연구동향 분석

시판 복분자주의 기호도 분석을 통한 탐색적 등급 분류

이승주(Seung-Joo Lee) 2014년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 시판 복분자주의 기호도 분석을 통한 탐색적 등급 분류' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 음료기술
  • classification
  • discriminant analysis
  • koreanblackraspberrywine
  • preference
  • quality
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,625 1

0.0%

' 시판 복분자주의 기호도 분석을 통한 탐색적 등급 분류' 의 참고문헌

  • 관능특성 및 판별함수를 이용한 한우고기 맛 등급 분석
    조수현 한국축산식품학회지 29 (1) : 132 ~ 139 [2009]
  • Understanding consumer preferences for rice wines using sensory data
    Lee SJ Sci. Food Agr 88 : 690 ~ 698 [2008]
  • Statistical Discriminant Analysis on the Driving Ability of the Brain-injured
    김재희 한국데이터정보과학회지 16 (1) : 119 ~ 127 [2005]
  • Sensory Evaluation of cooked rice with fuzzy reasoning
    Lee SJ Food Sci. Technol 26 : 776 ~ 780 [1994]
  • Rela-tionship between objective measurements and taste panel assess-ment of beef quality
    Perry D Exp. Agr 41 : 981 ~ 989 [2001]
  • Quality scoring - A tool for sensory evaluation of cheese?
    Kraggerud H Food Qual. Prefer 26 : 221 ~ 230 [2012]
  • Quality ratings by experts, and relation with descriptive analysis ratings: a case study with beer
    Guinard JX Food Qual. Prefer 10 : 59 ~ 67 [1998]
  • Preference map-ping of cracker type biscuits
    Martnez C Food Qual. Prefer 13 : 535 ~ 544 [2002]
  • Prediction of food preferences in adult humans
    Logue AW Appetite 7 : 109 ~ 125 [1986]
  • Judging wine quality: Do we need experts, consumers or trained panelists?
    Hopfer H Food Qual. Prefer 32 : 221 ~ 233 [2014]
  • Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based on meat standards Australia methodology
    Polkinghorne RJ Anim. Sci 82 : 325 ~ 333 [2011]
  • Invited review: Sensory analysis of dairy foods
    Drake MA Dairy Sci 90 : 4925 ~ 4937 [2007]
  • Individual differ-ences in starchy food consumption: The application of preference mapping
    Monteleone E Food Qual. Prefer 9 : 211 ~ 219 [1998]
  • How do consumer hedonic ratings for extra virgin olive oil relate to quality ratings by experts and descriptive analysis ratings?
    Delgado C Food Qual. Prefer 22 : 213 ~ 225 [2011]
  • Factors affecting the sensory quality of vegetables
    Lyon DH Food Sci. Technol. Today 4 : 40 ~ 44 [1990]
  • Developments in dairy foods sensory science and education: From student contests to impact on product quality
    Bodyfelt FW Int. Dairy 18 : 729 ~ 734 [2008]
  • Development of a total quality scoring system based on consumer preference weightings and sensory profiles: application to fruit dates (Tamr)
    Ismail B Food Qual. Prefer 12 : 499 ~ 506 [2001]
  • Designs to bal-ance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effect in hall tests
    Macfie HJ Sens. Stud 4 : 129 ~ 148 [1989]
  • Currents in domestic alcoholic beverage market
    Korea alcohol liquor industry association Alcohol Beverage News [2011]
  • Correlations of sensory and instrumental meat tenderness values as affected by sampling techniques
    Poste LM Food Qual. Prefer 4 : 207 ~ 214 [1993]
  • Consumer assess-ment of eating quality - development of protocols for meat stan-dards Australia (MSA) testing
    Watson R Exp. Agr 48 : 1360 ~ 1367 [2008]
  • Beef quality grades as determined by Korean and Australian consumers
    Thompson JM Exp. Agr 48 : 1380 ~ 1386 [2008]
  • Antioxidant properties of Korean black raspberry wines and their apoptotic effectson cancer cells
    Jung JW Sci. Food Agr 89 : 970 ~ 977 [2009]