연구동향 분석
박사

Exploring student agency during the shift to collaborative contributors in small-group argumentation activity in middle school science classrooms

하희수 2020년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' Exploring student agency during the shift to collaborative contributors in small-group argumentation activity in middle school science classrooms' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 유인원
  • agency
  • argumentation activity
  • collaborative contributor
  • framing
  • framing negotiation
  • positioning
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
290 0

0.0%

' Exploring student agency during the shift to collaborative contributors in small-group argumentation activity in middle school science classrooms' 의 참고문헌

  • ‘ Just be quiet and listen to exactly what he ’ s saying ’ :Conceptualising power relations in inquiryorientedClassrooms
    36 ( 12 ) , 2029-2054 . [2014]
  • Zones of interaction : Differential access to elementary science discourse
    43 ( 5 ) , 443–466 [2006]
  • Words and minds : How we use language to think together
    [2000]
  • With an eye on the mathematical horizon : Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics
    93 ( 4 ) , 373–397 [1993]
  • What kind of a girl does science ? The construction of school science identities
    37 ( 5 ) , 441–458 [2000]
  • What is ‘ agency ’ ? Perspectives in Science Education Research
    36 ( 5 ) , 735–754 [2014]
  • What is agency ?
    103 , 962–1023 [1998]
  • What can argumentation tell us about epistemology ? In S. Erduran , & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre ( Eds . ) , Argumentation in science education : Perspectives from classroom-based research
    pp . 71–88 [2007]
  • We have never been modern ( C. Porter , Trans. )
    [1993]
  • We be burnin ’ ! Agency , identity , and science learning
    19 ( 2 ) , 187–229 [2010]
  • Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-in-practice : The stories of Amelia and Ginny
    3 , 43–71 [2008]
  • Understanding the role of wonderment questions related to activation of conceptual resources in scientific model construction : Focusing on students ’ epistemological framing and positional framing
    36 ( 3 ) , 471–483 [2016]
  • Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices : A case study of a responsive teaching environment
    49 ( 4 ) , 429–464 [2012]
  • Understanding students ’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry
    89 ( 4 ) , 634–656 [2005]
  • Two lectures . In G. Gordon ( Ed . ) , Power/knowledge : Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 ( pp . 78–108 )
    [1980]
  • Toward an epistemology of physics
    10 ( 2-3 ) , 105–225 [1993]
  • Thought and language
    [1986]
  • Theorizing passivity
    2 , 1–8 [2007]
  • The structure-agency dialectic in contested science spaces : “ Do earthworms eat apples ?
    52 ( 4 ) , 461–473 . [2015]
  • The skills of argument
    [1991]
  • The productive disciplinary engagement framework : Origins , key concepts , and developmentsDesign research on learning and thinking in educational settings : Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning
    pp . 161–200 [2012]
  • The mangle of practice : Time , agency , and science
    [1995]
  • The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation
    93 ( 3 ) , 448–484 [2009]
  • The grammar of agency : Studying possibilities for student agency in science classroom discourse
    10 , 40–49 [2016]
  • The future of education and skills : Education 2030
    [2018]
  • The emergence of grammar from perspective taking . In D. Pecher , & R. Zwann ( Eds . ) , The grounding of cognition ( pp . 198–233 )
    [2005]
  • The effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge in comprehension
    82 , 498–443 [1990]
  • The constitution of society : Outline of the theory of structuration
    [1984]
  • The Uses of Argument
    [1958]
  • Teacher agency and professional learning : Rethinking fidelity of implementation as multiplicities of enactment
    52 ( 4 ) , 489–502 . [2015]
  • Talking science : The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching
    32 ( 1 ) , 69–95 [2010]
  • Talking science : Language , learning , and values
    [1990]
  • Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education
    38 ( 1 ) , 39–72 [2002]
  • Structure , agency , and the development of students ’ identities as learners
    1 , 745–766 [2006]
  • Social foundations ofCognition
    44 , 585–612 [1993]
  • Social aspects of argumentation . In S. Erduran , M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre ( Eds . ) , Argumentation in science education : Perspectives fromClassroom-based research
    pp . 117–136 [2007]
  • Should great lakesCity build a new power plant ? How youth navigate socioscientific issues
    49 ( 5 ) , 541–567 . [2012]
  • SharingCognition toConstruct scientific knowledge in schoolContexts : The role of oral and written discourse
    26 , 359–389 [1998]
  • Scientific explanations :Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers ’ instructional practices on student learning
    45 ( 1 ) , 53–78 [2008]
  • Scientific arguments as learning artifacts : Designing for learning from the web with KIE
    22 ( 8 ) , 797–817 [2000]
  • ScienceCurriculum
    MOE Notification No . 2015-74 [ Supplement 9 [2015]
  • Science student role : Evidence of social structural norms specific to school science
    48 , 367–395 . [2011]
  • Science education in three-part harmony : BalancingConceptual , epistemic , and social learning goals .
    32 ( 1 ) , 268–291 . [2008]
  • Science education for the future
    80 ( 291 ) , 19–24 . [1998]
  • Science ,Culture , and the emergence of language
    86 ( 3 ) , 368–385 [2002]
  • Schlosser, M. (2015, August 10). Agency. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/agency/
    [2015]
  • Resistance and the development of scientific practice : Designing the mangle into science instruction
    33 ( 2 ) , 89–124 [2015]
  • Reflective judgment : Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood
    39 , 5–18 [2004]
  • Reassembling the social : An introduction to actor-network theory
    [2005]
  • Qualitative data analysis : An expanded source book ( 2nd ed )
    [1994]
  • Qualitative Research andCase Study Applications in Education
    [1998]
  • Putting on a greenCarnival : Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues
    51 ( 3 ) , 286–314 . [2014]
  • Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk ''
    47 ( 2 ) , 263–292 [1979]
  • Power in theClassroom : How theClassroom environment shapes students ’ relationships with each other and withConcepts
    22 ( 4 ) , 467–498 [2004]
  • Power , knowledge and subject-focused on Foucault ’ subject thought
    15 , 277–317 . [2009]
  • Positioning as not-understanding : The value of showing uncertainty for engaging in science
    55 ( 4 ) , 573– 599 . [2017]
  • Orders of discourse
    10 ( 2 ) , 7–22 . [1971]
  • On the form of a personal epistemology . In B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich ( Eds . ) , Personal epistemology : The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing
    pp . 169–190 [2002]
  • On the continuity of power relations in pedagogy .
    5 , 165–188 . [1995]
  • New Rules of Sociological Method . A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies
    [1976]
  • Nature-culture constructs in science learning : Human/non-human agency and intentionality
    52 ( 4 ) , 530–544 . [2015]
  • Multiple epistemological coherences in an eighth-grade discussion of the rock cycle
    15 ( 2 ) , 261–292 [2006]
  • Moving beyond pseudoargumentation : Teachers ’ enactments of an educative science curriculum focused on argumentation
    101 ( 3 ) , 426–457 . [2017]
  • Mind in society : The development of higher psychological processes
    [1978]
  • Mapping concepts of agency in educational Contexts
    50 , 420–446 [2016]
  • Making a scientist : Discursive ‘ ‘ doing ’
    doi : 10.17169/fqs-5.1.655 [2004]
  • Making ( electrical ) connections : Exploring student agency in a school in India
    92 ( 2 ) , 297–319 [2007]
  • Learning through collaborative argumentation . In C. E. Hmelo-Silver , C. A. Chinn , C. Chan , & A. M. O ’ Donnell ( Eds . ) , International handbook of collaborative learning
    pp . 314–332 [2013]
  • Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers ? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management
    24 ( 11 ) , 1171– 1190 [2002]
  • Knowledge and power in the technology classroom : A framework for studying teachers and students in action
    13 ( 1 ) , 163–184 [2018]
  • Knotworking to create collaborative intentionality capital in fluid organizational fields . In M. M. Beyerlein , S. T. Beyerlein , & F. A. Kennedy ( Eds . ) , Collaborative capital : Creating intangible value
    pp . 307–336 [2005]
  • Informal Logic : A Handbook for Critical Argumentation
    [1989]
  • Improvements to elementary children 's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation
    96 ( 3 ) , 488–526 . [2012]
  • Identity in science learning : Exploring the attention given to agency and structure in studies of identity
    45 ( 1 ) , 43–64 [2009]
  • Identity and agency in cultural worlds
    [1998]
  • Identity , agency , and knowing in mathematics worlds . In J. Boaler ( Ed . ) , Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning
    pp . 171–200 [2000]
  • I am science and the world is mine ” : Embodied practices as resources for empowerment
    105 , 335–342 [2005]
  • Human agency in social cognitive theory
    44 , 1175–1184 [1989]
  • How students design and enact physics lessons : Five immigrant Caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice
    45 ( 8 ) , 881–899 [2008]
  • Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement : Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom
    20 ( 4 ) , 399–483 [2002]
  • Fundamentals of argumentation theory : A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments
    [1996]
  • From peripheral to central , the story of Melanie ’ s metamorphosis in an urban middle school science class
    92 , 567–590 [2007]
  • From Teams to Knots : Activity-Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work
    [2008]
  • Framing in discourse
    [1993]
  • Framing in cognitive clinical interviews about intuitive science knowledge : Dynamic student understandings of the discourse interaction
    96 ( 4 ) , 573–599 [2012]
  • Framing for scientific argumentation
    49 ( 1 ) , 68–94 . [2012]
  • Framing as A Theory of Media Effects
    49 ( 1 ) , 103–122 [1999]
  • Framing Theory
    10 , 103–126 . [2007]
  • Frame Analysis：An Essay on the Organization of Experience
    [1974]
  • Fostering students ’ epistemic agency through the co-configuration of moth research
    102 , 1176–1200 [2018]
  • Fostering students ' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics
    39 ( 1 ) , 35–62 . [2002]
  • Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years
    [1970]
  • Expressions of agency within complex policy structures : Science teachers ’ experiences of education policy reforms in Sweden
    40 ( 5 ) , 538–563 [2018]
  • Exploring the role of collaborative reflection in small group argumentation : Focus on students ’ epistemic considerations and practices
    39 ( 1 ) , 1–12 [2019]
  • Exploring secondary students ’ progression in group norms and argumentation competency through collaborative reflection about small group argumentation
    36 ( 6 ) , 895–910 [2016]
  • Exploring science high school students ’ epistemic goals , epistemic considerations and complexity of reasoning in open inquiry
    38 ( 4 ) , 541–553 [2018]
  • Exploring responsive teaching ’ s effect on students ’ epistemological framing in small group argumentation
    37 ( 1 ) , 63–75 [2017]
  • Explorations of the structureagency dialectic as a tool for framing equity in science education
    52 ( 4 ) , 439–447 [2015]
  • Examining classroom science practice communities : How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-aspractice
    98 ( 3 ) , 487–516 [2014]
  • Examination of the relationship between engagement in scientific argumentation and conceptual knowledge
    10 ( 6 ) , 1415–1443 [2012]
  • Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms .
    84 ( 3 ) , 287–312 . [2000]
  • Epistemological resources : Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction
    39 ( 1 ) , 57–68 . [2004]
  • Enhancing the quality of argument in school science
    41 ( 10 ) , 994– 1020 . [2004]
  • Enhancing students ’ communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific issues
    14 ( 1 ) , 1–27 . [2016]
  • Engaging young children in collective curriculum design
    5 , 553–562 [2010]
  • Elementary students ’ views of explanation , argumentation , and evidence , and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year
    48 ( 7 ) , 793–823 [2011]
  • Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students’ epistemologies. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 409–434). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science , mathematics , engineering , and technology : A meta-analysis
    69 ( 1 ) , 21–51 . [1999]
  • Education for thinking
    [2005]
  • Doing the lesson ” or “ doing science ” : Argument in high school genetics
    84 ( 6 ) , 757–792 . [2000]
  • Discursive identity : Assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students
    41 ( 8 ) , 810–834 [2004]
  • Discourse and agency in school science laboratories
    28 ( 1 ) , 27–60 [1999]
  • Discipline and punish : The birth of the prison
    [1977]
  • Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents ’ thinking
    22 ( 4 ) , 545–552 [2011]
  • Dialectical features of students ’ argumentation : A critical review of argumentation studies in science education
    43 , 371–393 . [2013]
  • Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context
    4 ( 2 ) , 345–371 [2009]
  • Critical physics agency : Further unraveling the intersections of subject matter knowledge , learning , and taking action
    4 ( 2 ) , 387–392 [2009]
  • Creating participatory discourse for teaching and research in early childhood science
    21 ( 2 ) , 149–160 [2010]
  • Creating a culture of academic success in an urban science and math magnet high school
    89 , 392–417 [2005]
  • Constructing competence : An analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms
    70 ( 1 ) , 49–70 [2009]
  • Collaborative discourse , argumentation , and learning : Preface and literature review
    33 ( 3 ) , 345–359 . [2008]
  • Classroom communities ’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation
    95 ( 2 ) , 191–216 . [2011]
  • Characteristics of student inquiry found in project-based science practices : Focusing on theory-evidence-method coordinations and skills in using tools .
    35 ( 4 ) , 599–608 [2015]
  • Central problems in social theory : Action , structure , and con tradiction in social analysis
    [1979]
  • Capturing urban student voices in the creation of a science mini-documentary
    43 , 667–694 [2006]
  • Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom
    94 ( 3 ) , 506–524 [2010]
  • Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education : Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions
    92 ( 3 ) , 447–472 [2008]
  • Argumentation as a strategy for conceptual learning of dynamics
    43 ( 5 ) , 1939–1956 [2013]
  • Argumentation , evidence evaluation and critical thinking . In B. J. Fraser , K. G. Tobin , & C. J. McRobbie ( Eds . ) , Second international handbook of science education
    pp . 1001– 1015 [2012]
  • Arguing to learn and learning to argue : Case studies of how students ' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge
    45 ( 1 ) , 101–131 [2008]
  • Arguing collaboratively : Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building
    85 , 372-386 [2015]
  • Analyzing the effectiveness of argumentation program to conceptualize the concept of natural selection for elementary sciencegifted students
    36 ( 4 ) , 591–606 [2016]
  • Analysing the direction of socialisation from a power perspective
    15 ( 4 ) , 393–409 . [2010]
  • An inquiry into modes of existence .
    [2013]
  • Agency amidst formidable structures : How girls perform gender in science class
    52 ( 4 ) , 474–488 . [2015]
  • Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room : Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards
    55 ( 7 ) , 1053– 1075 [2018]
  • Achieving alignment of perspectival framings in problem-solving discourse
    21 ( 1 ) , 1–44 . [2012]
  • A theory of structure : Duality , agency , and transformation
    98 ( 1 ) , 1–29 [1992]
  • A theory of play and fantasy
    2 , 39–51 [1972]
  • A theory bite on contextualizing , framing , and positioning : A companion to Son and Goldstone
    27 ( 3 ) , 269–275 [2009]
  • A theoretical review and trial application of the ‘ resources-based view ’ ( RBV ) as an alternative cognitive theory
    35 ( 6 ) , 971–984 [2015]
  • A theoretical framework for physics education research : Modeling student thinking . In E. Redish , & M. Vicentini ( Eds . ) , Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi summer school , course CLVI
    pp . 1–64 [2004]
  • A study on the feature of small group discussion and the interaction types in middle school class
    25 ( 1 ) , 1–13 [2004]
  • A structure-agency perspective on young children ’ s engagement in school science : Carlos ’ s performance and narrative
    52 ( 4 ) , 516–529 [2015]
  • A learning progression for scientific argumentation : Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts
    94 ( 5 ) , 765–793 [2010]
  • A framework for K-12 science education : Practices , crosscutting concepts , and core ideas
    [2012]
  • A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning .
    30 ( 3 ) , 207–245 [2012]
  • A contemporary critique of historical materialism
    Vol . 1 [1981]
  • , R. E. , Redish , E. F. Resources , framing , and transfer . In J.van Langenhove
    ( Ed .