연구동향 분석

Evaluation of accuracy according to post processing time of single interim crowns fabricated by digital light processing 3D printer : an in vitro study

이범일 2022년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' Evaluation of accuracy according to post processing time of single interim crowns fabricated by digital light processing 3D printer : an in vitro study' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 3-dprinter
  • Additive manufacturing
  • Digital light processing
  • Interim crown
  • Post-curing
  • Precision
  • Trueness
  • Vat photopolymerization
  • accuracy
  • dentalcad/camsystem
  • post processing
  • rinsing
  • time
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,176 0

0.0%

' Evaluation of accuracy according to post processing time of single interim crowns fabricated by digital light processing 3D printer : an in vitro study' 의 참고문헌

  • [9] Alifui-Segbaya F, Bowman J, White AR, Varma S, Lieschke GJ, George R. Toxicological assessment of additively manufactured methacrylates for medical devices in dentistry. Acta Biomater 2018;78:64-77.
    [2018]
  • [8] Ahn JJ, Bae EB, Lee WS, Cho WT, Huh JB. Comparison of clinical fit of three-unit zirconia fixed prostheses fabricated using chairside and labside CAD/CAM systems. J Dent Sci 2020;15:239-42.
  • [85] Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, Ferracane JL, Bertassoni LE. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater 2018;34:192- 200.
    [2018]
  • [84] Abdulmohsen B, Parker S, Braden M, Patel MP. A study to investigate and compare the physicomechanical properties of experimental and commercial temporary crown and bridge materials. Dent Mater 2016;32:200-10.
    [2016]
  • [83] Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:313-20.
    [2016]
  • [82] Wu D, Zhao Z, Zhang Q, Qi HJ, Fang D. Mechanics of shape distortion of DLP 3D printed structures during UV post-curing. Soft Matter 2019;15:6151-9.
    [2019]
  • [7] Janeva N, Kovacevska G, Janev E. Complete dentures fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and a traditional clinical recording method. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2017;5:785-9.
    [2017]
  • [79] Khoshkhoo A, Carrano AL, Blersch DM. Effect of build orientation and part thickness on dimensional distortion in material jetting processes. Rapid Prototyp J 2018;24:1563-71.
    [2018]
  • [78] Bass L, Meisel NA, Williams CB. Exploring variability of orientation and aging effects in material properties of multi-material jetting parts. Rapid Prototyp J 2016;22:826-34.
    [2016]
  • [77] Hwang HJ, Lee SJ, Park EJ, Yoon HI. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:110-7.
    [2019]
  • [76] Michelinakis G, Apostolakis D, Tsagarakis A, Kourakis G, Pavlakis E. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:581-8.
  • [75] You SG, You SM, Kang SY, Bae SY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:479-85.
  • [74] Lehmann KM, Azar MS, Kämmerer PW, Wentaschek S, Hell EN, Scheller H. The Effect of Optical Conditioning of Preparations with Scan Spray on Preparation Form. Acta Stomatol Croat 2011;45:86-92
    [2011]
  • [73] Park JY, Bae SY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:159-69.
    [2017]
  • [71] Bae SY, Park JY, Jeong ID, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Threedimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:106-12.
    [2017]
  • [70] Kirsch C, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:551-8.
    [2017]
  • [6] Karakoç M, Batmaz I, Sariyildiz MA, Yazmalar L, Aydin A, Em S. Sockets manufactured by CAD/CAM method have positive effects on the quality of life of patients with transtibial amputation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017;96:578-81.
    [2017]
  • [69] Loflin WA, English JD, Borders C, Harris LM, Moon A, Holland JN, Kasper FK. Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;156:283-9.
    [2019]
  • [68] Al-Imam H, Gram M, Benetti AR, Gotfredsen K. Accuracy of stereolithography additive casts used in a digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:580-5.
    [2018]
  • [67] Patzelt SB, Bishti S, Stampf S, Att W. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing–generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:1133-40.
    [2014]
  • [66] Martorelli M, Gerbino S, Giudice M, Ausiello P. A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques. Dent Mater 2013;29:e1-10.
    [2013]
  • [65] Jeon JH, Kim DY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim WC. Repeatability and reproducibility of individual abutment impression, assessed with a blue light scanner. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:214-8.
  • [64] Shah S, Sundaram G, Bartlett D, Sherriff M. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques. J Dent 2004;32:653-8.
    [2004]
  • [63] Bosch G, Ender A, Mehl A. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1425- 31.
  • [62] Wang W, Yu H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Gao B. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:285-91.
  • [61] Sherman SL, Kadioglu O, Currier GF, Kierl JP, Li J. Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;157:422-8.
  • [60] Kalberer N, Mehl A, Schimmel M, Müller F, Srinivasan M. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: an in vitro evaluation of trueness. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:637-43.
  • [5] Orabona GD, Abbate V, Maglitto F, Bonavolontà P, Salzano G, Romano A, Reccia A, Committeri U, Iaconetta G, Califano L. Low-cost, self-made CAD/CAM-guiding system for mandibular reconstruction. Surg Oncol 2018;27:200-7.
    [2018]
  • [59] Kang SY, Park JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Three-dimensional trueness analysis of ceramic crowns fabricated using a chairside computer-aided design/manufacturing system: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:152-8.
  • [58] Katheng A, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Minakuchi S. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy and degree of polymerization of stereolithography photopolymer resin under different postpolymerization conditions: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:695-702.
  • [57] Yoon HI, Hwang HJ, Ohkubo C, Han JS, Park EJ. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:919-26.
    [2018]
  • [56] Lee S, Hong SJ, Paek J, Pae A, Kwon KR, Noh K. Comparing accuracy of denture bases fabricated by injection molding, CAD/CAM milling, and rapid prototyping method. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:55-64.
  • [55] Jeon JH, Hwang SS, Kim JH, Kim WC. Trueness and precision of scanning abutment impressions and stone models according to dental CAD/CAM evaluation standards. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:335-9.
    [2018]
  • [53] Grünheid T, Patel N, De Felippe NL, Wey A, Gaillard PR, Larson BE. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:157-64.
    [2014]
  • [52] Kang SY, Park JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Accuracy of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technique. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:354-60.
    [2018]
  • [51] International Organization of Standardization. ISO 12836. Dentistry- Digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations: Test methods for assessing accuracy. Geneva: ISO; 2015. Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:12836:ed-2:v1:en.
    [2015]
  • [50] Chockalingam K, Jawahar N, Chandrasekhar U. Influence of layer thickness on mechanical properties in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 2006;12:106-13.
    [2006]
  • [4] Chiu A, Chen YW, Hayashi J, Sadr A. Accuracy of CAD/CAM digital impressions with different intraoral scanner parameters. Sensors (Basel) 2020;20:1-9.
  • [49] Xu Y, Xepapadeas AB, Koos B, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Li P, Spintzyk S. Effect of post-rinsing time on the mechanical strength and cytotoxicity of a 3D printed orthodontic splint material. Dent Mater 2021;37:e314-e27.
  • [48] Galante R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: A review. Dent Mater 2019;35:825-46.
    [2019]
  • [47] Lee WS, Lee DH, Lee KB. Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:265-70.
    [2017]
  • [46] Revilla‐León M, Meyers MJ, Zandinejad A, Özcan M. A review on chemical composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing work flow of additively manufactured current polymers for interim dental restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;31:51-7.
  • [45] Myagmar G, Lee JH, Ahn JS, Yeo IS, Yoon HI, Han JS. Wear of 3D printed and CAD/CAM milled interim resin materials after chewing simulation. J Adv Prosthodont 2021;13:144-51.
  • [44] Peng CC, Chung KH, Yau HT. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:514-22.
    [2020]
  • [43] Nejatidanesh F, Lotfi HR, Savabi O. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:364-7.
    [2006]
  • [42] You SM, You SG, Lee BI, Kim JH. Evaluation of trueness in a denture base fabricated by using CAD-CAM systems and adaptation to the socketed surface of denture base: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 22 Nov 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.027.
    [2020]
  • [41] You SG, You SM, Lee BI, Kim DY, Kim JH. Effect of layer thickness setting on the adaptation of stereolithography apparatus–fabricated metal frameworks for removable partial dentures: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 24 Nov 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.041.
    [2020]
  • [40] You SM, You SG, Kang SY, Bae SY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of a maxillary trial denture according to the layer thickness: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:139-45.
  • [3] Arnold C, Monsees D, Hey J, Schweyen R. Surface quality of 3D-printed models as a function of various printing parameters. Materials (Basel) 2019;12:1-15.
    [2019]
  • [39] Yu BY, Son K, Lee KB. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:231-7.
  • [38] Park GS, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Seo DG. Effects of printing parameters on the fit of implant-supported 3D printing resin prosthetics. Materials (Basel) 2019;12:1-13.
    [2019]
  • [37] Ryu JE, Kim YL, Kong HJ, Chang HS, Jung JH. Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed provisional crowns according to build directions. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12:225-32.
  • [36] Osman RB, Alharbi N, Wismeijer D. Build angle: does it influence the accuracy of 3D-printed dental restorations using digital light-processing technology?. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:182-8.
    [2017]
  • [35] Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Factors Influencing the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Full-Coverage Dental Restorations Using Stereolithography Technology. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:503-10.
    [2016]
  • [34] Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater 2016;32:54-64.
    [2016]
  • [33] Shamseddine L, Mortada R, Rifai K, Chidiac JJ. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:49-54.
    [2017]
  • [32] Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:260-5.
    [2017]
  • [31] Park JY, Lee JJ, Bae SY, Kim JH, Kim WC. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:536-42.
    [2016]
  • [30] Revilla‐León M, Özcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont 2019;28:146-58.
  • [2] Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56.
    [2009]
  • [29] Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.
    [2012]
  • [28] Braian M, Jönsson D, Kevci M, Wennerberg A. Geometrical accuracy of metallic objects produced with additive or subtractive manufacturing: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2018;34:978-93.
    [2018]
  • [27] Nestler N, Wesemann C, Spies BC, Beuer F, Bumann A. Dimensional accuracy of extrusion-and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:103-10.
  • [26] Yao Q, Morton D, Eckert GJ, Lin WS. The effect of surface treatments on the color stability of CAD-CAM interim fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:248-53.
  • [25] Kim DY. Evaluation of fits of metal copings fabricated by using selective laser melting at various angles. J Prosthet Dent 11 Feb 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.029.
  • [24] Zarone F, Ruggiero G, Ferrari M, Mangano F, Joda T, Sorrentino R. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:761.e1-e7.
  • [23] Son K, Yu BY, Lee JH, Son YT, Lee KB. Comparison of intaglio surface adjustment in the oral cavity for lithium disilicate crowns fabricated using different scanners. J Prosthodont 2021;30:276-81.
  • [22] Park JH, Kim JE, Shim JS. Digital workflow for a dental prosthesis that considers lateral mandibular relation. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:340-4.
    [2017]
  • [21] Suese K. Progress in digital dentistry: The practical use of intraoral scanners. Dent Mater J 2020;39:52-6.
    [2020]
  • [20] Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D, Grosgogeat B. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:590-7.
    [2019]
  • [1] Jeon JH. In vitro precision evaluation of blue light scanning of abutment teeth made with impressions and dental stone casts according to different 3D superimposition methods. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:368-72.
  • [19] Patzelt SB, Spies BC, Kohal RJ. CAD/CAM‐fabricated implantsupported restorations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:77-85.
    [2015]
  • [18] Wang C, Shi YF, Xie PJ, Wu JH. Accuracy of digital complete dentures: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:249-56.
  • [17] Pereira AL, de Medeiros AK, de Sousa Santos K, de Almeida ÉO, Barbosa GA, Carreiro AD. Accuracy of CAD-CAM systems for removable partial denture framework fabrication: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:241-8.
  • [16] Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:545-51.
    [2018]
  • [15] Alqahtani F. Marginal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated using two extraoral CAD/CAM systems in comparison with the conventional technique. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2017;9:13-8.
    [2017]
  • [13] Arunyanak SP, Harris BT, Grant GT, Morton D, Lin WS. Digital approach to planning computer-guided surgery and immediate provisionalization in a partially edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:8-14.
    [2016]
  • [12] Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, WILDER JR AD, ROBERSON TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM–generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1171-81.
    [1996]
  • [11] Souza RO, Özcan M, Pavanelli CA, Buso L, Lombardo GH, Michida SM, Mesquita AM, Bottino MA. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system. J Prosthodont 2012;21:94-100.
  • The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique
    McLean JW 131:107-11 [1971]
  • Miyasaka T. Dimensional accuracy of dental casting patterns created by 3D printers
    Ishida Y 35:250-6 [2016]
  • Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations
    Miyazaki T 56:97-106 [2011]
  • Aspects of accuracy and precision in the additive manufacturing of plastic gears
    Berger U 10:49-57 [2015]
  • Advancements in CAD/CAM technology : Options for practical implementation
    Alghazzawi TF 60:72-84 [2016]
  • Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions : a new method of measuring trueness and precision
    Ender A , Mehl A . 109:121-8 [2013]