연구동향 분석

Greening International Trade : How are International Environmental Commitments Diffused and Implemented through Trade Agreements? = 국제무역의 친(親)환경화: 자유무역협정(FTA)을 통한 국제환경규범의 확산과 집행을 중심으로

한정현 2022년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' Greening International Trade : How are International Environmental Commitments Diffused and Implemented through Trade Agreements? = 국제무역의 친(親)환경화: 자유무역협정(FTA)을 통한 국제환경규범의 확산과 집행을 중심으로' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 공공행정과 군사학
  • bureaucraticpolitics
  • environmental politics
  • free trade agreements
  • issue-linkage
  • policy diffusion
  • policy implementation
  • sustainable development
  • trade-environmentlinkage
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
273 0

0.0%

' Greening International Trade : How are International Environmental Commitments Diffused and Implemented through Trade Agreements? = 국제무역의 친(親)환경화: 자유무역협정(FTA)을 통한 국제환경규범의 확산과 집행을 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • Young, O. R., & Levy, M. (1998). The effectiveness of international environmental regimes. In O Young & M. Levy (Eds.), The effectiveness of international environmental agreements (pp. 1-32). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    [1998]
  • Young, O. R. (2013). Compliance & public authority: A theory with international applications. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
    [2013]
  • Young, O. R. (2002). Institutional interplay: The environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, Susan Stonich, and E.U. Weber (eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 263-292). Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
    [2002]
  • Yeo, J. (2018). Policy implementation of international IUU fishing regulation in Korea: Policy ambiguity and policy conflict [Master’s thesis, Seoul National University]. S-Space. https://sspace. snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/143942
    [2018]
  • Wu, M., & Salzman, J. (2013). The next generation of trade and environment conflicts: the rise of green industrial policy. Northwestern University Law Review, 108, 401-435.
    [2013]
  • World Trade Organization (WTO) and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) co-publication. https://vi.unctad.org/tpa/web/vol1/vol1home.html
  • Wilson, J. (2015). Mega-regional trade deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing between the TPP and RCEP?. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 45(2), 345-353.
    [2015]
  • Why states act through formal international organizations
    Abbott , K. W. , & Snidal , D. 42 ( 1 ) , 3-32 . [1998]
  • Wakabayashi, M and Sugiyama, T. (2007). Japan‘s keidanren voluntary action plan on the environment. In R. D. Morgenstern and W. A. Pizer (eds.) Reality Check: The Nature and Performance of Voluntary Environmental Progress in the United States, Europe and Japan. Washington: RFF Press.
    [2007]
  • WTO. (n.d.c). Trade and climate change information brief: Climate change in regional trade agreements. World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news21_e/clim_03nov21-2_e.pdf (accessed in July 29, 2021).
  • WTO. (n.d.b). Regional Trade Agreements (RTA) Database. https://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicMaintainRTAHome.aspx (accessed in July 29, 2020).
  • WTO. (n.d.a). Early years: emerging environment debate in GATT/WTO. World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/hist1_e.htm (accessed in June 20, 2021).
  • Vogel, D. (2013). Global trade linkages: National security and human security. In Aggarwal, V. K. & Govella, K. (eds.), Linking Trade and Security (pp. 23-48). New York: Springer.
    [2013]
  • Vetoing cooperation : The impact of veto players on international trade agreements .
  • Van Asselt, H. (2014). The Fragmentation of Global Climate Governance: Consequences and Management of Regime Interactions. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    [2014]
  • Vaillant, M., & Ons, A. (2002). Preferential trading arrangements between the European Union and South America: The political economy of free trade zones in practice. World Economy, 25(10), 1433–1468
    [2002]
  • USTR. (2019b). USTR to request first-ever environment consultations under the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) in effort to combat illegal fishing. Office of the United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/pressreleases/ 2019/september/ustr-request-first-ever (accessed in July 29, 2021).
  • USTR. (2019a). USTR successfully resolves concerns raised in first-ever environment consultations under the U.S.-Peru trade promotion agreement (PTPA). Office of the United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/pressreleases/ 2018/april/ustr-successfully-resolves-concerns (accessed in July 29, 2021)
  • USTR. (2017). The United States officially withdraws from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Office of the United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/pressreleases/ 2017/january/US-Withdraws-From-TPP (accessed in July 29, 2021).
  • USTR. (2011). Final environmental review United States-Korea free trade agreement. Office of the United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/Countries%20Regions/africa /agreements/pdfs/FTAs/KOREA%20Final%20Environmental%20Revi ew.pdf (accessed in July 29, 2021).
  • USTR. (2007). Bipartisan agreement on trade policy. Office of the United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/factsheets/2007/asset_upload _file127_11319.pdf (accessed in July 29, 2021).
  • US approaches to the trade-security nexus in East Asia : from securitization to resecuritization
    Koo , M. G. 35 ( 1 ) , 37-57 . [2011]
  • UNCTAD and WTO. (2012). A practical guide to trade policy analysis.
    [2012]
  • Turtles and trade : The WTO 's acceptance of environmental trade restrictions .
  • Transatlantic convergence of PTAs ’ environmental clauses .
    Morin , J. F. & Rochette , M. 19 ( 4 ) , 621-65 . [2017]
  • Trade-environment negotiations in the EU , NAFTA , and WTO : Regional trajectories of rule development
    Steinberg , R. 91 ( 2 ) , 231-267 . [1997]
  • Trade , growth , and the environment
  • The world trade organization 's legitimacy crisis
    Esty , D. C. 1 ( 1 ) , 7-22 . [2002]
  • The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance
    Morin , J. F. & Jinnah , S. 27 ( 3 ) , 541- 56 [2018]
  • The rational design of international institutions
  • The promotion of sustainable development through EU trade instruments
    Douma , W. T. 28 ( 2 ) , 197-216 . [2017]
  • The power politics of regime complexity : Human rights trade conditionality in Europe
    Hafner-Burton , E. M. 7 ( 1 ) , 33-37 . [2009]
  • The politics of energy and climate change in Japan under Abe : Abenergynomics
    Incerti , T. , & Lipscy , P. Y . 58 ( 4 ) , 607-634 . [2018]
  • The move to preferential trade on the Western Pacific Rim : some initial conclusions
    Ravenhill , J 62 ( 2 ) , 129-150 [2008]
  • The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
  • The international anti-ocean dumping regime and South Korea : Policy diffusion , policy learning and the ambiguity-conflict matrix
    Seo & Koo 23 ( 2 ) : 145-172 . [ in Korean ] [2014]
  • The interaction of population growth and environmental quality
    Cropper , M. & Griffiths , C. 84 ( 2 ) , 250-254 . [1994]
  • The implementation of international nature conservation agreements in Europe : the case of the Netherlands
    Bennett , G. , & Ligthart , S. 11 ( 3 ) , 140-150 [2001]
  • The green side of protectionism : Environmental concerns and three facets of trade policy preferences
  • The globalization of liberalization : Policy diffusion in the international political economy
    Simmons , B . A. , & Elkins , Z . 98 ( 1 ) , 171-189 . [2004]
  • The evolution from Taylorism to employee gainsharing : A case study examining John Deere 's continuous improvement pay plan
  • The domestic battle over the design of non-trade issues in preferential trade agreements
    Lechner , L. 23 ( 5 ) , 840-871 . [2016]
  • The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science
  • The design of international agreements
    Guzman , A. T. 16 ( 4 ) , 579-612 . [2005]
  • The concept of legalization .
  • The compliance and implementation mechanism of the Paris Agreement
    Voigt , C. 25 ( 2 ) , 161-173 [2016]
  • The big chill : The WTO and multilateral environmental agreements .
    Eckersley , R. 4 ( 2 ) , 24-50 . [2004]
  • The appellate body rulings in the shrimp/turtle case : A new legal baseline for the trade and environment debate
    Howse , B . 27 ( 2 ) , 489-519 . [2002]
  • The WTO and the undermining of global environmental governance .
    Conca , K. 7 ( 3 ) , 484-494 . [2000]
  • The WTO and the environment : its past record is better than critics believe , but the future outlook is bleak
    Neumayer , E. 4 ( 3 ) , 1-8 . [2004]
  • The Rise of Renewable Energy Protectionism . Emerging Trade Conflicts and Implication for Low Carbon Development
    Lewis , J 14 ( 4 ) , 10-35 . [2015]
  • The Asahi Shimbun (2022, January 19). Japan’s clean energy strategy to push nuclear technologies. The Asahi Shimbun. https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14525409 (accessed March 20, 2022).
  • Tews, K., Busch, P. O., & Jörgens, H. (2003). The diffusion of new environmental policy instruments. European Journal of Political Research, 42(4), 569-600.
    [2003]
  • Taking ‘ Galton 's problem ’ seriously : Towards a theory of policy diffusion
    Braun , D. , & Gilardi , F. 18 ( 3 ) , 298- 322 [2006]
  • Tabuchi, H. (2020, February 3). Japan races to build new coal-burning power plants, despite the climate risks. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/03/climate/japan-coalfukushima. html (accessed April 10, 2022).
  • Synthesizing the implementation literature : The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation
    Matland , R. E. 5 ( 2 ) , 145-174 . [1995]
  • Subramanian, A. (1992). Trade measures for environment: A nearly empty box?. World Economy, 15(1), 135-152.
    [1992]
  • Strategic linkages : The evolving role of trade agreements in global environmental governance
    Jinnah , S. 20 ( 2 ) , 191-215 . [2011]
  • Steinberg, R. (2002). The Greening of trade law: International organizations and environmental issues. Boulder: Rowman and Lttlefield.
    [2002]
  • Standards as barriers versus standards as catalysts : Assessing the impact of HACCP implementation on US seafood imports
    Anders , S. M. , & Caswell , J . A . 91 ( 2 ) , 310-321 . [2009]
  • Sohn, Y. and Koo, M. G. (2011). Securitizing trade: The case of the Korea– US free trade agreement. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(3), 433-460.
    [2011]
  • Sohn, Y. (2019). South Korea under the United States–China rivalry: Dynamics of the economic-security nexus in trade policy making. The Pacific Review, 32(6), 1019–1040.
    [2019]
  • Sofer, K. (2016). Climate politics in Japan. Sasakawa Forum. https://spfusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Sofer-Climate-Politicsin- Japan.pdf (accessed April 23, 2022).
  • Siripala (2020, October 6). Will the Suga administration step up Japan’s climate change leadership?. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2020/10/will-the-suga-administration-step-upjapans- climate-change-leadership/ (accessed May 1, 2022).
  • Shahin, M. (2002). Trade and environment: How real is the debate. In G. P. Sampson and W. B. Chambers (eds.), Trade, Environment and the Millennium (pp. 154-182). NY: United Nations University press.
    [2002]
  • Reuters (2017, November 17). Electric cars not ready for mass production yet: Toyota chairman to Spiegel. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-toyota-batteries-idUSKBN1DH28U (accessed May 1, 2022).
  • Regionalism and multilateralism : crucial issues in the debate on RTAs
    Benini , R. , & Plummer , M. G. 41 ( 4 ) , 267-287 . [2008]
  • Rausiala, K. (2003). Citizen submission and treaty review in the NAAEC. In D. A. Markell & J. H. Knox (eds.), Greening NAFTA: The North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation (pp. 265-273). Stanford, CA: Stanford University press.
    [2003]
  • Postnikov, E. (2018). Environmental instruments in trade agreements: pushing the limits of the dialogue approach. In P. M. Cham (ed.) European Union External Environmental Policy (pp. 59-79). New York: Springer.
    [2018]
  • Political influence of exporting and import-competing firms : Evidence from eastern European and central Asian countries
    Yasar , M. 51 , 154-168 [2013]
  • Political cleavages within industry : Firm-level lobbying for trade liberalization
    Kim , I. S. 111 ( 1 ) , 1-20 . [2017]
  • Policy knowledge and epistemic communities
    Haas , P. M. 11578- 11586 [2004]
  • Poast, P. (2012). Does issue linkage work? Evidence from European alliance negotiations, 1860 to 1945. International Organization, 66(2), 277-310.
    [2012]
  • Pereira, H. (2018). How the WTO can help tackle climate change through fossil fuel subsidy reform: Lessons from fisheries negotiations. Geneva: International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development.
    [2018]
  • Park, S. W. & Ko, S. Y. (2007). Alignment of RFMO's transparency requirements and Korean fishery laws to prevent IUU fishing. Environmental Law and Perspectives. 27(3), 161-207. [in Korean]
    [2007]
  • Park, J. M. (2018, December 3). How South Korea was released from the preliminary IUU fishing designation. Hyndaihaeyang. http://www.hdhy.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=8451 (accessed September 14, 2021). [in Korean]
  • Park, H. J. (2013, April 20) South Korean distant water Industry facing reputational risk. Hangyorea. http://h21.hani.co.kr/arti/world/world_general/34348.html (accessed September 14, 2021). [in Korean]
  • Panayotou, T. (2016). Economic growth and the environment. In N. Haenn, A. Narnish, & R. Wilk (eds.), The Environment in anthropology (pp. 140-148). NY: New York University Press.
    [2016]
  • Pacific economic cooperation and Australia : Some questions about the role of knowledge and learning
    Higgott , R. 46 ( 2 ) , 182-197 [1992]
  • Overlap management in the World Trade Organization : Secretariat influence on trade-environment politics
    Jinnah , S. 10 ( 2 ) , 54-79 . [2010]
  • Otsuki, T., Wilson, J. S., & Sewadeh, M. (2001). What price precaution? European harmonisation of aflatoxin regulations and African groundnut exports. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28(3), 263-284.
    [2001]
  • On waves , clusters , and diffusion : A conceptual framework
    Elkins , Z. , & Simmons , B . 598 ( 1 ) , 33-51 . [2005]
  • OECD. (2018). Assessing implementation of environmental provisions in regional trade agreements. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    [2018]
  • OECD. (2013). Developments in regional trade agreements and the environment: 2012 Update. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    [2013]
  • OECD. (2012). Environment and regional trade agreements: Developments in 2011. (Trade and Environment Working Paper, 2012-01). Paris: OECD Publishing.
    [2012]
  • OECD. (2011b). Towards green growth. OECD Green Growth Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2011a). Environment and regional trade agreements: Developments in 2010. (OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper 2011-01). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2010). Environment and regional trade agreements: Developments in 2009. (OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper 2010-1). Paris: OECD Publishing.
    [2010]
  • OECD. (2009b). Declaration on green growth adopted at the meeting of the council at ministerial level on 25 June 2009. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2009a). Environment and regional trade agreements: Developments in 2008. (OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper 2009-1). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2008). Update on environment and regional trade agreements: Developments in 2007. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    [2008]
  • OECD. (2007). Environment and regional trade agreements. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    [2007]
  • NOAA. (2019). Improving international fisheries management-2019 repots to Congress. NOAA Fisheries. https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/dammigration/ improvingintlfisheriesmgmt_2019_report_final.pdf (accessed in 20 July 2021).
    [2019]
  • Multilateral environmental agreements in the WTO : Silence speaks volumes .
    Horn , H. , and Mavroidis , P. C. 10 ( 1 ) , 147-166 . [2014]
  • Morin, J. F., Dür, A, & Lechner, L. (2018). Mapping the trade and environment nexus: Insights from a new data set. Global Environmental Politics, 18(1), 122-139.
    [2018]
  • Morin, J. F., & Bialais, C. (2018). Strengthening multilateral environmental governance through bilateral trade deals. Center for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/PB%20no.123 _0.pdf (accessed in 20 July 2021)
  • Monteiro, J. A. (2016). Typology of environment-related provisions in regional trade agreements. (WTO Working Paper ERSD-2016-13). Geneva: WTO Publishing.
    [2016]
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2014). Vice Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yeol calls for EU’s cooperation for smooth resolve of the IUU fisheries issue. Ministry of Foreign Affairs https://www.mofa.go.kr/www/brd/m_4080/view.do?seq=350735&srch Fr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&multi_itm_s eq=0&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&company_cd=&am p;company_nm= (accessed in 29 July 2021) [in Korean]
  • Ministry of Fisheries. (2020). Early termination after 4 months of designation as a prospective IUU fishing country. Korean Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries. https://www.mof.go.kr/iframe/article/view.do?articleKey=28655&sear chSelect=title&searchValue=IUU&boardKey=10&currentPageNo=1 (accessed in 29 July 2021) [in Korean]
    [2020]
  • Ministry of Fisheries (2019). The US designated South Korea as a preliminary IUU fishing country. Korean Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries. https://www.mof.go.kr/iframe/article/view.do?articleKey=27380&boar dKey=10&currentPageNo=1 (accessed in 29 July 2021) [in Korean]
    [2019]
  • Ministry of Fisheries (2011). National Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing- Republic of Korea. Korean Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries. http://www.fao.org/fishery/docs/DOCUMENT/IPOAS/national/Korea Rep/NPOA_IUU_Korea_RepublicOld.pdf (accessed in 29 July 2021)
    [2011]
  • Milner, H. V. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: Domestic politics and international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [1997]
  • Mercurio, B. (2014). The Trans‐Pacific Partnership: Suddenly a ‘game changer’. The World Economy, 37(11), 1558-1574.
    [2014]
  • Mcneill, J. (2021). Exporting environmental objectives or erecting trade barriers in recent EU free trade agreements. Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies, 12(1), 40-53.
  • Markell, D. L., Knox, J. H. (2003). Greening NAFTA: The North American Commission for environmental cooperation. CA: Stanford University press.
    [2003]
  • METI. (2021). Overview of Japan’s green growth strategy through achieving carbon neutrality in 2050. Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry of Japan. https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100153688.pdf#page=10 (accessed April 20, 2022).
  • Loss aversion in riskless choice : A reference-dependent model ,
    Tversky , A. , & Kahneman , D. 106 ( 4 ) , 1039-1061 . [1991]
  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (Vol. 7). TX: Stata press.
    [2006]
  • Lloyd’s Register Foundation. The Risk Poll (climate threat perception). https://wrp.lrfoundation.org.uk/data-resources/a-world-of-risk-countryoverviews/ (accessed in 29 July)
  • Linking trade and environment in emerging economies : Korea ’ s ambition for making green free trade agreements
    Song , A. Y 34 ( 2 ) , 321-350 . [2021]
  • Limão, N. (2007). Are preferential trade agreements with non-trade objectives a stumbling block for multilateral liberalization? The Review of Economic Studies, 74(3), 821-855.
    [2007]
  • Lee, K. H. (2009, September 27). The US congress urges South Korea to accept new trade policy in KORUS FTA. Donga Ilbo. https://www.donga.com/news/article/all/20070518/8443232/1. (accessed September 13, 2021). [in Korean]
  • Lee, D. H. (2017, December 5). Fisheries ministry’s failure to reform distant water fisheries law driving South Korea to illegal fishing country. The Pressian. https://www.pressian.com/pages/articles/178399 (accessed September 13, 2021). [in Korean]
  • Lee, C. K., Lee, J. K., Park, H., and Kang, Y. D. (2020). New high standard for environmental and labour provisions in FTAs: Law and Economic Perspectives. Sejong: Korea Development Institution. [in Korean]
    [2020]
  • Leaders , pushers and laggards in the making of the climate regime
    Andresen , S. , & Agrawala , S. 12 ( 1 ) , 41-51 . [2002]
  • Laurens, N., Dove, Z., Morin, J. F., & Jinnah, S. (2019). NAFTA 2.0: The greenest trade agreement ever?. World Trade Review, 18(4), 659-677.
    [2019]
  • Kulovesi, K. (2014). Real or imagined controversies? A climate law perspective on the growing links between the international trade and climate change regimes. Trade, Law and Development, 6(1), 56-92.
    [2014]
  • Korea Overseas Fisheries Association. (2016). Declining Distant Water Industry. Korea Overseas Fisheries Association. http://www.kosfa.org/report/view.asp?pageno=1&startpage=1&num=3 47&list=search&search=sear_subj_cont&word=IUU [in Korean]
    [2016]
  • Koppenborg, F., & Hanssen, U. (2021). Japan's Climate Change Discourse: Toward Climate Securitisation? Politics and Governance, 9(4), 53-64.
  • Koo, M. G. (2021). Political Economy and Law of International trade: Between Free Trade Ideals and Mercantilist Bias. Seoul: Bakyoungsa. [in Korean]
  • Koizumi, S. (2021). Japan’s transition to become a decarbonized society. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/japan-climate-changecarbon- neutral-2050/ (accessed May 1, 2022).
  • Ko, K. (2018). Categorical Data Analysis. Seoul: Munwoosa. [in Korean]
    [2018]
  • Knowledge sharing and incentive design in production environments : Theory and evidence
  • Kim, J. K., & Keum, H. Y. (2011). An analysis of environment provisions in free trade agreements and its policy implications. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. [in Korean]
    [2011]
  • Kim, J. I. (2013, April 10). U.S. Designated South Korea as Illegal Fishing Country. Chosun Ilbo. https://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/04/10/2013041002199. html (accessed September 13, 2021). [in Korean]
  • Kim, D. S. (2007). US’s new trade policy: stronger labor and environmental standards in its free trade agreements. KOTRA. https://dream.kotra.or.kr/kotranews/cms/news/actionKotraBoardDetail. do?SITE_NO=3&MENU_ID=90&CONTENTS_NO=1&bbsSn=244& pNttSn=36353 (accessed September 13, 2021). [in Korean]
    [2007]
  • Keidanren (2022). Keidanren releases proposal toward achieving CN by 2050. Keidanren. https://www.jaif.or.jp/en/news/5876 (accessed May 1, 2022).
  • Keidanren (2013) A proposal for future energy policy. Keidanren. http://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2013/089.html (accessed May 1, 2022).
  • Kay, A., & Baker, P. (2015). What can causal process tracing offer to policy studies? A review of the literature. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 1-21.
    [2015]
  • Jänicke, M. (2005). Trend‐setters in environmental policy: the character and role of pioneer countries. European environment, 15(2), 129-142.
    [2005]
  • Jinnah, S. and Morin, J. F. (2020). Greening through trade: How American trade policy is linked to environmental protection abroad. London: MIT Press.
    [2020]
  • Jinnah, S. (2014). Post-treaty politics: Secretariat influence in global environmental governance. MIT Press.
    [2014]
  • Jinnah, S. (2011b). Strategic linkages: The evolving role of trade agreements in global environmental governance. Journal of Environment & Development, 20(2), 191- 215.
  • Jinnah, S. (2011a). Climate change bandwagoning: the impacts of strategic linkages on regime design, maintenance, and death. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 1-9.
  • Japan 's regional environmental leadership
    Graham , J 28 ( 3 ) , 283-302 . [2004]
  • Interrater reliability : the kappa statistic
    McHugh ML 22 ( 3 ) , 276-282 . [2012]
  • International norm dynamics and political change
    Finnemore , M. , & Sikkink , K. 52 ( 4 ) , 887-917 . [1998]
  • International institutions and issue linkage : Building support for agricultural trade liberalization
    Davis , C. L. 98 ( 1 ) , 153- 169 [2004]
  • Information revelation and structural supremacy : The World Trade Organization ’ s incorporation of environmental policy
    Johnson , T. 10 ( 2 ) , 207-229 . [2015]
  • Implementing multilateral environmental agreements : An analysis of EU directives .
    Perkins , R. , & Neumayer , E. 7 ( 3 ) , 13-41 . [2007]
  • IUU sanction legislations and extraterritorial application of domestic law - recent U.S. and EU legislations and their legal implications
    Lee , J. M. 12 ( 3 ) , 27- 65 . [ in Korean ] [2014]
  • IEA (2014). The way forward. International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/The_Way _forward.pdf. (accessed June 1, 2022).
  • Hufbuer, G. C. (2000). NAFTA and the environment: Seven years later. Washington D. C.: Peterson Institute.
    [2000]
  • Hufbauer, G. & Schott, J. (2007). Fitting Asia-Pacific Agreements into the WTO system [Paper presentation]. Conference on Multilateralising Regionalism Sponsored and organized by WTO-HEI Co-organized by the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR). Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/con_sep07_e/hufbauer _scott_e.pdf (accessed June 22, 2022).
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1980). National power and the structure of foreign trade. California: Univ. of California Press.
    [1980]
  • Harding, R. (2021, May 3). Japan’s ambitious carbon target sparks bureaucratic panic. The Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/90eefa81-94fd-49b7-9687-a3155b8b3ea7 (accessed May 10, 2022).
  • Hard and soft law in international governance
    Abbott , K. W. , & Snidal , D. 54 ( 3 ) , 421-456 . [2000]
  • Han, J. H. (2021). Competition and coexistence of international trade norms and environmental norms: Focusing on the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. The Review of International and Area Studies, 30(1), 141-169. [in Korean]
  • Han, J. H. & Koo, M. G. (2021). Diffusing and internalizing multilateral environmental norms through free trade agreements: The case of KORUS FTA and IUU fishing of South Korea. Review of International and Area Studies, 30(3), 131-165. [in Korean]
  • Haesebrouck, K., Van den Abbeele, A., & Williamson, M. G. (2021). Building trust through knowledge sharing: Implications for incentive system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 93(c), 101-241.
  • Haas, E. B. (1980). Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World Politics, 32(3), 357-405.
    [1980]
  • H. R. 3009 - Trade Act of 2002. (2022). https://www.congress.gov/bill/107thcongress/ house-bill/3009 (accessed June 1, 2021).
  • Greening up : The effects of environmental standards in EU and US trade agreements .
    Bastiaens , I . & Postnikov , E. 26 ( 5 ) , 847- 869 . [2017]
  • Green, A. (2005). Climate change, regulatory policy and the WTO: How constraining are trade rules? Journal of International Economic Law, 8(1), 143-189.
    [2005]
  • Gilardi, F. (2012). Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies. Handbook of International Relations, 2, 453-477.
    [2012]
  • George, C. (2014b). Environment and regional trade agreements: Emerging trends and policy divers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • George, C. (2014a). Development in regional trade agreements and the environment: 2013 Update. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Geographic proximity , trade , and international conflict/cooperation .
  • Gasser, L. (1998). The implementation and effectiveness of international environmental commitments: theory and practice. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    [1998]
  • Gallagher, K. (2004). Free trade and the environment: Mexico NAFTA, and Beyond. CA: Stanford University Press.
    [2004]
  • Gakou-Kakeu, J., Di Gregorio, M., Paavola, J., & Sonwa, D. J. (2022). REDD+ policy implementation and institutional interplay: Evidence from three pilot projects in Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics, 135, 102-642.
  • From norms to programs : The United Nations global compact and global governance
    Berliner , D. , & Prakash , A . 6 ( 2 ) , 149-166 . [2012]
  • Free Trade Agreement between the United States of America and the Republic of Korea (2019). https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-tradeagreements/ korus-fta/final-text (accessed June 1, 2020).
  • Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. The Review of economics and statistics, 87(1), 85-91.
    [2005]
  • Explaining energy dispute at the World Trade Organization
    Meyer , U 17 ( 3 ) , 391-410 [2017]
  • European Parliament. (2021). Japan's 2050 Goal: A Carbon-neutral Society. EU Parliament Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(20 21)698023 (accessed May 1, 2022).
  • European Commission. (2017). Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). EU Parliament Research Service. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/july/tradoc_155686.pdf (accessed May 1, 2022).
    [2017]
  • European Commission. (2001, May 16). Commission proposes bold EU strategy for sustainable development. European Commission Press Release. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-01-710_en.htm (accessed May 1, 2022).
    [2001]
  • Esty, D. C. (1994). Greening the GATT: Trade, environment, and the future. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
    [1994]
  • Espa, I. & Marín, D. G. (2018). Renewable energy subsidies and WTO Law: Time to rethink the case for reform beyond Canada–Renewable Energy/FIT Program. Journal of International Economic Law, 21(3), 621-653.
    [2018]
  • Epistemic communities , world-order , and the creation of a reflective research-program-Conclusion
    Adler , E. , & Haas , P. M. 46 ( 1 ) , 367-390 . [1992]
  • Environmental regulation and developanument : A cross-country empirical analysis .
  • Environmental regulation , economic growth and air pollution : Panel threshold analysis for OECD countries
  • Environmental provisions in American and EU free trade agreements : A preliminary comparison and research agenda
    Jinnah , S. and Morgera , E. 22 ( 3 ) 324-339 [2013]
  • Environment Agency. (1995). Harmonizing environment and trade policies. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan. https://www.env.go.jp/en/earth/iec/hetp/ch1.html (accessed May 10, 2022).
  • Enforcement practice under preferential trade agreements : Environmental consultations and submissions on environmental enforcement matters in the US-Peru TPA
    Restrepo , Y. V. P. 46 ( 3 ) , 247-262 . [2019]
  • Enforcement Decree of the Distant Water Fisheries Development Act of South Korea. (2022). https://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EC%9B%90% EC%96%91%EC%82%B0%EC%97%85%EB%B0%9C%EC%A0%8 4%EB%B2%95%EC%8B%9C%ED%96%89%EB%A0%B9 (accessed May 10, 2022). [in Korean]
  • Elkins, Z., Guzman, A. T., & Simmons, B. A. (2006). Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960– 2000. International Organization, 60(4), 811-846.
    [2006]
  • Ebuchi, T. (2021, June 18). For Japan, kicking the coal habit will be no easy task. Nikkei Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Energy/For-Japankicking- the-coal-habit-will-be-no-easy-task
  • East Asian way of linking the environment to trade in free trade agreements
    Koo , M. G. and Kim , S. Y 27 ( 4 ) , 382-414 [2018]
  • EU-Asia free trade agreements as tools for social norm/legislation transfer
    Garcia , M. , & Masselot , A 13 ( 3 ) , 241- 252 [2015]
  • Dür, A., Baccini, L.& Elsig, M. (2014). The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. Review of International Organizations, 9(3), 353-375.
    [2014]
  • Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation , innovation , CO2 emissions , population , and economic growth in OECD countries : A panel investigation
    Hashmi , R. , & Alam , K. 231 ( 4 ) , 1100-1109 [2019]
  • Durán, G. M. and Morgera, E. (2012). Environmental integration in the EU's external relations: Beyond multilateral dimensions. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [2012]
  • Droge, S. and Schenuit, F. (2018). Mobilising EU trade policy for raising environmental standards: The Example of Climate Action. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
    [2018]
  • Drezner, D. W. (2005). Globalization, harmonization, and competition: The different pathways to policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 841– 859.
    [2005]
  • Drezner, D. (2005, September). Gauging the power of global civil society: Intellectual property and public health. [Conference presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington D.C., United States. http://www.danieldrezner.com/research/gauginggcs.pdf
    [2005]
  • Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449-472.
    [2007]
  • Distant Waters Fisheries Development Act of South Korea. (2022). https://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EC%9B%90% EC%96%91%EC%82%B0%EC%97%85%EB%B0%9C%EC%A0%8 4%EB%B2%95 [in Korean].
  • Diffusion through issue linkage : Environmental norms in US trade agreements .
    Jinnah , S. and Lindsay , A . 16 ( 3 ) , 41-61 . [2016]
  • Diffusion through issue linkage : Environmental norms in US trade agreements .
    Jinnah , S. , & Lindsay , A . 16 ( 3 ) , 41-61 . [2016]
  • Determining the need for issue linkages in multilateral trade negotiations
    Hoekman , B. M. 43 ( 4 ) , 693- 714 . [1989]
  • Deere, C. L., & Esty, D. C. (2002). Trade and the environment in the Americas: Overview of key issues. In C. L. Deere and D.C. Esty (eds.), Greening the Americas: NAFTA’s lessons for hemispheric trade (pp. 1-27). Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
    [2002]
  • De Bièvre, D., Espa, I., & Poletti, A. (2017). No iceberg in sight: on the absence of WTO disputes challenging fossil fuel subsidies. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(3), 411-425.
    [2017]
  • Cuyvers, L. (2014). The sustainable development clauses in free trade agreements of the EU with Asian countries: Perspectives for ASEAN? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22(4), 427-449.
    [2014]
  • Crivelli, P., & Gröschl, J. (2016). The impact of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on market entry and trade flows. The World Economy, 39(3), 444-473.
    [2016]
  • Compliance with international agreements
    Simmons , B . A 1 ( 1 ) , 75-93 [1998]
  • Compliance & effectiveness in international regulatory cooperation . Case W. Res
    Raustiala , K. 32 ( 3 ) , 387-440 . [2000]
  • Competing for scarce foreign capital : Spatial dependence in the diffusion of double taxation treaties
    Barthel , F. & Neumayer , E. 56 ( 4 ) , 645-660 . [2012]
  • Colyer, D. (2012). Environmental provisions in free trade agreements. [Conference presentation]. West Virginia University, Department of Agricultural Resources Economics. West Virginia University, United States. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/123723/files/ENVIRONMENTA L%20PROVISIONS%20IN%20FREE%20TRADE%20AGREEMEN TS.pdf
    [2012]
  • Choosing an appropriate alliance governance mode : The role of institutional , cultural and geographical distance in international research & development ( R & D ) collaborations
    Choi , J , & Contractor , F. J 47 ( 2 ) , 210-232 [2016]
  • Cao, X. (2010). Networks as channels of policy diffusion: Explaining worldwide changes in capital taxation, 1998–2006. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 823-854.
    [2010]
  • Canadian-US environmental cooperation : Climate change networks and regional action
    Selin , H. , & VanDeveer , S. D. 35 ( 2 ) , 353-378 . [2005]
  • Bättig, M. B., & Bernauer, T. (2009). National institutions and global public goods: are democracies more cooperative in climate change policy?. International organization, 63(2), 281-308.
    [2009]
  • Blümer, D., Morin, J. F., Brandi, C., & Berger, A. (2020). Environmental provisions in trade agreements: defending regulatory space or pursuing offensive interests?. Environmental Politics, 29(5), 866-889.
    [2020]
  • Bhagwati, J. (2008). Termites in the trading system: How preferential agreements undermine free trade. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [2008]
  • Bhagwati, J. (2003). Free trade today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [2003]
  • Bhagwati, J. (2000). On thinking clearly about the Linkage between trade and the environment. Environment and Development Economics, 5(4), 485– 496.
    [2000]
  • Beyond trade : The expanding scope of the nontrade agenda in trade agreements
  • Bernauer, T. & Nguyen, Q. (2015). Free Trade And/Or Environmental Protection?. Global Environmental Politics, 15(4), 105–129.
    [2015]
  • Bechtel, M. M., & Tosun, J. (2009). Changing economic openness for environmental policy convergence: When can bilateral trade agreements induce convergence of environmental regulation?. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 931-953.
    [2009]
  • Bartlett, D. (2021, November 15). Kishida places Japan’s business interests at the forefront of climate policy. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2021/11/kishida-places-japans-businessinterests- at-the-forefront-of-climate-policy/ (accessed May 10, 2022).
  • Barczak, G, Lassk, F, Mulki, J (2010). Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 332– 345.
    [2010]
  • Barbieri, K. (1996). Economic interdependence: A path to peace or a source of interstate conflict?. Journal of Peace Research, 33(1), 29-49.
    [1996]
  • Bao, X., & Qiu, L. D. (2012). How do technical barriers to trade influence trade?. Review of International Economics, 20(4), 691-706.
    [2012]
  • Baccini, L., & Urpelainen, J. (2014). International institutions and domestic politics: can preferential trading agreements help leaders promote economic reform?. The Journal of Politics, 76(1), 195-214.
    [2014]
  • Axelrod, M. (2011b). Climate change and global fisheries management: linking issues to protect ecosystems or to save political interests?. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 64-84.
  • Axelrod, M. (2011a). Savings clauses and the chilling effect. In S. Oberthur and O. S. Stokke (eds.), Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change (pp. 345-369). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Asaoka, M. (2015, June 2). Japan’s INDC draft is neither ambitious nor fair. Kikonetwork. https://www.kikonet.org/eng/press-release-en/2015-06- 07/japans-indc-draft-is-neither-ambitious-nor-fair (accessed June 22, 2022).
  • Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership. (2017). https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/august/tradoc_157228.pdf (accessed May 1, 2022).
    [2017]
  • Aggarwal, V. K. (2013). U.S. free trade agreements and linkages. International Negotiation, 2013(18), 89-110.
  • Aggarwal, V. K. (1998). Institutional designs for a complex world: Bargaining, linkages, and nesting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
    [1998]
  • Addressing policy challenges in implementing Sustainable Development Goals through an adaptive governance approach : A view from transitional China
    Xue , L. , Weng , L. , & Yu , H. 26 ( 2 ) , 150-158 . [2018]
  • Achieving cooperation under anarchy : Strategies and Institutions
    Axelrod , R. , & Keohane , R. O . 38 ( 1 ) , 226-254 . [1985]
  • Accounting and the construction of the governable person .
    Miller , P. , & O'leary , T. 12 ( 3 ) , 235- 265 [1987]
  • A strategic theory of regime integration and separation
    Johnson , T. , & Urpelainen , J . 66 ( 4 ) , 645-677 . [2012]
  • A new era of trade-environment politics : Learning from US leadership and its consequences abroad
    Jinnah , S. and Kennedy , J 12 ( 3 ) , 95-110 . [2011]
  • A compliance-based theory of international law
    Guzman , A. T. 90 ( 6 ) , 1823-1887 . [2002]