연구동향 분석

국립공원 이해집단의 환경태도 비교와 국립공원 이용·관리의 중요도-만족도 분석 = Comparison of Environmental Attitude between Interest Groups and Importance-Satisfaction Analysis in National Park

한재경 2020년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 국립공원 이해집단의 환경태도 비교와 국립공원 이용·관리의 중요도-만족도 분석 = Comparison of Environmental Attitude between Interest Groups and Importance-Satisfaction Analysis in National Park' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 국립공원
  • 이해집단
  • 중요도 - 만족도 분석
  • 환경태도
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
240 0

0.0%

' 국립공원 이해집단의 환경태도 비교와 국립공원 이용·관리의 중요도-만족도 분석 = Comparison of Environmental Attitude between Interest Groups and Importance-Satisfaction Analysis in National Park' 의 참고문헌

  • www.me.go.kr
    [2018]
  • www.knps.or.kr/research
    [2016]
  • www.knps.or.kr
    [2019]
  • Willingness to pay for the environment : social structure , value orientations and environmental behaviour in a multilevel perspective
    11 ( 3 ) , 315-332.- 86 - [1998]
  • Walking tourist ’ environmental paradigm and psychological well-being
    23 ( 1 ) , 109-124 . [2011]
  • Visitors ` perceptions and attitudes about establishing a cable car in Mudeungsan provincial park
    25 ( 3 ) , 421-431 . [2011]
  • Usage pattern and satisfaction level of visitors to Gaya National Park
    8 , 267-280 . [1997]
  • Understanding and management of National Park , 1st ed.
    [2016]
  • Tourism pattern and of trail visitors on Gyeryong National Park
    17 ( 1 ) , 97-103 . [2013]
  • The ‘ New Environmental Paradigm ’
    9 ( 4 ) , 10-19 . [1978]
  • The visitors characteristics of urban ecological park-The cases of Gildong ecological park , Yeouido tributary ecological park
    42 ( 1 ) , 64-74 . [2014]
  • The validation of NEP scale for elementary school students in Korea
    22 ( 4 ) , 40-52 . [2009]
  • The use ( and abuse ) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years , J. Env
    30 ( 2 ) , 143-158 . [2010]
  • The social bases of environmental consern
    44 ( 2 ) , 181-197 . [1980]
  • The relationship between recreation specialization , place attachment , environment behavior and proenvironment activities of male mountaineering participants
    55 ( 2 ) , 499-509 . [2016]
  • The perception of the environmental protection policy and its determinants between interest groups , J. local Gov
    13 ( 2 ) , 205-229 . [2001]
  • The impact of Chinese consumers ' New ecological paradigm and environmental knowledge on pro-environmental consumption behavior : focused on moderating effect of environmental self-efficacy
    4354 , 250-269 . [2014]
  • The gender gap in environmental attitudes : the case of perceived vulnerability to risk
    78 ( 4 ) , 830-840 . [1997]
  • The gender gap in environmental attitudes : A system justification perspective
    [2013]
  • The effects of knowledge , beliefs and attitudes about environment on issue-based environmental problem solving in middle schools
    20 ( 1 ) , 118-130 . [2007]
  • The change of attitudes toward nature and program evaluation of environmental program participant ’ s
    15 ( 1 ) , 73-78 . [2011]
  • The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology
    [2012]
  • The Importance-Performance Analysis ( IPA ) for decided selection by visitors at Gyeryongsan National Park
    19 ( 4 ) , 67-75 . [2015]
  • The Determinants of Individuals ’ Attitudes Towards Preventing Environmental Damage
    63 , 536-552 [2007]
  • System justification , the denial of global warming , and the possibility of `` system-sanctioned change ''
    36 ( 3 ) , 326-338 . [2010]
  • Study on relationship between self-construals , environmental friendly psychology and green consumer behavior
    12 ( 2 ) , 427-453 . [2011]
  • Social Psychology ( 11th ed
    [2015]
  • Segmentation of management sectors and identification of relationships between management sectors and visitor ́ s satisfaction in National Park
    18 ( 4 ) , 243-261 . [2006]
  • Rural-urban differences in environmental knowledge and actions
    25 ( 1 ) , 19-25 . [1993]
  • Revisiting importance-performance analysis
    22 ( 6 ) , 617-627 . [2001]
  • Residents Perceptions of the outdoor spaces of environmentally-friendly apartmentComplexes
    35 ( 6 ) , 1-13 [2008]
  • Research on the importance and satisfaction of selection attribute for Tourism destination , using importance-performance analysis
    28 ( 12 ) , 25-41 . [2016]
  • Re-examination of importance-performance analysis ( IPA ) used in tourism studies in Korea
    22 ( 1 ) , 119-137 . [2010]
  • Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns ,
    17 ( 1 ) , 51-56 . [1988]
  • Park management evaluation using importanceperformance analysis
    80 ( 1 ) , 103-108 . [1991]
  • National Park statistic 2016
    [2016]
  • Motivation and Personality ( 2nd ed. )
    [1970]
  • Measuring visitors ’ satisfaction in National Parks
    6 ( 2 ) , 61-67 . [2002]
  • Measuring the environmental attitudes for National Park visitors
    89 ( 5 ) , 589-608 . [2000]
  • Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigmEcology and History-Culture Programs-
    56 ( 3 ) , 425-44223 ( 1 ) , 147-168 . [2000]
  • J. C. , Importance-performance analysis
    [1977]
  • Inst . For . Recr. , 20 ( 2 ) , 115-126 . Lee , J. H.
    , 2001 , pplication of Importance-Performance Analysis [2001]
  • Influence of sociodemographics and environmental attitudes on general responsible environmental behavior among recreational boaters
    35 ( 3 ) , 1-29 . [2003]
  • Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands : A wastern Australian case study
    28 ( 3 ) , 768-776 . [2008]
  • Green teens : Investigating the role of emotional intelligence in adolescent environmentalism
    138 , 225-230 [2019]
  • Gender differences in environmental concern : revisiting the institutional trust hypothesis in the USA
    47 ( 1 ) , 17-37 . [2015]
  • Farmers ’ attitudes about farming and the environment : A survey of conventional and organic farmers
    9 ( 2 ) , 123-143 . [1996]
  • Facility Management strategy of a Korea National Park based on importance-performance analysis
    29 ( 6 ) , 952-958 . [2015]
  • Explaining gender differences in concern about environmental problems in the United States
    25 ( 11 ) , 1067-1084 [2012]
  • Examining the determinants of public environmental concern : Evidence from national public surveys
    39 , 77-94 [2014]
  • Evaluation of use satisfaction for Tohamsan and Namsan National Parks in Kyongju -Focused on Importance-Performance Analysis
    17 ( 3 ) , 153-165 . [2008]
  • Evaluation of tourist destination attractiveness by IPA : focused on Damyang Juknokwon Bamboo Park
    28 ( 10 ) , 169-189 . [2016]
  • Environmental consciousness in Korea
    12 ( 1 ) , 177-204 . [2003]
  • Environmental attitude , motivations and values for marine biodiversity protection , J. Behav
    69 , 61-70 [2017]
  • Environmental attitude , in : Clayton , S. D. ( cd ) , The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology
    [2012]
  • Empirical validation of affect , behavior , and cognition as distinct components of attitude
    47 ( 6 ) , 1191-1205 [1984]
  • Ecotourists & quot ; Satisfaction and behavioral intentions
    21 ( 4 ) , 175-201 . [2006]
  • Do women make a difference ? Analysing environmental attitudes and actions of members of the European Parliament , Env
    [2019]
  • Development of environmental attitude scale for Korea junior high school students , J. Env
    12 ( 7 ) , 763-774 . [2003]
  • Designing a likert-type scale to measure nuclear energy attitude
    [2001]
  • Demographic predictors of environmental concern : It does make a difference how it ’ s measured
    79 ( 4 ) , 734-753 . [1998]
  • Comparison of environmental attitude between interest groups in Juwangsan National Park , J. Env
    26 ( 11 ) , 1235-1246 . [2017]
  • Comparison of environmental attitude between interest group in Gayasan National Park , J. Env
    27 ( 11 ) , 1049-1057 . [2018]
  • Characteristics and variables of nuclear energy attitudes of social groups
    13 ( 10 ) , 955-963 . [2004]
  • Belief , Attitude , Intention , and Behavior
    [1975]
  • Assessment of impact rating class and deterioration condition on the trails in Juwangsan National Park
    29 ( 4 ) , 605-614 . [2015]
  • Analysis of attractiveness of eCotourism program in national park using IPA ,
    23 ( 1 ) , 147-68 . [2011]
  • Analysis of attractiveness of Naejangsan National Park : An applied Importance Performance Analysis , Nor . As
    8 ( 4 ) , 253-267 . [2012]
  • An analysis on the relation between residents ’ perception of tourism impact , environmental attitude and participation : Focused on Keumkang pine tree forest trail
    ,50 ( 3 ) , 339-354 [2015]
  • An analysis on the environmental ethics and the environmental consciousness of visitors in Naejangsan National Park
    12 ( 1 ) , 21-29 . [2008]
  • An analysis on the differences in National Park visitors ’ pro-environmental behavioral intention and support for National Park managerial policies by personal norm
    30 ( 1 ) , 197-210 . [2016]
  • An analysis of conflict structure between stakeholders for effective management of National Park in Korea
    [2007]
  • Alternative solutions to mitigate conflicts on private land for reasonable management of National Parks in Korea
    40 ( 5 ) , 47-57 . [2005]
  • Age and attitude toward climate change in Seoul , Korea
    74 , 221-232 [2012]
  • A study on visitors ’ differences of satisfaction level due to lifestyle in Bukhansan National Park , Korea
    30 ( 5 ) , 915-921 . [2016]
  • A study on visitors ' and managers ' perception to national park use and management attributes -A case study on National Parks in Kangwon area
    17 ( 1 ) , 35-43 . [2003]
  • A study on the wetland user 's eCoconsciousness and preference of amenities - focused on upo marsh users -
    Tec.,16 ( 6 ) , 77-91 . [2013]
  • A study on the recognition of visitors for the National Park facilities
    18 ( 3 ) , 33-44 . [2014]
  • A study on the pro-environmental behavior intention of the visitor in Bukhansan National Park
    16 ( 4 ) , 53-63 . [2016]
  • A study on the facilities in Mudeungsan National Park by Importance-Performance Analysis ( IPA )
    [2014]
  • A study on the differences in environmental perceptions of the interest groups in the protected areas : focused on Seoraksan National Park
    28 ( 6 ) , 779-788 . [2014]
  • A study on the differences in environmental perceptions of the interest groups in the protected areas
    28 ( 6 ) , 779-788 . [2014]
  • A study on the botanical garden visitors ' eCoconsciousness and motivation
    28 ( 2 ) , 235-246 . [2014]
  • A study on importance-performance analysis of National Park facilities management based on visitor characteristics
    6 ( 1 ) , 63-71 . [2002]
  • A study for recognition about cultural heritage of visitors in Bukaksan ' s Seoul fortress : focused on modified New Environmental Paradigm ( NEP ) scale
    22 ( 1 ) , 133-150 . [2010]
  • A structural relationship between place attachment and environmental factor to temple forest trail in Gyeongju National Park
    26 ( 2 ) , 283-291 . [2012]
  • A relationship between environmental awareness , place attachment , and environmentally friendly behavior intention of Han River Park visitors- grounded on New Environmental Paradigm ( NEP )
    42 ( 3 ) , 121-132 . [2018]
  • A proposal for advancement and cooperation between National Park Service and local communities-case study area
    8 ( 1 ) , 37-48 . [2017]
  • A comparison study of walking tourists ` selection attributes at National Park using the importance- Performance analysis
    24 ( 4 ) , 91-112 . [2012]
  • A comparative study on green consumption behavior between Korean and Chinese women
    14 ( 4 ) , 183-207 . [2011]
  • A Study of environmental awareness and attitudes in Ibadan
    18 , 669-684 . [2012]
  • A Difference analysis among nationally , gender and age regarding environmentally conscious behavior
    16 ( 8 ) , 5089-5095 . [2015]