흥미 척도의 응답양식 탐색' 의 참고문헌

  • 응답자의 성격특성과 응답스타일
    김석호 조사연구 12 (2) : 51 ~ 76 [2011]
  • 성격검사의 형식이 응답왜곡(faking)에 미치는 효과:Normative 형식과 ipsative 형식의 비교
    김명소 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직 19 (3) : 371 ~ 393 [2006]
  • 비전형적 반응과 성격검사 하위요인 간의관계 탐색
    차정은 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격 20 (4) : 115 ~ 130 [2006]
  • 명시적 부정문항과 암묵적 부정문항이 심리척도의 요인구조에 미치는 영향
    김아영 교육평가연구 16 (1) : 44 ~ 59 [2003]
  • Yea-saying, nay-saying, and going to extremes : Black-white differences in response styles
    Bachman, J. G. Public Opinion Quarterly 48 (2) : 491 ~ 509 [1984]
  • WINMIRA 2001 [Computer software]
    von Davier, M. Institute for Science Education [2001]
  • Variations in response style behavior by response scale format in attitude research
    Kieruj, N. D. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22 (3) : 321 ~ 342 [2010]
  • Using item response theory to measure extreme response style in marketing research : A global investigation
    De Jong, M. G. Journal of Marketing Research 45 (1) : 104 ~ 115 [2008]
  • The instability of Response sets
    Hui, C. H. Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (2) : 253 ~ 260 [1985]
  • The handbook of marketing research
    Baumgartner, H. Sage : 95 ~ 109 [2006]
  • The great response-style myth
    Rorer, L. G. Psychological Bulletin 63 (3) : 129 ~ [1965]
  • The effect of response style on self-reported conscientiousness across 20 countries
    Mõttus, R. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38 (11) : 1423 ~ 1436 [2012]
  • The effect of response style bias on the measurement of transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership
    Moors, G. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 21 (2) : 271 ~ 298 [2012]
  • The convergent validity of acquiescence : an empirical study relating balanced scales and separate acquiescence scales
    Ferrando, P. J. Individual Difference 37 : 1331 ~ 1340 [2004]
  • Testing the stability of an acquiescence style factor behind two interrelated substantive variables in a panel design
    Billiet, J. B. Sociological Methods and Research 36 (4) : 542 ~ 562 [2008]
  • TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics
    Mullis, I. V. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education. Boston College [2012]
  • Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias
    Ray, J. J. The Journal of Social Psychology 121 (1) : 81 ~ 96 [1983]
  • Response style behavior : question format dependent or personal style?
    Kieruj, N. D. Quality & Quantity 47 (1) : 193 ~ 211 [2013]
  • Response Styles in Marketing Research : A Cross-National Investigation
    Baumgartner, H. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2) : 143 ~ 156 [2001]
  • Rating versus ranking: what is the best way to reduce and language bias in cross-national research?
    Harzing, A. W. International Business Review 18 (4) : 417 ~ 432 [2009]
  • Rasch models in latent classes : An integration of two approaches to item analysis
    Rost, J. Applied Psychological Measurement 14 (3) : 271 ~ 282 [1990]
  • Modeling acquiescence in measurement models for two balanced sets of items
    Billiet, J. B. Structural Equation Modeling 7 (4) : 608 ~ 628 [2000]
  • Model selection and Akaike’s Information Criterion(AIC) : The general theory and its analytical extensions
    Bozdogan, H. Psychometrika 52 (3) : 345 ~ 370 [1987]
  • Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes
    Paulhus, D. L. Academic Press : 17 ~ 59 [1991]
  • Individual differences in Response scale use : Mixed Rasch modelling of Responses to NEO-FFI items
    Austin, E. J. Personality and Individual Differences 40 (6) : 1235 ~ 1245 [2006]
  • Improving rating scale measures by detecting and correcting Bias components in some Response styles
    Greenleaf, E. A. Journal of Marketing Research 29 (2) : 176 ~ 188 [1992]
  • Exploring the effect of a middle response category on response style in attitude measurement
    Moors, G. Quality & Quantity 42 (6) : 779 ~ 794 [2008]
  • Evaluating Survey Questions : A Comparison of Methods
    Yan, T. Journal of Official Statistics 28 (4) : 503 ~ 529 [2012]
  • Diagnosing response style behavior by means of a latent-class factor approach. Socio-demographic correlates of gender role attitudes and perceptions of ethnic discrimination reexamined
    Moors, G. Quality & Quantity 37 (3) : 277 ~ 302 [2003]
  • Detecting measurement invariance in organizational surveys
    Eid, M. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 16 (1) : 20 ~ 30 [2000]
  • Dealing with extreme response style in cross-cultural research : A restricted latent class factor analysis approach
    Morren, M. Sociological Methodology 41 : 1 ~ 13 [2011]
  • Cross-national response styles in international educational assessments: Evidence from PISA 2006
  • Cross-cultural examination of the Fishbein Behavioral Intentions Model
    Lee, C. Journal of International Business Studies 22 : 289 ~ 305 [1991]
  • Consistency of extreme response style and non-extreme response style across traits
    Wetzel, E. Journal of Research in Personality 47 (2) : 178 ~ 189 [2012]
  • Categorical data analysis
    Agresti, A. John Wiley & Sons [2002]
  • Assessing extreme and Acquiescence Response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling
    Cheung, G. W. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 31 (2) : 187 ~ 212 [2000]
  • Are acquiescent and extreme response styles related to low intelligence and education?
    Meisenberg, G. Personality and Individual Differences 44 (7) : 1539 ~ 1550 [2008]
  • Addressing score bias and differential item functioning due to individual differences in response style
    Bolt, D. M. Applied Psychological Measurement 33 (5) : 335 ~ 352 [2009]
  • A structural model-based optimal person-fit procedure for identifying faking
    Ferrando, P. J. Educational and Psychological Measurement 73 (2) : 173 ~ 190 [2012]
  • A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work-related measures in a equivalent manner?
    Riordan, C. M. Journal of Management 20 : 643 ~ 671 [1994]