``Computed radiography versus indirect digital radiography for the detection of glass soft-tissue foreign bodies 'RADIOGRAPHY -LONDONWB SAUNDERSVOL.22 NO.3
:223-227[2016]
Variation in the position of theCentral axis maximum buildup point with feld size for high energy photons beams [Correspondence ] ''
43 , 911 ([1970]
S. :Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology : image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography
#NAME?[1998]
S. : Simulated Bone Erosions in a Hand Phantom : Detection withConventional Screen-Film Technology versusCesium Iodide-Amorphous Silicon Flat-Panel Detector
[2000]
Rodiation Quantities and Units ''
Report No . 33[1980]
Response to letter re :Computed radiography versus indirect digital radiography for the detection of glass soft-tissue foreign bodies 'RADIOGRAPHY -LONDONWB SAUNDERSVOL.23 NO.1
:82[2017]
R. Optimization of Dose and Image Quality forComputed Radiography and Digital Radiography 'Journal of digital imaging VOL.19 NO.2
[2006]
Prospective Volumetric Assessment of the Liver on a PersonalComputer by Nonradiologists Prior to Partial Hepatectomy
0235 ( 2 ) :386–9 .[2011]
NIH Image to ImageJ : 25 years of image analysis
079 ( 7 ) :671–5 .[2012]
M. and Vogl , T.J. : Internet technology for clinical applications in a digital radiography department
40 , 371-387[2000]
Liver Volumetry Plug and Play : Do It Yourself with ImageJ .
11 ; 31 ( 11 ) :2215–21 .[2007]
K. : Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector : clinical comparison with conventional radiography
11 , 1688-1696 ,[2001]
Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography
[2001]
Image quality of the front exposure system and the back exposure system in the indirect ( x-ray-to-lightConversion ) digital radiography system [ 6510-151 ] 'Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging VOL.6510 NO.3
:651045[2007]
H. : Dose Reduction in Patients Undergoing Chest Imaging - Digital Amorphous Silicon Flat-Panel Detector Radiography Versus Conventional Film-Screen Radiography and Phosphor-Based Computed Radiography
[2003]
Garland H T. `` DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY AND FILM SCANNERS : AUTOMATING THE TRANSITION TO FILMLESS RADIOLOGY '' Journal of digital imaging VOL.14 NO.2//SUP
:128-130 .[2001]
G. `` The Enhanced Workflow and Efficiency of the Wireless Local Area Network ( WLAN ) -Based Direct Digital Radiography ( DDR ) Portable Radiography '' Journal of digital imaging VOL.28 NO.3
[2015]
G. : AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging
Vol . 117 , No . 1-3 ,[2005]
Framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital x-ray imaging
[2005]
Flat-Panel X-ray Detector Based on Amorphous Silicon Versus Asymmetric Screen-Film System : Phantom Study of Dose Reduction and Depiction of Simulated Findings
[2003]
Etude dosimétrique d ’ un faisceau de rayons X de 25 MV Dosimetric study of a 25 MV X-ray beam ''
54 , 951 ([1973]
Dose-volume histogram and dose-surface histogram analysis for skin reactions toCarbon ion radiotherapy for bone and soft tissue sarcoma 'Radiotherapy and oncology VOL.95 NO.1
:60-65[2010]
Development and Application of Programs to Measure Modulation Transfer Function , Noise power spectrum and Detective Quantum Efficiency
Vol . 117 , No . 1-3 , pp . 283-287[2005]
Comparison ofradiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations withConventional screen-film radiography ,Computed radiography and direct digital radiography
C. : Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency ( DQE ) of digital x-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1
Vol . 114 , Nos 1-3 , pp . 39-44 ,[2005]
Advances in Digital Radiography : Physical Principles and System Overview1
[2007]
: 89Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digitalChest radiography system with screen/film andComputed radiography systems : aContrast-detail phantom study
28 : 2328-2335 .[2000]
6. Huda, W., Rill, L.N. and Bruner, A.P. : Relative speeds of Kodak - 85 - computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems. Med. Phys. 24, 1997, 1621-1628.
3. Piraino D W , Davros W J , Lieber M , Richmond B J , Schils J P , Recht M P , Grooff P N , Belhobek G H . "Direct Digital Versus Conventional Film Screen Radiography of the Musculoskeletal System" Journal of digital imaging VOL.11 NO.3//SUP1 (1998):172-173.
1. Richard R. Carlton and Arlene M.Adler, Principles of Radiographic Imaing(Thomson,2006) 4th, pp.284-301.
'
X선 영상성립을 위한 최소 투과선량에 대한 연구 = A Study on a Minimum Transmission Dose for Formation of X-ray Image'
의 유사주제(
) 논문